Text
                    W E D N E S D AY 2 8 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 2 2

W W W. I N D E P E N D E N T.C O.U K

Hamish McRae

Saphora Smith

Will there be a
house price crash?

Rich nations fail on A girl abducted
climate deadline
twice by one man

Sheila Flynn

Miguel Delaney

England now head
to Qatar with spirit

This is a Labour moment, says Starmer

Keir Starmer and wife Victoria arrive at the Labour conference in Liverpool yesterday for his keynote speech

Tory MPs tell Kwarteng
to sort Budget ‘disaster’
IMF warns chancellor his tax cuts will increase inequality
KATE DEVLIN, ADAM FORREST
AND ANDREW WOODCOCK

Kwasi Kwarteng is facing
demands from his own party to
act urgently over fears that
millions of homeowners will
face a steep hike in mortgage

rates. Tory MPs have called for
action from the chancellor to
restore investor confidence
after the pound fell to a record
low on Monday. One senior
Conservative described the
mini-Budget as “the shortest
suicide note in history”, a nod

to the description of Labour’s
1983 election manifesto. While
the IMF yesterday also
criticised the mini-Budget,
warning that “large and
untargeted fiscal packages”
increase inequality and could
undermine monetary policy.


WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Editorials Massive cuts in public spending will be needed to pay for this fiscal gamble
Provided he lasts that long, Kwasi Kwarteng will have his fate sealed on 23 November. That is the date the chancellor has chosen to release his medium-term fiscal plan, and the Office for Budget Responsibility will simultaneously publish a fresh set of forecasts for the economy. These two elements were the missing links in Mr Kwarteng’s mini-Budget, presumably omitted because Mr Kwarteng, with that overconfidence he is becoming famous for, decided he could dispense with them. Investors begged to differ, sold down sterling... and the rest is a debacle of historic proportions. The chancellor doubled down over the weekend, with mouthwatering talk of yet more unfunded tax cuts. He refused to do anything to stem the run on the pound, until now. One of Mr Kwarteng’s predecessors used to be fond of saying, “when you’re in a hole, stop digging”. At last, Mr Kwarteng has bowed to the inevitable. But how will he now dig himself out of this hole he has gouged out for himself? In a way, the solution presents itself, logically. Absent any miraculous upsurge in economic growth, there are few options open to him. His party won’t let him reverse his tax cuts, and nor will they tolerate other tax hikes to make up for the lost revenues – approaching £50bn. The markets won’t let him borrow the money, except at punitive interest rates, as we have seen – and perhaps not even then. Besides, Mr Kwarteng is far too proud to excite such a humiliating U-turn, and Liz Truss promised to tax cuts during her leadership campaign. She promised delivery. Her chancellor duly delivered. They cannot ask for the taxes back. Besides, they’re supposed to be engine for growth. The last resort would be to approach the International Monetary Fund for assistance. But the IMF loan would come with strings, and probably tax rises. So much for “taking back control”. So, the only way left to make the numbers add up by the next fiscal event in November is to attack public spending. “Attack” being an appropriate word, in this case, because the squeeze will have to be so severe. The steep increase in the cost of serving
the national debt at higher interest rates and inflation means there will be less for other purposes even without a budget crisis. No different to households and firms, inflation affects schools, universities, NHS, local authorities, emergency services and every other public service. If Mr Kwarteng goes down this path, and he has little alternative, there will certainly be real-term cuts in budgets across the board, with particular pressure on the wages of teachers, hospital staff and council workers. In other words, there will be industrial action on a scale not seen in 40 years. Trouble in the NHS as it enters the difficult winter period – with the unhappy prospect of an upsurge in flu and Covid cases – will also spell political trouble. Pensions and benefits will also be trimmed, but far beyond the reductions in eligibility for universal credit already announced by Mr Kwarteng. The “triple lock” guaranteed increases to pensions look especially vulnerable – despite being pledged in the 2019 Conservative general election manifesto. Much the same can be said for the promise to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of national income; and the various dollops of money set aside for “levelling up” schemes, investment zones and tax-free freeports. It will be a bonfire of the vanities and manifesto hopes. Then again, hardly anything the Truss government does was presaged in that document. Another age of austerity for the public sector beckons, therefore, with all the misery that applies, just as it did when George Osborne tore chunks out of it before – and services such as the courts and police are still feeling the baleful effects, even now. The terrible truth is that social security benefits and teachers’ wages, for example, are being cut back in order to pay for tax cuts for the very rich – and to save face for Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng. The cuts will make a longer, deeper recession inevitable, and won’t do anything to boost the trend rate of economic growth. At a time of a strong Labour revival, with the resilient Keir
Starmer being gifted clap-lines and huge poll leads, the Tories could scarcely be in a worse position – or worse led. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Tories warn Kwarteng to act fast to calm market turmoil The chancellor’s mini-Budget has been dubbed ‘the shortest suicide note in history’ (The Independent) K AT E D E V L I N ADAM FORREST ANDREW WOODCOCK Kwasi Kwarteng is facing demands from his own party to act within days amid fears millions will face a steep hike in
mortgage rates – with one senior Conservative MP describing last week’s mini-Budget as “an unmitigated disaster”. Tory MPs called for swift action to restore investor confidence after the chancellor triggered turmoil in the markets and caused the pound to fall to a record low. The IMF last night issued an extraordinary rebuke of his tax plans, urging a rethink and saying they would “increase inequality.” No 10 was also forced to deny claims of a split between Liz Truss and Mr Kwarteng over how to deal with the market reaction. One senior Conservative backbencher described the miniBudget as “the shortest suicide note in history”, a nod to the famous description of Labour’s 1983 election manifesto, telling The Independent it could be “an unmitigated disaster”. The Tory disquiet could even be seen at Labour’s conference in Liverpool, where one frontbencher told The Independent he had received a text from an ex-minister in Boris Johnson’s government urging Labour to win the next election, signed “a patriot”. Mr Kwarteng has vowed to push on with the government’s radical borrowing-fuelled £45bn tax cut spree despite growing calls to reverse course and said he would produce a “credible plan” to reduce government debt. “We are confident in our long-term strategy to drive economic growth through tax cuts and supply-side reform,” the chancellor said at a meeting with banking and investment chiefs yesterday. But former Brexit secretary David Davis said Mr Kwarteng must act “pretty bloody soon – and certainly by the party conference”, which begins in Birmingham this weekend. He accused Mr Kwarteng of doing “what the Americans call a ‘Hail Mary’ – throwing everything up in the air and hoping it works”. “He has to give an idea of what the thinking is, there was no attempt to explain the thinking last week,” Mr Davis added. Sir Bob Neill, the Tory MP who chairs the Commons justice committee, also said Mr Kwarteng had to move “very quickly” to restore confidence. He called on the chancellor to bring forward
the mid-term fiscal plan set for November and think again about his surprise announcement that he was scrapping the top rate of tax, paid by those earning more than £150,000. The Bank of England yesterday signalled it is ready to ramp up interest rates to shore up the pound. The Bank’s chief economist Huw Pill warned they “cannot be indifferent” to the developments of the past days – seen as a signal the cost of borrowing will have to go up to protect the pound and keep a lid on inflation. “It is hard not to draw the conclusion that all this will require significant monetary policy response," Mr Pill said in a speech to the Barclays-CEPR International Monetary Policy Forum. "We must be confident in the stability of the UK’s economic framework.” Senior economists also suggested more urgency was needed in the response to the crisis. Charlie Bean, the former deputy governor of the Bank of England, said he would have advised the Bank to call an emergency meeting. Mr Kwarteng held a call with Tory MPs, as he sought to settle nerves in the wake of the market fallout. But Mel Stride, the Conservative chair of the Commons Treasury committee, warned the party’s reputation on the economy was “in jeopardy”. In an interview, Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake, also a member of the Commons Treasury committee, refused to rule out voting against the finance bill containing some of the government’s planned tax cuts. One Tory MP told The Independent there could be a “big battle” over the plan to axe the top rate of income tax, suggesting up to 20 MPs could rebel on the issue. But another moderate backbencher played down the idea of a rebellion over tax cuts. “You will lose the whip – any government that can’t carry its Budget is no longer a government. Losing moderate MPs will mean a further lurch to the right,” they said. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk.
Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News IMF warns mini-Budget could deepen inequality Government fiscal policies have provoked a rare intervention from the global lender (The Independent) R O RY S U L L I VA N The International Monetary Fund has hit out at Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng’s tax cuts for the rich, warning that “large and
untargeted fiscal packages” would probably deepen inequality in Britain. In a rare intervention, the IMF took aim at the British government after the UK chancellor’s mini-Budget on Friday caused sterling and bonds to plummet and gilt yields to soar, reflecting the cost of borrowing. The market turmoil started after investors were spooked by Mr Kwarteng’s plan to offer tax cuts to the richest while increasing state expenditure dramatically. “We are closely monitoring recent economic developments in the UK and are engaged with the authorities,” an IMF spokesperson said. “Given elevated inflation pressures in many countries, including the UK, we do not recommend large and untargeted fiscal packages at this juncture, as it is important that fiscal policy does not work at cross purposes to monetary policy,” they added. The global lender predicted that the UK’s new measures would “likely increase inequality” rather than achieving the government’s aim of creating a prosperous Britain. It urged the British chancellor to change tack when he gives a statement on 23 November, a promise he made earlier this week in a bid to calm the markets. “The 23 November budget will present an early opportunity for the UK government to consider ways to provide support that is more targeted and reevaluate the tax measures, especially those that benefit high-income earners,” the IMF said. Commentators noted that the IMF’s wording closely resembled warnings it typically gives to emerging economies in the throes of a current account crisis. It comes after Larry Summers, a former US treasury secretary, accused Britain of “behaving a bit like an emerging market turning itself into a submerging market”. Labour said the IMF’s statement showed the dangers of Ms Truss’s and Mr Kwarteng’s economic policies.
Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “This statement from the IMF shows the seriousness of the situation. “Families will be concerned about what market movements in recent days mean for them. The government must urgently lay out how it will fix the problems it created through its reckless decisions to waste money in an untargeted cut in the top rate of tax. “Waiting until November is not an option. The government must urgently review the plans made in their fiscal statement last week. First the Bank of England had to step in to reassure markets. Now, this statement from the IMF should set alarm bells ringing in government and make it clear that they need to act now.” In response to the IMF’s rebuke, a UK Treasury spokesperson said: “We have acted at speed to protect households and businesses through this winter and the next, following the unprecedented energy price rise caused by [Vladimir] Putin’s illegal actions in Ukraine.” They insisted ministers were “focused on growing the economy to raise living standards for everyone”, and promised that the chancellor would set out measures in November to ensure that debt falls as a share of GPD “in the medium term”. Mel Stride, a Sunak ally who chairs the Commons Treasury Committee, said his party’s strategy put it “in jeopardy”. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Punish Truss for financial mayhem, urges Starmer Sir Keir Starmer with applauding delegates after delivering his conference speech in Liverpool yesterday (AFP/Getty) ANDREW WOODCOCK POLITICAL EDITOR Sir Keir Starmer has issued a call for Britain’s voters to punish Liz Truss at the ballot box for the financial mayhem unleashed by her mini-Budget, telling them: “Don’t forget. Don’t forgive.”
In a direct pitch for traditional Conservative voters, he said that Labour was now the party of “sound money ... homeownership [and] responsible government”, while Truss’s “spectacular” irresponsibility had sent the pound plummeting, stoked inflation and destroyed Tory claims to be “the party of aspiration”. In a sign of growing confidence that power is within grasp at the general election expected in 2024, Sir Keir cited earlier Labour victories achieved after long periods of Tory rule as he told cheering delegates: “As in 1945, 1964 and 1997, this is a Labour moment.” Mr Starmer unveiled plans for a publicly owned electricity generation company, to be funded from an £8bn national wealth fund announced by shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves on Monday with a remit to invest in clean energy from wind, solar, tidal and nuclear. He also announced a target of 70 per cent homeownership, with first-time buyers given first options on homes in their areas. The Great British energy proposal won warm applause from a packed hall in Liverpool and TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady hailed it as “a big, bold move that will cut bills and secure our energy future”. But trade union Unite said that Mr Starmer needed to be “bolder” in his response to the cost-of-living crisis, while campaign group Labour for a Green New Deal said he should commit the party to public ownership of the whole energy system. Instead, GBE would operate alongside private firms, with an independent board free to take investment decisions under a mandate set by ministers. Labour aides said their ambition was for it to eventually take a similar proportion of the market as state-owned power companies in countries like France or Sweden. Sir Keir said that his green prosperity plan to make UK electricity fossil fuel-free was a reflection of the fact that action on the climate crisis was no longer a question of “austere self-
denial” but was at the heart of Britain’s future economic opportunities. But the focus of the rapturously received speech was more on establishing a vision for what Starmer termed “a fairer, greener future”, as well as setting down clear dividing lines with Conservatives. Twelve years of Tory-led governments had left Britain “all at sea”, with working people anxious for their future, raw sewage being pumped into rivers, backlogs at borders and in hospitals and crimes like burglary going “totally unpunished”, he said. For the past decade, Conservative ministers had lambasted Labour for failing to “fix the roof while the sun was shining”, he said. “But take a look around Britain,” he told delegates. “They haven’t just failed to fix the roof. They’ve ripped out the foundations, smashed through the windows and now they’ve blown the doors off for good measure.” He added: “We can’t go on like this. What we’ve seen in the past few days has no precedent. The government has lost control of the British economy – and for what? They’ve crashed the pound – and for what? Higher interest rates. Higher inflation. Higher borrowing. And for what? “Not for you. Not for working people. For tax cuts for the richest 1 per cent in our society. Don’t forget. Don’t forgive. The only way forward is to stop this – with a Labour government.” In a speech which was light on personal touches, Mr Starmer recalled growing up in modest circumstances in the 1970s, when rising prices once saw his family’s phone cut off because they could not pay the bill. But he said that his parents still had hope because of the “unwritten contract” that hard work would be rewarded with a better life for their children. Now that contract had been “broken”, he said, adding: “That’s the deep cost of Tory failure. They keep talking about aspiration, but they don’t understand how they’ve choked it off for working people.”
To loud applause, he again firmly ruled out any deal with the Scottish National Party in the case of a hung parliament. And he borrowed a slogan from Sir Tony Blair to declare: “We are the party of the centre-ground. Once again, we are the political wing of the British people and we can achieve great things.” Mr Starmer’s speech was enthusiastically hailed by shadow cabinet minister Peter Kyle, who told The Independent: “Keir set out his vision for a better Britain on his own terms. This is the moment that Labour overtook the Tories in the battle of ideas and having the leadership that will deliver. We have left them flailing in the dust.” But a Conservative spokesperson said: “On his eleventh relaunch to date, this was yet another details-light speech full of vacuous slogans, rehashed phrases and empty promises. There’s nothing ‘new’ about Keir Starmer’s Labour, no matter how much he tries to emulate Tony Blair.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News/ Sketch A penalty shootout against a Tory team that’s gone home Starmer delivers the easiest speech of his life, says Tom Peck The Labour leader spoke at conference with his party surging in the polls (AP) There is always a moment when an opposition party starts to look like a government in waiting. At the end of the 2009 Conservative Party conference, David Cameron lined up his shadow cabinet behind him – George Osborne, William Hague, Liam Fox, Theresa May, Andrew Mitchell, the list goes on – and it seemed inevitable to the point of certainty that the voters were going to give these people their blessing.
Thirteen years later, on to the stage in Liverpool, out strode Keir Starmer. It is by no means inevitable that he will be the next prime minister, but you really do have to feel that momentum is on his side. Why do you have to feel that? Well, there were some clues in the speech itself. “There is raw sewage in our rivers and seas,” he said. “Crimes like burglary totally unpunished. People are told to drive themselves to hospital after having a heart attack.” Look, we all know that political soothsaying is a mug’s game but when the sea’s full of shit and no one does anything about when you get burgled and there are people having heart attacks in their own cars, you just get that same sort of sense of inevitability really, don’t you? That everything is just completely and utterly banjaxed. And this wasn’t even Keir Starmer’s introduction. This was several minutes in. Who knows, before last Friday, maybe this would have been higher up. But he also had to mention the destroyed currency, the higher interest rates as a direct result, and the inevitable mortgage misery it will cause. And what is it for? Well, it’s in service of just one policy, so far, and that’s to fund a tax cut solely for the benefit of high earners, the sort of thing that the Tories worked out they had to stop doing some time in around 2006, or at least attempt to conceal, or they’d never be in government again. Politicians are always warned not to be seen to be “measuring the curtains” in Downing Street, but what is Keir Starmer meant to do if the current occupant appears to be going out of her way to open up the door and drop kick the Labour Party through it? The backdrop to Starmer’s speech was a YouGov poll showing the largest poll lead that polling company has ever produced since it started up in 2001. That’s right: 17 points. Various hardright Tories who backed Liz Truss are determined not to accept the colossal error they have made, and have been dredging up worse polls for Margaret Thatcher in the early Eighties. Of course, Truss could turn it around – but for the historical parallel to be exact, she would need whoever is the equivalent of Roy
Jenkins to set up a rival party and for Argentina to invade the Falklands. These things may not happen. We all know that political soothsaying is a mug’s game but when the sea’s full of shit and no one does anything about when you get burgled, you just get a sense of inevitability, really, don’t you? Starmer is regularly accused of being boring. Such accusations occur because he is indeed boring. But the voters truly do not seem to care. They are bored of not being bored. For a while, Truss being boring seemed like a welcome antidote. Her plodding statements and speeches did not in any way meet the historic moment of the death of the Queen but had Johnson been around, he would somehow have made it all about him, in his own, uniquely repellent way (as he did in the House of Commons). But Truss really isn’t boring anymore. Setting fire to the economy, hammering house prices and jacking up mortgages for the ordinary people who have already been asked to pay for tax cuts for millionaires couldn’t be less boring. She’s also had walking electoral kryptonite Jacob Rees-Mogg lift the ban on fracking and then go on TV to announce that it’s been made possible through worrying less about earthquakes. People, generally speaking, are not pro-earthquake. They’re not pro-fossil fuel either, because they can see that it’s burning up their children’s futures. And they were allowed to become so frightened about energy prices for so long (because the Tories
had to have a leadership contest all summer rather than do anything about it) that they are now sufficiently literate in the workings of the energy market to understand that a few extra droplets of gas in about a decade’s time won’t make any difference at all. Starmer, meanwhile, is going to launch a new state-owned energy company, Great British Energy, which he reckons is going to invest in clean power and become as big as the French state-owned energy company, EDF. Truss, meanwhile, spent most of the summer telling rooms full of Tories that solar power was bad. That she didn’t want to see “solar panels in fields”; somehow unaware that cheap, non-planet destroying power is immensely popular. The speech was billed, in advance, as an open goal but it was more than that. It was several open goals. It was a penalty shootout against a team that’s already gone home. And Starmer gently slotted his home, one after the other, after the other. He could hardly fail to do so, in his own steady way. At some point, in the short years ahead, the Tories will surely have to start making it harder for him. They could hardly be making it any easier. But then, the worst of the pain is yet to come. If this was the most important speech of Starmer’s career, it was also the easiest. He did just fine. And it’s not that that’s all that can be expected, but it’s certainly all that’s needed. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News/ Analysis Will Labour decide to play it safe or seize the moment? Starmer made an unashamed pitch for the political centre ground (PA) ANDREW GRICE Aided by the government’s self-inflicted wounds, an upbeat Labour Party finally sniffs a return to power after 12 long years in the wilderness. But a fierce debate rages behind the scenes at the party’s Liverpool conference about precisely how Labour should adjust to the dramatically changed political landscape.
Does the Tories’ turmoil, and a 17-point Labour lead in the latest opinion poll vindicate Keir Starmer’s “safety first” approach? Or should Labour seize the moment to go “big and bold” in setting out its alternative vision for the country while voters are bemused by Liz Truss’ “new” government? In a confident speech to the conference yesterday afternoon, Starmer straddled both sides of the internal debate, characteristically seeking out its middle ground. Not before time, he spelt out how the UK would change by the end of a fiveyear term of Labour government. There was a new policy in Great British Energy – not the nationalisation many in his party want but a state-owned company to exploit the opportunities of green energy so they are not hoovered up by foreign-owned firms. Starmer made an unashamed pitch for the political centre ground, an obvious move when the Tories have suddenly veered off to the right in an ideological crusade that worries many of their own MPs. He invaded natural Tory territory, positioning Labour as the “party of home ownership” (with an aim of raising it from 65 to 70 per cent in five years) and “aspiration”, stressing his own working-class roots. (The public is sceptical about them, given that his name starts with “Sir”). Starmer genuinely relishes the prospect of fighting the next general election on the economy. Of course, all Labour leaders have to say that, even if they prefer the party’s comfort zone of the NHS and other public services. But events have given Starmer the confidence to mean it. He vowed to win a fight with the Tories over wealth redistribution and workers’ rights, with “fairness and economic reason on our side”. The pound’s slump since last Friday’s mini-Budget might not be the economic equivalent of Black Wednesday, when the UK was ejected from the European exchange mechanism in 1992, but it could prove the political equivalent – with the Tories suffering the same catastrophic loss of economic competence. Handed this open goal, Starmer argued credibly that Labour is now the party of “sound money”.
He acknowledged the state of the public finances Labour would inherit would make rescuing services “harder than ever”. But he raised the spirits and the sights of his audience, who showed how the party had changed by giving him several standing ovations during the speech. “This is a Labour moment,” he declared, citing Labour’s watershed election victories in 1945, 1964 and 1997. Although some Labour MPs had hoped for more policy announcements, the speech passed the “vision” test. Starmer has not yet given us the complete picture, but he has started to sketch it out. Given the unexpected backdrop, he needed to show voters he could provide the stability and sensible and dependable leadership the Tories are patently not giving. Under Starmer, the party has rightly stopped trashing the New Labour era – never a good look to voters who, after all, gave Blair three terms in office Starmer’s declaration that Labour is again the “political wing of the British people” – a deliberate echo of Tony Blair’s mantra shortly before his 1997 landslide – angered his left-wing critics. It was a poke in the eye for the trade unions, who regard Labour as the political wing of their movement. Under Starmer, the party has rightly stopped trashing the New Labour era – never a good look to voters who, after all, gave Blair three terms in office. Labour can now leave the brand-trashing to the Tories, as Liz Truss blows up much of what was done by
Rishi Sunak, Michael Gove and even some of Boris Johnson’s works. However, there is no guarantee the Tory and market turmoil will last. That is why some Labour MPs whisper that going “big and bold” now could make the difference between a hung parliament with Starmer heading a minority Labour government and winning an outright majority – still a massive mountain to climb given Johnson’s 80-seat majority in 2019. The case for the defence, as one adviser put it, is that Starmer “is occupying the centre ground but the policies are centre-left”. He cited the party’s pledge to restore the top 45p rate of income tax and its ambitious green energy plans. But Starmer doesn’t want to frighten the horses. Labour has avoided talk this week of taxing unearned income, which it is looking at, for fear of headlines about a “wealth tax” that would be portrayed as “class war” by the Tories and their newspaper cheerleaders, handing Truss some desperately needed ammunition. As I watched the speech, I could imagine Starmer making a good prime minister – perhaps more of a reassuring, competent Clement Attlee figure than a Blair mark two. But first, he has to get there. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Tory missteps give Labour belief they can gain power Truss’s ‘scorched earth’ approach buoys conference mood Keir Starmer enjoys one of numerous standing ovations in Liverpool yesterday (PA) ANDREW WOODCOCK Liz Truss appears to be taking a “scorched earth” approach to the economy that will leave a Labour government to pick up the pieces after the expected election in 2024, a shadow cabinet minister has said.
As stock markets sank and the pound plunged in the wake of last week’s “kamikaze” mini-Budget, delegates at Labour’s annual conference in Liverpool could scarcely believe their luck at the apparent willingness of the prime minister and chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng to take a hatchet to their own party’s biggest electoral assets. And there was a growing sense of confidence among them that opinion polls giving Keir Starmer’s party leads of up to 17 points over the Conservatives could presage a remarkable return to power just five years after Labour’s crushing defeat in 2019. Senior members of Starmer’s team feel that Labour’s journey to Downing Street has been massively accelerated by the downfall of Boris Johnson over Partygate and by the Tories’ choice of an ideologically driven leader who they see as hugely out of touch with voters. They believe that the arrival of Truss allows them to play to Starmer’s strengths by casting the election as a choice between a careful and responsible statesman and a reckless gambler. Moves like scrapping the 45p tax rate, ending the bankers’ bonus cap, rejecting a windfall tax and racking up billions in debt allow them to paint Truss and Kwarteng as the unashamed friends of the rich and deprived Tories of their key attack line – that Labour would waste money and borrow excessively. “They seem to have given up the whole project of broadening their coalition that won Johnson the red-wall seats,” said one. “It’s the same with fracking – it’s poison in a lot of seats the Tories need to win. They seem to be giving up on climate and the environment at just the point when mainstream opinion is coming round to the fact it’s a major priority.” Where the talk at last autumn’s conference in Brighton was of a two-term project to make Labour electable again – and of whether Sir Keir would survive to complete the scaling of the “mountain” the party had to scale – in Liverpool the bars and restaurants were buzzing with dreams of an overall majority allowing Starmer to govern without the need for support from Lib Dems or the SNP.
The Tories seem to be giving up on the environment at just the point when mainstream opinion is coming round to the fact it’s a major priority While shadow ministers dutifully repeated the importance of avoiding complacency, conversation kept returning to the elections of 1964, when Harold Wilson overturned a 100-seat Tory majority, and 1997, when Tony Blair gained 145 seats to sweep aside a stale and tired Conservative government. One shadow cabinet member told The Independent the mood at conference was “exhilarating”. “It’s the best I’ve seen it since the late Nineties, when we really felt we were on our way,” he said. “The Tories have really screwed themselves by choosing Liz. She and Kwarteng come across as ideologues who are not listening to anybody. When you look at the polls, there has been no ‘Truss bounce’. She’s ‘hit the ground’, as she said she would.” Another said: “They haven’t just vacated the middle-ground, they’ve leapfrogged out of the pitch.” There was a sense of near-bewilderment in Liverpool over the PM’s strategy. Did she really believe a Thatcher-style tax-cutting agenda could deliver sustainable growth in the deeply unfavourable context of a cost of living crisis, or was she simply hoping for a brief “sugar rush” which could get her through the election? Some senior figures thought it was possible that a tired Tory party which had given up hope of staying in office was simply grabbing what it could for its supporters and leaving Labour to
deal with the consequences. “I really think they could be that cynical,” one said. Another figure very high up in the Starmer team put it down to “ideological fervour”: “It’s like they’ve swallowed the Trump nonsense about the ‘big state’ whole. They actually seem to believe that the establishment – the Treasury, the civil service, the OBR – is against them and they know better. “They come across as arrogant. Cameron and Osborne were so careful about not seeming to be in it to help the rich. Truss and Kwarteng don’t seem to have that inhibition.” Labour spirits have been buoyed at Liverpool by Starmer’s apparent success in shaking off memories of Jeremy Corbyn’s regime, just a year after he was loudly heckled by leftists furious at his “betrayal” of promises to retain the former leader’s agenda. The respectful observation of a tribute to the Queen and the rendition of the national anthem before a union jack backdrop was the physical representation of a party that has returned to the centre ground and once more become “the political wing of the British people”, said Starmer. Expected rows over strikes and picket lines failed to materialise, with one senior union leader telling The Independent that the movement was not going to “rock the boat” at a time when it can seriously envisage Labour relatively soon being in a position to take action on workers’ rights.
Tough week: Liz Truss leaves No 10 yesterday (Getty) And Starmer’s keynote speech, promising a nationalised energy firm and declaring that like 1964 and 1997 “this is a Labour moment”, was greeted with repeated standing ovations with no sign of dissenting voices. Delegates streaming out of the hall were unanimous in their praise for the address, with one saying “He’s shown we’re back, we’re united and we’re ready for government”, and another adding: “If you’d told me three years ago we’d have got so far by now, I wouldn’t have believed you.” One shadow minister contrasted the atmosphere with past years: “Previously, when you went on to stage, you were preparing yourself for the heckles. This time, it was like a best man’s speech – everyone in the room willing you to do well and wanting to be part of the experience.” Although the leadership was defeated in a vote on proportional representation, a member of the shadow cabinet said: “If the biggest spat we have at conference is on voting reform, I reckon we’ll take that.” Remaining uncertainties in Labour ranks revolved about Sir Keir’s ability to break through to voters as a prime minister in waiting, with a poll for The Independent finding that almost half (46 per cent) still do not know what he stands for, two and a half years after he took office.
One senior figure accepted that Starmer needs to make himself “more three-dimensional” by giving voters a sense of who he is as a person. “That doesn’t mean trying to turn up the charisma,” he said. “But he has got to be relatable, and he’s not done that yet.” But another said Starmer needed to be cautious about opening up on his personality: “You’ve got to be who you are, otherwise you end up with Gordon Brown liking the Arctic Monkeys and Theresa May running through the wheatfields.” Another agreed: “I’m not worried about Keir’s presentation. He doesn’t have to be out there cracking jokes and scoring points. He has plenty of attack dogs to do that for him. What he needs to do is show the contrast between the choices on offer. With Boris it was the serious statesman versus the joker. With Liz he is facing someone who is coming across as reckless and a gambler. It is good that he appears more careful.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Huq apologises to Kwarteng as Labour suspends MP for ‘superficially Black’ remarks Rupa Huq has admitted her comments were ‘ill-judged’ (Reuters) ROB MERRICK DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR The MP suspended by Labour for calling Kwasi Kwarteng “superficially” Black has apologised to the chancellor. Rupa Huq
offered “sincere and heartfelt apologies” for what she called her “ill-judged” comments at a fringe meeting at Labour’s conference. The Ealing Central and Acton MP initially defended her remarks, in which she said, of the wealthy, Eton-educated Mr Kwarteng, “you wouldn’t know he’s Black”. But she has backtracked after Conservative MPs condemned them as “racist” and Keir Starmer removed the party whip from her. However, Labour is likely to continue the suspension pending an investigation into the full circumstances of what Ms Huq said. The comments were condemned by Ed Miliband, the shadow climate change secretary, who said: “There is absolutely no place for these kind of comments in our politics “The party will have to decide what it does in terms of her and her future. These comments are reprehensible and awful.” Ms Huq tweeted: “I have today contacted Kwasi Kwarteng to offer my sincere and heartfelt apologies for the comments I made at yesterday’s Labour conference fringe meeting. My comments were ill-judged and I wholeheartedly apologise to anyone affected.” The controversy is a rare moment of disruption of a Labour conference that has otherwise run smoothly for Sir Keir, amid Tory turmoil over economic policy. The former shadow Home Office minister spoke at an event, on Monday, hosted by British Future and the Black Equity Organisation and also attended by the party’s chair, Anneliese Dodds. On a short recording, obtained by the Guido Fawkes website, she could be heard saying: “I’m sorry if I was not making myself understood clearly. He superficially is a Black man.” She said Mr Kwarteng went to “the top schools in the country” and added: “If you hear him on the Today programme, you wouldn’t know he’s Black.” Earlier, Jake Berry, the chair of the Conservative Party, wrote to the Labour leader calling for Ms Huq to lose the Labour whip.
He said: “I trust you will join me in unequivocally condemning these comments as nothing less than racist.” At the event, Sunder Katwala, who was chairing it for the British Future and Black Equity organisations, challenged the MP’s remarks, it is understood. He is believed to have said that the chancellor’s Conservative allegiance “doesn’t make him not Black ... and I think the Labour Party has to be really careful”. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Labour vows to put climate crisis at core of overseas aid Preet Gill promises legislation to prioritise ‘greatest threat to humanity’ (Getty) ANDREW WOODCOCK A Labour government would pass a law to require the UK’s overseas aid spending to prioritise action to tackle the climate crisis. In a speech to Labour’s annual conference in Liverpool yesterday, the shadow international aid secretary Preet Gill confirmed the party’s commitment to restore the requirement
for 0.7 per cent of national income to go to aid, after it was slashed to 0.5 per cent by Boris Johnson. She said that a Labour government will introduce a new focus on using UK assistance to developing countries to address “this century’s biggest threat to humanity”. Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has put climate centre stage at this year’s gathering, taking place under the slogan “A Fairer, Greener Future”. The focus on the environment reflects leadership concern that younger supporters may be drifting away to the Green Party, as well as a belief that record heatwaves this summer have pushed climate up the agenda for millions of mainstream voters. Ms Gill promised to restore the independence of overseas development assistance within Whitehall, after Mr Johnson merged the Department for International Development (DFID) into the Foreign Office. She said: “Boris Johnson’s ideological merger has failed. “It now falls to Labour to undo that damage and earn back the trust of Britain’s partners. Keir was absolutely right when he called the closure of DFID ‘totally misguided’ and ‘wrongheaded’, and his commitment to international development speaks to who he is. “So, just as 25 years ago, DFID was created to tackle the global challenges we faced, a Labour government will put in place a new model with the independence needed to meet the challenges of the 21st century: one that recognises the link between development and climate. Its mission will be to deliver on the sustainable development goals. “We will reinstate Britain’s commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of income on aid. And we will deliver a distinct development programme that brings value for money and ends the government’s wasteful and transactional approach. The climate emergency is this century’s biggest threat to humanity. That is why I am also announcing today that Labour will legislate to make sure that, as a priority, Britain’s aid budget helps address climate change.”
Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Breakfast clubs for all young pupils, Labour will pledge Bridget Phillipson will reveal her plans at the party conference today (Getty) ZOE TIDMAN A Labour government would introduce free breakfast clubs in all primary schools in England, according to its shadow education secretary. Bridget Phillipson will unveil plans to fund the first meal of the day for younger pupils at the party conference today,
saying they would help to “drive up standards” across the country. The breakfast clubs would be funded by reintroducing the top rate of income tax for the highest earners, she will tell party members in Liverpool. Labour has pledged to bring back the 45p rate that was scrapped in Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-Budget last week. Unions and charities have welcomed the pledge, saying it would help to improve children’s chances at school. “Not only is this important in terms of wellbeing, but it is also educationally important as pupils are not in a fit state to learn if they are hungry,” Geoff Barton from the Association for School and College Leaders said. Ms Phillipson will tell the Labour party conference that gaps in learning and opportunities “open up early” and therefore solutions “must start early too”. “We need a fresh vision of that education. One that looks to the future, not the past,” she will say. “Labour will build a modern childcare system. One that supports families from the end of parental leave through to the end of primary school. “As the first step on that road, we will introduce breakfast clubs for every primary school child in England, driving up standards in maths, reading, and writing, and giving mums and dads choices.” Union leaders said many schools do already run breakfast clubs, relying on different streams of funding – including government schemes, charities and their own budgets – and often target support to the pupils most in need. This pledge would help to “simplify the situation” and ensure it is available in all schools, they said. Alison Garnham, head of the Child Poverty Action Group charity, said free breakfasts in all primary schools would be a “breakthrough kids and parents need”. It would not only boost learning and wellbeing but also help parents to balance their jobs with family life, she said.
“Hunger is a real concern for school staff who regularly see children arriving in the morning without having eaten, and therefore not ready to learn,” Paul Whiteman from the NAHT union said. “These concerns have only been exacerbated by the cost-of-living crisis, which is pushing more families into poverty.” The number of children on free school meals at lunch – which are available to the most disadvantaged pupils – soared to nearly 2 million in England this year. Charities fear hundreds of thousands more pupils are in poverty but falling through the cracks of the scheme due to missing out on eligibility criteria. The Department for Education was approached for comment. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News/ Politics Explained Why Labour finally sounds like a party of government Keir Starmer said all the right things in Liverpool yesterday and cleverly avoided Brexit (Reuters) S E A N O ' G R A DY Keir Starmer making a speech about solar power, wind farms and home insulation can’t be many people’s idea of a fun afternoon in Liverpool, but the Labour Party was certainly enjoying itself as he trudged his way through his green agenda. They say Starmer is a dull speaker, but he got the assembled democratic socialists to their feet when he announced the
prospective launch of a nationalised utility named Great British Energy. His hair lustrous and groomed, his rhetoric more lively than usual, a few good jokes and a solidly centrist platform, Starmer made Labour sound like a party of government. Nato; the SNP; antisemitism; national interest before party interest; even levelling up: Starmer said all the right things. He mostly avoided Brexit, wisely. The old Blairite line about being the “political wing of the British people” is as bizarre and meaningless as it was in the 1990s, but it fitted the moment. The one crucial thing that was probably missing was a simple compelling reason why Labour would make people better off: families need to pay the bills. All that said, when your party is in possession of a 17 percentage point lead in the polls and the government is in the middle of a humiliating economic crisis, you don’t need to try too hard. Rather than the bombastic showman, Starmer is now up against Liz Truss, who, with the best will in the world, makes Starmer look like a cross between Tony Blair and Jesus Christ. It’s as well to consider the journey the party has been on. Less than three years ago, the party had its worst performance since the 1930s at the December 2019 general election. Boris Johnson “got Brexit done”, conquered the Red Wall and crushed Jeremy Corbyn. Labour was down to about 30 per cent of the vote. Even in the earlier stages of the pandemic, Labour lagged behind. But a combination of Tory collapse and Labour renewal and reform have restored the party’s fortunes – and to a degree almost inconceivable even two years ago, when Starmer delivered his first conference speech in a virtually empty room. He said at the time that his first task was just to persuade people to give Labour a hearing, and that succeeded. We are now well into the second phase of the recovery, and the beginnings of Labour looking and sounding more like a government-in-waiting. A strong shadow team relative to the government front bench is another novelty for Labour in opposition. It is rare for a party to be turned around inside a single parliamentary term, allowing for the fact that Labour has lost the
last four elections and has spent a total of 12 years trying to sort itself out after Gordon Brown slipped to a loss in 2010. Indeed, it is almost two decades since the last time Labour won a general election (2005), though some credit and recognition has to be given to Corbyn for the remarkable surprise of 2017, which deprived Theresa May of her majority. Still, the general record has been depressing and recent byelection, local election and polling successes suggest that the days of disappointment may be coming to an end. There are precedents. In 1992, after a fourth defeat in a row, finishing a poor seven percentage points behind John Major, few gave the Labour Party much hope, even under the managerial social democrat John Smith. There was much talk then, as now, of PR. Then came Tony Blair, modernisation, a floundering, exhausted Tory government and the New Labour landslide. Something of the same happened after the 1959 general election; a Tory landslide and a 100 majority was overturned by Harold Wilson in five short years. There is a life cycle in governing parties that means they naturally decay. Intellectual and even physical exhaustion sets in, the backbenches fill up with the discarded and the disappointed, they tend to start talking to themselves and forget what they are for, a sort of political senility. On the other side, oppositions can use the leisure time they are unwillingly gifted to scrap and argue, but also to formulate new policy and reconnect with the voters. They benefit from a natural feeling of "time for a change". Even more than that, though, after multiple election defeats, parties can simply become so hungry for power they stop squabbling and accept a more disciplined way of doing things. It’s how Labour got back in 1997, and how the Tories got back in 2010. It feels like Labour is, at last, bored with losing more than it is bored by Starmer. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP

WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Truss is bad for Britain on the world stage, voters say More than half think the PM isn’t up to the job of representing the UK abroad (PA) K I M S E N G U P TA WORLD AFFAIRS EDITOR Liz Truss does not have what it takes to best represent British interests when dealing with senior international leaders, according to a poll. More than 52 per cent say they have little or
no confidence the prime minister will perform well on the world stage, with the same number holding that this comes after the country’s reputation was already seriously tarnished during the Boris Johnson years. Pessimism about what lies ahead was also echoed by a majority (52 per cent) who believe that Brexit has damaged Britain, with a large number (46 per cent to 19 per cent) holding that the process has been badly mismanaged. Only 7 per cent thought that the UK’s standing in the world has been improved by the political situation in this country in the past few months. Just 6 per cent of the 2,096 British adults questioned by Deltapoll for The National newspaper said they were “very confident” that Ms Truss would be an effective world leader. Nearly one-third (30 per cent) said they were “not very confident” about her being in Downing Street domestically or internationally, while 22 per cent said they were “not at all confident”. But 28 per cent were “quietly confident” about how her leadership will develop. Truss met Joe Biden and other world leaders in New York last week on her first foreign outing as prime minister (PA) The survey was taken during the prime minister’s first week in office and reflects, say the pollsters, the mood at the start of a new chapter in the nation’s history following the death of the Queen and the accession of King Charles. The poll was carried out between 9 and 12 September, before last Friday’s miniBudget, which was followed by a further slip in Tory support.
Other findings from the poll include: 71 per cent of people questioned want the government to prioritise controlling energy costs over climate challenges at present and 78 per cent backed concerted European action to tackle the energy crisis. Some 54 per cent felt the UN should seek to end the Ukraine war, the main driver of the energy crisis. Seventy-six per cent backed the imposition of sanctions on Russia but 56 per cent also felt the UK has done enough to help Ukraine in the conflict. And 40 per cent said the UK was right to follow the US in withdrawing from Afghanistan last year, compared to 37 per cent who said it was the wrong decision. The same number backed another international intervention there if that became necessary. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Brexit has slashed Eurostar capacity by third, says CEO Uncertain future: the unused Eurostar terminal at Ashford International (Simon Calder) SIMON CALDER TRAVEL CORRESPONDENT The extra passport checks the UK requested after leaving the EU are “not sustainable”: that is the damning view of Jacques Damas, outgoing chief executive of Eurostar. The boss of the
cross-Channel train operator revealed that post-Brexit border arrangements have reduced capacity on links from London to Brussels and Paris by one-third – forcing Eurostar “to charge higher prices to our customers”. Earlier this month Huw Merriman, chair of the transport select committee, wrote to Eurostar expressing concern about the impact of the continued closure of Ebbsfleet and Ashford international stations in Kent. Trains for Brussels and Paris ended their calls there as the coronavirus pandemic began. They will not open until 2025 at the earliest. Eurostar is also ditching direct trains to Disneyland Paris in June 2023. In his response to the parliamentary committee, Mr Damas spelt out in devastating detail the damage caused by Brexit to international rail travel to and from the UK. His letter, which Mr Merriman has published, begins: “I fully appreciate the disappointment felt by many at the continued closure of the Kent stations and, indeed, the recent announcements regarding Disneyland Paris – a popular destination for many of our British customers, including those previously from Ashford. “I also appreciate the economic impact of such a decision on the South East and the loss of choice for individual travellers. I can understand that people contrast these decisions with the recovery in travel this year and question why we have not moved to re-open the stations.” While financial constraints and engineering issues were partly responsible, Mr Damas explained that Brexit has cut Eurostar capacity by 30 per cent – simply because the new passport requirements take time and require more space. “Additional border checks apply to UK citizens seeking to enter Schengen, as they do to all ‘third country nationals’. Since around 40 per cent of our customers are UK nationals, this has resulted in a significant increase in the processing times at stations. The stamping of British passports by Continental police adds at least 15 seconds to individual passengers’ border crossing times.
“Even with all booths manned, St Pancras can currently process a maximum 1,500 passengers per hour versus 2,200 in 2019. It is only the fact that Eurostar has capacity-limited trains and significantly reduced its timetable from 2019 levels, that we are not seeing daily queues in the centre of London similar to those experienced in the Channel ports. This situation has obvious commercial consequences and is not sustainable in the mid-tolong term.” With supply so constrained, said Mr Damas, “we are currently not able to respond to the high demand on our core routes linking capital cities”. He explained that reopening the intermediate stations, where demand and average fares are much lower, “would make things even worse as it would take away from London vital border police resources”. Officials at the large terminals – London, Brussels and Paris – handle five or 10 times more passengers at Eurostar’s large terminals than in intermediate stations. The immediate consequence, Mr Damas writes: “Despite the return to travel, Eurostar cannot currently pursue a strategy of volume and growth. We are having to focus services on those core routes which make the maximum contribution per train and to charge higher prices to our customers. “The whole focus of this effort is to manage and reduce the debts we had to incur; there is no prospect of any dividends to shareholders until this is done.” Mr Damas revealed the severe financial damage caused by the pandemic, during which shareholders put £250m into the business – almost twice as much as the total dividends since Eurostar was created. Revenues were cut by 95 per cent for 15 months in 2020-21, and the Omicron wave in December 2021 and early 2022 cost Eurostar at least €50m (£43m) more. “Eurostar needed to find an additional £500m in commercial debt in order to survive,” he said. Mr Damas added: “The uncertainty regarding the EU’s Entry Exit System – much discussed with the committee – hangs over us.”
The withdrawal agreement negotiated by the UK and the European Union means British travellers to the EU will be photographed and fingerprinted from November 2023, adding to the transaction time. In response, Mr Merriman tweeted: “The transport committee will write to the new rail minister [Kevin Foster] and the rail regulator for observations and interventions to support Eurostar – a vital cog in our transport system.” The Independent asked the Department for Transport and the Home Office for a response. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Royal Mail workers to strike for 19 days in pay dispute Postal staff protest in north London earlier this month (AFP/Getty) LIAM JAMES Royal Mail workers are to strike for a further 19 days across October and November in a long-running dispute over pay and conditions.
The Communication Workers Union (CWU) said the action by its members will have a “dramatic impact” on peak mail periods such as Black Friday, Cyber Monday and the lead-up to Christmas. Walkouts will be a mixture of single days and rolling action across Royal Mail Group’s (RMG) network, the CWU said. The union, which represents 115,000 postal workers, said the move follows a threat centred around the “outrageous” decision by RMG’s senior management to withdraw from major national agreements, push ahead with cuts to workers’ terms and conditions and “completely sideline” the union. The strike vote came on the eve of a planned walkout on Wednesday. Dave Ward, general secretary of the CWU, said RMG leaders were “treating postal workers as if they are stupid”. “These are the same people that have kept the country connected and returned Royal Mail Group to record profit,” he said. Mr Ward pleaded with the public to “stand with their local postal worker” as they face “the fight of their lives to save their jobs”. “We will not stand by and see the Royal Mail Group become the next P&O but we need your backing to win,” he added. The strikes come days after Royal Mail said it had informed the CWU that it wanted to “modernise the ways of working with them”. Yesterday, the company declined to elaborate on what changes they were specifically seeking but said it was discussing it with the CWU. Royal Mail said CWU had ignored an offer for talks facilitated by Acas, the government’s arbitration service. A Royal Mail spokesperson said: “This evening, rather than responding to our offer of Acas talks, the CWU announced further damaging industrial action, once again taking the path of prolonging disruption over resolution.
“Royal Mail is losing £1m a day and must change faster in response to changing customer demands. We operate in a competitive market, and our customers have choices.” The company said strikes will make its financial situation worse and apologised to customers for the coming inconvenience. Strikes began early this summer as postal workers demanded a “proper pay rise” after being offered 2 per cent at a time when inflation nears double figures. The CWU said its strikes were the biggest of a summer which also saw walkouts by rail workers, Openreach engineers, BT call centre staff, refuse collectors and barristers. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Posts seen by Molly Russell left psychiatrist ‘unable to sleep’, inquest hears Online content viewed by 14-year-old before her death would have ‘made her feel more hopeless’, inquest told (Family handout/PA) CHIARA GIORDANO
A child psychiatrist was “not able to sleep well for weeks” after seeing “disturbing” self-harm posts Molly Russell viewed on social media before her death. Dr Navin Venugopal said the “very disturbing, distressing” content the 14-year-old had engaged with would “certainly affect her and made her feel more hopeless” as he gave evidence at an inquest into her death. Proceedings were paused for a few moments yesterday as the family’s lawyer Oliver Sanders KC told North London Coroner’s Court a “rather unpleasant” Instagram account had been set up using an image of Molly as its profile picture. In a short statement, a spokesman for Instagram’s parent company Meta said: “This account has been removed from Instagram for violating our policies.” Molly, from Harrow in northwest London, ended her life in November 2017, prompting her family to campaign for better internet safety. Molly, from Harrow in northwest London, ended her life in November 2017 (Family handout/PA) The inquest heard the 14-year-old had written a note before she died, which Dr Venugopal described as “very sad to look at”. Under questioning from Coroner Andrew Walker, the witness agreed it was important to recognise “children are not adults”, and that adult matters should not be accessible to children. Dr Venugopal told the inquest he saw no “positive benefit” to the material viewed by the teenager before she died. Asking the
witness about what effect the material would have had on Molly, the coroner said: “This material seems to romanticise, glamorise, and take the subject of self-harm – take it away from reality and make it seem almost unreal, take away from these terrible acts any kind of consequence. You have looked at the material, do you think that the material that Molly viewed had any impact on her state of mind?” Dr Venugopal replied: “I suppose I will start off, I will talk about the effect the material had on my state of mind. I had to see it over a short period of time and it was very disturbing, distressing. Molly Russell’s father Ian Russell (centre), mother Janet Russell (right) and her sister (left) arrive at North London Coroner’s Court on the first day of the inquest (Kirsty O'Connor/PA) “There were periods where I was not able to sleep well for a few weeks so bearing in mind that the child saw this over a period of months I can only say that she was (affected) – especially bearing in mind that she was a depressed 14-year-old. It would certainly affect her and made her feel more hopeless.” The coroner continued: “Can you see any positive benefit for that material being looked at?” “No, I do not,” Dr Venugopal replied. Mr Sanders then took the witness through a number of videos viewed by Molly on Instagram, followed by a note written by the teenager on her
phone two days after watching one clip which used “identical language”. Dr Venugopal told the court: “If they are of that mindset and are seeing these sorts of things, it could have an impact.” Pinterest’s Judson Hoffman told the inquest the site was ‘not safe’ when Molly used it (PA) The witness was taken through his reports in which he concluded the content Molly viewed had “exacerbated her sense of helplessness”. He added that he believed she was “placed at risk” through the self-harm related material she accessed online. The head of health and wellbeing at Instagram’s parent company Meta and the head of community operations at Pinterest have both apologised at the inquest for content Molly viewed. Meta executive Elizabeth Lagone said she believed posts which the Russell family argued “encouraged” suicide were safe when the teenager viewed them. Pinterest’s Judson Hoffman told the inquest the site was “not safe” when Molly used it. The inquest, expected to last two weeks, continues. Additional reporting by Press Association Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP

WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Richest countries fail to strengthen climate plans ahead of UN deadline A climate demonstration in Paris this week – less than two moths before Cop27 (AFP/Getty) SAPHORA SMITH CLIMATE CORRESPONDENT The world’s richest countries have failed to update their climate goals in time to meet a United Nations deadline ahead of a key climate summit in Egypt.
The majority of the G20 group of the world’s richest and largest developing nations failed to submit new or strengthened plans to cut their emissions to the UN by 23 September. This is despite the fact that they collectively represent around 80 per cent of the world’s gross domestic product and account for the same proportion of global emissions. Out of the group of 20 nations, which includes the European Union, only the United Kingdom, Indonesia, India, Australia, Brazil and Korea did so. A crucial outcome of the Glasgow climate summit last year, signed off by 197 countries, was a request for countries to “revisit and strengthen” their 2030 climate plans in 2022. It matters because analysis showed that countries’ 2030 plans at Cop26 would result in 2.4C of global heating by 2100, far above the Paris aim of keeping temperatures well below 2C and ideally at 1.5C. Cop 26 president Alok Sharma said in a speech this summer that “every country” must respond to the call to revisit and strengthen their Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions – “particularly the G20.” “They must do so not at some vague point in the future, but by 23 September this year,” he added. Only 23 nations in total, including the six members of the G20, submitted updated plans. l k Sh id fC b h ill
Alok Sharma was president of Cop26. In November he will pass the Cop presidency to Egypt (Getty) The United Kingdom’s updated submission explains more fully how the UK will deliver its plans without changing its commitment to reduce emissions by at least 68 per cent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. This is the approach recommended by the UK’s independent climate change committee. Australia was one of the G20 countries that significantly upped its ambition, submitting a new target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 43 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 earlier this year. This, it says, will put Australia on track to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, and is a 15 percentage point increase on its previous 2030 target. Australia’s new centre-left government came to power earlier this year on a platform of greening the nation, and has attempted to shake off the country’s previous reputation as a laggard on climate action. India, the world’s third largest emitter, submitted plans to reduce the emissions intensity of its GDP by 45 per cent by 2030 from 2005 levels, compared to its earlier goal of 33-35 per cent. South Korea updated its target to reduce emissions from a 26.3 per cent reduction from the 2018 level up to a 40 per cent reduction. Indonesia strengthened its target to reduce emissions by 31.89 per cent by 2030 compared to a business-as-usual scenario, up from 29 per cent in its previous commitment.
Young people protest against climate inaction in Mumbai on Saturday (AFP/Getty) And Brazil said it was committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 per cent by 2030, compared with 2005. Although the Climate Action Tracker says this commitment is weaker than its original one made in 2016. Tom Evans, a policy adviser in climate diplomacy and geopolitics at climate change think tank Third Generation Environmentalism, said the lack of many new climate targets was “deeply disappointing” but not surprising. “World leaders in the biggest emitting countries are facing multiple crises, yet they have not realised that accelerating climate action is the solution to rising energy prices, stimulating economic growth and securing peace,” he said. “Cop27 is the chance for leaders to come with new climate plans, backed up with concrete steps to make them reality.” Gareth Redmond-King, the international lead at the Energy Climate Intelligence Unit, which aims to promote informed debate on energy and climate in the UK, said just because there was an absence of new targets did not mean there was an absence of climate action. He pointed to the fact that the United States and China, the world’s biggest emitters, have committed unprecedented levels of spending to the clean transition and reports that the
European Union plans to raise its target to tackle climate change but is unlikely to do so until after Cop27 in Egypt. The European Union has been racing to end reliance on Russian gas, after Moscow shut off much of it flowing to the bloc following its invasion of Ukraine. “Even without new UN targets, momentum to a cleaner, more secure future is well underway,” he said. “Renewable costs are falling as gas prices surge, making it increasingly clear that climate solutions drive growth, cut energy bills, protect food supplies, and undermine funding for Russia’s war machine.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News New Met chief vows he will be ‘ruthless’ in rooting out racism within police force Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley admitted the force has a ‘real problem with race’ (PA) LIZZIE DEARDEN HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR The new Metropolitan Police commissioner has vowed to be “ruthless” in rooting out racists and misogynists from the force’s ranks.
Sir Mark Rowley refused to say whether he thought Britain’s largest force was institutionally racist, but admitted it has a “real problem with race”. Speaking to journalists at New Scotland Yard yesterday, he said he was “not interested in using labels that have been kicked around by different people to mean different things”. “Racism is a systemic issue that we have been too weak in tackling, it’s got too much of a hold in corners of the organisation,” Sir Mark added. “I’m going to be ruthless about rooting out racism and the other bad behaviours, I’m going to confront the systemic issues that have allowed it to prosper in a way it shouldn’t have done.” He was speaking days after meeting the family of an unarmed Black man, Chris Kaba, who was shot dead by a Metropolitan Police officer following a car chase earlier this month. The force previously committed to rooting out racism following the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, but they were followed by a series of scandals revealing racist WhatsApp messages between officers. Police currently only have the power to seize personal mobile phones and search private communications in criminal investigations, rather than those into misconduct breaches. Sir Mark said there was “an argument to say policing should be able to reach further” but that changes to disciplinary processes to ensure police are not “forced to retain” unsuitable officers were more important. He acknowledged that “ghastly incidents” such as the murder of Sarah Everard and cases involving misogynistic officers have dented public trust. “We’ve let the public of London and the good majority of the workforce down,” he said. “These cases that have been oozing out over recent years are really toxic and damaging and awful.
“We need to have a deep, hard look at ourselves and say ‘are these just inevitable? Every big organisation has a few problems that emerge,’ or is it worse than that? In my view it is much worse than that.” Public trust was one of the factors that saw the Metropolitan Police put in special measures by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in June. But a damning report published last week showed it was also missing targets for answering 999 and 101 calls and needed to improve the way it investigates crime, protects vulnerable people and supports victims. The watchdog reveals that almost 14,000 people wanted by the Metropolitan Police for crimes including violence and sex attacks were on the loose, many for significant periods of time. Asked what had caused the decline in performance and standards, Sir Mark said: “I’m not interested in trying to unpick previous decisions or events, I wasn’t here for the last four years and I don’t want to comment on the calls that people made or how that went.” He was a Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner and the head of UK counter-terrorism policing, serving under Dame Cressida Dick as commissioner before retiring from policing in 2018. Sir Mark said that one of the key missions in his first 100 days in his new post would be a blitz on wanted offenders. “We will be bearing down on that and bringing down the number of people who are wanted for serious offences,” Sir Mark said. “We think we can get that number down by well into three figures, it’s about moving the balance point so we’ve got more people prosecuted and less people on the run.” Commander Alexis Boon told the press conference that the Met had contacted courts in London to warn of an “oncoming surge” in prosecutions.
He said there would be an “intensification of our activity” targeting prolific offenders, fraud and suspects at large. “We are focusing particularly on offenders who commit violence against women and girls – those who are wanted for rape, for breaching orders, for stalking, sex offenders,” the senior officer added. “We are going to go after burglars, robbers, people with weapons – you will see hundreds of arrests over this hundred days of wanted subjects, people we’re going to bring to justice.” Other key priorities laid out by the new commissioner included bolstering community policing and “getting the basics right” on responding to crime, including fulfilling a pre-existing policy of making officers attend every domestic burglary. Sir Mark said he also wanted to support “disillusioned” officers on the frontlines, after figures showed Scotland Yard was struggling fulfilling its targets for a national recruitment drive. The commissioner said the amount of time spent on nonpolicing calls were a “massive challenge”, adding: “Other services are struggling to cope and we are dealing with too much of it. At any one time we’ve got so many officers waiting with people in hospital for mental health assessments. “We are not social workers, yet we are filling that void sometimes in mental health and other areas.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP

WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Pictures of the Day Desert tracks The Giza Pyramids in Egypt on World Tourism Day. EPA
Holy water A busy day at St Mark’s Basilica in Venice. AFP Don’t say cheese A devotee of the Jor Soo Gong Naka shrine with skewers pierced through her cheeks takes part in a procession during the annual Vegetarian Festival in Phuket, Thailand. AFP
Night moves A great blue heron flies over the Androscoggin River in New Hampshire, USA. AP Give us a wave A surfer at Tynemouth beach on the North East coast of England. PA Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP

WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 News Home news in brief A blustery day in Liverpool yesterday with more turbulent weather on the way (Getty) Torrential rain and 50mph winds due Heavy rain and high winds are headed for Britain later this week as an Arctic chill brings days of unseasonably cold weather. Northerly winds have caused temperatures across the UK to plunge, with lows of 6C in many areas expected at night, several degrees below the early autumn average. Met Office forecasters said the tail end of Hurricane Fiona, which made landfall in Canada last week, has also contributed to
Britain’s cool start to the week. Come Friday, commuters face a testing journey as heavy rain and high winds are expected to hit at morning and evening rush hours. “Everywhere will see a few hours of heavy rainfall,” Becky Mitchell from the Met Office told The Independent. Liverpool or Glasgow to host next Eurovision Song Contest Liverpool and Glasgow are the two cities which remain in the competition to host the 2023 Eurovision Song Contest. Birmingham, Leeds, Newcastle, Sheffield and Manchester were removed from contention to host the music event in place of Ukraine. Announcing the news, Phil Harrold, the chairman of the BBC’s host city selection committee, said: “Thanks to all seven cities across the UK who have demonstrated the enthusiasm and passion for Eurovision that exists right across the UK. We were incredibly impressed by the quality and creativity of all the city bids in what was a highly competitive field.” Further discussions will now take place with officials from Glasgow and Liverpool and the host city will be announced “within weeks”, the BBC have said, with the final decision a matter for the BBC in conjunction with the EBU. Man arrested after woman ‘sexually assaulted’ in park A man has been arrested on suspicion of rape and robbery after reports a woman had been sexually assaulted in a London park. Police were called to Burgess Park at 5.23am on Saturday morning and the woman was taken to hospital for assessment. She is being supported by specialist officers and a 31-year-old man has been arrested, the Metropolitan Police said. Local residents took to social media to share concerns that some parts of the park are not lit. Man sought after girl sexually assaulted at train station
Police are hunting for a man after a 16-year-old girl was sexually assaulted at a railway station. British Transport Police said the teenage girl was at Rhyl station in North Wales at about 4pm on Saturday 17 September when a man sat next to her on a bench on the platform. He began to speak to her and asked “inappropriate questions” before he allegedly sexually assaulted her. Albanian asylum seekers will not be fast-tracked for deportation The Home Office has admitted that Albanian asylum-seekers cannot be fast-tracked for deportation despite Priti Patel’s promise to “speed up” their removal. In an abrupt U-turn, Home Office lawyers have conceded that the government cannot fasttrack the deportation of Albanians who have claimed asylum in the UK. Instead, the policy will only apply to Albanians who do not claim asylum. The comments were made in a letter to the refugee charity Care4Calais, who noted: “As virtually all Albanian refugees arriving will seek asylum, this makes the proposed policy insignificant.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP

WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Huge explosions detected close to Russian pipeline Sabotage cannot be ruled out after the leaks were discovered Gas bubbles from the Nord Stream 2 leak reaching the surface of the Baltic Sea (Reuters) THOMAS KINGSLEY Powerful underwater explosions have been recorded by seismologists in Denmark and Sweden after the discovery of gas leaks in major Russian gas pipelines to Europe. The discovery of the explosion came after Denmark’s prime minister claimed the leaks may have been caused by sabotage. “There is no doubt that these were explosions,” Bjorn Lund, a
seismologist at Sweden’s National Seismology Centre, told SVT. If the explosions are linked to sabotaged leaks, it could dramatically escalate European concerns over the supply of Russian energy to the continent, which many nations remain reliant on despite a scramble to find other sources since Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine. Earlier, Sweden’s Maritime Authority said it had issued a warning after the discovery of the leaks on the Russian-owned Nord Stream 1 pipeline in Swedish and Danish waters, shortly after another one was found on the nearby Nord Stream 2 project. “There are two leaks on Nord Stream 1 – one in Swedish economic zone and one in Danish economic zone. They are very near each other,” a Swedish Maritime Administration spokesperson told Reuters. The leaks were located northeast of the Danish island Bornholm, the spokesperson said, however it was not immediately clear what had caused the leaks. Notably, Denmark’s prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, said she “cannot rule out” sabotage after the leaks were detected. Nord Stream AG, the operator of the network, said three offshore lines of the Nord Stream gas pipeline system have sustained “unprecedented” damage in one day. It also said that it was impossible to estimate when the gas network system’s working capability would be restored. The German economy ministry also reported a drop in pressure in the Nord Stream 1 pipeline. “We are investigating this incident as well, together with the authorities concerned and the Federal Network Agency,” the ministry said in a statement late Monday. “We currently do not know the reason for the drop in pressure.” While the Nord Stream 2 pipeline has never operated, Nord Stream 1 had been carrying gas to Germany until earlier this month, when Russian energy giant Gazprom cut off the supply, claiming there was a need for urgent maintenance work to repair key components. Despite not delivering gas to Europe, both pipelines have still been filled with gas, German news agency DPA reported.
Gazprom’s citing of technical problems as the reason for reducing gas flows through Nord Stream 1 has been rejected by German officials as a cover for a political power play following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Gazprom started cutting supplies through Nord Stream 1 in mid-June, blaming delays to the delivery of a turbine that had been sent to Canada for repair. The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline was already complete when German chancellor Olaf Scholz suspended its certification on the eve of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February. Germany has been heavily reliant on natural gas supplies from Russia, but since Moscow launched its war in Ukraine, Berlin has been looking for other sources of energy. Fears of a winter shortage have eased somewhat as gas storage has progressed in recent weeks. “We do not see any impact on the security of supply,” the economy ministry said, referring to the pressure drop in Nord Stream 1. “Since the Russian supply stopped at the beginning of September no gas has flowed through Nord Stream 1 any more. Storage levels continue to rise steadily. They are currently at about 91 per cent,” it added. Yesterday, a ceremony was held for the inauguration of a new pipeline, Baltic Pipe, which will bring Norwegian gas through Denmark to Poland. The Norwegian gas is intended to have an important role in replacing Russian gas. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Nearly 100,000 Russians cross into Kazakhstan after Putin’s mobilisation order Many Russians have also fled to Georgia – a satellite image shows long queues at the border (Maxar Tech) THOMAS KINGSLEY Nearly 100,000 Russians have fled into neighbouring Kazakhstan following Vladimir Putin’s partial mobilisation
order, government officials in Astana claim. Kazakhstan said it is struggling to accommodate the tens of thousands of Russians who have fled their homeland since Moscow announced a military mobilisation last week, but will attempt to deal with what it called a “humanitarian matter”. Russian men, some with families, started crossing the world's second-longest land border en masse last week after President Vladimir Putin’s announcement of a call-up, say officials. Russians do not need a visa or even a passport to enter Kazakhstan, just their Russian identity papers. The Russian language is also widely spoken in the country, which is home to a large ethnic Russian minority. However, the sudden influx has stretched the infrastructure of the vast but sparsely populated nation. Hotels and hostels are full, and rent has skyrocketed. Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, whose administration has refused to support what Russia calls a “special military operation” in Ukraine, urged patience and tolerance.
“A lot of people from Russia have come here over the last few days,” he said in a speech yesterday. “Most of them were forced to leave by the desperate situation. We must take care of them and ensure their safety. This is a political and humanitarian matter.” His government will discuss the situation with Moscow, he said. Satellite images have shown queues of thousands of vehicles leaving Russia waiting to get into neighbouring Georgia. The other side of the road back into Russia is almost entirely clear in the pictures released by Maxar Technology, which were taken on Sunday. It is estimated that the queue today contains nearly 6,000 vehicles. Georgian officials said earlier that the number of Russians arriving each day has nearly doubled since President Putin announced a partial mobilisation for the war in Ukraine. Georgia’s interior minister Vakhtang Gomelauri said: “Four to five days ago, 5,000-6,000 (Russians) were arriving in Georgia daily. The number has (now) grown to some 10,000 per day,” he added. Russians wait to get personal identification numbers in Almaty, Kazakhstan, yesterday (AP) And the number of Russians entering the European Union has jumped, EU border agency Frontex said yesterday. “Over the past week, nearly 66,000 Russian citizens entered the EU, more than 30 per cent [more] compared to the preceding week. Most of them arrived in Finland and Estonia,” Frontex said in a
statement, referring to the week from 19 to 25 September. Frontex said that over the last four days alone, 30,000 Russian citizens had arrived in Finland. Russian officials have sought to play down the economic impact mobilisation may have as more than 70,000 IT sector workers left Russia soon after Moscow sent its troops into Ukraine in February, although some have since returned. The Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RSPP) said the list of professions granted deferment from partial mobilisation needed to be expanded. “The short-term departure in the workforce of a number of key personnel cannot be efficiently compensated by rapid recruitment in the market, when it comes to technological production with a high level of demands for workers' qualifications,” RSPP said in a statement. It said key staff at organisations vital to the economy and critical infrastructure, and those in the defence sectors, should be granted deferment. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Putin poised to announce annex of Ukraine regions People from Luhansk and Donetsk vote during a referendum in Sevastopol, Crimea (AP) THOMAS KINGSLEY The first results from four occupied regions of Ukraine showed majorities of more than 96 per cent of people voting in favour of becoming part of Russia, in referendums denounced by Kyiv and the West as a sham. The state-owned Russian news agency RIA said the initial counts showed majorities ranging from 96.97 per cent in the
Kherson region, based on 14 per cent of votes counted, to 98.19 per cent in Zaporizhzhia, based on 18 per cent of the count. In the Donetsk and Luhansk people’s republics, the majorities pushed 98 per cent with a similar number of votes counted. The figures came as speculation mounted that Vladimir Putin is expected to announce annexation of territories later this week. Voting finished yesterday. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said yesterday that Putin is likely to announce the accession of the occupied regions of Ukraine to the Russian Federation during his address to parliament on 30 September. Kyiv and the West have dismissed the referendums as a sham and pledged not to recognise the results while Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky said the Donetsk region in the east remained his country’s. “Russia’s leaders almost certainly hope that any accession announcement will be seen as a vindication of the special military operation and will consolidate patriotic support for the conflict”, the MoD bulletin said. Russia warned it could resort to nuclear weapons to defend what it claimed as its own territory, including newly acquired lands. After the balloting, “the situation will radically change from the legal viewpoint, from the point of view of international law, with all the corresponding consequences for protection of those areas and ensuring their security”, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. A billboard reads: ‘Our choice – Russia’ prior to the referendum in Luhansk (AP)
President Vladimir Putin has talked up Moscow’s nuclear option since last week after a Ukrainian counteroffensive led to battlefield setbacks and has the Kremlin’s forces increasingly cornered. The balloting that started on Friday in the Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Luhansk and Donetsk regions and a call-up of Russian military reservists ordered by Mr Putin are other strategies aimed at buttressing Moscow’s exposed position. Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy head of the Russian Security Council chaired by Mr Putin, spelled out the threat in a fresh nuclear threat yesterday. “Let’s imagine that Russia is forced to use the most powerful weapon against the Ukrainian regime that has committed a large-scale act of aggression, which is dangerous for the very existence of our state,” he wrote on his messaging app channel. Tens of thousands of residents had already fled the regions amid the war, and images shared by those who remained showed armed Russian troops going door to door to pressure Ukrainians into voting. Mariupol mayor Vadym Boychenko, who left the port city after the Russians finally seized it following a monthslong siege, said only about 20 per cent of the 100,000 estimated remaining residents cast ballots in the Donetsk referendum. Mariupol had a pre-war population of 541,000. Another billboard in Luhansk says: ‘With Russia forever, 27 September’ (AP) “A man toting an assault rifle comes to your home and asks you to vote, so what can people do?” he said during a news
conference. French foreign minister Catherine Colonna said while visiting Kyiv yesterday that France was determined “to support Ukraine and its sovereignty and territorial integrity”. Meanwhile, the mass call-up of Russians to active military duty has to some degree backfired on Mr Putin. It has triggered a massive exodus of men from the country, fuelled protests in many regions across Russia and sparked occasional acts of violence. In response, Ukraine has urged the European Union yesterday to impose economic sanctions on Russia to punish it for staging annexation votes in four occupied regions, and said the moves by Moscow would not change Ukraine’s actions on the battlefield. Foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba, after talks in Kyiv with Ms Colonna, said personal sanctions would not suffice as punishment for the referendums, billed by Russia as a prelude to it annexing four Ukrainian regions. “It won’t be enough to limit oneself to cosmetic measures... the softer the reaction to the socalled referendums, the greater the motivation for Russia to escalate and annex further territories,” Mr Kuleba told reporters. “In the content of the eighth EU sanctions package, we will see just how seriously the EU takes the problem of referendums.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Diplomatic row looms after Japan’s consul interrogated on spying charges in Russia Tatsunori Motoki being questioned by Russian authorities (Screengrab/@igorsushko) S H W E TA S H A R M A Japan has demanded an apology from Russia after its diplomat was blindfolded and physically restrained during an
interrogation and accused of being a spy, deepening a diplomatic row between the two countries. Tatsunori Motoki, who worked at the Japanese consulate general, was detained in Vladivostok in Russia’s far east on allegations that he obtained classified information about Russia, the foreign ministry in Moscow said. On Monday, Russia‘s foreign ministry notified Japan‘s embassy in Moscow that the official had been declared “persona non grata”, or an undesirable person, on grounds that he conducted illegal espionage activity, and ordered him to leave the country within 48 hours. According to the Russian Federal Security Service, he was detained while receiving classified information about “Russia’s cooperation with an Asia Pacific country” and the impacts of the west’s sanction policy on the economic situation in the maritime territory. It was alleged that he was caught paying money for it, Tass news agency reported. Japan lodged a formal protest with Russia yesterday and rejected the espionage allegations against him. Japan’s foreign ministry said the diplomat was arrested on 22 September and was interrogated with his eyes covered, his hands and head pressed and immobilised. “The alleged illegal activity insisted by the Russian side is completely groundless,” chief cabinet secretary Hirokazu Matsuno told reporters. Mr Matsuno said Japan‘s vice foreign minister Takeo Mori summoned Russia‘s ambassador to Japan, Mikhail Galuzin, to demand a formal apology from the Russian government and measures to prevent a repeat of the incident. Describing Russian authorities’ treatment of the consulate official as “intimidating” during the interrogation, he said such handling of consular officials violates the Vienna convention and a Japanese-Russian treaty over consular affairs. “It is extremely regrettable and absolutely unacceptable,” Mr Matsuno said. Japanese foreign minister Yoshimasa Hayashi said: “There is absolutely no evidence that there was any engagement in illegal
activities as the Russians claim.” Tass news agency reported the official confessed to violating Russian laws and that he was captured red-handed on camera in a restaurant. The incident marks another blow to Japan-Russia ties which have deteriorated since Tokyo joined the west in slapping sanctions on Moscow following its invasion of Ukraine. In response to the sanctions, the Kremlin has repeatedly referred to Japan as a “hostile” country, a designation it has also given to the US and EU countries and their allies. The Japanese government banned the export of materials that could be used for chemical weapons to 21 Russian entities in the latest sanctions on Monday. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Berlusconi’s girlfriend, 32, wins seat despite not going to constituency in campaign Marta Fascina was elected in Sicily in a town she said she used to visit on holiday as a child (Reuters) THOMAS KINGSLEY It is a good week for Silvio Berlusconi. On Sunday he was part of the three-party alliance that won Italy’s general election, was
elected to the senate and he could even reappear in Italy’s cabinet. Tomorrow, he will celebrate his 86th birthday. And, as good things are supposed to come in threes, it turns out his 32-year-old girlfriend, Marta Fascina, also has something to celebrate – she won a seat in the Italian parliament during this weekend’s elections, despite not showing up in the constituency during the campaign. Ms Fascina, 32, won the vote in the Sicilian town of Marsala, a town she said she used to visit on holiday as a child. That might not seem enough to convince some constituents, but she secured more than 36 per cent of the vote to allow her sit in the Chamber of Deputies, Italy’s lower house of parliament. She represents, not surprisingly, her OAP boyfriend’s Forza Italia party and said in an interview that she “accepted with pride” the opportunity to run in Sicily. Despite being 54 years younger than Berlusconi, she has been his partner since 2020. She was born just four years before the first of his three stints as Italian prime minister. It should be a story to warm the heart, but some in Sicily were left unimpressed by the election result. “She ran for Sicily because she came here on vacation. Is this normal?” asked her defeated rival Antonio Ferrante from the Democratic Party. Berlusconi with Fascina at a polling station on Sunday (EPA)
Despite cynicism, she appears to share her party leader’s views on halting the conflict in Ukraine, telling Italian news outlet Libero that peace was attainable if “Putin and Zelensky ... sit at a table together with mediators such as Italy”. “To avert a humanitarian, economic and geopolitical catastrophe, diplomacy must absolutely prevail,” she said. Last week, Berlusconi was criticised for saying that long-time friend Vladimir Putin was pushed into war. Berlusconi was re-elected to Italy's upper house on Sunday with more than 50 per cent of the votes in the northern city of Monza. While overall his party lost ground compared with the 2018 general elections, it fared better than expected and Mr Berlusconi's victory was particularly heartfelt. “Regaining a seat in the senate was a sort of personal revenge for Berlusconi, after all the judicial problems he went through,” said Massimiliano Panarari, political analyst at Rome's Mercatorum University. In 2013, the senate expelled him because of a tax fraud conviction stemming from his media business, and he was banned from holding public office for six years. After he served a sentence of community service, a court ruled he could once again hold public office and he won a seat in the European Parliament in 2019. His third and last premiership ended abruptly in 2011 when financial markets lost confidence that the billionaire media magnate could manage Italy's finances during Europe's sovereign debt crisis. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Satellite image shows scale of Hurricane Ian from space The weather system was approaching the west coast of Florida as ‘an extremely dangerous major hurricane’ (AP) LO U I S E B OY L E SENIOR CLIMATE CORRESPONDENT Satellites have captured the enormous Hurricane Ian from space as the category 3 storm barrels towards the Florida coast. The images, released by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, showed tightly packed storm bands rotating
north after the eye of the hurricane passed over western Cuba yesterday morning. Hurricane Ian crashed into Cuba at 4.30am (eastern time) yesterday in Pinar del Rio province, where 50,000 people had been evacuated. Winds reached sustained speeds of 125mph (205km/h) with storm surge of up to 14 feet (4.3m). At 2pm (ET) yesterday, the National Hurricane Centre further sounded the alarm that Ian was approaching the west coast of Florida as “an extremely dangerous major hurricane”. Maximum sustained winds have increased to near 120mph with higher gusts. Recent models are projecting the hurricane to make landfall south of Tampa Bay, an area that has not seen a major storm for more than a century. Storm surge could reach up to 12ft (3.7m) in the Tampa area however due the size of the storm, which is being supercharged by warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico, large stretches of Florida’s coast are also at risk. Around 2.5 million people were under evacuation orders along Florida’s Gulf Coast including in parts of Pinellas and Hillsborough counties, home to St Peterburg and Tampa. Mandatory evacuations were also placed on some of Pasco, Sarasota, Charlotte and Lee counties. Governor DeSantis urged Floridians to heed warnings to evacuate and seek higher ground (AP)
Nearly the entire central Florida Gulf Coast has some kind of evacuation order in place. On the forecast track, the centre of Ian was expected to move over the southeastern Gulf of Mexico yesterday, pass west of the Florida Keys later tonight, and approach the west coast of Florida within the hurricane warning area on tomorrow and tomorrow night. Meteorologist Brandon Orr, from WPLG in Miami, tweeted video shortly before midday yesterday showing water already pouring over the sea wall in Key West. The region is expected to have storm surge between two and four feet, and winds up to 70mph. Yesterday, governor Ron DeSantis urged Floridians to heed warnings to evacuate and seek higher ground due to potential for “catastrophic flooding and life-threatening storm surge”. President Joe Biden has approved a disaster declaration for Florida “immediately upon receiving” a request from Governor DeSantis, and said he has spoken with mayors in Tampa, St Petersburg, and Clearwater yesterday. New hurricane watches and warnings were also being issued for neighbouring states of Georgia and South Carolina. As the climate crisis drives up the world’s average ocean and air temperatures, hurricanes are expected to become stronger – and the damage more catastrophic, scientists say. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Iran protester death toll much higher, says Amnesty Streets are blocked during unrest in the country’s capital Tehran (AP) M AYA O P P E N H E I M WOMEN’S CORRESPONDENT The number of protesters being killed in Iran is higher than state TV figures claim, with the Iranian authorities exhibiting a “pattern of distorting the truth” to conceal human rights abuses, Amnesty International has warned.
Iran has been rocked by 11 days of protests, which erupted after Mahsa Amini’s death in police custody in mid-September. The 22-year-old Kurdish woman died after being detained by the morality police for allegedly infringing Iran’s stringent rules on hijabs. Women’s rights are profoundly restricted in Iran and wearing a headscarf is compulsory in public for all women, with those who do not wear a hijab, or have some of their hair on display while wearing a hijab, facing punishments ranging from fines to imprisonment. Mansoureh Mills, a researcher at leading human rights organisation Amnesty International, told The Independent the true numbers of protesters who have recently been killed in Iran is higher than the numbers officially released. State television stated on Saturday that at least 41 people have been killed during protests, noting the death toll was based on its own tally, with official figures yet to be published. This death count predominantly consists of demonstrators but also includes security force officials. Ms Mills, who specialises in Iran, said: “Amnesty International has recorded at least 30 people being killed, four of them children, but we believe the real number is higher, given the horrific level of violence being perpetrated by the security forces. The Iranian authorities have a pattern of distorting the truth to cover up their human rights violations. Following the November 2019 protests, during which security forces killed hundreds of men, women and children, the authorities consistently denied any responsibility. “They continued to cover up the real death toll of people killed during the November 2019 protests, and publicly praised security and intelligence forces for their role in the crackdown.” The campaigner warned women and girls in Iran are being forced to endure “harassment, violence and arbitrary arrest” for taking off their headscarves in the protests. “We have also received reports of women’s rights defenders being arrested while protesting for women’s rights over the past week,” Ms Mills added. “This is something that we are investigating.”
When “political unrest” and major demonstrations erupt, the Iranian authorities “arbitrarily arrest journalists, political activists and human rights defenders to silence any form of public dissent or reporting and criticism of the human rights violations they are committing”, she said. Ms Mills called for the Iranian authorities to “urgently repeal laws and regulations that impose compulsory veiling on women and girls, perpetuate violence against them and strip them of their right to dignity and bodily autonomy”. The campaigner argued the morality police “which enforces these abusive and discriminatory laws” needs to be scrapped. “The policing of women’s bodies and lives in Iran is not restricted to their clothing choices,” Ms Mills added. “However, it is the most visible and one of the most egregious forms of the wider oppression of women and it stokes violence against them on a daily basis.” The protests have swept across at least 46 cities, towns and villages in Iran – with women waving their hijabs and hurling them in bonfires and chopping off their hair at the forefront of protests. More than 1,200 protesters are estimated to have been arrested in the largest demonstrations to descend on Iran’s streets in nearly three years. Crowds have demanded Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is ousted as well as shouting “Woman, Life, Freedom!”. Rothna Begum, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch’s women’s rights division, who specialises in the Middle East and North Africa, told The Independent: “The true numbers of people killed are likely to be higher than what state media are reporting but even official numbers are far too high for deaths during what are largely peaceful protests. The authorities must refrain from excessive use of force and investigate all deaths that have taken place during the protests.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP

WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World Tributes and outrage as Abe state funeral divides Japan Akie Abe, widow of the assassinated former prime minister Sinzo Abe, hands his ashes to his successor Fumio Kishida (AFP/Getty) ALISHA RAHAMAN SARKAR Japan and its allies paid tribute yesterday to the country's longest-serving prime minister Shinzo Abe at a controversial state funeral marred by protests. The rare state funeral, held at an estimated cost of up to $12m (£11m), was attended by more than 4,300 people, including 50 present and former heads of state.
Protests objecting to the expenditure and to the veneration of Abe’s legacy continued yesterday even as the ceremony began at 2pm local time, with Abe's ashes being carried into the Nippon Budokan Hall in central Tokyo by his widow, Akie Abe. Prime minister Fumio Kishida has been criticised for spending taxpayers’ money at a time of global economic uncertainty, to host the first state funeral for a Japanese politician since 1967. Such ceremonies are otherwise exclusively reserved for senior members of the imperial family. Abe, who was assassinated on 8 July during a campaign rally, was honoured with a 19-volley gun salute. Dressed in a traditional black kimono, Ms Abe walked inside the hall carrying her husband's ashes in an urn placed in a wooden box and covered with silk. She then passed on the box to Mr Kishida, who then handed it to the military officers for it to be placed on the altar. Japanese PM Fumio Kishida pays tribute (Leah Millis/AP) Inside the concert venue, a large portrait of Abe draped with black ribbon hung over a bank of green, white and yellow flowers. Attendees stood while a military band played the Kimigayo national anthem and then observed a moment of silence. Abe’s widow shed tears as a video tribute highlighting key moments in the former prime minister’s life played in the hall.
Leading the tributes with the first eulogy of the day, Mr Kishida praised his predecessor's efforts in diplomacy and security. “He was a person who needed to live for a long time,” said Mr Kishida in his 12-minute speech. “I had a firm belief that you were to contribute as a compass to show the future direction of Japan and the rest of the world for 10 or 20 more years.” He added: “Abe-san ... you’ve worked tirelessly and exhausted all your energy for both Japan and the world.” Abe's successor and long-time aide Yoshihide Suga noted that many people in their twenties and thirties had shown up to offer flowers. “You always said you wanted to make Japan better, that you wanted young people to have hope and pride,” Mr Suga said with a trembling voice. US vice-president Kamala Harris attends the funeral (Getty) US vice-president Kamala Harris, Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese, India's Narendra Modi and South Korean prime minister Han Duck-soo were among the foreign dignitaries to pay floral tributes at the ceremony. The funeral has been viewed by analysts as a bid by the current Japanese prime minister to strengthen diplomatic ties with the country’s partners, amid plummeting domestic support. He was expected to hold 40 meetings yesterday, in a round of what he termed “funeral diplomacy”.
Despite facing a backlash, Mr Kishida defended his decision to stage the full state funeral, calling it a way of honouring Abe’s achievements, as well as standing up for democracy. Protesters in Tokyo hold a banner opposing the state funeral (AFP/Getty) Members of the public remained divided, however, with one poll showing only 30 per cent of respondents agreed with the decision. At a peaceful protest rally against the funeral, hundreds of people marched toward the hall, some banging drums and many shouting and holding banners. “Shinzo Abe has not done a single thing for regular people,” Kaoru Mano said. “One big problem is that there was no proper approval process,” pensioner Shin Watanabe said during the demonstration. I’m sure there are various views. But I don’t think it’s forgivable that they will force a state funeral on us when so many of us are opposed.” On Monday, nearly 1,000 people marched through the streets of Tokyo demanding the event be called off after a man in his seventies last week set himself ablaze outside the prime minister’s office. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP

WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 World World news in brief Leonard Glenn Francis is alleged to have orchestrated one of the US Navy’s worst corruption scandals (Interpol Venezuela) Malaysian fugitive requests asylum in Venezuela A Malaysian fugitive nicknamed “Fat Leonard”, who orchestrated a huge bribery scheme involving dozens of US Navy officials, has requested asylum in Venezuela, according to reports. The defence contractor, whose real name is Leonard Glenn Francis, was earlier spotted in Venezuela by two investigative journalists after fleeing the United States earlier this month. He was later captured by authorities in Venezuela. Now after a week, he has applied for asylum in the South
American country, a law enforcement official has said, according to the Associated Press. Francis slipped away from his house arrest in San Diego on 4 September, weeks before he was set to be sentenced. He has acknowledged overbilling the US Navy by $35m with the help of dozens of US officials whom he plied with prostitutes, Kobe beef, cigars, and other bribes so they would direct their ships to ports Francis controlled in the Pacific in southeast Asia. He pleaded guilty in 2015 and began cooperating with the authorities. US and Venezuelan officials said that Francis cut off his ankle monitor, fled to Mexico and then made his way to Cuba before turning up in Venezuela. Protests erupt after boy from Dalit community ‘beaten to death’ Violent protests broke out in India’s Uttar Pradesh after a 15year-old boy from the Dalit community died after he was allegedly beaten by his teacher in a school. Nikhit Kumar died 19 days after he was allegedly thrashed by his teacher for giving incorrect answers in class. According to a police complaint filed by Nikhit’s family, the boy was verbally abused for being a Dalit – belonging to the lowest rung of the Indian Hindu caste system. His family has alleged that the teacher physically assaulted the boy with sticks and kicked him until he fell unconscious, over a mistake in a social science test on 7 September. The teenager was in and out of hospital for two weeks after the incident, police say, but was rushed to the emergency ward on Sunday after his condition deteriorated. Protests broke out after his body was handed over to the family following a post-mortem. The teacher suspected of the attack remains on the run, police have said, and faces charges under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, as well as culpable homicide, voluntarily causing hurt, and intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace.
Shakira ordered to stand trial over tax fraud allegations Shakira is facing up to eight years in jail after being ordered to stand trial amid allegations of tax fraud. The 45-year-old Colombian singer has been accused of not paying taxes in Spain between 2012 and 2014, and six prosecutors have convinced a Spanish court to bring the singer to trial. In 2021, allegations surfaced when she was accused of using shell companies to conceal control of assets. She was also accused of putting her name on forms only in countries considered tax havens. In total, the singer is alleged to have evaded €14.5m (£13m) in tax. Shakira has called all allegations against her “false,” adding that she has paid everything that she owed to the government. She claimed that between 2012 and 2014, her fiscal residence was in the Bahamas so she was exempt from having to pay Spanish income tax. If she is found guilty, the singer could face up to eight years in prison. Feral pigs torment residents in New Zealand An increase in the population of wild pigs in New Zealand’s capital Wellington has led to them entering suburban gardens, killing baby goats and intimidating dogs. Residents in Brooklyn said that wild pigs have ended up on popular walking tracks and in backyards. Naomi Steenkamp, who raises goats on her property behind the Brooklyn wind turbine, said to Stuff that her own kid goats had been “eaten alive” by the wild pigs. “I don’t think people realise how big they are,” she was quoted as saying after her husband shot and killed one that she thought weighed 120kg over the weekend. According to the Wellington City Council, the feral pig population in the suburbs of Brooklyn has been expanding and causing problems for locals. It is thought the wild pig population has increased because the Covid-19 lockdowns limited hunting. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk.
Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Voices Are we heading for a crash? A number of lenders have paused making new mortgages (AP) HAMISH MCRAE The surge in mortgage interest rates inevitably means a softer housing market – and the great question is whether they will also lead to a fullblown crash. What do we know? Well, we know for a start that a number of lenders including the Halifax subsidiary of Lloyds Bank have paused making new mortgages. We know that the markets have pushed up the interest rates on government stock to above 4 per cent, and that
the Bank of England is clearly going to boost its interest rates further. But we don’t how high rates will go, whether there will be a serious recession this winter, and – conversely – we don’t know how big the positive impact will be from the cuts in stamp duty. There are plenty of views about the market – but this is one of those situations where views are less helpful than numbers. So some numbers. The core numbers are the cost of money to the lenders – and the easiest way to see that is to look at what the government has to pay. That is the anchor for interest rates that banks pay on the money market. Typically, banks will have to pay a bit more than the government. They also have to add on their admin costs and allow for the quite small risk of a borrower defaulting. So gilt yields are the floor – and that floor is a lot higher now than it was a few months ago. Two-year gilts yesterday were around 4.3 per cent compared with 0.7 per cent at the beginning of the year. Five-year gilts were 4.4 per cent and 10-year gilts were 4.2 per cent. By historical standards, these rates are pretty normal – for 10-year gilts yielded between 4 per cent and 6 per cent through the decade from 1998 to 2008. In the 1970s, ’80s and early ’90s, they were even higher. But since the 2008 banking crash, gilt yields fell dramatically, with the two and five-year rates going negative in 2020. Of course mortgage rates never went negative – banks have to make some profit – but most home borrowers have never experienced what used to be normal interest rates. We don’t know where rates will go in the future but we do know this is a global phenomenon, with US 10-year rates 3.8 per cent and Italian rates 4.5 per cent. However, the dreadful response on the markets to the government’s tax cuts and extra spending plans means that UK rates have gone faster than most. Realistically, that risk premium for the UK is not going away anytime soon, and global rates will not fall much for a couple of years either. So home-buyers have to plan on paying 5 per cent or more for a new mortgage. If they have a fixed rate, then it will be that sort of level if they have to roll one over.
What does this do to the housing market? There are a lot of influences and the cost of mortgages, while important, is only one of them. Homes will gradually become more affordable as wages catch up There is the state of the economy, and while there is clearly going to be a global slowdown we don’t know how serious that will be. There does seem to be continuing pressure for immigration into the UK, with net migration running at about 250,000 a year. Thanks in part to lifestyle changes following the pandemic, including working remotely, people want bigger homes. Homeownership seems to be rising again, with 65 per cent of UK homes owner-occupied, and continued strong desire for people to own their homes. Pull these together the demand side of the equation looks reasonably solid, while planning and other restrictions seem likely to hold back supply. The market will also be underpinned by cash buyers, which according to Savills account for one-third of all purchasers. There is a further twist to the tale, which stems from the very strong rise in prices over the past year. The most recent numbers from the Office for National Statistics show an increase of 15.5 per cent over the 12 months to July, the highest rate of increase since May 2003. The biggest fall in recent years was a decline of 15.6 per cent in the year to February 2009. So if the fall in the coming months were similar to that which happened in 2008/9, only people who bought in the past year would actually see a loss on their purchase. Everyone else would still be ahead.
So will this be as bad as that last crash? Here we have to leave the facts behind and make a judgement. My answer to that is: no. I think it is quite possible there could be a 10 per cent “correction” – that word people use when a market has got overblown and needs to deflate a bit. More likely, though, is a long period of more-or-less stable prices overall, with some areas and types of property climbing and others slipping. If this is right, homes will gradually become more affordable as wages catch up. But we will not have much of a feeling for the outcome until markets settle down. It will be some time before that happens. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Voices Steady speech is enough from Starmer as Tories implode Safe pair of hands: all the Labour leader had to do was not look incompetent (Getty) JOHN RENTOUL CHIEF POLITICAL COMMENTATOR It wasn’t a great speech, but it didn’t have to be. Keir Starmer is not a great speaker, but he doesn’t have to be. He had to read out a reasonably coherent text, remind people that he once had a real
job, and look like a plausible prime minister. He succeeded triumphantly on all points. He faced a huge political opportunity, handed to him on a plate by an incompetent, overconfident government, and he didn’t make a fool of himself. Given the eagerness with which Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng seem determined to help him, that was all he needed to do. Parts of the speech were well designed to win over some of the voters Labour lost at the last election. The section on Brexit was surprisingly honest. “It’s no secret I voted Remain,” Starmer said, mentioning something he has tried hard not to mention for the past few years, before adding: “as the prime minister did”. Truss’s Remain vote ought to have undermined her standing with the Tory faithful more than it did because it makes her connection with Leave voters weaker than Boris Johnson’s ever was or Rishi Sunak’s could have been. It opens up that group of swing voters to a rival offer from Starmer. “I want to speak directly to the people who left Labour on this issue. Whether you voted Leave or Remain, you’ve been let down,” he said. “If you voted to take control of your life and for the next generation to have control of theirs, then I say to you: that is what I will deliver.” It is a measure of the changing terms of political trade that “Take Back Control” could work better for Labour at the next election than for the Conservatives. Apart from that section, however, there was little attempt to reach out to former Tory voters. Starmer was in the comfortable position of having the Tory prime minister and chancellor do his work for him in driving their voters away. So many of them are deeply offended by tax cuts for the rich at a time of national hardship that all Labour has to do is look respectable and not incompetent to reap the benefit. Starmer had a few Blairite phrases – he even claimed that Labour was “the party of the centre ground” – and he continued to distance himself from the legacy of Jeremy Corbyn. There was a pointed reference to Vladimir Putin’s “imperialism” which
isn’t the kind of language Starmer’s predecessor would use, and a pro-business rhetorical tilt through the whole speech. He had to read out a reasonably coherent text, remind people that he once had a real job, and look like a plausible prime minister But it was not a Blairite speech, in that it remained securely in the Labour Party’s comfort zone – albeit with an ambiguous green tinge. It contained a flash of partisan hostility when Starmer told delegates not to forget or “forgive” the tax cuts for the richest 1 per cent. And large expanses of it consisted of platitudes and lists of places in Britain. The delegates willed it on, interrupting with a dozen standing ovations. They can sense that the political playing field has tilted sharply in their favour and happily cheered any reference to the “next Labour government” knowing that it means something now. They don’t yet believe the opinion polls, because a Labour majority would require an unprecedented swing, but the disarray in the government is so chaotic and so unexpected that the prospect of a minority Labour government in a hung parliament now seems well within their grasp. Hence some of the interesting things that Starmer didn’t say in his speech. His attack on the Scottish National Party said nothing about why it was relevant – it didn’t need to because everyone in the hall understood the context. In an election campaign in which a hung parliament is a likely outcome, the Tory attack on a Labour-SNP “coalition of chaos”, which was so successful in 2015, would still be a powerful one. Hence: “We can’t work with them. We won’t work with them. No deal under any circumstances.”
There wouldn’t have to be a deal, because the SNP would have to allow a minority Labour government to rule because it couldn’t prop up a Conservative government – but the important message is to try to stifle the “coalition of chaos” before the Tories deploy it. The other silence in the speech was the Liberal Democrats, not mentioned once. The Lib Dems are in a similar position to the SNP, in that they can hardly put a Tory prime minister in No 10 after the next election either. But there could be something in it for both parties if they cooperate informally before and after an election. If Starmer is serious about preparing for government, good relations with the Lib Dems are a simple precaution. This was the speech of a leader who is serious about preparing for government. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Voices Bank of England’s chief must stand up to the government Can Andrew Bailey shake off his cautious instincts and take control? (Getty) JAMES MOORE The markets may have paused for breath but the aftershocks from the chancellor’s “Kami-Kwasi mini-Budget” – that crack came courtesy of Labour’s Wes Streeting – continue. The pound recovered a bit of ground, as usually happens the day after markets throw up, but it remains stuck in the sale section.
Ditto Britain’s debt, which there’s going to be a lot more of. Our bonds currently sit alongside those issued by banana republics. How long before the ratings agencies class them as junk? The Bank of England’s governor Andrew Bailey said the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) would “not hesitate” to act to raise rates to restore a modicum of sanity. Trouble is, hesitating is exactly what it is doing. The clearing banks who lend to you and I, on the other hand, have been pulling their mortgage deals faster than Tory MPs can run and hide from angry voters. In the wake of this godawful train wreck, the Bank’s former deputy governor Charlie Bean went to the BBC to say he – kind of, sort of – would have pressed for an emergency meeting of the MPC, had he still been in the thick of it: “On this occasion, if I had still been at the bank in my role as deputy governor, I certainly would have been counselling the governor that I think this is one of those occasions where it might have made sense (to call a meeting).” So is that a maybe or is it probably? I think it’s a probably. But such equivocation is precisely the problem. If he’d tapped on Bailey’s door, he would have been right to do so. I think. It’s kind of catching isn’t it? But what would have been the answer: “Well, I’ll think about it. Never fear, old bean, we’ll do what’s necessary. I won’t hesitate.” ? Does anyone imagine Mark Carney, Bailey’s predecessor, still sitting on his hands at this point? The thing about Carney was that he was quite prepared to nettle his political masters – and the right-wing press too, when he felt it necessary. He would also have brushed off the bellyaching of backbench of Tory MPs – who are currently trying to blame a mess of their own making on Bailey – as the buzzing of pointless mosquitos.
Hard medicine from the Bank now might serve to stave off something worse down the track – but Bailey has to prove he can match words with actions I also doubt anyone would be threatening the Bank’s independence at this point. A member of the globe-trotting elite of the financial community, with a CV full of roles – any one of which would have made the career of another – Carney was hard to land a blow on. Bailey is different, having spent most of his career at the Bank with a brief sojourn as the boss of the Financial Conduct Authority, a poisoned chalice that he just about managed to survive (even if it was touch and go at points). He’s much more grounded in the British establishment. He also has a different style. More collegiate and consensual. Less assertive. Can Bailey, who has already been accused of sleeping at the wheel as inflationary pressures started to build, now shake off his cautious instincts and take control in the midst of a crisis created in Westminster? Part of the pound’s weakness is born of the markets’ perception that he won’t press the button and take the flak that will come with doing so. That they have no confidence in the TrussKwarteng doomsday cult is clear. But they clearly don’t think Bailey is tough enough to stand up to them. The MPC has consistently gone for half-point rate rises when other central Banks have being going harder, and faster. The US Federal Reserve in particular. It has pushed through three consecutive 0.75-point rate raises. This has created problems across the globe because the dollar is the world’s reserve currency, in which energy and a large basket of goods are priced. Having investors flocking to it has weakened other currencies and has clearly exacerbated Britain’s woes. But you have to play
with the cards you’re dealt, however painful that may be. Once inflation takes hold, it is desperately hard to put down – even when you have a sensible and competent government, which the one Truss has put together is not even close to being. Britain needs a governor who is willing to stand up to the government – and stand up for the Bank’s independence. Bailey needs to subtly shake his fists, as some of his predecessors were willing to do. That is counter to his instincts – and the markets know it, which is a problem for all of us. Who else can Britain rely on now the wolves are firmly at the door and the government has been taken over by Spongebob and Squarepants? Hard medicine from the Bank now might serve to stave off something worse down the track. But Bailey has to prove he can match words with actions. I’m not sure that he can. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Voices/ Editor’s Letter Berlusconi’s shock return is more bad news for Italy The former leader is back and propping up the far right after serving a political ban for tax fraud, writes David Harding Silvio Berlusconi may end up with a cabinet seat in Meloni’s alliance (Reuters) With all the headlines generated by Giorgia Meloni’s success at the Italian general election, it was easy to miss that Silvio Berlusconi has made an astonishing political comeback.
His Forza Italia party is part of the alliance that should allow her to form a government and become Italy’s first female prime minister. Berlusconi is returning to Italy’s senate, after an almost 10-year absence – though he has been an MEP since 2019 – and may even end up getting a seat in the cabinet. During the campaign, where he used social media to hammer home his message a la Trump and Bolsonaro, he said grandly that he would be a “father figure” to Meloni. In some ways, he has acted as warm-up act for the pair. It all seems vaguely amusing, the OAP lothario with an air of mischief and who looks like he has just walked out of a 1970s European disco, but it isn’t really. Centre-right Berlusconi has hitched himself to a government that legitimises the far right which will have implications far beyond Italy. The biggest reason he was not been elected for such a long time was that he was banned from holding public office for six years because of a tax fraud conviction. Berlusconi gave Putin a duvet cover with a life-sized image of the two men shaking hands in 2017 In 2013, he was convicted of paying for sex with a minor, charges he later successfully overturned, but in such circumstances, you would have thought he might have avoided jokes on TikTok during the campaign about stealing young men’s girlfriends. No chance. And, worryingly, there is his relationship with Vladimir Putin. Italy has supported Ukraine since Russia’s invasion, and steadfastly throughout every accusation of war crimes and atrocities, the disappearance of thousands of ordinary people, and dubious referendums on the part of Moscow.
But Berlusconi has long been Putin’s friend, he even gave the Russian leader a duvet cover with a life-sized image of the two men shaking hands in 2017. Last week, the kindly uncle mask slipped as Berlusconi claimed Putin had somehow been pushed into building his army up on the Ukraine border, invading and killing, then trying to install “decent people” in government in Kyiv. Those comments were worrying but may ensure that Meloni, who has pledged to back Nato, will not deviate from Rome’s support for Kyiv. Either way, Berlusconi’s political comeback is worrying. Tomorrow he turns 86. Maybe it should be time to retire. Yours, David Harding International editor Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Voices/ Letters So many nurses’ salaries could be paid from the tax cuts given to the ultra-rich The vast chasm between the Kwarteng income tax cuts for the worst and best-off workers needs constant reiteration. For minimum wage fulltimers – about £1.50 a week. For highest rate payers – £870. Nearly 600 times as much. And a lucky footballer on £250k per week? A mind-boggling £2.36m a year. This insane and immoral gift to each already ultra-rich individual would pay for 68 nurses. Alan Kirby Cornwall Dead-end street James Moore (EV running costs soar and green targets are in peril, Business, yesterday) points out that electric vehicles are becoming much more expensive to run as the cost of electricity rises sharply, and that the government is not helping by adding VAT at 20 per cent for public charging points. Perhaps one factor is the large tax revenue stream arising from the sale of petrol and diesel fuel, so the treasury has little incentive to encourage a switch to EVs, particularly in the light of last week’s tax-cutting announcements. John Wilkin Bury St Edmunds
What about pensioners? Having read most of the articles in your newspaper concerning the new prime minister’s economic policies, nowhere have I been able to find any mention of how these policies will affect the many pensioners with no or little private pension. Richard Walter Leeds Bring back Boris... Suddenly, Bojo and Rishi seem like they were the dream team! What’s happening? John Maxwell Bournemouth A cataclysmic mini-Budget I read Andrew Woodcock’s article (We’ll get UK out of endless cycle of crisis, says Starmer, News, yesterday) with interest. Keir Starmer and the Labour Party can now manifestly show who are the “grown-up” political party in this country. Although to be fair, many Conservative MPs must be holding their heads in their hands at this economic trajectory their chancellor is leading them on. This mini-Budget has been cataclysmic – and yet again it was a continuation of the leadership hustings, with the Tory hierarchy talking to their converts. It was a pre-election gung-ho statement, two years too early unless they are not telling us something! Keir Starmer is right that this party has lost fiscal credibility and Labour, with hopefully good, proactive plans, can lead the poor beleaguered country out of this never-ending spiral of crises. We all want to wake up to calm and well-considered governance, instead it appears to be a gameshow to these new kids on the block. Yes, there does need to be a growth initiative but not at the expense of everything else. So cometh the hour, cometh the man Sir Keir and lead us out of this rabbit hole debacle. Judith A Daniels Great Yarmouth
Bright spark Your article states “.... electrical products in the home are rated by how many kilowatts (kW) of electricity they consume in an hour....” (Why knowing your kilowatts is the key to saving on energy, Voices, yesterday) Appliances are certainly labelled in kW but that is a measurement of power they are capable of drawing through the meter ie the maximum rate at which they consume energy at a moment in time. It is most certainly not a measure of how much energy an appliance consumes in an hour. That is measured in kWh. To the extent that a 1kW appliance using its rated power for an hour uses 1kWh of energy, the table of appliance costs in the article is numerically correct but what a pity not to explain that kWh is the correct unit for measuring energy (and what an electricity meter measures). The table of costs is also rather muddling in that it lists gas appliances in with electrical appliances and gives everything an hourly cost when the cost of a washing machine cycle would be more useful. Peter Newbery Royal Park ‘Hit the ground’ Back in July, Liz Truss promised that if she was elected Tory leader she’d “hit the ground [sic]”. That’s exactly what she’s done as prime minister, and after Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-Budget on Friday, Sterling is hitting the ground with her. Truss’s administration of “no talents” is a car crash of a government – and it’s not even got out of the garage yet. Sasha Simic London In Liz we Truss
I think we should cut Liz Truss some slack and give her credit for living up to her campaign message that she would deliver, deliver, and deliver. After three weeks in office she has delivered billions in tax cuts to the wealthiest, delivered rising inflation and interest rates, and delivered the worst value of the pound against the dollar in history. Go Liz. I am sure the 82,000 people who chose her to be our prime minister are thrilled. Deborah Everett Manchester Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ The Big Read ‘Down the road of hell’ Jan Broberg, victim of a mind-boggling kidnap case in the 1970s when a friend of the family, trusted church member and father of five abducted her, tells her story to Sheila Flynn Jan was kidnapped twice by Bob Berchtold; they are pictured in 1974, the same year he first fled with the child to Mexico (Jan Broberg) The first time Jan Broberg was kidnapped as a child, her parents and investigators in their tight-knit, conservative Idaho community barely knew how to define a paedophile. In the
1970s, FBI agents were out of their depth when it came to child molestation, according to one of the men on the case. When it happened again two years later, the pitfalls of naivete and excessive trust became apparent. Jan was kidnapped by the same expert groomer, the same man who had insidiously infiltrated the Brobergs’ lives, twice. “They were perfect childhood years, until the day I woke up in the back of that motorhome. I had such a good childhood,” Ms Broberg tells The Independent in an exclusive interview. A Peacock true crime drama premiering next month, the limited series charts how furniture owner Bob Berchtold groomed the entire Broberg clan to get access to young Jan – including having affairs with both her mother and father. It stars Colin Hanks, Jake Lacy and Anna Paquin and is produced by Jan Broberg and her mother. No one ever wants to think their friend or relative might have nefarious intentions. No one ever wants to think that anything bad can happen in their beloved neighbourhood or congregation. But Jan, almost five decades later and a mother herself, wants people to know that this is exactly how the worst abuses go unnoticed or unpunished. Ms Broberg, who grew up to become an actress and advocate, believes that even now, nearly five decades later, those same trusting qualities continue to place young people squarely in the sights of the most manipulative predators. “As long as we adults are unwilling to talk about the fact that it is in our family, in our congregation, in our community centre, our business community, that it is someone we know ... as difficult as it is to talk about and to tell those stories and then to do something about it, it will continue to happen because you cannot rely on a child,” she says.
Jan (left) readies for school with her younger sisters at their home in Pocatello, Idaho, in 1969 (Jan Broberg) Ms Broberg grew up in quintessential small-town America. The oldest of three girls, she was born to Bob Broberg, a florist, and Mary Ann, a chorister in their Mormon community in Pocatello, Idaho. Mr Broberg played the piano every day to wake up his daughters, who became close with another family in town who attended the same church: The Berchtolds. Bob Berchtold and his wife, Gail, had five children. He was a furniture store owner and charismatic; Mary Ann was the first to introduce him to her family. The Berchtolds and the Brobergs had everything in common: They were members of the LDS
faith, the fathers were both business owners, their children were similar ages. They became fast friends; there was a “best friend” for everyone, one of the Broberg girls says in a 2017 Netflix documentary about the families, Abducted in Plain Sight, directed by Skye Borgman. The wives became close as did the husbands and the girls fantasised about marrying the Berchtold boys. Berchtold, who picked up the nickname “B” during the family’s interactions – began picking up the Broberg girls and driving them to school. “He even knew how to make sure that we became best friends with his kids and his wife,” Jan tells me. “We learned how to paint ceramics at her house. And she taught us how to make the best chocolate chip cookies ... And then Gail had this recipe, and we still have recipe cards with her name on them in our recipe file. I found them for the series to use as real props.” None of them had an inkling of what Berchtold was really doing. His attention always seemed particularly focused on Jan, but he was also working on her parents to get close to her. He finagled a sexual encounter with Mr Broberg, who teared up while admitting it in full detail publicly for the first time in the Netflix documentary. Then he kidnapped Jan under the ruse of taking her horseback riding. Instead, he drugged the 12-year-old and brought her in his motorhome to Mexico. When Jan woke up, she was restrained and alone, but voices were coming through a speaker. They were named Zeta and Zethra; they were aliens, they told Jan, and so was she. They told her that her mother was her biological parent but her biological father was alien. She had been tasked with a mission to have children with a male they had chosen, they told her. If she failed, her younger sister – who also allegedly was half alien – would be forced to replace her. When Jan’s restraints were eventually removed, she walked into the main part of the motorhome and found “B” there; her young brain believed that he was the man chosen by the aliens. The Brobergs waited days
to report her disappearance, not wanting to upset the Berchtold family and also giving “B” the benefit of the doubt. “I never had an inkling that he had sexual designs on Jan,” Mr Broberg says in the documentary. “We weren’t really sure, even then, what a child molester was ... I don’t know how we could have been so gullible when there were so many red flags.” Bob and Mary Ann Broberg raised their three girls in Idaho and were both also manipulated by Berchtold (Jan Broberg) The Brobergs were “naive”, FBI agent Pete Welsh, who worked the case, says in the Netflix show. “They don’t know things like that happen.” Eventually, with the help of Berchtold’s brother, authorities tracked the pair to Mazatlan in Mexico. “B” had married Jan because there the age of consent was 12. The
Brobergs flew to Mexico to retrieve their daughter and she was not the same girl they’d remembered. Berchtold was also returned to Idaho. Upon their return, Jan swore nothing untoward had happened. A medical examination revealed her hymen intact, despite molestation the girl later revealed. Then Berchtold’s wife, Gail, turned up at the Brobergs’ house and said that, if they didn’t drop charges against her husband, his “dirty laundry” with Mr Broberg would be aired. So Mr and Mrs Broberg signed affidavits claiming they believed Berchtold probably thought he had their permission to take their daughter – to the shock of prosecutors and the public, who had followed the case closely. The government still pursued Berchtold but he was let out on his own recognizance and moved to Utah. That’s when his affair started with Jan’s mother. His manipulation was so strong that he convinced her to have an eight-month sexual relationship with him as he struggled to maintain connections with the family – to get to Jan. Jan, meanwhile, still thought she had to complete her alien mission. She returned to school and life, despite being more standoffish, and “B” continued to secretly send her letters and still engineer meetings. Between 1975 and 1976, Berchtold was having encounters with both Mrs Broberg and her daughter. He later moved to Wyoming to run a recreation centre and two years after he fled with Jan to Mexico, she begged her parents to work there for the summer. When she threatened to hitchhike or run away, Mrs Broberg put her on a plane to Jackson Hole.
After the second abduction, Berchtold was charged with first-degree kidnapping and other charges. But he was later acquitted by reason of mental defect She stayed there for two weeks, living with “B”, and was miserable when she went home to Idaho. It wasn’t long before she disappeared, leaving a note to say she’d run away and hated her family’s religion and “screwed-up” morals. In reality, she was taken again by Berchtold from her bedroom. Her parents did not report the disappearance for two weeks. “B,” who remained in contact with the family, kept up a charade, calling to say he’d heard from Jan. He claimed to be worried that she might be working as a prostitute and asked if her family had any updates. When they finally contacted Agent Welsh, he “knew darn well that [Berchtold] was right in the middle of” it, he said in the documentary. Berchtold was traced to a motorhome in Salt Lake City decorated with poster-size pictures of Jan. Tracking calls he made from a pay phone, investigators figured out he’d enrolled Jan in a Catholic girls’ school in California. He had been pretending he was a CIA agent whose wife had been killed and had to keep the identities of his daughter and himself secret. “An investigation determined that Bob Berchtold had convinced two guys who were in jail with him, he would given them $1000 a month if they burned down” the florist shop Mr Broberg owned, Mr Welsh says in the documentary. “And they did. They not only did that, they burned down a whole half a block of
Pocatello. They were convicted ... but we could not pin it on Berchtold.” After the second abduction, Berchtold was charged with firstdegree kidnapping and other charges. But he was later acquitted by reason of mental defect and sentenced to a few months in a psychiatric facility. In recorded tapes, Berchtold blamed much of his behaviour on childhood abuse and experiences such as looking after his younger sister from a very early age. Jan, meanwhile, still felt the mission was afoot. It wasn’t until she was 16 that she really began to shake that belief. The aliens had told her that, if she hadn’t borne Berchtold a child by that age, she’d be vaporised and they’d come for her little sister. But then she turned 16, and nothing happened. However, the trauma was far from over. Jan was still processing her experience as time went on. One particular college assignment prompted her to ask her parents more questions about what happened to her and evaluate her abuse. Jan (left) poses with her parents and sisters in 2015 (Jan Broberg) “I had a few brief moments of screaming at one or the other, or both of them, on the phone when I was writing that paper,” she tells me. “Like, how come we don’t see this? What is wrong with all of us? Why are we so loving and trusting and nice? It was like that. And then it was over, I mean, any sort of blame.”
Jan went on to get married, have a son and stepchildren, and pursue a career as an actor. Berchtold went on to serve a year in jail for abusing another young girl. He’d later come after the Berchtolds for speaking and writing about their story, even getting into physical altercations. Jan and her mother worked on a self-published book, Stolen Innocence: The Jan Broberg Story, which was published in 2003. Berchtold continued to plague the family, decades later, turning up to speaking engagements and, at one point, even fighting with Jan’s Bikers Against Child Abuse (Baca) protectors. Jan got a life-long restraining order against Berchtold in 2004 after he confronted her in a courtroom – their first face-to-face meeting in years. She stood her ground and pointedly told him she would continue to tell her family’s story to stop predators like him. After that, Berchtold had little time afterwards to do more harm. He was found guilty in Utah of assaulting a Baca member protecting Jan and took his own life in 2005 before he could serve a jail sentence. Jan was informed of his death by a prosecutor and tells The Independent how receiving the information made her feel “so strange.” “I sat there and I was stunned. I was relieved, I was sad, I was angry. He got out too easy,” she says. “I was also so sad for his children and the wife – that, for all of his gifts he had as this charismatic person, that this was not just me ... the others that he had harmed and the aftermath in our lives.” After wading through “so many emotions”, Ms Broberg ultimately felt “relief” that he could no longer hurt her or her family anymore.
The Brobergs picnic in the mountains in 1971, three years before family friend Bob ‘B’ Berchtold kidnapped their oldest daughter (Jan Broberg) Ms Broberg urges people to trust their instincts with the hope that other children will be saved from abuse at the hands of a skilled predator. “It’s so important that we, as the adults, educate ourselves, listen to our spidey senses,” she says. “We wait, when the hair comes up on the back of our neck because someone at church puts their hands on the bottom of their child’s back for 10 seconds too long – and we see our child do one little shoulder motion wiggle.” That’s when everyone needs to act, she says. Both of her parents were emotional in the 2017 documentary. Mr Broberg has since passed away, which his daughter believes may be a small blessing given some of the revelations in that programme. Despite the gravity in his mind of his extramarital activity, he still wanted the incident to be included in the documentary, says Jan. His thought process was: “If what happened to me is happening to someone else, maybe ... the result isn’t the same,” says Jan. “But if somebody is manipulating someone down the road of hell to doing something, that they will then be blackmailed for that, they will be held over a barrel for that ... I want them to know, these manipulators, these master manipulators, can get you to do something so terrible.” She hopes the new show, produced by Jan and her mother, gives a realistic snapshot of how such grooming and abuse can happen. She did what she could to help the actors and the
production, even leaving handwritten letters for the cast, such as Jake Lacy who plays Berchtold. “I just had this moment where I was like, I need to write them a letter, a handwritten letter,” Jan says. “Because this has got to be so hard, for an actor to play these roles and to give them the creative license to, you know, bring your own person to it but here’s some interesting things that I wanted to let you know about my mother, my father, about Berchtold. “And [Lacy has] talked about that ... he’s like, ‘Jan is like this remarkable person, where she could write me a letter about this person and tell me all of his good qualities so that he wouldn’t be a stereotypical monster because that’s her message. It’s someone you love and trust’.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ Letter from America Britain feels less appealing to live in as the days go by With the pound tanking against the dollar, Holly Baxter weighs up if she will ever return to her homeland for good Britons still bemoan the fact that Americans can’t get fish and chips right but our country has a lot more to feel embarrassed about (Getty/iStock) Watching the pound tank from across the Atlantic is a strange feeling. All around you, your American friends are celebrating and talking about planning trips “to Europe”. Amid the cacophony, you sit silently, unsure what to think. You get paid in dollars, it’s true; you have a visit planned to the motherland during which everything will surely be more affordable. Yet
something about the news hits you right in the national pride. What happened to the persistence and the strength of pound sterling, the currency we clung to even as everyone else reached for the euro? It’s always been worth more than the dollar. It’s always been a respected currency, a steady currency, one that you could rely on. All of a sudden, American commentators on Bloomberg are talking about how the UK is an economy that has “submerged itself”. Even though your wallet is heavier, things feel like they’re looking grim. As an expat (especially one who, like me, is on a tenuous, nongreen card track visa that can be revoked at a whim), you always live with one foot in your adopted country and one in your homeland. You might get used to driving on the right side of the road instead of the left and you might integrate eye-wateringly high medical charges into your everyday life, but you’re still a Brit. You still bemoan the fact that Americans can’t get fish and chips right, or the fact that none of them seem aware of the existence of the rest of Britain outside of central London. You still cheer for Team GB at the Olympics and England during the World Cup. So when you watch your own country shooting itself in the foot, over and over and over again, you get a little embarrassed. “Did Brexit actually happen?” someone asked me at a party in the East Village a couple of weeks ago. I informed her that yes, it did happen, and no, the consequences haven’t been good. “What was it anyway?” she said, loading up a cracker with Brie. “Some kind of Trump thing?” I paused for a second in knee-jerk selfdefensive mode, then considered that the most accurate way to describe it really was, yes, “some kind of Trump thing”.
The US has its problems but at least it’s headed on a (shaky) upward trajectory after the global low point of Donald Trump There was a touch of triumphalism among American liberals when Boris Johnson was prime minister. “Now you have your own Trump!” they would say to me, a glint in their eye. They’d become so used to being the embarrassing uncle on the world stage that everyone secretly wanted to leave. Now, Britain had stood on the table and publicly soiled ourselves. Everyone was temporarily distracted by our idiotic behaviour – and hey, at least the US now has Joe Biden, who despite his many faults is at least a normal human being. There’s been less interest in Liz Truss, partly because of her lack of bombast and partly because she seems to be failing so fast that no one wants to bother getting to know her. Truly, Truss has woken up inside a Tory’s worst nightmare: the economy’s tanking on her watch, and the reigning monarch died days after meeting with her. You couldn’t make it any worse for the woman if you tried. But of course we know that the country isn’t falling apart around her because of her own personal choices; it’s too early for that. Too many years of Conservative rule have made us all look like complete fools and now everyone’s reaping what was sown. It says something that the high point of British news this year was a queue to see the Queen’s closed coffin and a cartoon depicting Paddington Bear as the grim reaper.
There was a time when my husband and I used to talk about “when we return to the UK”. We had ideas about sticking it out here for a decade or so, traveling across the States, imbibing all New York City had to offer, and then perhaps going back to London or to a nice little country abode on the Cornish or Northumbrian coast. But as time has passed, we’ve come to realise we will probably never return. The US has its problems, but at least it’s headed on a (shaky) upward trajectory after the global low point of Donald Trump. Across the Atlantic, we can only watch in horror as our beloved Britain continues to sink lower and lower, with no signs of rebounding in sight. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2 ON THIS DAY Miles Davis, pioneer of cool jazz, died on this day in 1991 (Getty) 490BC: The original Marathon was won by a breathless messenger who ran 24 miles from the scene of the Battle of Marathon to the city of Athens. “Rejoice, we conquer,” he gasped – then dropped dead.
929: King Wenceslaus of Bohemia, Good King Wenceslas of the Christmas carol, was murdered by his younger brother, Boleslaw. 1573: Caravaggio, Italian painter, was born in Italy. 1685: Judge Jeffreys was appointed lord chancellor of England. 1745: “God Save the King” was first performed at Drury Lane Theatre, arranged by Thomas Arne. 1865: Elizabeth Garrett Anderson qualified to become Britain’s first practising woman doctor. 1923: The Radio Times was first published. 1964: Harpo Marx, the silent one who chased girls and played the harp, died aged 75. 1978: Pope John Paul I died after only 33 days as pontiff. 1991: Miles Davis, the jazz trumpeter, died aged 65. He invented an entirely new sound which became known as cool jazz. On this day last year: The Prince of Wales, the Duchess of Cornwall and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge attended the glittering world premiere of the new Bond film No Time to Die. Birthdays Sir Jeremy Isaacs, TV producer and former general director of the Royal Opera House, 90; Brigitte Bardot, actor and animal rights activist, 88; Helen Shapiro, singer, 76; Jon Snow, journalist, 75; Jennifer Rush, singer, 62; Janeane Garofalo, actor and comedian, 58; Mira Sorvino, actor, 55; Mika Hakkinen, former racing driver, 54; Carre Otis, model and actor, 54; Naomi Watts, actor, 54; Hilary Duff, actress and singer, 35. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ Plane Talk CLUB CLASS Virgin Atlantic will join SkyTeam from next year but who really benefits from airline alliances, asks Simon Calder Virgin Atlantic had previously resisted any such clubs (supplied) The world has three big airline alliances: Oneworld, Star Alliance and SkyTeam. Virgin Atlantic spent 39 years steadfastly outside them all. Yet now the carrier is to join SkyTeam from “early 2023”. Virgin Atlantic’s chief executive, Shai Weiss, says: “Joining SkyTeam is an important milestone. Our membership will allow
us to enhance established relationships with our valued partners at Delta and Air France-KLM, as well as opening up opportunities to collaborate with new airlines. It will enable a seamless customer experience, with an expanded network and maximised loyalty benefits.” Well, allow me to take issue with some of that. I am not sure that there was any obstacle to Virgin Atlantic transferring passengers to or from Aeromexico, Kenya Airways or Vietnam Airlines, to name some of the further-flung members of SkyTeam. I believe passengers connecting between airlines on a single ticket have a right to, and generally receive, an experience as seamless as possible: check-in for both legs at the start of the journey, baggage checked through to the final destination, etc. Nor can I see that the network possibilities for those of us who like to fly on Virgin Atlantic will be expanded: you could always combine Sir Richard Branson’s airline with Garuda Indonesia or Saudia (though be warned that Virgin’s generous free alcohol policy is not reciprocated on the latter). But those “maximised loyalty benefits” are certainly going to materialise for frequent flyers. Aligning the carrier fully with Delta, Air France, etc, means that elite members of Virgin Atlantic’s Flying Club will get lounge access, priority check-in and “more opportunities to earn and redeem miles” on other SkyTeam members. This is all about business travellers, or wellheeled leisure passengers. Schedule analyst Sean Moulton points out that the move makes London Heathrow a hub for both Oneworld and SkyTeam – while more Star Alliance partners serve LHR than any other airport. And he says, “The move has the potential to create a true hub for Manchester – with Air France, KLM and Saudia having the potential to feed Virgin’s US flights from Manchester.” That opportunity will not affect British passengers (except, possibly, through the extent to which more links are created to meet demand from connecting overseas customers). So what does Rob Burgess, editor-in-chief of the UK frequent flyer site Head for Points think about it? His joy is not exactly
unconfined. “My wife and I have around one million Virgin points between us, so you’d expect me to be heavily invested in this issue,” he says. “My initial reaction, however, was ‘meh’. I suspect that 90 per cent of the value I will get from being in SkyTeam already arrived when the existing joint venture between Delta Air Lines, Air France and KLM launched. You can already earn and redeem Virgin points on these three airlines, and get reciprocal status benefits.” He believes the added benefit of extending Virgin’s links will not make much difference: “There is certainly nothing wrong with airlines such as Korean, XiamenAir, Tarom, Czech, etc, but for the majority of Head for Points readers they are never going to be a key part of their ‘earning’ or ‘burning’ mileage plans.” More intriguing, Mr Burgess believes, is what the Virgin move may signal about the concept of alliances – something that the two large UAE-based airlines have never bothered with. “We had all begun to think that alliances were over, and that joint ventures were the way forward. This is certainly what Emirates and Etihad believe. Either Virgin Atlantic has smelled something in the air which the rest of us have missed, or it is arriving at the party just as everyone else is heading home. Let’s see.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ Ask Simon Calder Must I really get a taxi from one terminal to another? How do you get from Heathrow Terminal 4 to Terminal 3 in the middle of the night? (PA) Q Are there any cab firms you would recommend at London Heathrow? Here’s the situation. I am flying from Heathrow via Paris to Costa Rica. The flight is at 6.20 am. I pre-booked an airport hotel at Terminal 4, but then Air France moved its services to Terminal 3. I have been told I must be there at 3.20am. Public transport isn’t running. Taxi services I have called are quoting up to £60 which is the same as it costs from
my home over an hour away! I can’t cancel the hotel as I booked it at a bargain rate. What do you advise? Name supplied A I recommend that you enjoy your night at Terminal 4, and catch the first train from that terminal’s railway station to the central area – serving Terminals 2 and 3. It leaves at 5.16am and takes just four minutes. Add a five-minute walk to the check-in area, and you will be there nicely at 5.25am. France says its minimum check-in time is 40 minutes, so that gives you 15 minutes for unexpected hold-ups. Given that the timing is fairly tight, in your position I would make my presence known at check-in. Jump the queue (politely, of course), because most passengers by then will be lining up for subsequent flights. Of course, airlines like to have all their passengers at the terminal good and early. It means they can process people at the optimum pace (for them), rather than everyone showing up shortly before check-in closes. But in your case, I think you can hold Air France responsible – and politely request the airline does all it can to get you checked in and on your way. I agree, it’s not quite the cushion that most of us would want before a long journey like yours, but in the circumstances I would certainly recommend it to save £60. And the train is free. Email your question to s@hols.tv or tweet @simoncalder Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ IndyBest THE HEAT IS ON Tamara Hinson on the portable heaters to keep you toasty We’re sorry to break it to you but colder, darker days are on the horizon. But don’t panic because we’ve come to the rescue with some brilliant portable heaters guaranteed to take the edge off the long days of winter. Like any other device, those keen to splash huge amounts of cash can easily knock a sizeable dent into their bank balance by throwing large sums at heaters that do
everything barring a quick clean of the kitchen sink. But is it necessary? In our opinion, no. Features we’d suggest looking out for when shopping for a portable heater include digital displays, timer functions and remote control functionality, all of which make it easier to crank up the heat without having to emerge from your blanket or bed. How we tested For once we were grateful for a brief respite from the summer heat. An unexpected cold snap provided the perfect opportunity to put our heaters to the test – a process that certainly took the edge off the sudden drop in temperature. We took our testing incredibly seriously, cranking temperatures up to the max and putting the devices through their paces, whether it was by lugging them to different rooms to examine their ability to warm spaces of different sizes or timing how long they took to achieve maximum heat. In short, it was hot, sweaty stuff. Although, on the plus side, we’re pretty certain our calorie burn was similar to that achieved by an hour in a Swedish sauna. Duux Threesixty smart fan and heater: £99.99, Duux
Say hello to a heater that looks nothing like a heater. Which, to be clear, is a good thing. This sleek piece of kit, designed for rooms of up to 30 sq metres, has a monochrome matte exterior which ensures it won’t clash with your carpets or cushions, and it heats up incredibly quickly. Duux claims it heats up three times as fast as your average heater and it took just a couple of minutes to warm our entire living room. We loved the design of the air outlet, which ensures an even distribution of warmth and eliminates the risk of heat-hogging dogs, cats and kids turning into trip hazards. Irrespective of where we sat, we enjoyed constant, even heat. The Duux, which has two fan speeds, three heat settings and a temperature range between 22C and 30C, can be tweaked using the control panel on the device or an app. The grey colourway is currently unavailable, but the white version is still in stock. Buy now Delonghi Capsule Hobby 2.4kW heater: £44, Amazon There’s a nod to retro style with this heater, thanks to its sleek design which brings to mind an old-style radio with chunky knobs on either side of the extra-wide carrying strap. We loved
the smoothness of the controls, which made it ridiculously easy to alter the fan speed and temperature by two large dials. Plus, it’s another one that ticks the versatility box – during hot sticky days (remember those?), there’s the option to use the fan alone. Buy now Dyson purifier hot + cool formaldehyde purifying fan heater: £649.99, Dyson First, let’s address the elephant in the room: the name, because let’s face it – “formaldehyde” isn’t top of the list when it comes to words we look for in the name of our heater. But we were pleased to learn it refers to the heater’s ability to kill the chemical (although we suspect there’s not a huge amount of it in the average household). Formaldehyde fearmongering aside, this heater, launched in early 2021, is a great, compact appliance that quickly warms medium and large rooms (it oscillates up to 350 degrees) and is easy to use, thanks to its app, voice control and remote control functionality. The upside of the eye-watering price tag is that it cools and purifies too, and top-notch Hepa filters make it especially suitable for allergy-prone people. This one is temporarily out of stock at most retailers, but you can sign up to be updated by Dyson when it is available again.
Buy now Beldray Climate Cube: £19.99, Amazon This compact heater is great for smaller homes – it heats up relatively quickly and can be easily stashed away when not in use. We loved the look and feel of the controls, which require the lightest of touches but lie flat and low to minimise the risk of accidental knocks. We could quickly scroll between the two fans speeds and choose between temperatures of 25C and 35C, and once the cold winds of winter have passed, it can be used as a fan or air cooler too (you’ll need to fill a small tank at the rear in order to use the latter feature). Buy now
Russell Hobbs retro 1.8kw horizontal/vertical grey fan heater: £19, Very Russell Hobbs’s newest heater is on-trend, surprisingly powerful and costs less than £20. With coverage of up to 20sqm, it’s perfect for bedrooms and can be used vertically or horizontally – a great feature for teens’ bedrooms, where space is often at a premium. The controls – which are easily accessible, irrespective of the heater’s position – make it easy to switch between the two power settings and turn up the heat, while the built-in handle ramps up the portability. Buy now
Dimplex MaxAir MAXAIR25B ceramic fan heater: £189.95, Aircon Centre With its shiny black chassis and 2500w of power, this is the supercar of the heating world. There are three heat settings to choose from and its oscillating motion ensures that all areas are covered, irrespective of how it’s positioned. There’s also a timer, which is ridiculously easy to set and reminded us that nothing beats the thrill of stepping into a pre-heated house on a cold, damp day. The tiny remote control (which weighs about the same as a pencil) makes it easy to control from afar, and its tall, slimline design was also a hit, providing brilliant coverage – as much as we love warm feet, we loved the top-to-toe blast this heater provided. Buy now
Draper Tools PTC electric space heater: £45.43, Amazon This compact heater reminded us of the wind machines used in films to give Hollywood superstars that sexy windblown look, although that’s where the similarities end. Its cheery ruby exterior (picture a pair of cherry red Dr Martens boots and you’ll know the colour we’re talking about) offers a welcome alternative to the usual greys and blacks used for heaters, and the brilliant dial-style controls make it easy to fully customise the heat output. One of the dials can be used to crank up the temperature by tiny increments, while the other allowed us to choose between half power or full power, and to use the heater with the fan or without. It’s easy to operate and we loved the smoothness with which the fan could be tilted back and forth. Our one gripe? The cable, which comes in at a measly 1.3m. Buy now
MeacoHeat 1.8kw heater: £39.99, Meaco Keen to downsize your electricity bills? Meaco’s 1.8kW heater, which costs under £80, has a nifty motion sensor which means it will automatically turn on when you enter the room, then power down when you leave, minimising the risk of burning your hard-earned cash on unwanted hot air. It’s another heater which offers plenty of opportunities for customisation, whether it’s with the option to set the timer for one, two or four hours, and to switch between low and high modes. Buy now
Dunelm chimnea style flame effect heater: £100, Dunelm Love the cosiness of a fire but worried about accidentally singeing yourself, the kids or the dog? This might just be the solution. Designed to resemble a chiminea, Dunelm’s flameeffect heater is compact and lightweight but will quickly heat up small and medium rooms up to 30 sq metres. The incredibly realistic faux flames were our favourite effect but we also loved the controls, which have a wood-effect finish that coordinates with the heater’s three sturdy legs. Although we’d have liked to see more temperature specifics (the dial simply lists low and high heat) we loved the simplicity and speed with which we could crank up the temperature and the fan power. Plus, we liked the option to use the heater with or without the artificial flame. Buy now The verdict The Duux threesixty smart fan is a brilliant, hi-tech heater which will add a touch of class – not to mention instant warmth – to any home. Draper Tools’s PTC electric space heater is another powerful gadget that’s easy on the eye, while MeacoHeat’s 1.8kW heater is brilliant value, although we’re not going to lie –
being prone to laziness, it was the motion sensor that helped to win us over with this one. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ Lifestyle ‘Sexual communication is a foreign language for many’ As the internet continues to ridicule rock star Adam Levine’s alleged attempts at sexting, Matthew Neale tries to unravel why men are so bad at typing out their erotic sweet nothings Culture and entertainment ends up teaching men how to sext badly (iStock) Picture the scene. It’s New Year’s Eve, and you’ve just stepped away from the clamour of the coked-up boys and their NFT portfolios to get some air outside. A stranger comes out to join
you, and you feel the grip on your Aldi prosecco tighten a little when you notice how handsome he is. Minutes pass in seconds. Something wild and intoxicating is in the air, louder than the EDM playlist and thicker than the plumes of cigarette smoke. Then it happens: he leans in slowly, places his hand awkwardly on the small of your back, and whispers those seven little words in your ear: “I may need to see the booty.” Now that we’ve all resoundingly dunked on Maroon 5 singer Adam Levine and his allegedly extramarital sweet nothings, perhaps it’s time to draw a line under it. Are the memes fantastic? Of course. Does repurposing the messages in the context of a real-life conversation make for a passable opening hook to an article on sexting? The jury’s out. But do phrases like “that body is absurd” and “it is truly unreal how fucking hot you are” really represent a terrifying new plateau of societal cringe? Come on. Let’s be honest: if a comprehensive transcript of all your horny correspondence was published, would you stand by every word of it? If you were raised as a cishet man, as I was, I’m going to take a punt and say the chances that you’ve written something breathtakingly unsexy to a woman at some point in your life are hovering around the 100 per cent mark. Clearly this isn’t just a problem for pop stars in their forties. Something is rotten in the state of the internet, and it’s going to take more to sort it out than disapprovingly tutting at the man who wrote “Moves Like Jagger”. Attempts at something a little more lyrical often turn out to be even worse. The Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’s declaration of “I love you, alive girl” to girlfriend Lauren Sanchez – glimpsed in a bundle of alleged text messages published by The National Enquirer in 2018 – sticks in the memory, appropriately enough for sounding like an AI robot’s first attempt at writing a Maroon 5 song. Even then, we’re only looking at choice pickings from the last few years; one peek into the state of play a century ago, particularly James Joyce’s unforgettably vivid “love letter” to Nora Barnacle in 1904, should be enough to dispel any
suggestions that we left behind a halcyon era of more refined horniness. Ness Cooper, a clinical sexologist, therapist and writer, says that part of the problem is that men don’t actually talk enough about sex. The difference is that some of that communication needs to take place before crash-landing into the DMs. “While men may be more open talking about sex to intimate sexual partners, including in fun formats such as sexting, they are often hesitant to discuss sex and sexual pleasure to others, such as friends and even healthcare providers when sexual issues arise,” she explains. Allow yourself to get things wrong, as long as your sexting is consensual and the other person is comfortable, anything can be sexy What often happens is that when men seeking to hook up with women get their clumsy advances rejected, they assume that women simply aren’t as interested in sex – or worse, devolve into misogynistic tropes to protect their bruised ego. That frequently isn’t the case. “This may make men seem more forward when suggesting things around sex (including in sexting), yet their needs and desires may be on the same level as reciprocal female partners,” Cooper says. If there’s clearly no understanding of consent on display from the offset, why would anyone expect a safe and/or pleasurable evening to follow?
When you do screw up, Cooper adds, own it and listen to any advice you’re lucky enough to receive. “Allow yourself to get things wrong,” she says. “As long as your sexting is consensual and the other person is comfortable, anything can be sexy. It’s about experimenting with what works for you and your partner(s), and that’s also going to be different each time you sext.” The problem isn’t just that men aren’t being taught good sexual communication, but that they’ve grown up bombarded by culture and entertainment that teaches them how to do it badly – and that it works. We’re constantly assured – via Pepé Le Pew through to Ryan Gosling’s character in Crazy Stupid Love – that not taking “no” for an answer exemplifies confidence, romance, and ultimately success in the form of sex. No wonder young men are confused when it transpires that the world doesn’t work that way, and discover that their plucky, never-say-die attitude to romance is actually a creepy, please-leave-me-alone ticket to a harassment lawsuit. Anne Hodder-Ship, a sex and relationship expert based in the US, is keen to point out that men aren’t given great tools to convey their horniness by society – but that they do need to learn. “Sexual communication is a foreign language for many people, but for anyone who has sexual interactions with other people, we’re all required to learn how to speak this foreign language with no handbook, no one to ask for help, no class to take,” they say. “[It’s] not because of malicious intent, but because of this total ineptitude that technically isn’t our fault.”
Adam Levine with wife Behati Prinsloo in 2020 (Getty) Like any skill, it takes work to get good at it. And like any skill worth getting good at, there will always be an abundance of charlatans and snake-oil salesmen ready to tell you there’s a faster and easier way. Unsurprisingly, even for people who might see that worldview as anything other than a joyless dystopia, viewing half the population as a means to an end is also not, it turns out, a great way to get laid. You may have to actually get to know people and imagine that their value transcends that of a blow-up doll. “As inconvenient as this is, there is no script to memorise that you can learn and use until the day you die,” Hodder-Ship says. “We are not all robots. Everyone is unpredictable, and we’re all weird in different ways. So we have to engage with people knowing that. If somebody has sold you this idea that there’s a cheat code, you’ve been scammed.” In other words, if you want to get good at sexting, you’re going to have to do the boring stuff: sharing stimulating, mutually enjoyable conversations; taking an interest in people and their desires; reading an entire article or a book to the end without deciding that it’s all woke nonsense written by beta cucks, or whatever Ben Shapiro is selling you this week. “The internet is primarily made up of garbage content, cat videos and porn,” Hodder-Ship laughs. “That means we have to navigate intentionally. So if there’s a headline that’s promising
‘the number one way to make her come 40 times every day’ or ‘here are the 10 ways to make sure she always answers your DMs’ – anything like that, don’t click on it.” Wait, not even for research? “You can be curious, read it for fun, but that is not the stuff that’s actually going to teach you how [to communicate effectively]. That’s the stuff that’s going to teach you how to get made fun of like Adam Levine.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ TV WELCOME, MATT Andrew Buchan talks to Nick Hilton about playing a former health secretary alongside Kenneth Branagh’s Boris Johnson ‘I only met Kenneth Branagh as Boris, which was surreal’: Andrew Buchan, who plays Matt Hancock in ‘This England’, discusses the new series (PA) Andrew Buchan is not getting political. This is despite the actor, who played Andrew Parker Bowles in The Crown, taking on the role of Matt Hancock, alongside Kenneth Branagh’s Boris Johnson, in Sky’s This England. This impartiality is both by edict
of the show’s publicity department – which has forbidden questions about politics – and the actor himself. “I’m definitely not one of those people who sits down at a dinner party and opens up the chat with political debate,” he tells me. “I’m not that guy.” Perhaps that’s not what you’d expect to hear from an actor who cut his teeth in the BBC’s Westminster drama Party Animals, starred in Sky One’s Cabinet Office thriller Cobra and now brings his chops to Michael Winterbottom’s dramatisation of the early months of the Covid-19 crisis. Yet for this character, he thinks his indifference to politics might have helped him “because I might have been tempted to colour Matt in a certain way”, he muses. “If I had an incredibly strong opinion of him one way or the other, maybe that would’ve filtered in.” His equivocal stance on Hancock (whom he exclusively refers to as “Matt”, like an old, slightly trying, friend), a man who has divided family gatherings – both literally and figuratively – for the past two years, is typical of the studied neutrality of This England. The project’s progenitor, Winterbottom, has made overtly political (and overtly left-wing) films before, like The Road to Guantanamo and The Shock Doctrine, alongside movies such as 24 Hour Party People and TV series The Trip. But for all that This England highlights the mistakes made in the government’s handling of the crisis, it is not the raging antiBoris polemic that many were expecting. And Hancock gets off very lightly. “With Matt, the main thing for me playing the man was not to go in there and play people’s opinions of the man,” says Buchan, “but literally purely and simply to play what was written for me on the page.” This involved turning to some of Hancock’s former colleagues to punch through a public perception now overshadowed by grainy CCTV footage of him snogging his lover in the midst of the pandemic. “What I’d gleaned from certain people who worked closely with him,” he tells me, “[was] that the man was obsessed with planning. I think that definitely comes across in the script.”
Buchan as Matt Hancock in ‘This England’ (Sky) Of course, the biggest story about This England – other than Kenneth Branagh’s extraordinarily distracting prosthetics – has been its timing. Not only does it follow hot on the heels of Johnson’s plummet from power, but, by most scientific reckoning, we are not entirely out of the woods with the pandemic either. We certainly weren’t when the project was announced back in January 2021 (when the UK was still in a national lockdown): is it too soon to tell this story? “I’m not really sure I can comment on that,” replies Buchan, succinctly. “It’s just a factual piece of history. One of the biggest things to happen for a generation. It’s a story that needs to be told. If it’s too raw and too soon, understandably, for people, then obviously steer clear. But if ever a story needed to be told about what went on behind the thought process that led to certain decisions, it’s this, surely.” I’m not wholly convinced. I ask him what this dramatisation has achieved that a documentary, for example, wouldn’t have. “I think Michael obviously has his own reasons,” he says. “The characters are bringing more of a fictional licence to it. So you can maybe explore a little more than just in a black and white documentary.” And black and white This England is not: it’s a vision of British politics in billowing technicolour, led by a Kenneth Branagh performance of cartoonish grandeur.
“I’ve never actually met Ken,” he tells me. “I’ve met someone dressed as Boris Johnson. And the person dressed as Boris Johnson, who claimed to be Ken Branagh, would chat out of character between scenes and I’d think to myself, I mean, this sounds like Kenneth Branagh…” This was despite the cast and crew being sequestered away in Norfolk for the duration of production, staying in brick and flint cottages and spending weekends enjoying solitary walks. “[Branagh’s] prosthetics call was so early that he was in there way before the rest of us, and he’d leave way after the rest. I never actually met Ken as Ken. I only met Ken as Boris, which was surreal.” Like the characters depicted in This England, Buchan is no stranger to the privilege associated with esteemed institutions. After a modern languages degree at Durham University, he trained at Rada, Britain’s most famous drama school. Future Hollywood stars like Tom Hiddleston and Andrea Riseborough were in his graduating class. But it was a far cry from most of his upbringing. It was his father who received the call to say that he had been admitted to the illustrious acting course. “I was working as a concierge at a hotel in Bolton at the time,” he says. “And he had got a call from the principal and said, ‘he’s actually at work at the minute.’ So he phoned the hotel receptionists, who were on the other side of the lobby, and they screamed, ‘Andy! Someone’s on the phone! He sounds quite important!’ And that’s how I found out about getting into Rada. As the concierge at a hotel. In Bolton.”
If ever a story needed to be told about what went on behind the thought process that led to certain decisions, it’s this I want to draw parallels between Oxford – alma mater of both Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock – and Rada, but Buchan isn’t really having it. “I’m not gonna place too much importance on it,” he demurs. “You can either act or you can’t, and that’s what all the teachers tell you. In drama school, what they do is give you little devices for your kitbag that may help you in the future.” And his post-Rada career exhibited a similar lack of affect. “I came out of drama school and had to get a part-time job, which was with Bulldog Broadband. And I worked with about seven Ghanaians and just had the absolute time of my life.” At no point in our conversation – which is conducted by phone, with Buchan tucked away in a Marylebone churchyard where the bells seem to toll every time I ask a particularly penetrating question – does Buchan light up as much as when talking about his time at Bulldog Broadband. “My agent would phone and say, ‘Oh, you’ve been offered this at the RSC.’ And I’d say, ‘I don’t think I want to do that; I’m having a lovely time here.’” “The Ghanaians would bring me Jollof rice every day to eat. They’d change the screensaver on my computer to the famous waterfalls in Accra. I literally just had the best time,” he says, with a sigh.
And if you doubt the sincerity of this seemingly incongruous story – he is, after all, no longer working for Bulldog Broadband, having starred in dozens of TV shows, from playing the lead in Garrow’s Law to his turn as grieving father Mark Latimer in Broadchurch, and Hollywood movies, such as All the Money in the World – as we conclude our call, the publicist jumps back on the line and tells him that her family is from Ghana. Hearing this, I suspect as I listen in, is a source of far greater interest and excitement to him than talking about Matt Hancock. Portraying a grief-stricken Mark Latimer in ‘Broadchurch’ (ITV) It’s a transformation that Hancock himself is possibly undergoing. He sounds more excited talking now about crypto than he ever did when defending the NHS. “He’s obviously a clever chap but he’s also very ambitious,” is Buchan’s judgement, which is as close as he comes to volunteering a political opinion. And so how did he feel when, after wrapping filming, Hancock’s clinch with aide Gina Coladangelo made front-page news and ended both his marriage and tenure at the Department of Health? “This should be a huge box set if you think about it,” he tells me, “that’s where my head went at that moment. It was slightly ridiculous to think that we could cover the whole thing because it was such a long chapter in history, and ongoing.” So he wouldn’t be tempted then, to don the NHS pin or the black turtleneck, and reprise his role as Hancock, perhaps in an
office romcom about Matt and Gina? “I think that would be a no. I’ve got rid of him.” ‘This England’ begins on Sky Atlantic tonight at 9pm. It is also available on Now Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ TV review YES MINISTER Reality show ‘Make Me Prime Minister’ involves ambitious candidates trying to prove they have what it takes to be Channel 4’s alternative PM, says an intrigued Sean O’Grady Darius Nasimi was the first ‘PM’ to be fired (Channel 4) ★★★★☆ Given the state of British politics, I’m not sure that using a reality TV format to choose our next prime minister is such a terrible idea. Of course, Make Me Prime Minister (Channel 4) isn’t actually designed to do this – that’s the task of a tiny
handful of unrepresentative Tory activists in Liz Truss’s case – but rather to entertain and to educate us a little. I have to say, having been badly jaundiced by over-exposure to politics and politicians over some decades, I am pleasantly surprised at how well the show works. Somehow it actually manages to make the political process look like God’s work. A minor miracle. Basically, it’s a bit of a rip-off of The Apprentice, with two teams of members of the public taking it in turns to be their “team leader”, ie PM, and to take on assignments and make fools of themselves. The Lord Sugar role is split between Alastair Campbell, exLabour spin doctor and Baroness Warsi, the former Tory cabinet minister. They’re quite the pair of tough cookies, and don’t hold back, but mercifully they don’t try to emulate the abrasive, scornful grumpiness of the progenitor of the Amstrad. This week’s task is to come up with a bright idea about education. This is then researched with a bunch of primary school pupils, launched to some cynical trouble-making journalists, presented with a speech to an audience of the voting public, and duly voted on. There’s then a bit of volatility when Campbell and Warsi ask the losing team’s “PM” – Darius Nasimi – whether he’d like to resign, or else, nominate a member of his “cabinet” to be considered for expulsion from the series. Alastair Campbell is one of the judges (ITV/Shutterstock)
Unlike in real life, the PM’s decision is not final, and it’s Campbell and Warsi who choose who gets fired. Darius tries to dump on a couple of his ministers, but such is his unpopularity with the voters that they feel obliged to jettison him. Interestingly, Darius is actually the one most likely to get the top job in real life. He’s already been a Tory candidate and in full possession of a moving back story – smuggled into Britain as a baby in the back of a van as his family escaped the Taliban. He’s a good public speaker, but he has terrible gimmicky ideas, can’t command the loyalty of his team, and suffers badly from excessive self-confidence. For some reason, he reminds me of David Cameron… Even with Jackie “I have the power” Weaver on his team – the lockdown internet star of that rowdy viral parish council meeting – he can’t make his policy of one compulsory outdoor lesson per week seem consequential or useful. After returning from a humiliating 72 per cent to 28 per cent drubbing in the voting, he still thinks himself brilliant. His levels of self-delusion are dangerously high, even for a politician on the make. Still, one to watch. By contrast, the victorious PM, Natalie Balmain, is much more sincere and authentic. Her proposal for putting vocational lessons in the curriculum at least has some connection to the real world. She’s a hesitant speaker and prone to tears but her public pitch works, and she handles the press marginally better than Darius. Or, indeed, Kwasi Kwarteng after he crashed the pound. ‘Make Me Prime Minister’ airs Tuesdays at 9.15pm on Channel 4 and is available on All 4 Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ Film ‘I was obsessed... Marilyn was tragic and unknowable’ Julianne Nicholson is terrifying as Marilyn Monroe’s mother in the incendiary Netflix film ‘Blonde’. She discusses with Adam White why it has been both ‘revered and brutalised’ Nicholson: ‘I feel like my name isn’t mentioned without ‘underrated’ going before it’ (Victoria Will) As a teenager, Julianne Nicholson was a Marilyn Monroe “fangirl”. The Emmy-winning star of Mare of Easttown and the
jungle thriller Monos devoured every book she could find on her. She watched her films, listened to compilation albums of her songs, had photographs of her taped up in her locker. “I was obsessed,” she recalls. “I thought she was so beautiful and tragic and kind of unknowable.” Now, a few decades later, she’s playing her mother in a movie so incendiary that everyone involved – including star Ana de Armas – has been forced to rush to its defence. Nicholson, to her credit, admits that it won’t be for everyone. Particularly those who don’t want to see her as a child abuser in the grips of schizophrenia. Nicholson, all ocean-green eyes and freckles, is calling from her daughter’s bedroom in Hampshire, sunlight beaming through the window behind her. She’s just moved to the UK from New York with her actor husband Jonathan Cake – a native Brit – and their children, after a pitstop at the Venice Film Festival to watch Blonde for the first time. She was nervous – her teenage adoration of Marilyn made her feel “protective” of the star’s memory, right down to the women who’ve got to play her on screen – “but Ana blew me away”. Did that sense of protectiveness of Marilyn’s memory extend to Blonde itself? “Yes,” Nicholson says softly. She repeats it, more decisively this time. “I think the book was written with such love, as is the script. Meeting Andrew and talking to him about the process and the years he’s put into the project and the story he wanted to tell… it felt totally worthwhile and special.” Blonde distils Marilyn Monroe’s short life into a parade of ghoulish encounters and existential hits to the soul. She’s transformed into a pound of flesh for America to feast upon. That premise – from writer and director Andrew Dominik, who adapted Joyce Carol Oates’s doorstopper of a bestseller – has understandably got Blonde into trouble already. An impressionistic art film punctuated by scenes of abuse, orgies and flashes of joy curdling into misery – plus a talking foetus! – it’s been called “ridiculously vulgar” by The New Yorker and “a slow-motion death march” by NPR. The Independent’s Amanda Whiting dubbed it “a new low” in Hollywood’s treatment of the star. Others have been more kind, with Mark Kermode writing
in The Observer that it’s a “gothic melodrama [and] fever dream”. On the review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, Blonde currently sits at a delicious 52 per cent “fresh” – so close to “rotten” that you can practically smell it about to turn. “I think it’s a remarkable film,” Nicholson says. “But it’s already been revered and brutalised, and I get both sides. I imagine it’s just going to get more of that as it goes.” If Blonde is a Marilyn Monroe biopic that’s been doused in petrol and set on fire, Nicholson plays the match that ignites it. In just 15 minutes of screentime as Marilyn’s mother Gladys, Nicholson has a nervous breakdown, speeds through the streets of Hollywood as it goes up in flames and tries to drown her daughter in the bath. “I feel like I need to prep certain people in my family,” she says, grimacing. “Or, dare I say, actually Nicholson as Marilyn mother Gladys in discourage them from watching it. I’m Monroe’s ‘Blonde’ (Matt Kennedy/Netflix) often cast in darker dramas, so when they go through my work now, they’re like” – she lets out a tired sigh – “‘Here we go again!’ This time, I’m just gonna say, ‘Listen, you don’t have to watch it.’” There seems to be a bit of a disconnect between some of the reactions to the film and the spirit in which it was made – both Dominik and De Armas, for instance, have condemned the adults-only NC-17 certificate it’s received in the US. It means Blonde joins a murky lineage that includes Showgirls, Emmanuelle 2 and, um, Flesh Gordon Meets the Cosmic Cheerleaders. I admit I found Blonde a lot less objectionable than I expected. “I too thought it would be more explicit,” Nicholson says. “I feel like I see much more sexually explicit or violent films regularly that are for seven/eight/nine-year-old kids to be watching, which is terrible. So much of what we see [in Blonde] is artistic and beautiful, but I wonder if it’s because the sex and violence here provoke feelings in us that are not normally what
happens when we’re watching a more straightforward, R-rated movie. I don’t know if it makes people uncomfortable.” One of her big hopes for the film is that it might introduce her to people. “Which might make them want to look a little deeper into work I’ve done, or maybe it’ll remind someone of me,” she says. “I expect a lot of directors I admire will be curious about it.” But she’s also pragmatic when it comes to potential outcomes – Nicholson’s career has never been linear, always a zigzag. Even the Emmy didn’t feel like a big shift. “It’s the rare actor who gets the part that then changes everything,” she says. “We think that all the time. That’s the perception. But it’s still a fucking slog. Like, ‘Oh my god, am I still not getting that offer?’” Nicholson and Kate Winslet in ‘Mare of Easttown’ (HBO/Sky) There have been more than a couple of false starts. In 2000, she was a few years out of drama school when she was handpicked by Steven Spielberg to lead a supernatural drama series he was producing called The Others – Nicholson had worked with Spielberg’s wife Kate Capshaw on a romcom called The Love Letter a year before. The Others was spooky and ambitious (and all on YouTube, if you care to look) but was cancelled after 12 episodes. She had a brief run on Ally McBeal soon after, starred in a few more short-lived TV shows, and played supporting parts in films such as Kinsey, Black Mass and I, Tonya. Seeing her steal
scenes is almost like being invited into a secret club. Call it The Cult of Julianne Nicholson. Whenever she gets a rare showcase, like the punch-to-the-gut 2017 indie Who We Are Now – in which she plays a destructive, desperate mother fighting for custody of her young son – critics howl about the “terrific, unsung Julianne Nicholson”, or that she’d win an Oscar “if there’s any justice in this sick, sad world”. Does she ever notice the words that tend to crop up around her? “Like underrated?” she laughs. “That’s honestly been the story of the last 10 years or so. I feel like my name isn’t mentioned without ‘underrated’ before it. And that’s fine! But it’s a strange feeling.” She remembers how surreal it was to win the Emmy and go to awards dos for Mare of Easttown, the HBO murder mystery starring Kate Winslet. People would approach her to say how much they loved her work. “When I’m not on a set, I don’t really go out a lot,” she says. “I’m not very ambitious, so it sometimes feels like I’m just acting in a void. Like I do the work and then I just go back to my life. So it’s really moving to then meet people in the business and hear them say nice things, or receive a lot of kindness from them.” Which is a roundabout way of saying that she’d like to become less surprised that people have noticed her. What might help is getting bigger parts. “This sounds funny,” she admits, “but I’d like my characters to be more front and centre in the story moving forward. I love being a part of ensembles, but I’m at a place now where I’d like to become more involved.” When she’s working on something, she finds that she learns more and more about her characters as she plays them. “But when you only have four of five scenes, then it means the character gets closed [early]. I want to go deeper.” That’s Nicholson’s dream. Plus, she adds, no more child trauma. If anything other than Nicholson links Blonde, Monos, Mare of Easttown and her 2020 HBO limited series The Outsider, it is violence inflicted on or by children. Hardly the nicest of coincidences. She recalls something she told her agent at the
start of this year – halfway between a joke and an order. “If you send me one more dead kid, I swear I’m leaving.” ‘Blonde’ is on Netflix Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Section 2/ TV review Ageing provocateur Jeff Bridges’ riveting thriller ‘The Old Man’ proves that the spy genre can achieve poignance, says Amanda Whiting Diminished king: Bridges as the elderly but awol CIA agent Dan Chase (FX) ★★★★☆ At first it’s hard to believe The Old Man could be a spy thriller. The Disney Plus series opens with mighty Jeff Bridges groaning to put on socks. His elderly but awol CIA agent – the too aptly named Dan Chase – makes doctor’s appointments to discuss
ailments he doesn’t even have. “When I was a little girl, you were a king,” his daughter tells him, seemingly testing out lines for dad’s eulogy. Soon, though, the diminished king’s past catches up with him, forcing a return to imperial form. Turns out it’s like riding a bike. By the end of the first hour, Dan’s polishing off the upstarts sent to apprehend him with the kind of lethal timing that belongs in a Bond film. When one foe spits, “Fuck you, old man,” at the end of a drag-out fistfight, Dan has his dogs – who must have been lurking nearby the entire time – finish him. Why didn’t he call in the dogs earlier? Probably because this way looks cooler. Based on Thomas Perry’s 2017 novel, this seven-episode series takes its time in fleshing out exactly what mysterious misdeed, committed during the Soviet-Afghan War, Dan’s been on the run from these past 40 years. It also dangles the connection between Dan and Harold Harper (John Lithgow), the FBI Gman who’s been called back from retirement to pursue him. Ultimately, the particulars don’t matter as much as the personalities involved. The Old Man is a show about how far these men will go – even near the end of their lives – to save themselves. Alia Shawkat and John Lithgow as FBI agents (FX) The action is interrupted by flashbacks that reluctantly connect the past to the present. We see Dan, played by Bill Heck in the
1980s, when he was a young idealist among the Mujahideen, and we watch him make the reckless decision to desert the cause. Heck is compelling in his role, as are Alia Shawkat as Harold’s stone-faced protegee and EJ Bonilla as an agent who threatens to unearth Harold’s secrets. Too many of the series’ characters are prone to unnatural speechifying, but usually they get around to saying something of interest. Bridges, though, is captivating playing the many sides of his wizened spook – a widow haunted by his dead wife, a father confronting his mortality, an irrepressible charmer who manages to snag a date (a tender, affecting Amy Brenneman) on the lam. The garden-variety spy patter could be lifted from Taken or Mission: Impossible, but Bridges delivers it in a convincing growl. “Any more you send at me, I’m sending back in bags,” Dan tells Harold in his own “very particular set of skills” moment. “Anyone you send at my kid, I’m sending back in pieces.” So many of Hollywood’s secret agents – James Bond, Ethan Hunt – refuse to get old and fair enough. It’s a lot less fun to watch a creaky old man who has trouble with his socks muster the strength for one last sleeper hold. But Dan and Harold don’t refuse to give up spy life; they just can’t escape it. It’s their sombre reluctance that lends this familiar cat-and-mouse thriller poignance to transcend the genre. The Old Man is on Disney Plus Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Business Record high for food prices as they rise 10.6% in a year More than three in four Britons say they will be ‘moderately or severely affected’ by the cost of living crisis (PA) R O RY S U L L I VA N Food inflation has reached an all-time high after prices soared by 10.6 per cent in the year to September. This is up from the 9.3 per cent recorded in August by the British Retail Consortium (BRC)-NielsenIQ index.
Over the past year, fresh food products spiked by a record 12.1 per cent, rising from 10.5 per cent last month. The spiralling cost of food has been driven in part by the war in Ukraine, which has made products like vegetable oil more scarce. Some items have been adversely affected by a drought in Europe. However, the price of fruit such as strawberries and tomatoes has dropped because of the prolonged period of sunshine. Rising food prices have contributed to the worst inflation seen in the UK since the early 1980s, with economists predicting that the 10.1 per cent level reached in August will grow further. Amid such economic pressures, Helen Dickinson, the head of the BRC, urged the government to freeze planned increases in business rates, saying it would allow retailers to charge the public less for goods. “Retailers are battling huge cost pressures from the weak pound, rising energy bills and global commodity prices, high transport costs, a tight labour market and the cumulative burden of government-imposed costs,” she said. “And, with business rates set to jump by 10 per next April, squeezed retailers face an additional £800m in unaffordable tax rises. Government must urgently freeze the business rates multiplier to give retailers more scope to do more to help households.” Mike Watkins, head of business insight at NielsenIQ, said that 76 per cent of Britons fear they will be moderately or severely affected by the cost of living crisis in the next three months. This is significant increase from the summer, when 57 per cent of people expressed concern. The government has been accused of gambling with the economy by increasing borrowing and reducing tax at a time of financial instability. Kwasi Kwarteng, the chancellor, announced the measures in his mini-Budget on Friday, which set out Liz Truss’s “plans for growth”. The announcement spooked investors, leading the pound to plunge to an all-time low against the US dollar.
Labour described the government’s approach as a “very risky casino-style gamble”, while Huw Pill, the Bank of England’s chief economist, acknowledged yesterday that interest rates may have to be lifted again to reduce inflation to 2 per cent. “It is hard not to draw the conclusion that all this will require significant monetary policy response,” he said. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Business ‘Serious headwinds’ for Daily Mail see newsrooms for site and paper merge In a joint letter to staff, the editors admitted that the war in Ukraine and the ongoing cost of living crisis have caused problems for the busienss (Getty) SAMUEL LOVETT SENIOR NEWS CORRESPONDENT
The Daily Mail and Mail Online website are to bring their newsrooms “closer together” – a major development for the publications, which have traditionally sought to maintain strict independence from one another. Ted Verity, the Mail Newspapers editor-in-chief, and Danny Groom, the Mail Online editor and publisher, told staff the aim was “to significantly improve the quality of all our products by ending unnecessary duplication”. “For years, we’ve had multiple journalists working for the Mail’s titles writing and processing rival versions of the same stories,” the two editors wrote in a joint letter circulated yesterday. “Now the time has come to take the next step in the digital revolution by bringing our two superb news gathering operations – the Mail and Mail Online – much closer together to fully harness their formidable story-getting power.” The editors admitted that the war in Ukraine and the ongoing cost of living crisis have brought “serious headwinds for our business,” but insisted that the move “will help our titles be even more successful” and “more influential”. Under the DMG Media umbrella, the titles have often produced rival versions of stories for print and online but will now share content across the two platforms – a move that is expected to emulate the model adopted by the Mail’s sports departments, which have been collaborating across print and digital for more than three years. In avoiding staff doubling up and chasing the same stories, bosses hope that the Mail’s journalists will be able to dedicate more time to producing original content across all three publications. As a result, the newsrooms are expected to remain editorially separate — though both Mr Groom and David Dillon, editor of the Mail on Sunday, report to Mr Verity, who has overseen increasingly closer collaboration within DMG Media since taking over as editor-in-chief. A senior source said that the change in operations will not usher in a raft of redundancies at the Daily Mail, the Mail on Sunday and the Mail Online, the latter of which is read by more than 24
million people each month, and stressed that the move does not amount to a merger. However, it’s understood that staff at the publications are waiting to receive assurances about their future. In their letter, Mr Verity and Mr Groom wrote that further information will be provided in the week ahead about efforts to better collaborate across the Mail brands. “Naturally everyone will be wondering: what does this mean in practice for me and my immediate colleagues? The answer very much depends on which area you work in: there’s no one size fits all. “That’s why, starting this week, we will be talking to all news and production staff to give further details – and to hear how you think working practices can be improved by all the advantages of the digital age.” The move comes on the same day that John Witherow, editor of The Times, announced that he would be stepping down after nearly a decade in the role. He has been appointed chair of Times Newspapers. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Business/ Inside Business Kwarteng just chose the wrong business tax to cut Retailers are under huge pressure. In April they face a 10 per cent tax hike (EPA) JAMES MOORE CHIEF BUSINESS COMMENTATOR Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-car crash is a failure of historic proportions. The best of it is, the supposed tax-cutting chancellor couldn’t even cut the right tax. We’re talking about
business levies. Corporation tax was the one he chose to attack, scrapping the increases planned by Rishi Sunak and setting the headline rate at 19p. So far, so wrong. Britain has for some time had the lowest headline rate of corporation tax in the G7 but also the lowest level of business investment. Previous chancellors said their purpose in cutting it was to encourage that. It failed to do so. However, the biggest bugbear for a good number of businesses, retailers in particular, isn’t corporation tax either at 19p or 24p or... take your pick. It is, instead, business rates. And they are causing real problems. The level a business pays is based on the rateable value of their premises, which creates perversity from the outlet. For example, a small chain of bookshops in the south of England – they still exist – will end up paying proportionately much more than Amazon will. The latter cites its vast warehouses where property is cheap and rates are correspondingly low. However, the real problem today is that rates are increased every April based on September’s CPI inflation. Right away, you should be able to see why that’s causing a fuss. CPI inflation is likely to top 10 per cent this month, which means rate-paying businesses are going to get thumped with a massive tax hike at the beginning of the new financial year. The British Retail Consortium (BRC) reckons its members stump up roughly a quarter of the tax, members which are already grappling with nightmarish cost pressures. There is the pound’s government-inspired plunge, surging energy bills and global commodity prices, rising transport costs and wage bills as a result of the tight labour market. Throw in the burden of the extra bills the government has thrown at them through a variety of failed policies including, yes, Brexit, and is it any wonder that shop price inflation is heading north at a rapid rate? The BRC’s latest data, released this morning, shows that shop price inflation accelerated to 5.7 per cent in September, compared to August’s 5.1 per cent.
Food inflation is proving to be particularly problematic: it jumped to 10.6 per cent from 9.3 per cent. Throwing in a 10 per cent tax hike on top of that lot is a bit like chucking a lit match into the middle of a petrol forecourt after a tanker spillage. Freezing rates in a mini-Budget would therefore actually have made some kind of sense, even if it were pricey and only temporary. It might have taken some of the heat out of the inflationary fires burning unchecked in the British economy, inflationary fires which are scorching those on low incomes, and increasingly leaving scars on those further up the ladder. But only the rich are winners from Kwarteng’s descent into ideological madness. It looks as if the chancellor chose to cut corporation tax in the pursuit of cheap headlines and boastful ministerial statements: “Look, see how we’ve got the lowest headline rate in the G7.” Labour has promised to “scrap” business rates but has been a little vague about what that might actually mean in practice because there will have to be some kind of property-based levy. The reason rates are still with us is that they’re much harder to avoid than corporation tax, which is all but optional when it comes to large multinationals with battalions of clever accountants at their beck and call. If rates were easy to reform then they would have been reformed by now. As such, Labour’s promises have to be taken with a pinch of salt. But at least the party sees that there is a problem. Kwarteng, to quote one of his predecessors, seems to be singing in his bath in the face of it. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Business Business news in brief Upper Crust has enjoyed a resurgence post-pandemic (SSP Group/PA) Upper Crust owner raises earnings expectations SSP Group, which owns station and airport catering brands such as Upper Crust, said the recovery of business and commuter travel and a surge in summer holiday-goers has boosted its revenues. The company, which operates food and beverage outlets in travel spots around the world, said that it expects revenues over the three months to 30 September to be 91 per cent of prepandemic levels in 2019. Sales will be around £2.17bn and pretax earnings will be in the region of £140m for the full year,
slightly ahead of its previous expectations and driven up by a stronger fourth quarter. PA Odds of winning Premium Bonds prizes improves Millions of pounds more in Premium Bonds prizes will be up for grabs from next month, in a boost for 22 million savers. Treasury-backed savings giant NS&I said it will increase the prize fund rate from 1.40 per cent to 2.20 per cent, adding an expected £76m to the prize fund for October. The odds of each £1 Premium Bond number winning a prize will improve, from 24,500 to one to 24,000 to one. The rejig also means that, at the bottom end of the prize values, there will be fewer £25 prizes than there were previously, with an estimated 3,484,716 available next month, down from 4,774,798 this month. PA ‘Momentum’ for Irn-Bru maker despite inflation Irn-Bru maker AG Barr said it has seen “strong momentum” over the past six months but is still facing pressure from soaring cost inflation. Roger White, chief executive of the Scottish drinks firm, said it has come under pressure from rising CO2 prices, commodities and weakness in the pound. “We’ve been able to hold our prices, which is positive, and have been able to positively offset a lot of increases we are seeing through the supply chain,” he said. “Revenues increased by 16.7 per cent to £157.9m over the six months to 31 July, while pre-tax profits increased by 1.2 per cent to £24.7m, alongside increasing challenges for industry.” PA Rangers, JD Sports and Elite Sports fined £2m for price fixing JD Sports, Elite Sports and Rangers Football Club have been fined a total of more than £2m by the competition watchdog after it found they fixed the prices of replica football kits. The Competition and Markets Authority said Elite Sports and JD
Sports broke the law by fixing retail prices of the Rangersbranded kits and other clothing items from September 2018 to July 2019. The watchdog added that Rangers “also took part in the collusion”, but only in fixing the price of specific adult home short-sleeved shirts from September to mid-November in 2018. The authority said all three worked together to stop JD Sports undercutting the retail price of the shirt on Elite’s Gers Online store. JD Sports has been fined £1.49m, Elite Sports fined £459,000 and Rangers fined £225,000. PA Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Sport/ Football Three Lions’ ‘spirit’ brings cautious hope for Qatar England rallied from two goals down to draw 3-3 with Germany and dispel any anxiety from a winless streak leading up to the World Cup (AFP/Getty) MIGUEL DELANEY CHIEF FOOTBALL WRITER England might have conceded a late goal to prevent a badlyneeded win, but you wouldn’t have guessed it from some of the reactions within Wembley afterwards. The players were
embracing, and this wasn’t consolation. It was conviction, recognition of achievement, and a sense of coming together. It was the same feeling they’d had in the team hotel just before this stirring 3-3 draw with Germany. There, the senior players organised the sort of meeting that may well come to be seen as a key moment, if England actually do fulfil their potential in Qatar. The team leaders had been conscious of an anxiety gripping this group for the first time, and wanted to change it. Gareth Southgate was only too willing to encourage this. “We stay on track,” was the message. “We stay calm. We’ve been through moments like this before. We stay at it.” That was precisely what happened in the comeback against Germany. The England team did show a resilience, as they also started to play rousing football. It was why the initial flurry that brought three quick goals has left a more lasting impression than Kai Havertz’s late equaliser. That goal can be written off as one of those moments. This was more about the collective, as well as a solid spell of good football. It is a more substantial base to build on than a mere result, especially given the Nations League itself had essentially been written off. It is why no one is too concerned about a sixgame winless run. The way international football works – especially in the modern game – is that it is really only tournaments that leave any kind of impression. No one will remember any of this at all if England go out and beat Iran in that opening game.
Southgate will get some relief from recent criticism after England showed impressive character (PA) Southgate himself spoke of how this had been “a really strange period, so many teams are up in the air”. That is still true of England but the difference now is that spell against Germany has offered them a positive feeling for the eight weeks between now and the World Cup. The anxiety is gone. They’re looking forward to the camp with more hope, convinced by the ideas. This was another of the more significant elements of the last few days, which represented this crucial last meet-up before the real business begins. Southgate left the squad in no doubt about the preferred system, or the likely starters. He persisted with the three-man backline, albeit with much more force going forward, certainly in that second half. The full-backs actually played as wing backs, which makes a considerable difference, as Luke Shaw probably played his way into the team. Bukayo Saka meanwhile showed he has arguably been wasted in that area, but also illustrated he could currently be best as an impact sub. Either way, the system will persist, certainly in the biggest games. Southgate made this clear when asked about the goals conceded. He was unequivocal. “I don’t think the system is responsible for any of the goals, I think that is clear. We were a bit naïve on the counter for the second, and the first and the third are individual errors. What pleased me was the threat we had playing in that system.
“People are going to have an opinion but I think it is the best way for us. If I am going to be a wishy-washy change my mind then it is pointless me doing it. I think the players are committed to it, they know the more they play it, the more comfortable they will be and the more challenges opponents pose the more they get used to dealing with it.” Kane remains crucial to England’s chances (EPA) There are still problems to deal with, of course. Southgate said he was “very” encouraged but obviously wasn’t going to get carried away. Jude Bellingham further grew into his midfield role, although fine-tuning with the rest of the team is naturally required. England need to work on more of those connections between defensive core and that attack. There’s then the player who now faces the greatest criticism of all, and is probably the biggest issue of all. Harry Maguire was partly at fault for two of the goals, both displaying why he has been dropped from the Manchester United side and how he is suffering for not being in it. This is again where Southgate only stressed the same message, though: focus, belief, trust. “I know everyone will focus on Harry but there were some very good moments Harry has delivered in the last two matches. Luke is an outstanding footballer, so do we not pick him because he doesn’t play? We have to back our best footballers unless it is untenable.”
That is going to be one of the big questions over the next few weeks. Is the decision the same if Maguire is barely playing by then? It is why Southgate’s eight weeks is going to be filled with so much analysis, more than anything else. It is also why a positive feeling tonight was so important. It doesn’t leave the players wondering in this wait. There is hope again. There was a feeling of celebration again. Southgate laughed as he spoke of how everyone remembered what it was like to score, but you could see he was buzzing. So were the players as they filed by him while he was doing some of his press duties. There were warm embraces from Phil Foden, among others. There was togetherness. There was, as the manager summed up, “spirit”. That is the feeling the players will be left with before they next step out onto the pitch. That just so happens to be at the Khalifa International Stadium, for the opening World Cup match against Iran. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Sport/ Football Southgate sees signs of life in troubled England team Got your back: Gareth Southgate kept faith in Harry Maguire (The FA/Getty) R I C H A R D J O L LY SENIOR FOOTBALL CORRESPONDENT England were suffering. Gareth Southgate thought they were suffering for their success. Unlike those who went before them, the Southgate generation has never really tasted unpopularity
and underachievement. Until a manager who had taken England agonisingly close to their second major tournament had secured a historic first, their inaugural relegation from the Nations League. Until they were losing to Germany and for a man as integral to pivotal moments in the history of the England team as Southgate, perhaps it had to be Germany in what might be his Wembley farewell as his country’s manager. Did the boos beckon? We may never know for certain but the previous two matches suggest so. But if this might yet be a tale of the rise and fall of Southgate, it was interrupted by signs he still commands his players’ confidence, that he, and they, can orchestrate a turnaround. In coming from 2-0 down, in drawing 3-3 with Germany, Southgate sensed a winning blend of character and quality that means more when it is demonstrated in difficult times. “They have had a run they have never experienced with their national team, they have only known good times and positivity,” he said. He was too understated to ram home the point that the players who have come to the fore in his tenure lack the unpleasant memories many of their predecessors possess because of his prowess. But he has a handful in his squad who are remnants of unhappier times, who can testify that playing for England was an ordeal. A few months before he assumed control, Harry Kane, Raheem Sterling, Eric Dier and Kyle Walker played in the historic nadir that was Euro 2016’s exit to Iceland. John Stones and Jordan Henderson were on the bench that day, unable even to get in that team.
The players held talks with one another this week (EPA) And if Southgate did not name names, the probability is that they were the ringleaders of the resistance now. His senior players took matters into their own hands this week, with management’s knowledge but without the coaching staff present. “They asked if they could have a meeting on their own to talk things through and for me that was such a positive sign,” said Southgate. An aside followed: “By the way, there are moments at some clubs where that is not such a positive sign. But they talked it through with me. The best teams have a core of players that drive things.” Part of Southgate’s success has lain in his empathetic and empowering management, in his ability to bring players together for a common cause. When he needed help, they demonstrated a similar trait. Southgate seemed to have consigned the cliques that undermined England to the past. Yet, as he said, it was easier to celebrate their unity when results were forthcoming. “We can talk about team spirit when things are going well but the true test is in adversity,” he said. Arguably, England have not exited adversity yet. They have gone six games without a win for the first time since 1993, since Graham Taylor’s reign unravelled amid incoherent football. They had only scored one goal in 520 minutes before a quickfire flurry of three in 13. Condemned as dull and defensive, they were energetic and attacking.
And yet Southgate felt they may reap a greater benefit from their resilience and resourcefulness. His team have mounted too few comebacks against high-class sides. If ideal preparation for a tournament can come from wins, here at least it stemmed from a winning mentality. “The whole experience has been one we needed to grow the team,” he said. “We are going to have pressure in a World Cup. You can try and avoid it, but it is coming, so better we feel it and learn how to deal with it. The players reacted in the right way when Germany scored. We showed character but also a lot of quality and I think the crowd also came with us and stayed with us: even at 0-2, they didn’t get on their back and that was so important for us.” Southgate: ‘The players reacted in the right way when Germany scored – we showed character’ (PA) Southgate was not condemned in the court of public opinion. He accepts, however, that some of his decisions will never please everyone. He remains an advocate of the back three, arguing that none of the three goals conceded were due to the formation. “People are going to have an opinion, but I think it's the best way for us,” he added. “I have to accept there’s going to be a huge amount of noise but if I’m going to be wishy-washy, change my mind, and not give us the best chance of winning, then it’s pointless me doing it. I think the players are committed to it.”
The delivery was typical Southgate – eloquent, thoughtful and polite – but there is a defiance to his choice of system and his tried-and-trusted personnel. If many of his squad have never tasted failure, it is in part due to his choices. If they showed a loyalty to him, it is reciprocated. “I think in these moments we’ve got to back our best and are most experienced players, unless we’re in a situation where it’s almost untenable and impossible to pick them,” he added. His own position certainly is not untenable yet and if England was long deemed the impossible job, Southgate made it look more possible than most. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Sport/ Rugby union Selection points the way to French swansong for Jones The England coach named a 36-man training squad on Monday (Action Images/Reuters) H A R RY L AT H A M - COY L E By accident or design, it is rare that Eddie Jones is not the story in English rugby union, but out slipped the first selection of his final year in charge on Monday morning almost under the radar. These have been difficult days for a sport with a tendency to
lurch from crisis to crisis. Bad news loomed at Sixways where Worcester’s sad plight reached an unfortunate terminus with their suspension from all competitions, while Wasps look on nervously as they bid to halt their own slide into the financial mire. Quietly, though, it is now less than a year to go until the next men’s World Cup, and an intriguing training squad was named to begin Jones’ last 12 months in office. There is refining to be done before an important autumn – a final group to be named in mid-October can look forward to more team-bonding in the Jersey swell with a return to the Channel Island planned after a popular trip last year – but there are clues to be taken from an initial 36-player selection that will assemble in Richmond on Sunday to begin the charge up the home straight. Jones reminded those left out that the door is never closed, as Danny Care will well know, but one wonders if his failure to grasp the opportunity in Australia may mean that tour is the Harlequins’ scrum-half’s last hurrah in an England shirt. His place outside of this 36 does not come as a major surprise, with Ben Youngs refreshed to return, Alex Mitchell looking sharper than ever and Jack van Poortvliet ready to build on his successful first taste of Test rugby in the summer. Similarly, Joe Launchbury will have to battle his way back in, with even injuries to Maro Itoje, Nick Isiekwe and Charlie Ewels not enough to prompt a recall for the lock. Instead, it is to two more young talents that Jones turns: Northampton’s rangy Alex Coles is capable of covering four or six and Hugh Tizard is a player of particular promise. A summer move to Saracens to partner Isiekwe and Itoje is unlikely to do Tizard’s chances of bolting into the World Cup picture any harm; of the seven uncapped names in this chosen group, Tizard might be the likeliest to end up playing a prominent role at the tournament. Jones’s years of trial, and often error, mean that this looks like a squad of reasonable depth, with an exception, perhaps, in the centres. England will hope, as ever, that Manu Tuilagi‘s presence comes with a degree of permanence; a year of full fitness would give the side so much in the way of midfield
clarity, but his injury issues and an absence of alternatives has left England short of midfield answers in the past. If they wish to play directly, as the indications were from the Australia tour, then Tuilagi – and the England medical staff – may again be key, having been fit throughout their 2019 highs. The England head coach preached adaptability and a need for his players to lead on the field ahead of a vital four-match run: “We’ve got these extremes in the game at the moment. We want to understand how we play rugby at our best, with our players, and be able to play that game. “But we need to be able to adapt to a different game. Probably 25 per cent of the game now is uncontrollable through sin-bins, HIAs and uneven numbers in the game. The game becomes completely different so we need to be able to adapt from our game to the game that’s going to be played at that time. That’s hard to do because there are not too many teams in the world who can do it. In fact, I can’t name one at the moment. So there’s a great opportunity for us.” Jones the prognosticator has ruled this World Cup cycle with his forward looks and talk of evolution, but the time for extravagant experimentation might be over. It may be helpful to the England coach that he has exposed so many players to Test rugby during the last few years but now is surely the time to bed in, with Argentina, Japan, New Zealand and South Africa all likely to provide varied but significant threats. The top sides in the world have rarely looked more closely bunched as they round the last bend and kick into a 12month dash towards next year’s French finish. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP
WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 Sport Sport news in brief Zhou Guanyu says he is ‘happy and grateful’ to continue with the Italian team (Getty) Chinese driver signs deal to stay at Alfa Romeo Zhou Guanyu has signed a contract to remain at Alfa Romeo for the 2023 Formula One season. Guanyu, 23, has scored six points in his rookie season with the team – including a points-scoring finish on debut in Bahrain – and will remain as Valtteri Bottas’s teammate next year. Zhou was involved in a terrifying accident at Silverstone in July – though walked away unscathed – and Alfa Romeo boss Fred .
Vasseur says he has been impressed with the Chinese driver’s “approach to work”. Zhou said: “I am happy and grateful to Alfa Romeo F1 Team for the opportunity to be part of the team for another season.” Zhou has also scored in the top 10 in Canada and Italy – with a best finish of eighth in Montreal – and lies 17th in the Driver Standings with six races left, 40 ponts behind Bottas. Marathon boss urges Farah to find Kipchoge inspiration Sir Mo Farah has been encouraged to take inspiration from marathon world record holder Eliud Kipchoge ahead of Sunday’s London Marathon. The four-time Olympic gold medallist, two years older than the legendary Kenyan, who is 37, enters the race in good form after emerging victorious in the Big Half earlier this month to bounce back after being upset at the Vitality London 10,000 in May. Race director Hugh Brasher said that Farah can still produce a vintage performance on Sunday and in the future, with Kipchoge proving age is no barrier to success. Eliud took 30 seconds off his own world record to win last Sunday’s Berlin Marathon in 2 hours, 1 minute and 9 seconds. “I think that Eliud is proving that the age barriers that we used to think existed do not necessarily now exist," Mr Brasher said. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO TOP