Tags: magazine   magazine new york  

ISBN: 0028-7369

Year: 2022

Text
                    FINANCIAL
PRESSURE ON
UKRAINE

THE FED
®

FINANCIAL
PRESSURE
ON RUSSIA

OMICRON

RUSSIAUKRAINE

U.S.
I N FL ATI O N

CHINA

OIL PRICES

EUROPEAN
I N FL ATI O N

GAS PRICES

COAL PRICES
GERMAN
GOVERNMENT

EUROPEAN
CENTRAL
BANK

N E T-Z E R O
C L I M AT E
POLICY

BIDEN
A DM I N IS TR ATI O N
(midterms)

In the
midst of our
mind-boggling
“polycrisis,”
one economic
historian has
become every
lefty know-itall’s favorite
know-it-all.

By Molly
Fischer




HOME. NO PLACE LIKE IT.
A beacon of timeless glamour, The Towers of the Waldorf Astoria New York has been home to the world’s most fascinating people. Live atop the internationally famous hotel, an icon which has set the global standard for hospitality and accommodation since 1931. Enjoy the best of the world’s greatest city and call the most distinguished address in New York home. There truly is no place like it. New studio to penthouse condominium residences priced from $1,800,000 defined by unsurpassed amenities, legendary service, and incomparable history. waldorftowers.nyc | +1 212 872 1245 | @waldorfnyc | #WaldorfTowersNYC Exclusive Marketing and Sales Agent: Douglas Elliman Development Marketing THE COMPLETE OFFERING TERMS ARE IN AN OFFERING PLAN AVAILABLE FROM SPONSOR (AB STABLE LLC). FILE NO. CD18-0101. Equal Housing Opportunity. Waldorf Astoria is a registered trademark of Hilton International Holding LLC, an affiliate of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Hilton”). The residences are not owned, developed, or sold by Hilton and Hilton does not make any representations, warranties or guaranties whatsoever with respect to the residences. The developer uses the Waldorf Astoria brand name and certain Waldorf Astoria trademarks (the “Trademarks”) under a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable license from Hilton. The license may be terminated or may expire without renewal, in which case the residences described herein will not be identified as a Waldorf Astoria branded project or have any rights to use the Trademarks.
THE DAILY BEAST THE TINA TURNER MUSICAL SEE IT THIS WEEK! TinaOnBroadway.com SCAN TO WATCH WHAT EVERYONE’S RAVING ABOUT.
Photo: Pari Dukovic
“All theater is time-bound. There are shows you should see and this is one. AND THERE ARE SHOWS YOU SHOULD SEE RIGHT NOW, FOR THE BENEFIT OF YOUR OWN SPIRIT, and this is one of those, too.” Chris Jones, Chicago Tribune February 24, 2022 Photo by Matthew Murphy
NEW BLOCK OF TICKETS NOW ON SALE THROUGH JANUARY 1, 2023 “ YOU’LL LAUGH, CRY, AND ” LEAVE FULL OF HOPE Daily Express ! WINNER! BEST MUSICAL ALL ACROSS NORTH AMERICA THE HIT MUSICAL BASED ON THE REMARKABLE TRUE STORY COME FROM AWAY Book, Music and Lyrics by Irene Sankoff and David Hein Musical Staging by Kelly Devine Directed by Christopher Ashley Gerald Schoenfeld Theatre, 236 West 45th Street COMEFROMAWAY.COM Proud Partner of COME FROM AWAY

march 28–april 10, 2022 features Galaxy Brain The cult of Adam Tooze. By Molly Fischer 30 Blocked A U.K. teen caught up in the battle over trans health care. By Caitlin Moscatello 36 The Future of Trumpism Could Ron DeSantis be the right’s new standard-bearer? By Jonathan Chait 42 P H OTO G R A P H : M AG N U M P H OTO S Luke, 18, is one of thousands of young trans people in the U.K. whose care has been delayed. Photograph by Olivia Arthur 9
march 28–april 10, 2022 the culture pages intelligencer 16 22 60 68 What excess mortality reveals about the pandemic By David Wallace-Wells The buoyant Pete Buttigieg By Ross Barkan 20 26 An oral history of one of Off Broadway’s most improbable success stories By Molly Langmuir Valérie Lemercier’s surrealist spin on Céline Dion. By Rachel Handler Inside Dhamaka’s storage-containersize kitchen By Chris Crowley Crypto’s head honchos confront the war in Ukraine By Jen Wieczner Tomorrow The Group Portrait 37 Minutes With … The Money Game strategist 49 BEST OF NEW YORK Seasoned New Yorkers tell us their favorite karaoke bars, framers, bike shops, and more. plus: Even more expert recommendations on Curbed.com. 10 n e w y o r k | nymag.com How Blue Man Blew Up 66 Jon Batiste on a Lifetime Making Musical Alchemy How the New Orleans native fuses hip-hop, jazz, rock, and humanism By Justin Curto Inspired by a True Diva 80 To Do Twenty-five picks for the next two weeks 72 Critics movies by Alison Willmore Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas torment each other, sexily, in Deep Water pop by Craig Jenkins Rosalía’s evolution in Motomami tv by Kathryn VanArendonk Pachinko is an epic family drama on an intimate scale 12 Comments 98 Games: New York Crossword, by Matt Gaffney; the Vulture 10x10s 100 The Approval Matrix on the cover: Adam Tooze. Photograph by Brian Finke for New York Magazine. The chart above Tooze is adapted from a recent edition of his newsletter. this page: Pete Buttigieg at the Department of Transportation in Washington, D.C. Photograph by Victor Llorente for New York Magazine. For customer service, call 800-678-0900.
A MY THICAL-BIBLICAL-APOCALYPTIC COMEDY! 8 WEEKS ONLY • PREVIEWS BEGIN APRIL 1 THORNTON WILDER LILEANA BLAIN-CRUZ BY DIRECTED BY LINCOLN CENTER THEATER TELECHARGE.COM 212-239-6200 GROUPS: 800-BROADWAY x2 LCT.ORG 150 WEST 65TH ST. THE SKIN OF OUR TEETH is sponsored by The Blanche and Irving Laurie Foundation. This production is supported by a generous bequest from the Douglas S. Cramer, Jr. Revocable Trust.
Comments March 14 27 2022 ® THE FIRST GENERATION BORN AFTER UKRAINE WON INDEPENDENCE DOCUMENTS THE BEGINNING OF THE RUSSIAN INVASION. SIXTEEN DAYS IN UKRAINE BY Anastasiia Mokhina, Aleksey, Viktoriia Khutorna, Petro Chekal, and Nasta and Victor Dobrovolskyi, Anastasia Kovalchuk, Julia Berdiyarova, and Victoria Vlasenko. Masha Varnas, L ana Muradian, Vova Prylutskyi, Matsiiovskyi, and Yasia Myroshnychenko. Leonid. Daria Holovatenko, Danyil Zadorozhnyi, Mariia Shuvalova, Inna Zadorozhnaya, Anastasiia Viekua, Katya Vasiukova, Vika Zavhorodnia, Lisa Bukreyeva, Alexander, Roman Vydro, Markiian Yehor Shata lo, Polina Polikarpova, Lesyk Yakymchuk, Svyatoslav Fursin, and Sana Shahmuradova. 20 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 1 4 2 7 2 0 2 2 New York’s latest issue told the story of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine through the eyes of 30 young people living through the war (“Sixteen Days in Ukraine,” March 14–27). Author Edwin Hayward called the oral history “an incredible read. A vivid reminder that the people caught up in the invasion of Ukraine had lives that were just like everyone else’s—and then they didn’t.” This American Life’s Ben Calhoun found the package “devastating and illuminat1 ing, and unique within the coverage of the war. My thoughts are with those who shared their stories here, and my admiration to those who elevated their voices with this.” Sbunker co-founder Agon Maliqi had “been reading this stream of captivating testimonials for almost an hour and … damn! You’ll be hard pressed to find any other genre of writing that can so powerfully portray the ways in which war upends lives.” Morgan Pomaika’i Lee of Christianity Today tweeted, “The specificity of this pain will wreck you,” and Proofpoint’s Sherrod DeGrippo wrote, “Moving. Infuriating. Horrible. Inspiring. Delicate. Tender. Funny. Sad. Hopeful. Sweet. Young. Absolutely incredible piece.” On his MSNBC broadcast, Chris Hayes praised the story, noting: “I got a vision of what this has meant in a daily way almost u d.” ng to T av , the deputy editor-in-chief of The Village Ukraine who contributed reporting to the project, said, “Here in Ukraine we are prepared for this Ukrainian war fatigue that eventually comes when global media are covering wars and conflicts. The hope is you guys will con- tinue to cover these stories, because it’s really important in the face of Russia’s aggression and the ongoing struggle here.” In “Still Yawning at the Apocalypse” (March 14–27), David Wallace-Wells wrote about the pervasive blend of complacency and fatalism that has met the U.N.’s latest climate report. Biologist Colin J. Carlson said the column “nails part of the problem with the new #ipcc report: people have heard the real-time impact assessments before as projections, and don’t necessarily know when/which things moved from one compartment into the next,” while Washington State University’s Steve Austin tweeted, “This is indeed what is happening. Amazingly, most in the US have gone rapidly from ‘it’s not real’ to ‘ok, we’ll deal with it.’ Can we?” Mark Brownstein of the Environmental Defense Fund’s energy program wrote, “The climate crisis is no less serious or immediate than the geopolitical crisis facing us today.” And Variety’s Michael Schneider said, “All the stuff we talk about. All the stuff we fight about. Nothing will matter if we can’t live on this planet anymor is on fire.” Don’t Look Up coSirota added, “It’s as if an 2 asteroid is headed toward Earth but there’s a media and political system designed to make us not care.” 12 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 march 14 27 2022 | new york 21 Bilge Ebiri profiled the former child star Ke Huy Quan on the cusp of his return to the screen in Everything Everywhere All at Once (“Another Life,” March 14–27). Film critic Scott Weinberg found it “so cool to see the acting resurrection of Ke Huy Quan, whom everyone remembers from Temple of Doom and The Goonies!!,” and @MindaMZ “was already excited to see Michelle Yeoh in this, a movie about a middle aged woman kicking ass (more please), but Ke Hey Quan, too? Take. My. Money.” Howard Ho wrote, “When I was a kid, only one actor 3 in the movies looked like me. I used to recite his dialogue into the mirror, imagining myself as Short Round from Indy2. Seeing him make his big screen return is like a piece of me being restored.” Direc- tor Justin Decloux noted, “This article … is great, but it does skip over the fact that he starred in a Taiwanese action film called Red Pirate (1997) directed by Jackie Chan’s mentor.” Many readers seemed delighted to learn that Jeff Cohen, who played Chunk in The Goonies, is still close with Quan. @katychristy said, “I was a massive Goonies fan as a kid (and still could probably recite it line for line) and it just makes me so happy that 1. the actor that played Data is returning to his acting career and 2. his lawyer is the actor who played Chunk.” Writer Danielle Sepulveres added, “Finding out that Data and Chunk are still friends made my heart grow three sizes. I love this profile.” Send correspondence to comments@nymag.com. Or go to nymag.com to respond to individual stories.
li . u l Graber’s line of fashion-forward cellular shades are now available in NEW blackout options, so you can delight in sleeping in. Find an expert near you at graberblinds.com
ADVERTISEMENT Diving Into the Unknown L Artist Lo Harris faces fears and reignites her creative fuel in Cancun o Harris never expected to be a full-time artist. With a background in vi journalism and the desire to work in a newsroom, the Brooklyn-based creative’s love for visual arts was sidelined as a hobby — something to le on outside of her nine-to-five job. She created an Instagram account fo her art, designs highlighting social and racial justice, self-love, and her inspirations. During the summer of 2020, shortly after the death of George Floyd, h Instagram received an influx of followers, her work was being commissioned, and began her path as a full-time artist in January 2021. That October, feeling burnt out and in need of a vacation, Harris took a trip to Cancun, Mexico with her best friend. While there, she found herself inspired, invigorated, and rethinking her relationships with her art and herself. A trip intended for rest and relaxation provided a resurgence of self-love, acceptance, and creative fuel. It’s not uncommon to be inspired by travel, but what exactly happens to our brains and bodies while immersed in these new experiences? Along with boosts in menta and physical health, studies have also linked travel to possible increases in creativit an enhanced brain function, and overall well-being. Read her story to experience Cancun with Lo, a place where she reconnected with herself. Notice how the vivid colors of the Yucatan show up in her work (and closet) and bookmark her recommendations for must-visit places during your own visit. Pop out to share your own travel stories! Scan the QR code to read about Lo’s trip and be inspired to start planning your own. This advertiser content was produced in partnership with Marriott Bonvoy and Vox Creative.

inside: The hottest kitchen in town / Mayor Pete flourishes in Washington / Crypto confronts the war Tomorrow: David Wallace-Wells COVID’s Arithmetic A single metric might change much of what we know about the pandemic. 16 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 live long enough in a pandemic and you will see the entire narrative landscape shift, even flip, sometimes more than once. As recently as a month ago, Americans of a certain cast of mind could have still looked to China—and indeed all of East Asia, Southeast Asia, and Oceania—with some plausible pandemic envy. Those early lockdowns in Wuhan were brutal, yes; some of the surveillance testing, contact tracing, and quarantine measures imposed in places like South Korea and Singapore were very restrictive, true; closed borders and reentry policies in Australia and New Zealand went further than those of any country in Europe or the Americas; and while the Sinovac vaccines weren’t as effective as those made by Moderna or Pfizer, the success of true “zero covid” policies through the region meant that in many places, shots got into arms without anything like a major covid surge ever having taken place. All of that seemed like an unimaginable triumph. Now, after P H OTO G R A P H : N E W S H A TAVA KO L I A N / M AG N U M P H OTO S A grave in Tehran in March 2020.
a brutal Omicron wave punishing its largely unvaccinated elderly, Hong Kong has a cumulative death toll approaching Canada’s. (In February, it was 25 times lower.) Omicron spikes elsewhere in the region—in South Korea, in Singapore— have proved less threatening, given higher rates of vaccination among the elderly. But panicked lockdowns imposed again in China suggest that the country’s leadership, at least, believes an enormous amount of pandemic vulnerability remains—enough to justify a total shutdown of Shenzhen, a city of almost 20 million and such a critical economic and manufacturing hub that American observers immediately started raising their expectations for inflation. Narrative turnabouts are not new with Omicron. Some are familiar: The disease wasn’t spread through the air, then it was; masks weren’t worth it, early on, then became not just essential but badges of personal vigilance, then only useful if they were KN95s. Some narrative shifts were more obscure: Omicron was said to be “mild,” though it is roughly as severe as the original strain in immunologically naïve populations. Others have been somewhat memory-holed, as when much of the public-health Establishment spent the fall of 2020 suggesting that herd immunity would be reached when 60 or 70 percent of the country was infected or vaccinated, a threshold we have now long since surpassed with nothing like herd immunity in sight; or when it spent the summer of 2021 insisting that breakthrough cases were exceedingly rare and breakthrough deaths essentially nonexistent, when in fact probably a quarter of all American deaths since Delta have been among the vaccinated. Some reversals were technical, as when rapid tests were first considered imprecise, became indispensable during Omicron, then had their efficacy in preventing transmission called into question. Some had to do with policy: School closures were once part of a first-response wave of restrictions, but a growing understanding of the relatively low risk to kids and real costs of keeping them home has meant schools are now broadly viewed as among the most important places to remain open. And some had to do with personal behavior, as when many of the same people who spent 2020 yelling at Thanksgiving travelers and arguing that responsibility to protect others should dominate one’s personal behavior spent 2021 reasoning that vaccines had absolved us all of that responsibility. Many of those who once reacted in horror to “Let it rip” proponents began wondering if anything at all could have stopped the early spread in its tracks. Our experience of the pandemic has The unsteady narratives of COVID-19 are reminders that the stories we told ourselves were often incomplete. been littered with bad-faith argumentation and instigation, but most of these narrative reversals are not that, or even signs of what Harvard’s William Hanage has called the “motivated reasoning” of the pandemic. One narrative replacing another is one description of the scientific method, and among the many astonishing features of this pandemic is how quickly science was able to process and respond— perhaps without adequate speed, but at least fast enough for vaccines to be designed within two days, manufactured within two months, and rolled out to the vast majority of the world within two years. But the unsteady narratives of covid-19 are reminders that, as sure as we might have been about how to interpret our experience of it, the stories we told ourselves about what we were dealing with and what we should be doing to protect ourselves were often incomplete, clouded by much more uncertainty and ignorance, wishful thinking and reflexive panic, than we were ever comfortable acknowledging. There is one data point that might serve as an exceptional interpretative tool, one that blinks bright through all that narrative fog: excess mortality. The idea is simple: You look at the recent past to find an average for how many people die in a given country in a typical year, count the number of people who died during the pandemic years, and subtract one from the other. The basic math yields some striking results, as shown by a recent paper in The Lancet finding that 18.2 million people may have died globally from covid, three times the official total. As skeptical epidemiologists were quick to point out, the paper employed some strange methodology— modeling excess deaths even for countries that offered actual excess-death data and often distorting what we knew to be true as a result. A remarkable excess-mortality database maintained by The Economist does not have this problem, and, like the Lancet paper, the Economist database esti- mates global excess mortality; it puts the figure above 20 million. As a measure of pandemic brutality, excess mortality has its limitations—but probably fewer than the conventional data we’ve used for the last two years. That’s because it isn’t biased by testing levels— in places like the U.S. and the U.K., a much higher percentage of covid deaths were identified as such than in places like Belarus or Djibouti, making our pandemics appear considerably worse by comparison. By measuring against a baseline of expected death, excess mortality helps account for huge differences in the age structures of different countries, some of which may have many times more mortality risk than others because their populations are much older. And to the extent that the ultimate impact of the pandemic isn’t just a story about covid-19 but also one about our responses to it—lockdowns and unemployment, suspended medical care and higher rates of alcoholism and automobile accidents— excess mortality accounts for all that, too. In some places, like the U.S., excess-mortality figures are close to the official covid data— among other things, a tribute to our medical surveillance systems. In other places, the numbers are so different that accounting for them entirely changes the picture of not just the experience of individual nations but the whole world, scrambling everything we think we know about who did best and who did worst, which countries were hit hardest and which managed to evade catastrophe. If you had to pick a single metric by which to measure the ultimate impact of the pandemic, excess mortality is as good as we’re probably going to get. so what does it say? A year ago, it seemed easy enough to divide pandemic outcomes into three groups—with Europe and the Americas performing far worse than East Asia, which appeared to have outmaneuvered the virus through publichealth measures, and much of the Global South, especially sub-Saharan Africa, which looked to have been spared mostly by its relatively young population. Today, a crude count of official deaths, not excess mortality, suggests the same grouping: North America and Europe have almost identical death counts with official per capita totals eight times as high as Asia, as a whole, and 12 times as high as Africa. South America’s death toll is higher still— ten times as high as Asia and 15 times as high as Africa. The excess-mortality data tells a different story. There is still a clear continentby-continent pattern, but the gaps between them are much smaller, making the experi- march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 17
intelligencer ences of different parts of the world much less distinct and telling a more universal story about the devastation wrought by this once-in-a-century contagion. According to The Economist, Europe, Latin America, and North America have all registered excess deaths ranging from 270 to 370 per 100,000 inhabitants; excess mortality in Asia is estimated between 130 to 330; in Africa, the range is 79 to 220. These numbers are not identical, but, all things considered, they are remarkably close together. The highest of the low-end estimates is barely three times the lowest; the highest of the highend estimates is not even twice as high as the lowest. If you adjust for age, as the Economist database does separately, the differences among continents grow more dramatic— suggesting a reversal of outcomes, rather than a convergence. Outside of Oceania, Europe and North America were the best in the world at preventing deaths among the old, and they were several times better at protecting their elderly, of whom they had many more, than Africa and South Asia. East Asia performed better, but only slightly: Canada is in line with China, Germany just marginally worse than South Korea, Iceland in the range of Japan. By almost any metric, Oceania remains an outlier: The Economist estimates zero excess deaths among the elderly in New Zealand, for instance, and gives the whole region an excess-mortality range of negative 31 to positive 37 per 100,000 residents, meaning it’s possible fewer people died there than would’ve had we never even heard of sars-CoV-2. In the country-by-country data, the divergences grow even bigger. Perhaps most striking, given both self-flagellating American narratives about the pandemic and current events elsewhere on the globe, is that the worst-hit large country in the world was not the U.S., which registered the most official deaths of any country but ranks 47th in per capita excess mortality, or Britain, which ranks 85th, or even India, which ranks 36th. It is Russia, which has lost, The Economist estimates, between 1.2 million and 1.3 million citizens over the course of the pandemic, a mortality rate more than twice as high as the American one. Russia is not an outlier. While we have heard again and again in the U.S. about the experience of the pandemic in western Europe—sometimes in admiration, sometimes to mock—it has been eastern Europe that, of any region in the world, has the ugliest excess-mortality data. This, then, is where the pandemic hit hardest— in the countries of the old Warsaw Pact and formerly of the Soviet bloc. In fact, of the ten worst-performing countries, only one is outside eastern Europe. The world’s worst pandemic, according to the data, has been in Bulgaria, followed by Serbia, North Macedonia, and Russia, then Lithuania, Bosnia, Belarus, Georgia, Romania, and Sudan. (Have you read much about pandemic policy in any of these countries?) Peru, which had what is often described as the most brutal pandemic in the world, ranks 11th—with the smallest gap, among those countries with the most devastating pandemics, between the official covid data and the estimated excess mortality. (You probably haven’t read much about Peru, either, but its lockdowns were severe—for months, only one member of each household was allowed out once a week. At one point, an exemption was extended allowing for children under the age of 14 to leave their homes for 30 minutes of exercise per day, so long as it was conducted less than 500 meters away.) Because The Economist allows you to explore how excess mortality evolved over time, country by country, the data also clearly showcases the pandemic as a tale of two years—a mitigation year, 2020, and a vaccination year, 2021. Early in the vaccine-distribution phase, with the U.K. and U.S. moving most quickly, it was striking how so few of the countries that had done well in preventing spread in 2020 were doing well in providing vaccines quickly. Over the course of 2021, many of those gaps disappeared, with countries across East Asia and Oceania eventually accelerating their vaccine distribution and parts of Europe that were slow at the outset starting to catch up too. But the U.S. took the opposite course. In 2020, the U.S. had done a bit worse than average among its OECD peers. In 2021, when pandemic outcomes were often determined by the relative uptake of American-made vaccines, the U.S. did much, much worse than that. In country after country in Europe, the pandemic killed a fraction as many last year as it had the year before. In the U.S., it killed more. A year ago, it was possible It has been eastern Europe that, of any region in the world, has the ug t excessmortality data. 18 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 to defend the American record as merely below average—worse than it should have been but not, judging globally, cataclysmically bad. Today, it is cataclysmically bad, which is both outrageous and ironic, given that it is largely American vaccine innovation that has changed the pandemic landscape for the rest of the world—the rest of the rich world, at least. On February 1, 2021, just after the inauguration of Joe Biden, the U.S. had registered, according to The Economist, 178 excess deaths per 100,000 inhabitants, quite close to Britain’s 166, Belgium’s 162, and Portugal’s 201. Fast-forward a year and those gaps have exploded. The U.S. has now registered 330 excess deaths per 100,000— meaning our total has roughly doubled. In Britain, the excess mortality grew only 30 percent; in Portugal, it was 17 percent. The gaps between deaths in the U.S. and countries that had done better in the first year of the pandemic, like Germany or Iceland, have gotten even bigger. If the U.S. had the same cumulative excess mortality of Germany, it would have had 600,000 fewer deaths. If it had the excess mortality of Iceland, it would have had a million fewer deaths—and would have only lost about 100,000 Americans in total. How did this happen? The answer is screamingly obvious, if also, in its way, confusing: The U.S. drove an unprecedented vaccine-innovation campaign in 2020, which empowered much of the world to turn the page on the pandemic’s deadliest phases, then, in 2021, utterly failed to take advantage of its power itself. But what is perhaps even more striking is that American vaccination coverage isn’t just bad, by the standards of its peers, but getting worse. About two-thirds of Americans have received two shots of vaccine, a level that is in line with Israel and not far off from the U.K., though below many other wealthy countries. (And even in the U.K., vaccination was more effectively directed toward the old.) But over the last six months, the country has had an opportunity to make up that gap with boosters and has simply not taken it. Only 29 percent of Americans have had a booster shot of vaccine, which puts us behind Slovenia, Slovakia, and Poland and means that less than half of those people happy to be vaccinated a year ago have chosen to get a third shot through Delta and Omicron. Booster campaigns seem like an obvious opportunity for easy public-health gains, yet remarkably few Americans seem to think it’s worth the trouble. Why? For everything we think we know about the pandemic and how people have responded to it, that one remains a ■ maddening mystery.

intelligencer The Group Portrait: Dhamaka’s Tiny Factory of Flavors The miniature kitchen drawing enormous crowds. By Chris Crowley the kitchen at Dhamaka—the Indian establishment at Essex Crossing with a monthlong waiting list—is about the size of a large storage container. At tightly packed stations, cooks work, if not back-to-back, then close enough to pass ingredients without taking a step. To make the pulao, a rice dish, chef de cuisine Eric Valdez uses a portable butane burner, which takes up less space than a stove. “I’ve camped, I’ve cooked with this before,” says Valdez. “But in a professional kitchen? This is my first time.” Dhamaka, which opened in February 2021, is known for its unadulterated representation of regional Indian dishes less familiar to diners abroad: Gujarati stuffed peppers with peanuts and chickpea-flour masala; a pig’s-head salad from the country’s northeast. It’s become a destination to members of the South Asian diaspora seeking the house paneer, food geeks who love to complain that New York’s Indian offerings can’t compare to London’s, and finance bros eager to boast about getting one of the most coveted reservations in town. Even at Omicron’s peak, Dhamaka was booked out for weeks. “We don’t really get cancellations,” says chef Chintan Pandya. Pulao is one of the most popular menu items, and at first the restaurant tried to limit orders: “Every time we got busy, it was chaos,” Valdez says. Each pulao takes about eight minutes to cook, and only two can be made at a time. But he got used to it: “It’s about timing. You need to smell the steam coming out—that’s when you know it’s cooked enough.” Valdez simultaneously works the pass and the pulao station; there’s no room for anyone else. In such cramped surroundings, it helps that some of the staffers, including Valdez and line cook Abubacarr Gikineh, have worked together before (Valdez and Gikineh did stints at Junoon and then Rahi, Pandya’s first restaurant with his business partner, Roni Mazumdar). One year in, everybody in the kitchen still seems a bit surprised by the fanfare. “People ask, ‘How are you guys always busy?’ I’m like, ‘I’m just cooking the food, bro. I don’t know why they like it,’” Gikineh says. “Everything that I do I learn from Chintan and Eric. I do it how they taught me, ■ and if we can do better, that’s good.” 20 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2
from top left: Roni Mazumdar, Eric Valdez, Tsepak Dolker, Chintan Pandya, Saul Anastacio, Rafael Zaragoza, Shawon Deb, Cristian Gonzalez, Lila Weitzner, Juan Gonzalez, Abel Aviles, and Bubacarr Kabba. Photograph by Evan Angelastro march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 21
intelligencer 37 min u tes w ith … Thanks to billions of dollars in allocation money, the Transportation secretary is living his best life. by ross barkan hese days, pete buttigieg is concerned about the future of democracy. “I don’t think it’s an accident that the last time fascism was fashionable in certain corners of this country’s political class, one of the things they said for Mussolini is he made the trains run on time—it was a transportation example,” he tells me in his spacious office overlooking the Anacostia River in Washington, D.C. “Which by the way, importantly, was not actually true,” he is quick to add, his eyes suddenly widening. He brings up China and the narrative of “their order versus our chaos,” which the Chinese bolster with enormous infrastructure investments. “Part of what motivates me in this work is that the work22 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 aday things that we’re focused on, it’s right back to some really profound issues we’re dealing with in terms of what kind of country we’re going to be,” Buttigieg says. “It’s about whether democracy can deliver.” Buttigieg, in his light-blue necktie and crisp white shirt, hasn’t had many acquaintances, let alone journalists, in his D.C. office since becoming Joe Biden’s secretary of Transportation in 2021. covid locked people behind Zoom screens, and Buttigieg, perhaps the administration’s most adept political animal, had been left to evangelize for transportation and infrastructure virtually. That has begun to change for the newly minted 40-year-old and father of twins, who is not only hobnobbing more in Washington Photograph by Victor Llorente
EXPERIENCE IT TODAY GET TICKETS AT LIONKING.COM
intelligencer but recently visited South by Southwest and packs a busy schedule of out-of-town events. His office, in the chic D.C. Navy Yard neighborhood, has few personal touches. A Notre Dame coaster, sitting next to a newsletter provided by a longshoreman union, is a small reminder of where he came from. In a year of woe and confusion for Biden—the war in Ukraine seems to be boosting a president who has been bogged down with Donald Trump–like approval ratings for many months—it has been Buttigieg who is out front and unruffled, the public face of a trillion-dollar infrastructure package that might be the president’s defining domestic-legacy item. At a time when other members of the Cabinet are struggling to escape the administration’s travails, Buttigieg has proved himself to be both a dogged defender of the president and an irrepressibly buoyant figure with a following all his own, as likely to appear in People magazine with his husband, Chasten, and the twins as on Meet the Press. Right time, right place for Buttigieg, who will always be known, to a certain crowd, as Mayor Pete. The former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, has been marked for stardom since his Harvard days, shooting to national fame with a surprisingly viable presidential campaign in 2020. In New Hampshire, Biden cut a blistering ad mocking Buttigieg’s small-town roots—comparing the former veep’s revitalization of the U.S. auto industry with Buttigieg’s revitalization of South Bend’s sidewalks—but Buttigieg still managed to strategically endorse Biden not long after, helping consolidate votes against a surging Bernie Sanders. If the Biden campaign seemed, at times, to subsist on whatever terror and rage Democratic voters could marshal against Trump, Buttigieg’s bid was a small taste of what Biden’s old boss had once offered curious Iowans. An openly gay military veteran making his own soaring case for aspirational liberalism, Buttigieg could captivate a packed gymnasium like Barack Obama and soon became a favorite of White House alums like David Axelrod. Now on everyone’s shortlist of possible presidential contenders, Buttigieg is reflective, if circumspect, about his future. “I don’t know if I’ll run for office ever again,” he says, pausing carefully before answering yet another question about what comes next. “It’s there,” he acknowledges of the political chatter, particularly talk of a future clash with Vice-President Kamala Harris, who has recently been the subject of stories of palace intrigue in the press. (According to a new book by New York Times reporters Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns, Biden’s staffers have been rolling their eyes at the “First World problems” that seem to preoccupy the vice-president, including an unflattering cover shoot for Vogue.) “The main thing is just not to be distracted by it,” Buttigieg says. “There’s literally no time.” However, he admits he offers communication advice when requested to a White House that has struggled to convey its accomplishments to voters. What he has missed about the campaign trail, he says, is “being in the room, watching faces rise and fall as I learn what really resonates.” But he is sure to diplomatically add, “It’s rewarding to be campaigning not for yourself but for an idea.” That idea is infrastructure, a bipartisan staple of Washington that, in its nuts-andbolts nerdiness, seems ideally suited to a politician who has always embodied the straight-A student hungry to answer the next question. Transportation policy genuinely excites Buttigieg, who gained a small degree of fame among wonks for his successful pedestrianization of South Bend. He has rolled out an ambitious plan to drastically slash traffic fatalities nationwide. He is outspoken about the environmental and sociological degradation that certain highway systems have brought to communities of color. Technocrats have great sway with him: Polly Trottenberg, his deputy, was the long-serving New York City DOT commissioner and has been given broad latitude to pitch and implement policy. Most important, Buttigieg commands money. A Reuters analysis of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, passed by Congress late last year, estimates that around $126 billion of the $660 billion allotted to the DOT for the next five years will be for new spending. Competitive grant programs will allow him to choose where the cash flows. “Building infrastructure is like building cathedrals,” he says. “It’s very rare the person who lays the cornerstone gets to be the person who cuts the ribbon.” Democratic politicians still bristling from the Trump years, when the pennypinching Elaine Chao ran the department, In a year of woe and confusion for Biden, it has been Buttigieg who is out front and unruffled. 24 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 sing hosannas for Secretary Pete. “My God, it’s night and day,” says New Jersey governor Phil Murphy. “He’s a guy who understands what it’s like being chief executive. If you’re a governor, you’re automatically on a similar wavelength with him. He’s lived in my shoes, and to some extent I’ve lived in his.” Infrastructure money will endear Buttigieg not only to powerful Democrats across the country but to voters. For example, it will go a long way toward building a new rail tunnel between New York and New Jersey, a project Chris Christie scuttled and Trump failed to revive. For Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, Buttigieg was a revelation because he was willing to listen to her pleas to incorporate funding for disability access to mass-transit systems. “He was as good as his word,” she says. “That’s really critical. A lot of folks, a lot of principals, they want to take the picture and don’t follow through.” Transit experts are pleased with Buttigieg but still waiting for a greater vision of what transportation should look like in the U.S. There are hard rules around how federal money is spent; much of it must go toward car-friendly highway-expansion projects. “What the administration has been focused on has been funding, not policy,” says Beth Osborne, the director of Transportation for America and a former highranking official in the Obama DOT. The pandemic-induced supply-chain crisis and inflation have presented steep challenges for Buttigieg, but he is calmly defensive of the administration’s performance thus far. “We’re doing a lot,” he says. “It’s worth noting that if you had looked at some of the coverage in October, you would have thought that the holidays were basically canceled, but we got through them.” More complications loom. Spirit and Frontier, two low-cost airlines, are seeking to merge, which would create another enormous carrier in an already consolidated industry that pretty much everyone hates. Buttigieg has the power, along with the Department of Justice, to derail the merger. For now, he’s noncommittal. “It has my attention, obviously,” he insists. Buttigieg claims he’s content in D.C. managing a massive federal bureaucracy and not campaigning for a promotion. Gazing out the window at the cranes cutting across the sky and the traffic flowing quietly over the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge, he considers this new pace of life. “I remember rejoicing any time, when I was running, that I got to be in the same hotel room for two nights in a row because that meant at least I didn’t have to pack my toothbrush.” “Now, one, two trips a week, maximum. ■ It’s more civilized.”
DONIZETTI LUCIA DI LAMMERMOOR ON STAGE APRIL 23–MAY 21 Zenith Richards / Met Opera Don’t miss Simon Stone’s bold new vision for Donizetti’s gripping bel canto drama. Soprano Nadine Sierra stars as the unraveling young heroine opposite tenor Javier Camarena, in a production set in the American Rust Belt of today. Riccardo Frizza conducts. Tickets start at $25. metopera.org 212.362.6000 Peter Gelb Yannick Nézet-Séguin GENER AL MANAGER JEANET TE LERMAN-NEUBAUER MUSIC DIRECTOR
The Money Game: Jen Wieczner Crypto’s Moral Ledger For the big trading platfor s, the war in Ukraine has turned borderlessness into a liability. 26 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 when western governments imposed sanctions on Russia after the invasion of Ukraine, seeking to sever Vladimir Putin’s banks and billionaires from global capital, Sam Bankman-Fried knew his company would have to comply. The 30-year-old, who is a billionaire 20 times over, runs FTX, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges. It’s incorporated in Antigua, headquartered in the Bahamas, and regulated in the U.S. Crypto itself may be a borderless, supranational abstraction, but the companies that have sprung up around it are domiciled in places with laws, and they don’t get to pick and choose which ones to obey. But after Bankman-Fried responded to the new rules, he went a step further. The American decided to block all Russian banks— even unsanctioned ones—from FTX, the better to ensure that the company’s platforms couldn’t be used to funnel assets to the pariah regime. Russian credit cards stopped working on FTX, and the platform stopped accepting Russian deposits. Then Bankman-Fried shut out banks in Kremlin-aligned Belarus as Illustration by Ben Kothe S O U R C E P H OTO G R A P H S : S T R I N G E R / A N A D O LU AG E N C Y V I A G E T T Y I M AG E S ( U K R A I N E ) ; S T E P H A N S C H U L Z / P I C T U R E A L L I A N C E V I A G E T T Y I M AG E S ( F LO W E R S ) intelligencer
THESE DOCTORS ARE AMONG THE BEST DOCTORS IN NEW YORK Each doctor has been peer-nominated and selected by Castle Connolly, the nation’s leading provider of information on top doctors. HAND SURGERY Mark E. Pruzansky, MD Hand, Wrist & Elbow Surgery, Sports Injuries 975 Park Avenue New York, NY 212-249-8700 HandSport.us PLASTIC SURGERY Barry M. Weintraub, MD Face, Eyes, Nose & Neck Procedures 800A Fifth Avenue New York, NY 212-737-7500 DrBarryWeintraub.com SPORTS MEDICINE All Doctors are Board Certified Jonathan L. Glashow, MD Shoulder, Knee, Arthroscopic Surgery 737 Park Avenue New York, NY 212-794-5096 GlashowMD.com NEUROSURGERY Ezriel E. Kornel, MD Minimally Invasive Brain & Spine Surgery 215 East 77th Street New York, NY 914-948-0444 TopSpineSurgeonNYC.com EYE SURGERY Lopa Y. Gupta, MD Dr. Mark E. Pruzansky Hand Surgery Castle Connolly Medical, Ltd. provides Top Doctors lists for many regional publications throughout the country, including New York magazine’s “Best Doctors” issue. TheBestDocs.com Laser Eyelid Lifts 1070 Park Avenue New York, NY 212-203-2838 DrLopaGupta.com HAIR TRANSPLANTATION Robert M. Bernstein, MD ARTAS® Robotic Hair Transplants Center for Hair Restoration 110 East 55th Street New York, NY 212-826-2400 BernsteinMedical.com
well. For him, the decision was easy, even obvious. “I don’t trust ourselves to be able to distinguish between the sketchiness of each individual institution,” he told me recently from Nassau. “I don’t want to be in a position of guessing, ‘Is this Russian bank, which is not sanctioned, acting as a conduit for that one?’” he said. “That’s a really messy situation, and you don’t want to fuck that up.” His fellow crypto CEOs, however, seem perfectly comfortable fucking that up. The heads of most of the other exchanges have begrudgingly promised to abide by the sanctions and do what the law requires—and nothing more. “Frankly, I think the communication of the industry has been quite bad,” Bankman-Fried said. “It has sounded somewhat pro–sanctions evasion.” Well before Russia’s war of aggression, there were worries that rogue states could use cryptocurrency to evade blacklists and move funds around the world in secret. On February 27, with Russian forces pressing toward Kyiv, Ukraine’s vice-prime minister issued a call for “all major crypto exchanges to block addresses of Russian users. It’s crucial to freeze not only the addresses linked to Russian and Belarusian politicians, but also to sabotage ordinary users.” Jesse Powell, the CEO of Kraken, rejected the idea out of hand, writing on Twitter that his company’s mission “is to bridge individual humans out of the legacy financial system and bring them into the world of crypto, where arbitrary lines on maps no longer matter, where they don’t have to worry about being caught in broad, indiscriminate wealth confiscation.” (“Besides,” he added, a little snottily, “if we were going to voluntarily freeze financial accounts of residents of countries unjustly attacking and provoking violence around the world, step one would be to freeze all U.S. accounts.”) Coinbase, another big platform, has taken the same position, as has Binance, the largest exchange by volume, which still allows trading in rubles. Given all the libertarians in the cryptosphere (some anti-Establishment anarchists, more utopian ideologues), one might think the Russian state’s killing of Ukrainian civilians would provoke a stronger response. But aside from Bankman-Fried, most western leaders in the crypto community are responding to the war remarkably coolly. For Illia Polosukhin, the Ukrainian co-founder of a blockchain platform called Near, the issue is not so abstract. In recent weeks, his social-media feeds have bifurcated into posts about bombings near his hometown of Kharkiv and those discussing the price of bitcoin. “It’s surreal,” he said. “It was two direct opposites.” He left Kyiv for Lisbon in late January, before the invasion, but he still has family inside Ukraine. He’s not in favor of banning all Russians from crypto trading—that would be too indiscriminate—but he thinks it would make sense to block those still residing in Russia. In his view, anyone who remains there is complicit, and so are those who transact with them. “I do see operating in Russia as actively contributing dollars to the government, which is waging war,” he said. even though the crypto markets have long since been flooded by apolitical speculators whose only motivation is profit, the CEOs of the big exchanges are still inf luenced by (and often count themselves among) a cohort of true believers: early adopters who think that letting governments dictate who can trade digital coins compromises the very ethos of the technology. Bitcoin, after all, was created in direct response to a global crisis: the mortgage meltdown of 2008 and the flood of stimulus by fiat that followed. It was both a financial innovation and a statement of principles; it had, bound up in its code, ideas about trust, transparency, autonomy, and the role of the state— or lack thereof. In the years since, as bitcoin and other digital tokens have proliferated, adherents have touted their borderless utility across a host of international problems and crises. Crypto is an elegant tool for immigrant laborers and refugees sending remittances to their home countries; it’s a banking alternative for Afghans fleeing the Taliban; it’s even a store of value for Venezuelans facing hyperinflation of the bolivar. But the Lagarde accused crypto outfits of being “accomplices” to those evading sanctions, who were using the technology “as we speak.” 28 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Ukraine war dwarfs these concerns. And arriving at a moment when the global market cap for digital coins is approaching $2 trillion, it has helped turn borderlessness into a moral liability. Crypto itself may be an unbeatable way to zap funds directly to Ukrainians defending their countr y, but the operators of these billion-dollar trading platforms are coming off as blasé, at best, about the possibility that their companies could be helping the Russian regime. When I asked Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong last week whether he has a responsibility to take a stance on the war, a spokesperson immediately demurred on his behalf and directed me to a Twitter thread in which he had said, in part, “We don’t think there’s a high risk of Russian oligarchs using crypto to avoid sanctions.” Just a few days later, Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, told a high-level gathering of industry experts that such techniques were “certainly being used, as we speak,” and accused crypto outfits of serving as “accomplices.” It’s not the first time Armstrong has tried to stay out of a conflict. In 2020, after the murder of George Floyd, he said he didn’t think it was his place to weigh in on racial injustice and Black Lives Matter, asserting that Coinbase had an “apolitical culture.” His employees staged a walkout, and 60 of them resigned. Much has been made of the notion that we are living in an era of “woke capitalism,” with corporations being pushed by investors and their own workers to act in more socially responsible ways. The Ukraine war has only accelerated this reshuffling of the corporate moral order. As the Yale business scholar Jeffrey Sonnenfeld has pointed out, oil companies—oil!—led the exodus from Russia after Putin’s invasion, forfeiting billions in potential profit. Wall Street’s old guard followed suit. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon did get blowback for questioning whether it was the finance industry’s function to ostracize Russia, telling Time, “That’s not our job.” But he had already set in motion the firm’s exit, the first by a big bank. And he quickly put out a new statement: “We firmly believe it is our responsibility at Goldman Sachs to lead the way in supporting the U.S. and international community’s efforts to punish Putin and his regime.” The alarming implication is that aside from the likes of Bankman-Fried, the crypto industry—the ascendant force in finance, the recipient of so much talent and investment—has scruples far weaker ■ than the vampire squid.
Back on Broadway April 14! “The lovable, big-heart musical comedy Broadway needs right now.” Chris Jones, Chicago Tribune Stephen Sondheim Theatre, 124 W. 43rd St. DoubtfireBroadway.com Proud Partner of Mrs. Doubtfire Broadway
HOW THE IMPECCABLY CREDENTIALED, IMPROBABLY CHARMING ECONOMIC HISTORIAN ADAM TOOZE SUPPLANTED THE DIRTBAG LEFT. GALAXY AIN by molly fischer Photographs by Brian Finke 30 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2

ENRY WILLIAMS was 7 in 2008, and what he remembers about 2008 is that his dad lost his job. Henry’s suburban childhood was comfortable, but even so, it was shadowed by an awareness of precarity. For a time when Henry was growing up, an aunt in her 20s lived with his family while she was between jobs. The aunt had gotten an M.F.A. in film. In the years to come, an M.F.A. in film would seem like a bad plan to Henry. When Henry Williams arrived at college, he was a stem guy: Computers were what you did to be practical. Eventually, he imagined, he might get a Ph.D. in physics. But his undergraduate career at Columbia was still young when other events intervened. Freshman year, he and a friend started a not-quite-kidding presidential campaign for former Alaska senator Mike Gravel. (They had heard about the senator on the socialist comedy podcast Chapo Trap House.) The campaign consisted primarily of a vigorous presence on dirtbag-left Twitter, where the so-called Gravel Teens gave their 89-year-old candidate’s account an unlikely fluency. The campaign did not achieve its goal of sending Gravel to the Democratic-primary debates, though it did attract mystified attention and national press. Williams’s allegiance passed in due course to Bernie Sanders, whose campaign suffered irretrievable defeat just before covid shut down Williams’s campus. Dissatisfied with remote school and disillusioned with college in general, he decided to take a year off—from class, but not from learning. What he wanted, he told me, was to find someone who could explain “what the hell was going on in the world.” From Sanders’s loss, to the emergence of a global pandemic, to the economic fallout, “it’s this incredibly fast-moving maelstrom of events, and particularly if you talk about the economics of it, it’s almost impossible to get a grip on.” This was when Williams discovered the work of economic historian Adam Tooze. In the corner of Twitter where Williams dwelled, Tooze had emerged as the explainer of first resort. He was the guy other guys recommended; he was also, from what Williams recalls, tweeting “a hell of a lot.” Williams heard Tooze on the Bloomberg Odd Lots podcast explaining how the current crisis was and wasn’t like 2008. He read Tooze in the London Review of Books explaining the pandemic’s effects across China, the U.S., and the eurozone. Starting with The Deluge, Tooze’s 2014 account of World War I and its aftermath, Williams proceeded to read all of his books—The Wages of Destruction (about the Nazi economy), Crashed (about the 2008 financial crisis), and Statistics and the German State, 1900–1945 (self-explanatory). His year off from college became, in effect, an independent study in Tooze. In seminar rooms and on Twitter, Tooze has won a following: They are primarily young men, known sometimes as “Tooze Bros” or “Tooze Boys,” if boys can encompass a male population in its early 20s to late 30s. Like Williams, these fans tend toward the left and have occupations that enable them to spend hours on Twitter forming opinions. They concern themselves with American economic and foreign policy, with special attention to the fraught places where these two intersect—for example, in confronting climate change. Perhaps some would once have cast their critique in the shitpost mode of the Chapo heyday, but lately, in place of provocation, they prefer an avalanche of facts. The Gravel 32 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 campaign, Williams reflected, “feels like forever ago. I feel a lot older than I was then.” What Tooze gives a reader like Williams is not a piercing, singular insight but a sense of rigorous mastery. In March, drawing on work by scientists, work by economists, and context in German politics, he assessed the feasibility of a Russian-energy boycott by Germany. (Conclusion: certainly difficult but perhaps not impossible.) Tooze’s great intellectual power is a gift for synthesis. “He just digests staggering amounts of information,” said Ted Fertik, one of his former Ph.D. students and now a policy strategist. Tooze roves across vast fields of data—historical data, technical data, data about Russian currency reserves, data about the Nazi steeltube industry—and returns with a reasonably accessible brief in hand. His omnivorously quantitative approach combines with his economic expertise to reveal familiar subjects in new ways. In Crashed, the book that was many readers’ introduction to his work, the financial crisis of 2008 becomes something even more complex and catastrophic than it might initially have appeared: an American housing bubble, yes, but also an international decadelong disaster brewed by the global dollar system. As a historian, Tooze once observed that work drawing on quantitative sources had become “a minority interest” in the field, one greeted at times with “an attitude of hostility and incomprehension.” As a public intellectual, he has found a more receptive readership. Let the historians wring their hands about Foucault and power; off campus, numbers make you sound like you know what you’re talking about. “He validates the little-boy inter ‘Risk’ while also 21ST-CENTURY POLITICS In the years since the financial crisis, a growing audience has sought answers regarding capitalism’s failures. Tooze, with his close study of what technocratic elites and free-market ideology have wrought, offered ammunition for leftist critique. As with the economist Thomas Piketty a few years prior, this has made him an unlikely celebrity. Crashed depicted the sheer scale of government intervention required to prop up global finance, and all the ways that falling short—doing too little or doing it too late—had led to needless suffering. To challenge decades of economic orthodoxy urging government thrift and free markets, it helps to have someone with the data to back up John Maynard Keynes’s assertion that “anything we can actually do, we can afford.” A figure like Sanders could make the case that things had to change, but a figure like Tooze could provide the proof. Tooze’s ongoing study of past global disasters has arrived at a present rife with global disasters to explain. The events of spring 2020 vaulted him to prominence: As much of the world shut down, his schedule filled. On one occasion, when booked back-to-back, he left a Zoom panel with Emmanuel Macron while the French president was mid-sentence—just closed the window on Macron. In an email, Tooze recalled, “I was kinda in shock for days afterward ;).” TOOZE’S OFFICE AT Columbia is approximately the height of two offices vertically stacked. Bookshelves run floor to ceiling along three of the walls, and on the fourth, beside a window open to the traffic noise of Morningside Heights, hang two oil paintings of airplanes. These were the first oil paintings Tooze bought, back
when he was in graduate school. Originally commissioned for Shell’s London corporate headquarters, they capture technological optimism at a 20th-century peak—“Supersonic longdistance passenger travel as it was imagined in the early ’60s,” Tooze said, “with a little bit of a sci-fi turn thrown in.” Although Tooze’s family is British, he spent much of his childhood in Germany, where his father worked as a molecular biologist. Growing up in the southwestern part of the country was, in Tooze’s telling, akin to growing up in a combination of Silicon Valley and Detroit—Mercedes and Porsche were both nearby. An early ambition of his was to become an engine and chassis designer for race cars. “I was quite serious about it,” he told me when we spoke in his office on a February afternoon. “I was doing, for that age”—early teens—“quite sophisticated calculations shaping the exhaust pulse as it exits the combustion chamber so as to minimize ‘back pressure’ and maximize scavenging and all that.” This was one of two great intellectual infatuations Tooze nurtured in his youth; the other was military history. “I’ve sort of sublimated those into more mature interests,” he said. His fascination with the inner workings of complicated machines now attaches to such subjects as the global bond market. Not unlike a Porsche engine, it is a product of material constraints and countless decisions made by highly trained experts. And these experts—the people drawing up plans and issuing orders—stand at the center of his work. Just as traditional military history offers a top-down perspective, so too does the Tooze view depict a world of high-level strategy: A move like Mario Draghi’s 2012 declara- class, and it proved “the first time I kind of got a sense of what liberated, intellectually creative teaching could be like at grad school,” he said. “And then that’s what I did at Yale.” Arriving in New Haven in 2009, he found himself part of a new academic economy. Within the artisanal guild system of Cambridge, “if you’re the salami-maker, that’s what you do.” At Yale, by contrast, “you’re being hired as a senior partner to a small academic consultancy and teaching business with a very large capital base. And so what they’re interested in doing is maximizing your human resource.” Tooze spoke fluent German, so he could teach alongside the Germanists; he knew his military history, so he could join John Lewis Gaddis’s Grand Strategy program and “do the whole Kissinger thing.” He’d found a polymath’s paradise and, in his view, the style that would make his career. The interdisciplinary approach Yale encouraged is “why I’ve ended up with you interviewing me,” he said. At Yale, he became interested in the financial crisis of 2008 as history—how its story was told even as events progressed. He soon saw that in order to understand the crisis as history, he would have to understand the crisis itself. “I realized it was a transatlantic story, like the story I told in Deluge and in Wages of Destruction,” Tooze said. “You had to relate European and American history, in this case, by way of their banks. The other thing I realized was that we were living through—as a result of globalization and financialization—a quite fundamental challenge to the framework of macroeconomics as we understood it.” Conventional macroeconomic models had failed to predict the crash, “and not by accident. The reason they had failed est in BIG MACHINES and great men playing EMBRACING ALL THE LEFT-WING, ANTI-IMPERIAL, we’re supposed to have.” tion that the European Central Bank, of which he was then president, would do “whatever it takes” to save the euro is equivalent to a decisive cavalry charge. Tooze’s parents had met at Cambridge, where his father was a scholarship student and his mother, he says, a child of the “Brahmanical upper-middle class.” Tooze, upon applying, was torn between studying economics and history. Because British undergraduate education involves a single focus, this choice appeared absolute. In economics, Tooze was by his own account “kind of on fire”—he’d been permitted as a teenager to teach a class on Keynesian models at his secondary school. His prospects in history appeared less auspicious; he enrolled in economics. With its entrenched traditions and exacting, unquestionable standards, the Cambridge approach to pedagogy makes intellectual life a kind of specialized craftsmanship. Tooze compares it to “being an Italian artisan in a very demanding trade like sausage-making or Parmesan-making or violin-making.” He chafed at the curriculum. After getting his history Ph.D. at the London School of Economics and returning to Cambridge as an assistant professor, “I found it very confining. It made me depressed,” he said. His “lifeboat” in those years took the form of a course he devised on the end of history. Reading the venerable Marxist Perry Anderson on Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man had been a “life-changing” experience for Tooze— where many on the left saw a celebration of liberal capitalism’s triumph, Anderson saw a historical analysis worth serious scrutiny. Tooze took Anderson’s approach as inspiration for the to predict it was the way they were built.” The lecture course that Tooze first taught in 2013 drew on economics, politics, and history. It also drew on Tooze’s particular charisma as a lecturer—his ability to convey a gobsmacked awe at the facts as well as the facts themselves. Attracting a mix of econ majors interested in being bankers and lefties interested in bankers’ failures, it became the kind of class where students showed up early to get a good seat. Crashed, essentially a book-length expansion of the course, was published in 2018. Yale was also where Tooze began offering a graduate course on the philosophy of history. Fertik remembered Tooze’s role in the class as a “convener” more than an instructor: someone who was “surely in the top half of the group in terms of the depth of his existing knowledge of the texts,” but who acknowledged that some of the students had expertise surpassing his own. He came to the material with a sense of discovery. In 2011, when Fertik took the class, it unfolded alongside Occupy. While he and his classmates wrestled with ideas about the end of history, a few hours away, history seemed to be taking place. “I reacted to Occupy as indicating the possibility of an ‘end to the end of history,’” Fertik wrote in an email. “This only intensified the feeling that the texts we were reading had visceral stakes.” Recalled Tooze, “A bunch of my more radical students were doing Occupy part time and this course. A whole bunch of them were actually off their heads on pills, and I was off my head from just not sleeping.” He was struggling with writing The Deluge at the time. “And it created this intense— I mean, it was amazing. An incredible classroom dynamic.” The group sometimes gathers for reunions. “You can die happy after march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 33
having that teaching experience once in your life,” he said. The students who collected around the class and the reading group it spawned came from many disciplines: philosophy, history, political science. They were also predominantly male. Regarding the gender dynamic of the scene, “I worry about it,” Tooze said, “because there’s a way of interpreting it as exclusive. And that’s very delicate terrain. It makes me very thoughtful, really, because it isn’t true statistically that I don’t have any female students and haven’t worked closely with women.” Within the Tooze Boy milieu, “it’s a homosocial environment, and that’s easy. We know it’s easy. It’s also true for women,” he said. “It creates a kind of bond, there’s no question.” He is relieved that his current Columbia reading group has a roughly 50-50 gender split. Nevertheless, “there is this Tooze Boy thing, and they are boys,” he said. WHEN HENRY WILLIAMS returned to school last fall, he saw that Tooze, who had moved from Yale to Columbia in 2015, was teaching a seminar called “Capitalism and Democracy.” The class was a graduate offering—technically, Williams was not qualified. When he showed up on the first day, “I selectively omitted the truth,” he said. Tooze’s eventual verdict was that as long as he kept up, he could stay. The next semester, Williams joined a Tooze-led reading group on the political economy of climate change. “The hope of this group is to be sort of generative,” Williams told me. “Breaking new ground, reaching new terrain.” In February, on the night I sat in, the group was discussing the book Bolivia in the Age of Gas. “I’m finding this stuff very challenging,” Tooze told the group. “I’m finding it very unfamiliar and outside my comfort zone.” The discussion that followed alighted on thinkers from Max Weber to Andreas Malm. When listening very closely, Tooze bowed his head and shut his eyes. Williams ventured that the book undersold Evo Morales as a polit- track at Georgetown, Columbia, and Cornell), there are a legion of podcasters, reporters, tweet threaders, and think-tankers with similar pedigrees and fewer prospects. This demographic may not have institutional power, but it sometimes has the ear of people who do. In corporate settings, in government settings, at economic ministries, “all the analysis is done by people in their 30s,” said Tim Sahay, a senior policy manager at the Green New Deal Network and one of Tooze’s friends. “Those are the people who have been paying attention to Adam.” In the offices of Senators Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren, Sahay told me, there are staffers for whom Tooze’s work serves as “a kind of secret handshake.” (He saw shades of Tooze in the Build Back Better climate legislation, which combined economic and CO2 modeling.) During the pandemic, the ranks of the Tooze Bros grew. Matthew Zeitlin, a reporter whose Tooze enthusiasm was perhaps the first I registered, remembered that in spring 2020, Tooze “was on a podcast every other day.” In Zeitlin’s most vivid memory of the early pandemic, he is simmering dried beans, he is listening to Tooze talk about the Treasury market on a podcast, and he is thinking, I’ve done this so many times. Tooze’s wife, Dana Conley, runs a boutique tour company, and during the pandemic, her work disappeared. Tooze was busier than ever, meanwhile. He set aside the book he had been writing about the economics of the climate crisis and began to think and write about the covid crisis instead; that book, Shutdown, was published last year. In 2020 and 2021, he started first a Substack called Chartbook, then a podcast called Ones and Tooze. Both allow him a wide-ranging mandate to explain numbers in the news. Tooze told me that a model that guides him is the BBC in its publicspirited educational heyday. A flautist in his youth, he fondly recalls an hour-long radio program dedicated to “discussing different recordings of late Beethoven string quartets, comparing passages.” “Every dude on here’s dream blunt rotation is MIKE DAVIS, ADAM TOOZE, AND FIDEL CASTRO.” ical figure. “All that is brilliant and right,” Tooze told him. Williams suggested that the extractive masculinist order in Bolivia resembled that of West Virginia. Tooze nodded forcefully—or Britain or Poland, he added. Later, Williams brought up meeting a person with a venture-capital-funded space-mining program, and there was laughter all around. Before Williams introduced himself to me after class, I had indicated him in my notes as “loud boy.” Within the academy, Tooze embodied a certain graduate student’s fantasy: a scholar defying recent trends toward social and domestic history, focusing instead on the elites who dominated economic and political battlefields. When Yakov Feygin, now an economic-policy researcher at the Berggruen Institute, was getting his history Ph.D. at the University of Pennsylvania, “I would joke that I want to be Adam Tooze when I grow up,” he told me. (He’s now at work on a book he describes as something like “Wages of Destruction for the postwar Soviet economy.”) Between Tooze and his students, the influence ran both ways. Those with whom Tooze worked most closely would read his publications in progress, inform his thinking, push him not to equivocate. The world as it appears in his work—as a place where global power brokers act with huge and often dire consequences—resonated with their experience. These were elite students who had graduated into the economic mess he described in Crashed. And if his own students have fared remarkably well (Tooze Boys can be found on the tenure 34 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 In January, he devoted an installment of Chartbook to mapping “the polycrisis we are in.” This polycrisis encompassed Omicron, U.S. inflation, European inflation, the need for net-zero climate policy, and the potential for war with Russia in Ukraine. “It comes from all sides and it just doesn’t stop,” Tooze wrote. “In German there is a compound noun: Krisenbilder—Crisis Pictures. I am going to draw some Krisenbilder.” What followed—the Krisenbilder—were thickets of color-coded arrows, increasingly dense, connecting such entities as “oil prices,” “ECB,” and “Biden admin (midterms).” Among them, further graphs charted the state of Ukrainian government debt, American oil prices, and E.U. gas imports. “The German philosopher-historian Reinhart Koselleck spoke of the gap in modernity between the space of experience and the ‘horizon of expectation,’ ” Tooze concluded. “Given our present mood, talk of a horizon of expectation feels like a rather pastoral image. What these Krisenbilder sketch is more like a mind map of our fears. But, with Koselleck, let us hope that these fears do remain on the horizon.” Another model Tooze said he looks to in his role as public intellectual is that of his maternal grandparents. “Leading synthesizers of global data on childhood nutrition,” Peggy and Arthur Wynn published research on poverty and family policy and together wrote a pseudonymous book attacking Tory business connections called England’s Money Lords. (Arthur was also, for a time, a
Soviet-spy recruiter at Oxford.) They continued their work into their 90s. Arthur died over his word processor one night after Peggy had gone to bed; he was making a list of things to do. IT WAS IN 2020 that Rachel Millman, a social-media editor, noticed something afoot among her male friends. It began with a man she described as “aesthetically, a Long Island bro to the core—the accent, the flat cap, the polo, all of it” but “also a dedicated DSA member.” One day, the pair was hanging out when an alarm on her friend’s phone whipped him into action. “He was all, ‘Oh, there’s a Tooze talk I have to watch right now,’ ” Millman said. As another friend, then another, professed their devotion to Tooze, a phenomenon took shape in Millman’s mind. “Guys only want one thing and it’s fucking disgusting,” she tweeted above a screenshot of Tooze’s Twitter profile. Now, when a noteworthy piece of Tooze content “drops,” the tweet recirculates. (“I accidentally created the Bat-Signal,” she told me.) Because Tooze, like his fans, is constantly on Twitter, he too came across the tweet. He was alarmed at the possibility that it might imply something untoward; when he DM’d her, Millman reassured him otherwise. In her mentions, she watches as Tooze fans find a community she calls “the Beyhive of nerds.” “Every dude on here’s dream blunt rotation is Mike Davis, Adam Tooze, and Fidel Castro,” tweeted journalist Aaron Freedman recently. “And there’s nothin wrong with that.” Last year, the journalist Alex Yablon sent out a newsletter diagnosing the emerging Tooze phenomenon. (Under the heading “Tooze Clues,” it included Tooze’s bespectacled, beard-flocked face Photoshopped next to cartoon dog Blue.) Yablon, a self-described “dilletantish liberal-arts type,” wrote that he had undergone a pandemic-inspired conversion to caring about the economy. He and his wife had been counting on universal pre-K to make New York affordable, and now the program’s future seemed in doubt. “I became obsessed with the debates over federal, state, and local fiscal policy in spring 2020 out of naked, immediate self-interest,” he wrote. “Once I finally tuned in, I found that the economic-policy consensus felt more up for grabs than at any point in my lifetime.” Back when he was graduating from college, circa 2008, he and his friends had talked over beers about topics like fiction and indie rock; now they talked about the E.U.’s carbon border-adjustment tax scheme. “We joke about becoming ‘Tooze pilled,’” he wrote. A large part of Tooze’s appeal is that he “suggests that this stuff is comprehensible,” Yablon told me. “In 2008, I didn’t feel like that.” “Is there a word for members of the Adam Tooze fandom,” wondered journalist Brendan O’Connor on Twitter last fall. What to call them? Tooze Boys, Tooze Bros, Tooze Hounds, Tooze Heads, Tooze Dudes, Toozers. (“Tooze Bro,” in my experience, seems to come up most often in relation to online fans, “Tooze Boy” in relation to students. I have heard, secondhand, of a complaint that everyone says “Tooze Bros” and no one says “History Boys.”) The name is contentious, the appeal inarguable. “For the Tooze Bros, what Adam does is he validates the little-boy interest in big machines and great men playing Risk while also embracing all the left-wing, anti-imperial, 21st-century politics we’re supposed to have,” said Ethan Winter, an analyst at the think tank Data for Progress. “That’s very fun.” The media contingent of Tooze’s fan base are readers who relish a chance to “feel marginally superior to Matt Yglesias,” as journalist Alex Pareene put it. Tooze conveys substance—a sense of undeniable expertise—in a way few of his fellow explainers can match. “It’s remarkable the breadth of things he covers,” Pareene said. “It puts the rest of us to shame. You check his newsletter and it’ll be like, ‘Here’s the economic implications of what’s happening in the Ukraine. Here’s a complex discussion of cryptocurrency, which I don’t even like talking about yet I can talk about at length.’ And then everyone else is like, ‘Here’s a woke college student who complained in a meeting.’ So many other public commentators—it illuminates how parochial their concerns are.” Tooze joined Twitter in 2015, at the suggestion of his teenage daughter (now a Columbia junior), and took to the medium energetically. “Every day, I can see him basically live-tweet-reading the Financial Times,” Pareene said of Tooze—partly under his inspiration, Pareene recently subscribed. The Tooze Bros look upon his productivity in wonderment. “It is mind-boggling. Beyond mind-boggling. I mean, I’ll see him tweeting at 4 a.m. sometimes,” Williams said. “I do that sometimes, but that’s really a mistake. That’s a problem for me.” In the seven years that he has been tweeting “intensively,” Tooze believes he has managed to avoid significantly offending anyone. For him, the app has provided a cordial and sustaining intellectual community. “Those are my peeps,” he said. Twitter has “become far more important for me than academic seminars.” Lately, he said, the writing he enjoys most is “the short tempos”—the articles, newsletters, and other commentary. He suspects the climate book he is working on now will be the last he writes for some time. Since the beginning of 2022, Tooze has published eight articles in The New Statesman, Foreign Policy, and The Guardian; 40 editions of Chartbook (not including link roundups); and 1,500 tweets. “The man’s output is insane,” said Winter. “He just crushes con(Continued on page 97) tent. I have no idea how it’s possible.” march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 35
t Luke came ut tr s w n w 11, hoping to start r n r as a teenager. Instead, he was held st n tc m c t that’s far from over. C TLI N MOSCATELLO h h l a thu 3

His bones ached. Sitting on the edge of his bed, he twisted repeatedly to relieve the pain in his back, which “feels like it could snap in two.” The discomfort was like having an illness, he says, except he was not sick. Instead, he was suffering from the side effects of puberty blockers—a drug that suppresses the estrogen his body would otherwise naturally produce. Luke was supposed to be on the blockers for a year, part of a mandatory thinking period for minors before they can be prescribed genderaffirming hormones through the United Kingdom’s National Health Service. That deadline, like others before it, had passed. When I first met him, he was 17, and he had been waiting six years for care. Luke is one of thousands of young people in the U.K. living in limbo, casualties of a battle being waged in the media and the court system over the Gender Identity Development Service, a division of the NHS that performs psychological assessments for gender-diverse youth. The fight has divided British mental-health professionals: On one side are clinicians who believe if a child says they’re trans, they’re trans—and they have the right to puberty blockers and hormones. A small group, however, has sued to force gids to adopt a more conservative approach and withhold medical interventions. Their aim, they say, is to prevent young people from making decisions they might regret. The case they brought, Bell v. Tavistock, continues to play out in the British courts, but the repercussions are already being felt. For almost a year, gids was brought to a near standstill. After an early court decision, no gids patients were referred for gender-affirming hormones, and today, roughly 5,300 young people are on the waiting list for a first appointment, with an expected wait time of 23 months. “I was in an absolutely terrible place because I couldn’t cope with waking up and things being the same every single day,” Luke says. He socially transitioned at age 12, the same year he was diagnosed with gender dysphoria. He has been binding his chest for so long that he barely thinks about it anymore. To boost his five-foot-four frame, he often walks in black lace-up boots with a chunky heel. (They also look cool.) He is now in his final months of secondary school. When the academic year started, his hope was that he could go on testosterone before university. “To see the treatment there and be running toward it, and it moves at the same pace as you away from you—coming to terms with that is the hardest thing,” he says. In places with a more progressive approach, such as the Netherlands or some parts of the U.S., Luke could have gone on blockers as early as age 12, preventing breast growth and menstruation. If he had continued on to hormones, he would have experienced a male puberty alongside his peers. But in the U.K., that path was closed to him. There are signs that the debate in the British courts has found an audience in the U.S. Last month, Texas governor Greg Abbott ordered state agencies to investigate parents of children who medically transition for child abuse. In his written opinion supporting the order, Texas’s attorney general cited arguments from Bell v. Tavistock. Nationwide, right-leaning lawmakers proposed 43 bills last year aimed 38 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 until he turned 10, Luke (who asked to be identified by first name only) never thought much about his gender. He was, by his own telling, “a very, very girlie girl.” His mother, a caretaker in a residentialcare home, and his father, an engineer, never suspected that he might be grappling with his gender identity—and for the first decade of his life, he wasn’t. “I had quite a balanced upbringing,” says Luke, who now lives about two hours outside London with his mother and 14-year-old brother. (His parents separated when he was 7.) With the onset of puberty, however, Luke began to feel disoriented in his body. He was particularly bothered by his hips. When he looked in the mirror, it was almost like staring at someone who’d had botched plastic surgery, he says. Instead of seeing minor curves, the reflection was like looking at “a badly done caricature, like Betty Boop.” Luke discovered that dressing in masculine clothes made him feel a little bit better, so he started wearing tracksuits. At age 11, he discovered videos about gender dysphoria on YouTube, made by people whose experiences matched his own. After watching videos by Jamie Raines, a British man assigned female at birth who documented his medical transition online, “I eventually settled on what I was,” says Luke. He had his long brown hair cut off and told his mother that he was, in fact, a boy. A few weeks later, he told his father, too. He eventually decided he wanted to be called Luke and use male pronouns. His father covered up a tattoo on his hand of the name they’d given Luke at birth, which Luke saw as an act of love. “He’s not superemotional, but that was his physical action, like, showing a lot of acceptance,” he says. Luke’s mother took him to see a general practitioner to discuss starting a medical transition; that doctor referred Luke to a specialist who, over the course of several appointments, diagnosed him with gender dysphoria, which meant he was feeling dis- P H OTO G R A P H S : M AG N U M P H OTO S Luke was a teenager, but sometimes he suffered from hot flashes so intense he felt faint. at preventing minors from accessing gender-affirming care. As the lawyers and legislators fight, countless gender-diverse young people are caught in the middle. Without access to blockers, some of them are forced to go forward with a puberty that doesn’t align with their gender, producing irreversible changes that can only be corrected with painful and expensive surgeries later on. In the meantime, governments and health authorities seem further than ever from reaching a consensus on the best kind of care for trans kids. So Luke and his peers wait, month after anguishing month.
tress over his gender identity and body not aligning. (To be transgender is not necessarily to have gender dysphoria: the latter is a medical diagnosis; the former is not.) In the early aughts, a protocol developed at the Amsterdam Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria to help dysphoric children began to gain traction. Researchers found that they could alleviate their depression by halting puberty at a relatively early stage (often around age 12, but earlier in some kids) using drugs that had, for decades, been prescribed to children with precocious puberty (when puberty starts too early, sometimes as soon as age 8). These puberty blockers prevented sex changes driven by adolescent hormones: Transfeminine kids could avoid developing an Adam’s apple and a deep voice, for instance; transmasculine kids could stunt breast growth. At age 16 (though sometimes younger), according to the protocol, those patients could choose to start on estrogen or testosterone. At 18, they could consider surgery. Shortly after his appointment with the specialist, Luke learned that in order to access blockers and perhaps eventually hormones, he would still need to be separately evaluated by gids clinicians. In September 2016, two months before his 13th birthday, Luke received his referral. He was told it would be roughly ten months until his first appointment. Then the letters began arriving. “I’d probably get a letter every four months telling me that the waiting list has been extended. Basically, you move forward a month and then you move back a month,” he says. During this time, “there were no checkups, nothing like that” to help Luke with his gender dysphoria. To cope, Luke tried to alter his body on his own. He began binding his chest, first using “really rubbish” binders he’d ordered on Amazon before finding one that didn’t hurt quite as bad. He Googled ways to deepen his voice, none of which worked, and lifted weights in the hopes of broadening his shoulders. He began menstruating, and his depression worsened. “I was getting really desperate,” he says. As his male peers began to physically mature around him, Luke felt stuck in place. “I was basically paused sounding like a teen girl,” he says. “Mentally, it created a conflict because my personality got forced to develop in order to cope with the circumstance, but I still had to inhabit a body that made me feel really immature and disconne tho once l eu when his classmates’ voices changed and his didn’t; he stopped doing gymnastics when he became hyperaware of the differences between his body and those around him. Luke considered using GenderGP, a telehealth service registered in Hong Kong that could potentially prescribe him blockers and hormones. The service has become popular with transgender people in the U.K. frustrated with the slow pace of the NHS. “It’s what everyone goes on,” says Luke. But the fees were expensive, and his family couldn’t afford it. Meanwhile, his first appointment with gids kept getting pushed back. The initial ten-month period became 18 months, then 22 months. Finally, he received a letter with a firm date. By then, he was almost 16 years old—the age at which young people in the U.K. are eligible for gender-affirming hormones. “I thought, Okay, I’ll go and get interviewed. They’ll see that I’ve been living as male for about four years, and they will put me on hormones because I’ve wanted it for a long time,” says Luke. At first, the letter felt like a winning lottery ticket. WHILE LUKE WAITED YEARS to be seen by gids, a rift was developing within the orga- nization. In 2014, the service’s leadership adopted the protocol developed in Amsterdam, but some clinicians objected that gids was pushing patients toward blockers and hormones too quickly. They began voicing their concerns internally, arguing for a greater commitment to therapy for patients with gender dysphoria. They were calling, in a sense, for a return to the organization’s roots. gids was founded in 1989 by Domenico Di Ceglie, a psychiatrist at St. George’s Hospital in London who wanted to create a place for young patients to explore their gender identities. It was one of the first clinics in the world dedicated to helping children with gender dysphoria. In 1994, gids was moved under the umbrella of the Tavistock, the talk-therapy arm of the NHS. It had “three or four staff in a tiny office” and saw as few as 50 patients a year, says Bernadette Wren, a retired consultant clinical psychologist and family therapist who started at gids around that time. Almost 20 years later, gids was still seeing only 300 or so patients a year. But then, in 2016, the organization made it e for rs to refer patients to an 018—the year Luke received notice of his first appointment— that number had jumped to 2,500. (Most patients are seen at the Tavistock clinic in London, although gids operates a smaller clinic in Leeds and has outreach sites in Bristol and Birmingham.) As the numbers grew, patients and their parents began arriving at gids already aware of blockers and hormone therapy, says Wren. gids director Polly Carmichael and some of the senior members of her team supported the gender-affirming model, but other clinicians were startled by the number of patients demanding medical interventions right away. They had trained as psychoanalysts and family therapists and came to the service expecting to do long-term therapeutic work. (gids’ most recent data shows that patients averaged ten appointments before moving on to hormone therapy. Carmichael did not respond to interview requests.) Anastassis Spiliadis, a psychotherapist and psychoanalyst who worked at gids from 2015 to 2019, says that at times, he felt like “the only thing that the service was offering was a medical approach.” Spiliadis was alarmed when, he says, Carmichael told clinicians not to bring their concerns to the service’s child-safeguarding lead. (A spokesperson for gids denied this, but evidence presented before a tribunal investigating the matter backs up Spiliadis’s account.) When the gids clinicians in favor of a less medicine-focused approach felt their objections weren’t addressed by management, ten of them (from a staff of around 70) shared their worries with David Bell, a high-ranking psychiatrist and former president of the British Psychoanalytic Society who had been at the Tavistock for more than 25 years. Bell worked with adults and was not affiliated with gids, but he was a staff representative on the Tavistock Council of Governors, which meant he was elected by employees to make sure they have a voice in how things are run. He was also not a neutral sounding board. He says that gids always made him “uncomfortable,” and that while he supports an adult’s right to medically transition, in his view, minors “can’t make that kind of decision.” He was skeptical of the idea that someone could be born trans. “Over time, you develop a gender identity, which is probably quite early on in life, but it’s not assigned at birth,” he says. “There isn’t a gendered soul.” Bell, who is 71, suspects clinicians came to him because “I had a reputation, I think, of being the kind of person who wasn’t scared to say what he thought.” In his conversations with clinicians, “the most important thing was that they felt, or they march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 39
“Seeing girls my age starting to look very curvy on the same believed, that the children referred to the service were not adequately cared for and were in danger of being motored on an inappropriate pathway, which would have irreversible consequences, without sufficient thought,” he says. In the summer of 2018, Bell wrote a report on the clinicians’ concerns and submitted it to the Tavistock Council of Governors. “Dr. Bell kind of ran away with it and wrote a report that was full of his own criticisms,” says Wren. He used “very, very extreme language, implying senior staff were harming children.” The 55-page report, which includes lengthy, anonymous testimonies from gids clinicians, was damning for gids management, going so far as to assert that the service is “not fit for purpose” and that “children’s needs are being met in a woeful inadequate manner.” Bell pointed to unmanageable caseloads, “an excessively affirmative attitude” that he attributed to external political pressures, ethical questions around consent, systemic homophobia among staff and parents (one clinician said some parents would rather their child be trans than gay), and inexperienced clinicians tasked with complex cases. Bell called for an overhaul of gids. If the concerns he raised weren’t acted upon, he warned, there could be long-term, damaging consequences for the service’s patients, and the reputation of the Tavistock would be “very seriously at risk.” IN THE FALL , just a few months after OF 2018 Bell submitted his report, Luke got ready for his first gids appointment. It had been four years since he socially transitioned. He had partially gone through puberty by then: His hips and breasts were developing, his body taking a shape that made him uncomfortable in his own skin. But he was no longer menstruating, after his general practitioner put him on what he believes were birthcontrol pills. Luke says that intervention, at least, had been helpful; it ended what had become a monthly crisis. “I’d just have a nagging feeling in my head, like, You’re actually an idiot. Look, you’re clearly a woman. You’re clearly going through this. You’re not what you think you are,” he says. “It’s a very oppressive feeling because it’s your own body against you.” Still, the pills “didn’t make everything okay,” he says. Luke got upset looking at photos of himself before puberty, when his body was “genderless,” what he describes as a blank canvas—when “it could have gone another way, but it didn’t.” He stopped going to gym class. He avoided parties. As his classmates started to look more like adults, Luke oscillated between two states of panic. Sometimes, it was like he was on a train he couldn’t jump off, barreling toward womanhood while knowing he was male. (“Seeing girls my age starting to look very curvy and like women, and knowing I was technically on the same playing field as them, that was really frightening,” he says.) Other times, he felt trapped, unable to move forward without the testosterone he needed. His experience stands in contrast to that of transgender minors with easier access to hormones. In December, I sat down with Jason (who asked that his name be changed to protect his privacy), a 16-year-old in the U.S. who came out as transgender in the eighth grade. He started on testosterone shortly before his 14th birthday, and at 15, he underwent transmasculine top surgery. He’s now having the high-school experience he imagined. He plays on the boys’ lacrosse team and doesn’t have to worry about taking off his shirt in the locker room; in fact, most of his teammates don’t know he is transgender. Sometimes, “I’ll be at a party talking to a girl, and I’m like, Oh, this is so normal,” he says. For Luke, the moments of normality arrived rarely, but he did his best to find his comfort zone. Over time, he grew his hair into a proper male shag and replaced the tracksuits with thrift-store finds, silk scarves, and patterned shirts (very ’70s Mick Jagger, though Luke was particularly inspired by Queen). He tried to focus on the positives of his body—that he was lean and not particularly curvy and didn’t have a high voice. It was much harder for transfeminine people stuck in the same waiting process, he suspected. His friend, who was assigned male at birth, couldn’t access blockers or hormones either. Over the span of several months, her voice broke, she shot up to five-foot- 40 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 ten, and her shoulders broadened. “That is, like, a real dire thing because those few months determine the rest of your life if you are male to female,” says Luke. When he looked at himself, he simply saw a boy who was a late bloomer. For his gids appointment, Luke drove with his mother to the service’s satellite office in Birmingham. It didn’t look like much, just some chairs in an otherwise empty waiting room, but Luke was elated that he was about to see the specialists who could change his life. “We were really excited to be moving forward and talked a lot about how far we had come,” says Luke. When two gids clinicians came in to talk with Luke and his mother, he expected that they’d quickly go through his history and start discussing medical options. Instead, “it was a very kind of vague check,” says Luke. “They were just like, ‘How old are you? How do you feel? When do you feel it?’” Most of the questions focused on the past year—if he’d felt more like a girl or a boy, if people treated him like a girl or a boy, if he felt his life would be better as a boy. They ended the meeting by handing him forms to fill out and said he’d need to come in for a total of four to six appointments. Luke soon found himself back in the car, somewhat bewildered, thinking, That’s it? Unlike the fast-paced care outlined in the Bell report, Luke’s experience with gids was maddeningly slow. He wasn’t yet caught up in the consequences of the court fight to come—the delays came instead from an overburdened service and the very thing the Bell report wanted more of: a staff invested in talk therapy, with no rush to prescribe blockers or hormones. Luke tried to stay positive, telling himself it was a start. Now, there was a clinician on his case and he was moving forward, at least incrementally. “First appointments are often introductory,” he figured. “I’ll come back next week, and we’ll start talking about my treatment.” It was a couple of months until he was seen again. During the next appointment, Luke and his mother kept saying the same things over and over—that he’d been living as a boy for years and that he’d been interested in gender-affirming hormones for years as well. He already had a genderdysphoria diagnosis and had been seen by a general practitioner and a mental-health
and like women, and knowing I was technically playing field as them, that was really frightening.” professional. Luke had assumed that because gids clinicians were gender specialists, they would read his file, get consent from both Luke and his parents, and move him on to an endocrinologist who could administer the hormones. By the third appointment, emotions were running high. One of the forms he was told to fill out asked if Luke thought of himself as a hermaphrodite, which he found offensive and outdated. He was similarly upset when a clinician challenged him on why he had never had a romantic relationship. Luke explained that he was too uncomfortable in his body to connect with another person on that level. “I can barely hug my family because it makes me so hyperaware of my body—that’s why I’m here,” Luke, who is bisexual, told her. He says that the clinician pushed back, stating that plenty of transgender teens are in relationships. In the same conversation, the clinician mentioned that Luke had said he sometimes wore eyeliner, and wasn’t that kind of experimental for someone who wanted to be perceived as male? Luke’s frustration grew. “It’s a bit of eyeliner. It’s not that deep.” “She really had a complete lack of understanding that transgender people are different, not everyone’s the same,” Luke says. “I was saying to her, ‘For me, it’s a very biological thing. For me personally, I could dress in feminine clothes and I would be fine as long as my chest was flat and my hips were narrow.’ And she was like, ‘What? What? You can’t do that.’” The appointment became a turning point for Luke and his mother. Until then, they’d been confident that they were on the path to starting his medical transition. But time was slipping away—by then, Luke had turned 16, the age he’d hoped to start his male puberty. A student in the grade above him at school, who had come out as transgender years after Luke, had paid for private care and was already on hormones. Luke’s younger brother was starting to go through puberty as well. It was as though everyone was passing him. The real bombshell came in a later appointment, when (Continued on page 87) march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 41
I T H E F U T URE OF TRUMP The greatest threat to Donald Trump’s hold on the Republican Party comes from his Florida neighbor, GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS , who may be more MAGA than the MAGA king himself. BY JONATHAN CHAIT 42 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Photo-illustration by Eddie Guy

as daily deaths from covid-19 tallied in the thousands across the country, Florida governor Ron DeSantis announced his latest effort to dismantle his state’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. Private businesses, he insisted, should stop requiring their employees to wear masks at work. Here was a perfectly selected message to build the brand he has established: Ron DeSantis, scourge of public-health bureaucrats, enemy of woke corporations, and friend of the little guy. Both the form and content of the message reflected careful planning. As DeSantis spoke, he looked like a man who had been mimicking Donald Trump’s speeches in front of the mirror. He performed a series of hand thrusts, in which he drew his thumbs together until they were almost touching, then jerked them apart in quick horizontal motions, as if he were playing an invisible accordion. After five such accordion pulls, he swung his right hand, thumb pointing up, in a semi-circular motion back inward to the center. DeSantis tweeted out the clip, and any maga fan watching, even without the sound on, would have grasped the gist just through the eerie physical impersonation. Republicans have collectively recognized that however much Trump may exasperate them, their president-in-exile will not be purged, nor will the changes he brought to their party be rolled back. He might, however, be co-opted. And if this is to happen, they have settled with remarkable unanimity on DeSantis as the person to do it. People who do not ingest large amounts of conservative media may have difficulty comprehending the extent of the adulation both the Trumpist and the Trumpskeptical wings of the party have lavished on DeSantis. On a daily basis, the rightwing press churns out stories with headlines like “The Promise of Ron DeSantis,” “Could Gov. Ron DeSantis Be the Favorite GOP Front-runner for 2024?,” “A Ron DeSantis Master Class in Rope-a-Dope,” “Media Keep Trying—and Failing—to Take Down Florida’s Ron DeSantis,” “Karol Markowicz on What Gov. Ron DeSantis Is Really Like: ‘So Real and Down to Earth,’” and on and on. The Florida governor has reportedly provoked Trump by refusing to preemptively endorse his likely candidacy for a second term, and DeSantis is putting himself in a position to challenge the former president for the 2024 nomination. An annoyed has d as that h wor eS ause he “has no personal charisma and has a dull personality,” according to Axios. But Trump has cause for concern: DeSantis has blitzed the national Republican donor circuit and turned most of the conservative media into his personal messaging apparatus. “You should be my governor,” cooed Sean Hannity in one interview. “We see him as the future of the party,” a Fox News producer wrote to DeSantis’s office in an email obtained by the Tampa Bay Times. This work has already yielded fruit: DeSantis’s polling has crept up steadily, while every other Republican who had once been whispered about as a potential nominee— Tom Cotton, Nikki Haley, Mike Pence, Josh Hawley—has barely registered. There are other, more troubling signs for Trump that his stranglehold over the party may be loosening. In December, during an interview in Dallas with disgraced former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly, Trump was booed by members of the crowd when he confirmed that he had received a covid booster shot. Since he left office, the Republican Party has by and large turned against the measures designed to ameliorate the impact of the pandemic, giving upstarts like DeSantis a chance to outflank him on what has become the central battleground of the culture wars. “What we’ve done is historic,” a confused Trump told his skeptical supporters in Dallas, claiming credit for the production of lifesaving vaccines. “Don’t let them take it away. Don’t take it away from ourselves.” Trump is right that DeSantis can’t compete as a performer with him or even with past Republicans who have built national brands. DeSantis has the anti-tax zealotry of Paul Ryan without the winsome affect and sculpted torso. He has the social conservatism of George W. Bush with none of the folksiness. He has the partisan fire of Newt Gingrich without the mesmerizing hair. He speaks in a nasal tone nobody has described as pleasant on the ears and has yet to utter an eloquent or memorable turn of phrase. Reporters have noted his puzzling lack of interest in human relationships outside his family, which has resulted in heavy staff churn. “You will be in the car with Ron DeSantis and he’ll say nothing to you for an hour,” one associate told Politico. “He would prefer it that way.” But in some respects, DeSantis’s distant middle-management energy is the point, especially when compared to Trump’s garish star power. It is crucial to understand that the critique of Trump that prevails among Republican officials is far narrower than the one proffered by Democrats or Never Trumpers. They don’t object to Trump’s on, lying, or contempt for s, except to the extent that these qualities hurt the party’s brand. What irritates, instead, is Trump’s constant disregard for basic political self-preservation. DeSantis offers them the prospect of a party 44 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 leader who can harness all the right-wing populist energy generated by Trump without the latter’s childlike inability to focus on what his advisers tell him. One DeSantis ally, confiding to the New York Times, summed up his appeal as “competent Trumpism.” His proto-candidacy reflects a handful of working assumptions. First, that any former Republican voter who opposed Trump on moral rather than aesthetic grounds is gone and not worth trying to bring back. Second, that the right-wing groups Trump brought into the Republican fold or whose creation he inspired are either political assets or simply too important to be culled. And third, that Trump’s attempt to secure an unelected second term was a failure of tactics, not a disqualifying ambition that merited rebuke and ostracism. The DeSantis pitch is to wrest the maga movement from the grifters who built it and place it in the hands of a trusted professional politician. This project raises two questions: Can it succeed in prying the nomination from Trump’s grip? And what would it mean if it did? Just imagine what a Trumpified party no longer led by an erratic, deeply unpopular cable-news binge-watcher would be capable of. ONE OF THE REASON S P O L I T I C A L analysts dismissed the possibility Trump could win the Republican nomination when he first ran is that such an outcome violated what was taken as virtually a scientific truth. A 2008 book written by a quartet of political scientists, The Party Decides, argued that presidential nominations only appeared to be controlled by the voters of Iowa, New Hampshire, and so on but were actually determined by party insiders. The elites, coordinating with one another, made their preferences known through the media, and the primary voters would absorb those messages and act accordingly. This thesis perfectly described the next contested primary that happened. The 2012 Republican nominating contest featured a succession of flamboyant rightwing populists—Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, Gingrich—who would enthrall the base and shoot up in the polls only to collapse as if pulled down by some gravitational force detectable solely by political science. But Trump’s 2016 nomination, in the face of near-total opposition from the Republican elite, obviously shows the party does not always decide. The voters might pick a nominee their party’s elites oppose if that candidate offers them something unique. Many Republicans have tried to discern the source of Trump’s appeal and replicate it. As early as 2016, Ted Cruz was tacking P R E V I O U S S P R E A D : J O E R A E D L E / G E T T Y I M AG E S ( D E S A N T I S ) in late february,
to Trump’s right on abortion and guns, and Marco Rubio briefly tried to match Trump’s schoolyard insults, at one point making fun of the size of his hands. But Trump’s secret sauce with the base turned out to be his unwavering pugilism. Having spent more time than perhaps any other Republican candidate consuming conservative media, Trump had absorbed its message that conservative America is under assault by sinister liberal elites. He built a political style designed for the world depicted on Fox News, in which the Republican Party is always losing because its leaders are too weak to fight back. Conservatives sum up his appeal with the phrase “But he fights.” As the “but” implies, they often acknowledge Trump’s f laws before praising his overriding instinct to attack their enemies. Even his errors can turn to his benefit. The more Trump draws howls of outrage from liberals and the media, the more he proves his tribal bona fides. DeSantis has undertaken an almost clinical effort to manufacture and bottle this aspect of Trump’s style. He has repeated the Trumpian narrative that the party’s leaders have failed to take the fight to the enemy. “We cannot, we will not, go back to the days of the failed Republican Establishment of yesteryear,” he promised in 2021. DeSantis’s brand is, like Trump’s, a Republican who never compromises, never apologizes, and always fights—whether the issue is education, the pandemic, or even Trump’s misconduct. At the cpac conference in his home state in February, he claimed that Democrats “want us to be second-class citizens” and assailed the “corrupt and dishonest legacy media.” The Republican elites rallying to DeSantis are calculating that his synthetic version of Trumpism will serve as an adequate substitute. The party is trying to regain its control of the process by offering the voters a more attractive product than, say, Jeb Bush. If you loved Trump, you will like DeSantis. And if you liked Trump, or maybe just tolerated him through gritted teeth, you will love DeSantis. One irony of DeSantis’s attempt to become the new Trump is that his trajectory was almost precisely the opposite of the latter’s. Trump grew up wealthy but was an indifferent student who allegedly cheated his way into college and retained a working-class affect when he inherited his father’s real-estate empire. DeSantis grew up mi (his mothe installed Nielsen boxes on televisions), before attending Yale and then Harvard Law School. At Harvard, he joined the Navy as a jag officer, later putting his legal skills to use during stints in Iraq and at Guantánamo Bay. After active duty in the Navy, DeSantis ran for a House seat in 2012 in the Sixth Congressional District in the middle of a two-decade stretch when the state was trending from purple to red. DeSantis prevailed in a crowded primary in part by winning endorsements from national tea-party groups. The way Republicans established their right-wing credentials at the time was by adopting radical libertarian stances on fiscal policy, and DeSantis duly proposed to abolish the graduated income tax and phase in cuts to “entitlement programs”—i.e., Medicare and Social Security. In Congress, he helped found the Freedom Caucus, a right-wing faction, though he didn’t participate in the destructive displays of rebelliousness, such as forcing government shutdowns to stage impossible demands, that made other caucus members intolerable to the party leadership. After Trump’s election, DeSantis could see that the energy on the right was flowing through different channels. When he ran for governor in 2018, he overcame a betterknown Republican rival by positioning himself as Trump’s staunchest defender. In Congress, he proposed to defund the Mueller investigation. He attacked his primary opponent for having failed to attend a Trump rally in 2016 and cut a cheeky ad showing himself reading Trump’s The Art of the Deal to his young son and instructing his daughter to “build the wall” with her toy blocks. He made frequent appearances on Fox News, where he caught Trump’s attention and won his blessing. “Ron is strong on Borders, tough on Crime & big on Cutting Taxes—Loves our Military & our Vets,” Trump tweeted. “He will be a Great Governor & has my full Endorsement!” A COMMON ASSUMPTION OF mainstream-media analysis of DeSantis is that he is merely pandering to Trump and his supporters and, as a graduate of Yale and Harvard, is too smart to actually believe what he is saying. This is a failure of imagination. DeSantis developed reactionary suspicions of democracy before Trump ever came along, which positioned him perfectly to straddle the elite-base divide within his party. In fact, DeSantis once wrote a book warning of the dangers of a megalomaniacal president who threatened to destroy the foundations of the republic. That president’s na ama. d Dreams From Our Founding Fathers in 2011, when he was running for Congress. It is out of print and has received barely any attention in the media. DeSantis joked recently that the book “was read by about a dozen people.” But it provides deep insight into the worldview that has propelled him to this point. Published at the height of the tea-party movement, Dreams From Our Founding Fathers made the case that Obama and his agenda were inimical to the Constitution and this country’s founding ideals. It is sprinkled with passages DeSantis would never have written after Trump took office. He notes accurately that the Founders “worried about the emergence of popular leaders who utilized demagoguery to obtain public support in service of their personal ambitions.” He flays Obama for alienating traditional allies, meeting with foreign dictators, and impugning American innocence with statements like “We sometimes make mistakes,” a far more measured assessment than Trump’s “There are a lot of killers. You got a lot of killers. Well, you think our country is so innocent?” He devotes an entire chapter to the importance of the president being personally humble, depicting Obama’s alleged excessive self-confidence as a disqualifying trait. DeSantis’s obsession with media bias, which has since become a motif of his political style, clearly developed before he ran for office. He laces the book with bitter complaints that the media failed to vet Obama or expose his allegedly radical influences, while extensively citing criticisms of Obama that appeared in the mainstream press, oblivious to the contradiction. DeSantis is an exceedingly unreliable narrator, wrenching heavily abridged quotations out of context to distort their meaning. For example, he plucks the phrase “At a certain point you’ve made enough money” to characterize Obama as a radical socialist who wants to confiscate all income above some level, neglecting to note that Obama’s follow-up was: “But, you know, part of the American way is that you can just keep on making it if you’re providing a good product or you’re providing a good service.” Still, Dreams From Our Founding Fathers is much more interesting than a typical partisan screed. Its author, who majored in history and spent a year teaching the subject at a tony boarding school, has clearly given a great deal of thought to the book’s thesis: that Obama’s agenda of raising taxes on the rich and spending more money on the non-rich is an attack on the Constitution. “As legend has it, Benjamin Franklin once said that ‘when the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic,’” he writes. While acknowledging that the quote is apocryphal—it was probably concocted by reactionaries many decades later and attributed to various Founding-era statesmen—he proceeds to march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 45
try to prove this was the real view of the Founders and the Constitution. The Constitution, he argues, was designed to “prevent the redistribution of wealth through the political process.” The danger is that, as his fake Franklin quote suggests, people will support programs funded by taxing the rich that benefit themselves. “Popular pressure to redistribute wealth or otherwise undermine the rights of property,” he laments, “will ever be present.” The Constitution’s role, as DeSantis sees it, is to prevent popular majorities from enacting the economic policies they want. DeSantis does not believe the Constitution merely establishes a set of ground rules for how policy should be written. He thinks the Constitution requires that conservative Republican policy prevail forever. This is not an original belief. It was the dominant right-wing position from the late-19th century through the middle of the New Deal, and conservative courts routinely struck down all sorts of progressive legislation on the grounds that the Constitution prohibits active government intervention in the economy. DeSantis treats any further expansion of government as a mortal threat to the Constitution. Sentences like “Obamanomics represents a dramatic departure from the nation’s founding principles” and “Obama’s quest to ‘fundamentally transform the United States of America’ represents the type of political program that the Constitution was designed to prevent” are found in nearly every chapter. The word redistribution and its variants appear more than 150 times. DeSantis’s core conviction is that an outcome in which Democrats win majorities through free and fair elections and vote to expand social spending by taxing the rich is fundamentally illegitimate. He is far from the only Republican to hold this view. The American right has never fully accepted the legitimacy of democratically elected majorities setting economic policy. This principle helps explain why even most Republicans who get queasy over Trump’s authoritarianism ultimately support him anyway. The prospect of Democrats winning elections poses a graver threat to the Constitution than Republicans stealing them. For those Republicans who always considered Trump no worse than the lesser evil, who feared more that he was squandering his power than that he was abusing it, DeSantis is not just an acceptable vehicle. He is one of them. WHAT HAS BROUGHT DESANTIS NEAR the pinnacle of Republican politics barely a decade into his career is not only his deep commitment to the principles of the conservative movement but also a keen understanding of the power centers within the party. As those centers have changed throughout his career, DeSantis has adjusted nimbly from tea-partyer to Trumpista. The identity he recognized in the spring of 2020, and embraced with deepening militancy, is founded on opposition to social-distancing policies during the coronavirus pandemic. DeSantis’s skepticism of public-health authorities paid economic and political dividends, at least for a while. During the 2020–21 academic year, when most states stuck with remote learning, Florida opened its schools, a position even Democrats belatedly recognized as correct. He has used covid as a stage to pick successful fights with the media, which has sometimes overreached in its criticism of his pandemic policy. Last year, a 60 Minutes segment accused him of corruption for steering vaccine distribution to the Publix chain of pharmacies, which had donated to his pac, though many acknowledged the popular outlet was a logical partner for the program. DeSantis deftly used the episode to thrill conservatives with sharp counterpunches against the media. “The whole thing is a big lie,” he fumed, using a PowerPoint presentation to make his case. But DeSantis’s aggressive covid politics have also seen him take increasingly extreme positions. Over the past year, DeSantis’s defense of what he calls “freedom over Faucism”—which, in addition to keeping schools open, has involved blocking towns from mandating masks and businesses from requiring vaccines and at one point scolding high-school students for wearing masks at a photo op—has drawn him into the arms of the anti-vaccine movement. He has appeared at a press conference with an anti-vaxxer, suspended a state health official for encouraging his staff to increase their vaccine uptake, and appointed vaccine skeptic Joseph Ladapo to serve as the state’s top health official. (People are “being forced to put something in their bodies that we don’t know all there is to know about yet,” Ladapo claimed. “No matter what people on TV tell you, it’s not true. We’re going to learn more about the safety of these vaccines.”) After confirming he received his first shot last year off-camera, DeSantis has refused to say whether he got a booster. One result of DeSantis’s support for the anti-vaccine movement is that, as of uar te ranked 46th nationally s sh lderly citizens who have received a booster shot. During the covid wave last winter, Florida’s death rate significantly outstripped California’s. At his February 2021 cpac speech, DeSantis 46 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 boasted that his state had a (slightly) below-average covid death rate. His covid riff at this year’s cpac made no mention of mortality statistics. DeSantis’s oppositional approach to politics borrows heavily from Trump’s style but with noticeable adjustments. Compared with the original, DeSantis’s version of Trumpism is much more methodical, which robs it of its organic spontaneity yet also eliminates the frequent blowback. He has followed Trump’s practice of using Twitter to launch unhinged attacks on the media and liberals, with the important revision of outsourcing the job to his spokespeople, most notably press secretary Christina Pushaw. This allows DeSantis to get much of the benefit of Trump’s fire hose of abuse, exciting conservative activists and flustering reporters with wild accusations, all while his underlings absorb the reputational damage. Trump’s genuine ignorance and limited vocabulary allowed him to effortlessly channel the Republican base’s contempt for the educated elite. DeSantis has to work at it. Last fall, he mockingly cited a Wall Street Journal article on the declining number of men attending college. “I guess there was a decline in the number of men, the percentage of men going to college or whatever,” he told his audience. “And they acted like this was a bad thing. And honestly, like, you know, to me, I think that is probably a good sign.” This is not, of course, advice that the double-Ivy DeSantis took himself. DeSantis’s culture-war appeals usually steer clear of Trump’s overt racism. (The one exception was during the 2018 general election, when he warned voters not to “monkey this up” by electing his Black Democratic opponent, a phrase that might have been a deliberate racist appeal but could also have been an unfortunate slip of the tongue.) He often attempts to formulate positions that could drive a wedge between the left and the center. Most important, while Trump’s culture-war gestures often produced nothing but ephemeral content for conservative media, DeSantis has placed real state power behind the right-wing social agenda. DeSantis has signaled his support for a bill that would restrict classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity, preventing teachers from explaining things like why some children have two fathers or two mothers. (Democrats offered an amendment to ensure the bill would be limited to discussions of sex. Republicans voted it down.) The bill’s deepest potential for harm lies in its details. It bans such discussions either before the fourth grade or “in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate.” Not only is the standard of “appropriateness” inher-
P H OTO G R A P H S : DAV I D A . G R O G A N / C N B C / N B C U P H OTO B A N K / N B C U N I V E R S A L V I A G E T T Y I M AG E S ; J O E R A E D L E / G E T T Y I M AG E S ; F R E D E R I C J. B R O W N / A F P V I A G E T T Y I M AG E S ; J O E R A E D L E / G E T T Y I M AG E S ; C N N / YO U T U B E ; S TO R M S M E D I A F O R D E L R AY B E AC H M A R K E T / M E D I A P U N C H / S H U T T E R S TO C K DESANTIS HAS UNDERTAKEN AN ALMOST CLINICAL EFFORT TO MANUFACTURE AND BOTTLE TRUMP’S STYLE. ently subjective, but its enforcement mechanism enables parents who don’t like the instruction their child gets on gender to sue. You don’t need to be a social liberal to see the potential for havoc. The bill will open “a lawsuit factory for culture war organizations to go after schools,” the libertarian magazine Reason notes, forcing schools “to shell out money to defend themselves” and giving “the most conservative parents the ability to veto school discussions that other parents are perfectly fine with.” DeSantis has appeared undaunted, tearing into a reporter who quoted Democrats who have called it the “Don’t Say Gay” bill. This allowed him to highlight, once aga ma at the hands of the me hou g to address the more serious objections to the bill. Pushaw went on Twitter to reframe the law as an “AntiGrooming Bill,” writing, “If you’re against the anti-Grooming bill, you are probably a groomer or at least you don’t denounce the grooming of 4- to 8-year-old children.” It was a perfectly orchestrated DeSantis culture-war set piece. DeSantis is also preparing to sign what he calls the “Stop W.O.K.E. Act,” a measure preventing uncomfortable racial discussions at any public school or college in the state that is so broad it would ban teachers or professors from defending affirmative action. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a free-speech group that has frequently denounced left-wing indoctrination and censorship on campus, describes the bill as “flatly unconstitutional.” This spring, DeSantis staked out a position to the right of his own party by promising to veto a congressional map designed by Republicans. DeSantis insisted instead on a more aggressive map that would eliminate two of the state’s five Black-held seats. DeSantis believes this maneuver can both increase his party’s strength in Congress and provoke a legal fight that would lead to the Supreme Court’s striking down the remaining provisions of the Voting Rights Act that protect minority representation in legislative redistricting. “In meetings, he would just demand, ‘Pass my maps! My maps! My maps!’ He’s just bizarrely obsessed with this,” a Republican told NBC. A measure that received less attention than either, but has enormous significance, is one DeSantis signed with little fanfare. In 2018, nearly two-thirds of Florida voters approved a ballot initiative to allow former felons to vote. Felon disenfranchisement is a relic of the post-Reconstruction era, when white southern states used it, in combination with laws heavily targeting Black men, as a tool to limit voting. The referendum granted eligibility to more than a million Floridians. DeSantis, who was elected governor at the same time the initiative passed, acted quickly to nullify it once in office. Republicans pushed through a law requiring former felons to pay off any outstanding fines or court debt before they could vote. At least three-quarters of eligible voters owe court debt, and of those, the vast majority can’t pay it back. The point of the bill was not to compel payments. Indeed, because the state has no central database listing all fines, many voters who had the money, and an intense enough desire to vote, to pay for the privilege could not do so. The bill’s purpose was to disenfranchise those voters. Republicans have been implementing voting-rights restrictions across the country since about 2011, but no state has enacted a measure as sweeping and draconian as Florida’s. DeSantis is the only (Continued on page 86) march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 47
A BLISS-INDUCING, GLEAMING, FEEL-GOOD MUSICAL COMEDY! HUGH JACKMAN GIVES THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS CAREER, AND SUTTON FOSTER IS INCANDESCENT. Photo by Julieta Cervantes VOGUE MUSICMANONBROADWAY.COM
of an entirely reimagined “Best of New York,” € where you’ll find dozens of standout services, shops, and spots across only a handful of categories— WELCOME TO THE SECOND YEAR because the best framer for someone looking to conserve a 27-foot-long Richard Serra quintych is quite different from the one for the person just looking to put a photograph in something simple and oak. To source our recommendations, we polled hundreds of savvy and stylish New Yorkers, among them architects, curatorial directors, art advisers, and authors. On Curbed.com, you will find updates to our best housepainters, upholsterers, playgrounds, woodworkers, toy stores, home-goods stores, exterminators, colorists, caterers, fitness instructors, and florists as well as the new entries found on the following pages. These include the laser-hair-removal studio frequented by several beauty editors (and a threader who is a master of the feathery, ’90s-esque brow), bicycle shops for used wheels or Tour de France–caliber bikes, and karaoke bars for all types—ranging from one with piano accompaniment to another where you can scream-sing Evanescence. Typography by Zipeng Zhu F E AT U R I N G karaoke bars ...................................... 50 framers .................................................. 52 storage units ..................................... 53 bike shops ............................................. 54 hair-removal services ................ 56 march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 49
BEST of NEW YORK 2022 as The Avengers and ’70s soft-core porn. The soundproofing is especially stellar, meaning even rowdy parties won’t hear one another—a bonus for Winters, who has gone to RPM with other Broadway singers to take a break from musical theater. “Sometimes you want to try new material without an audience,” she says. “You just want to let loose. It’s like therapy.” And for those who don’t mind singing to a bigger crowd, RPM’s larger rooms connect and can hold parties of over 200 people. For an Extensive ’90s Hip-Hop Catalogue ROSA’S AT PARK, 2568 Park Ave., the Bronx; rosaatpark.com For Karaoke in Koreatown GAGOPA KARAOKE, 28 W. 32nd St., third fl.; gagopakaraoke.com €gagopa is in a nondescript building in Koreatown with spare signage and a few string lights. Inside: a mirrored, disco-lit, linoleum-floored karaoke fun house. “Life these days is so driven by trends. Gagopa seems more than happy to simply be itself,” says Tae Yoon, the New York editor of Thrillist, who has been going out in Koreatown since the late ’90s. Gagopa (pronounced KA-gopa) offers private rooms for groups of up to 40 people (from $9 an hour per person) and is especially beloved for its BYO-friendly attitude. (For those who don’t plan ahead, Gagopa keeps a fridge stocked with $4 beers and bottles of wine and soju.) The staff provides buckets of ice to keep drinks cold and will bring takeout orders directly to your room, or you can bring your own spread. Alyse Whitney, a food editor who has been a Gagopa regular since 2012, says her friends have brought everything from homemade crab rangoon to Murray’s cheese boards to— once—three slow cookers full of hot dip. “The staff was like, What is she doing?” Whitney says. “But they allowed it.” For KARAOKE IN CHINATOWN DR. CLARK 104 Bayard St.; drclarkhouse.com 50 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 For Spotting Broadway Singers RPM UNDERGROUND, 246 W. 54th St.; rpmunderground.us €rpm underground opened in 2019 after Raj Banik and his business partners noticed a lack of large-scale karaoke-party venues. They decked out the space with contents of one owner’s collection of records, Pop Art, and Beatlemania ephemera, making it “one giant time capsule of why people love music,” says Broadway actor (and regular) Syndee Winters. RPM’s 18 private rooms (from $50 an hour) fit between five and 40 people and are decorated according to themes such €rosa’s at park is a Latin-fusion restaurant inside the Bronx’s Wingate, a new Wyndham hotel half a block from Grand Concourse. Every other Thursday at Rosa’s, After Work Karaoke takes over. Starting at 7:30 p.m.— with happy hour and dinner service still in full swing—the Bronx-based music and comedy duo the Range Brothers start taking names and songs. After Work Karaoke when japanese restaurant Dr. Clark opened in 2020, it took over a space on Bayard Street formerly occupied by Winnie’s, the karaoke dive that closed in 2015 after a 28-year run. (It reopened in 2019 on East Broadway.) “We started getting these OG Winnie’s customers, Chinese people from the neighborhood, gallery people,” says Yudai Kanayama, a co-owner of Dr. Clark. “For us, it was very important to keep the legacy of Winnie’s alive.” So the owners started hosting outdoor karaoke during the summer of 2020 (“It got almost too crazy—we started packing the whole street,” says Kanayama”), eventually moving the whole thing inside when indoor dining returned. Now, on Mondays at 11 p.m., a server turns on the screen (tucked between hanging dried plants from Green River Project, which did the interiors) and people sing in English, Japanese, and Mandarin between shochu highballs and Sapporos. “It’s a chill vibe and then it’s just, like, party time,” says actor and philosophy grad student (and regular) Billie Alexopoulos. “Everybody joins in, and it’s rowdy, it’s crazy, it’s a transformation.” (“I saw Lorde there once,” says Vanity Fair art columnist Nate Freeman. “I think she was a little surprised when karaoke started going down.”) Illustrations by Pete Gamlen
KARAOKE BARS started only in January but already has regulars like City Councilmember Althea Stevens, who says the crowd is young, largely from the Bronx, and there to sing hip-hop and R&B; oft-requested songs are by Busta Rhymes, Biggie, and Blackstreet and from JayZ’s ’90s catalogue. For the typically microphone-shy, it helps that Rosa’s extends the happy-hour menu of $7 mojitos and $5 shots until the singing stops at 10:30 p.m. and that the hosts sometimes hop on an additional microphone, hyping up members of the crowd to make sure they sing along with the chorus. For ScreamSinging Evanescence ALLIGATOR LOUNGE, 600 Metropolitan Ave., Williamsburg; alligatorloungebrooklyn.com €on thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays, a messy, strictly after-midnight karaoke scene takes over the back room at Alligator Lounge. “It’s when the creatures come out,” says longtime visitor Emily Vanderpool. Fueled by $7 Booty Shakers (Tecate and a tequila shot) and the free personal pizza that comes with every drink, patrons take to the stage to screamsing emo and pop-punk from the late 1990s and early aughts, like Green Day, Evanescence, and My Chemical Romance. The clientele often leans more college age and band-teesand-beanies than, say, the crowd at Bushwick’s Cobra Club, which rivals Alligator Lounge in intensity but skews more toward true DIY punk. For sheer emo nerve, Vanderpool says Alligator Lounge is hard to beat: On two separate nights, after particularly passionate performances of Fall Out Boy and Blink182, she has seen the singer crowd-surf the room. For OLD-TIMERS SINGING GEORGE MICHAEL MONTERO 73 Atlantic Ave., Brooklyn Heights “I don’t know if any other places really bring that ‘I’m gonna pick this dude up and carry him around’ vibe,” she says. “The bouncer did not love it. But nobody got kicked out.” For Piano Accompaniment SID GOLD’S REQUEST ROOM, 165 W. 26th St.; sidgolds.com/new-york €in 2015, paul devitt of Beauty Bar and pianist Joe McGinty of the Loser’s Lounge (as well as the Psychedelic Furs) opened Sid Gold’s Request Room, montero, with its flickering neon sign and glass-brick façade, opened on Atlantic Avenue near the waterfront as a longshoreman’s bar in 1938. It’s still well known for its maritime ambience (model ships, lifesavers, and framed photos of sloops abound), but since 2007, the place has become equally popular for its rather rowdy karaoke nights, run by host Amethyst Valentino. On Thursdays through Saturdays, get a paper slip at the bar when you buy a drink, fill it out, and give it to Valentino, who will which forgoes a karaoke machine in favor of a live pianist. Every night (except Sundays and Tuesdays) in the back room, behind a thick velvet curtain, a piano player takes requests for everything from Sinatra and Frankie Valli to ABBA and Britney Spears. Guests watch from rounded velvet booths, under a pressed-tin ceiling, and scan QR codes to pull up the song list. The regulars, per Sara, who has frequented Sid’s for six years and had her engagement party in the piano room, are often genuine talents. “It’s just a hidden gladly suggest other songs if yours is taken. Expect to hear the Eagles, Céline Dion, Billy Joel, Queen, and Sinatra. (Cristina Martin, a regular for almost a decade, recalls one especially notable rendition of “The Lord’s Prayer.”) Montero gets its share of young professionals and students, but Martin says the oldtimers are the heart and soul of the place, including “Bob. Whenever I see him,” Martin says, “I know he’s going to sing ‘Careless Whisper’ and bring the house down.” gem,” she says. “All of a sudden, it’s like Broadway level.” There’s no cover or song charge, but Sid’s does have a two-drink minimum. (The menu includes something called an After the Gold Rush—a gin drink with lemon, lime, honey, and gold glitter.) For “Robyn Roulette” BRANDED SALOON, 603 Vanderbilt Ave., Prospect Heights; brandedsaloon.com €the weekly “jared Michael Gniewek Karaoke Warzone” night at the karaoke nights at Fajitas Sunrise, a pink-and-orange-walled Mexican F r restaurant in Ridgewood, start off lowkey: A man the staff calls “the mariachi guy” sets up his equipment in the corner and sings an old bolero or two a before passing the microphone off to dinner guests. Eventually, says Litzy Confesor, a server at the restaurant, people forget about their plates and start dancing between the tables. Latin songs from the past 50 years or so are the focus: Think mariachi, bachata, F S and everything from Mexican pop from the 1980s to reggaeton from the 2010s. “It’s the songs we grew up with,” says Mariano Morán Ventura, a data analyst for the city who is originally from Veracruz, Mexico. Karaoke at Fajitas—which starts around 7 p.m. on weekends— is like being transported to a wedding back home, Morán Ventura says: “It’s a place where you can sing and get emotional to songs that may not even have a deep lyrical meaning, but you just end up singing along because you share the same culture.” JUAN G BRIEL A UST L R honky-tonk-ish gay bar Branded Saloon has a group of unusually devoted regulars: Prepandemic, the event was so important to videographer Don Calva that he would rearrange his work schedule to accommodate it. “And I’m not the only one who did that,” they say. “I met everybody I live with through karaoke night here.” Gniewek, the DJ, says regulars send him their song choices days in advance so they can practice at home, and he sends weekly emails with updates on new songs added to the catalogue; the night of, guests submit paper slips and sometimes wait two hours to sing. Song choices range from ’90s pop-punk nostalgia to Weird Al to Limp Bizkit to Rent. (“Basically the entire crowd is queer,” says regular Kat Rejsek. “The song choices reflect that.”) Throughout the night, Gniewek keeps one slip from everyone who sings, and at 11 p.m. whoever happens to be on the mic picks a slip from the pile for “Robyn Roulette.” Whoever’s name gets pulled sings “Dancing on My Own,” “whether they know the words or not,” Gniewek says. march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 51
BEST of NEW YORK 2022 For Annabelle Selldorf’s Framer HANDMADE FRAMES, 1013 Grand St., Williamsburg; handmadeframes.us For Unusual Shapes DOWNING FRAMES, 4261 24th St., Long Island City; downingframes.com €no request is too far-fetched for Downing Frames, which has been building pieces (from $200 to $38,000) for blue-chip artists, galleries, and museums like MoMA and the SculptureCenter for nearly 15 years. For Deana Lawson’s recent show at the Guggenheim, Downing incorporated mirrors, stickers, and holograms into frames for her interactive works. For artist Mariah Robertson’s geometric chromogenic prints, Downing created asymmetrical polygon frames. When multimedia artist Erin Shirreff wanted her pieces built inside the frame (think of a model ship in a bottle), she called the Long Island City framer. “Downing does everything for us,” says Yuta Nakajima, senior director at Hauser & Wirth, adding that the framer can pull off feats with remarkable turnaround. Nakajima recently needed eight large, delicate Philip Guston works in frames with gold leaf applied by hand; it would ordinarily be a six-week job, but Downing had them ready in a month. For Frames That Would Cost Double in Manhattan charge double what Adam Collignon charges, and the quality will be sometimes worse,” says Eckstein, recalling a 30-by-20-inch piece that came in at a $300-to-$400 framing estimate at Greenpoint Frames and $1,000 in Manhattan. Collignon has owned the business since 2018, when he took it over from his mentors. He has GREENPOINT FRAMES, 937 Manhattan Ave., Greenpoint; greenpointframes.com €the somerset house founder Alan Eckstein has gone to Greenpoint Frames for five years. Eckstein has since moved out of the neighborhood, but the vintage-furniture and art dealer still heads back to Greenpoint for framing (for both his store and home) because of the shop’s excellent price-toquality ratio. “Frame shops in the city are going to 52 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 F RA S H P F since made some updates, like adding new materials to the inventory and hiring his own staff (who Eckstein says did an “incredible job” with an uneven painted metal sign by a Jamaican artist that he recently brought in). “It feels like a little artist community in there,” Eckstein says. “They’re always playing cool music.” €architect annabelle Selldorf has been taking her personal art collection to Handmade Frames since 1990. She has referred her clients to Paul Baumann and Marilyn Gold, who own the shop, for just as long, sending them everything “from contemporary works to old masters,” she says. “They are meticulous in their approach to every project, whether it is for a museum or an individual.” One standout feature in Handmade Frames’ work: Baumann and Gold take into account the realities of living in a city like New York and find inventive ways to frame pieces (from $200) beautifully but flexibly. For a 27-foot-long Richard Serra quintych, they built a lacquered maple frame designed to break into two pieces during transportation; a delicate Hao Liang painted silk scroll was mounted with three glass panels to protect the work from light and airborne dirt. For Selldorf, though, it’s simple: “They know how to show the piece at its best.” stylist beverly nguyen has a very specific preference for frames: “I have most of my artwork in a 1.5-inch oak frame with floating glass,” she says, explaining that, to her eye, “it allows the piece to stand out and not distract you.” Nguyen, whose eponymous homewares shop stocks a lot of similarly warm and pareddown bowls, spoons, and brooms, initially had a hard time finding a framer that would build something to her specs: “Believe it or not, ten other framers fought me on this very simple design I requested.” Nguyen went by Soho Picture Framing after reading its Google reviews and found the perfect shade of oak (ask for “natural”) at the right price (from $250). And the owner, Michael Ingbar, immediately agreed to her dimensions. “He met me with no resistance,” says Nguyen, who has since gotten ten pieces framed with him.
FRAMERS For an Art Historian’s Eye BARK FRAMEWORKS, 21-24 44th Ave., Long Island City; barkframeworks.com €when elizabeth “Buffy” Easton first started working with Bark Frameworks, she was the chair of the European-paintings department at the Brooklyn Museum and had undertaken the sensitive task of reframing some of the museum’s Impressionist and Post-Impressionist paintings. Easton and Jed Bark spent ten years studying the collection before replacing the generic Louis XIV– and Louis XV–style frames with hand-carved ones made to honor the artists’ brushstrokes and composition. “I had never before considered the importance a frame plays in how one looks at a work of art,” she says, noting that one of Bark’s new frames for a Monet changed the viewing experience entirely by revealing an additional 45 square inches of the canvas. Easton continues to send pieces (both professional and personal) to Bark, both for his critical eye and the shop’s manufacturing capabilities: “I don’t know of any other framer that has both gilders in-house as well as a metal shop,” she says. “They can make a metal frame with no seams because they fabricate it directly for the work.” (Prices start at $350.) For New Collectors ULFIG PROJECTS, 544 Park Ave., Bedford-Stuyvesant; ulfigprojects.com €interior designer Adam Charlap Hyman is a genuine frame obsessive (“People make fun of me because I go to museums and take photos of the frames,” he says) and trusts Weston Ulfig with his own pieces. Charlap Hyman says that Ulfig typically makes “very quiet structural decisions” that add life to contemporary, modern pieces—at a slightly belowmarket rate for high-end framing (from $220 to $4,000), as he crafts most orders in-house instead of sending them out. For a series of Charlap Hyman’s own cutouts, Ulfig suggested mounting the works onto a textured mat, which, he said, would allow the viewer to pick up the shadow and dimension of the piece. “Ulfig performs this magic trick of putting pieces in a frame that gives them the right amount of space and air, with the right color around them, to make someone stop and look twice,” says Charlap Hyman. For Jenna Lyons’s Framer SKYFRAME, CHELSEA, 141 W. 28th St.; skyframe.com €three people gave us resounding recommendations for Skyframe, including Jenna Lyons, who has gotten countless pieces framed there. Lyons initially went there because the company is bonded and insured for high-end art, but she returned because Skyframe always said yes to her ultraspecific requests and never rushed a decision. On one occasion, when Lyons wanted a Cy Twombly done up in a custom silver-leaf frame (to compliment the drawing’s blue undertone) and a black border, Skyframe mounted the piece on a mat board so it would, at Lyons’s request, float within the frame without revealing a shadow. “It’s like finding a good tailor,” Lyons says. “I come to the table with knowledge and want to use the knowledge they have, too. They know what they’re talking about.” (Prices range widely—small matte-black jobs can start at $55; a hand-carved and gilded piece will be closer to $8,000.) For Easy Access MANHATTAN MINI STORAGE, storage-mart.com/ manhattan-mini €five people told us about simple, pricetransparent experiences at different branches of Manhattan Mini Storage (from $30 a month), which has 17 locations in the borough. Andrea Whittle, the features director at W magazine who has been using the 110th Street site to store the contents of her onebedroom, says the sign-up process was “seamless. The website has a useful guide that helped me estimate the size of the unit I would need. They gave me a coupon code for a moving company they work with, which I then quickly booked.” Brand consultant Michael Williams, who now uses Manhattan Mini Storage after a decade of trying other facilities, says the company’s locations typically have “a good loading-dock/parking area, which makes it easy whether you’re driving in or taking an Uber.” (He does, however, recommend the Chelsea location over the Spring Street one to avoid Holland Tunnel traffic.) J. Mueser creative director Matthew Woodruff appreciates that the key card gets you 24/7 access, meaning he can use the space in an emergency: “I recently stopped by to change into a pink suit—obviously exactly the thing you’d keep in a storage unit—for a friend’s pink-themed birthday party.” For All-in-One Service he shares with his girlfriend, he needed a company that could handle both moving and storage. Bombas founder Randy Goldberg, a friend of Coggins’s, recommended Liberty for its reasonable prices (from $70 a month), speed, and professionalism. “They did a meticulous— even rigorous—analysis over a video chat, where I showed them all my possessions, and I got a specific quote down to the square foot,” Coggins says. The move took slightly less time than Liberty had estimated; the company finished carting off his carefully wrapped books and furniture and lowered the quote accordingly. LIBERTY MOVING & STORAGE, libertymoving.com €author david coggins recently moved out of his West Village apartment of 12 years, which he’d filled to the brim with “objets, or what some people like to call clutter.” Not able to take all of his possessions with him to the new apartment For Million-Dollar Artworks CROZIER, crozierfinearts.com €art adviser todd Levin, who has helped clients find everything from Rembrandts to march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 53
BEST of NEW YORK 2022 Basquiats for 35 years, says that for storing high-value art, he (and almost everyone else in the industry) goes to Crozier. The storage company (from $100 a month) has serviced collectors for more than 40 years and is “the standard go-to used by the main auction houses,” says Levin, referring to Phillips, Sotheby’s, and Christie’s. “Everything is temperature controlled, humidity controlled, and the alarm systems connect to both the fire department and the police, which is crucial when it comes to keeping insurance costs down.” (Crozier tells us its units are kept at “museum standard,” meaning a climate of 50 percent humidity, 70 degrees for paintings, and 35 percent humidity, 55 degrees for photography.) While the city has other storage facilities with similar conditions, like Trimaxion in Long Island City, Levin says that is “more of a General Motors than Crozier’s Bentley experience,” in part because of Crozier’s menu of services: Besides storage, it provides international handling and on-site gallery rooms for showing works to potential buyers. For Château Latour DOMAINE, domainestorage.com €jamie wolff, a partner of Chambers Street Wines, says that once you’ve accrued more than a few cases of wine, proper wine storage becomes necessary: “Keeping them under the bed and running the airconditioning is not appropriate.” Many of his customers, Wolff says, use Domaine ($285 per year for every ten cases) for its proper storage conditions (55 degrees yearround, kept horizontal, for red and white) and in-house wine expertise: If you buy wine from another collector or vineyard and ship directly to Domaine, the staff will inspect the bottles before adding to your reserves. And last year, Domaine helped customize a software, so its website can track your collection and its current value and will even notify you when it’s time to uncork certain bottles. For Inherited Minks POLOGEORGIS, 143 W. 29th St.; pologeorgis.com €fur coats don’t fare particularly well in heat or F r f r H LI S R STORAGE UNITS K sunlight—both can cause rotting and discoloration. Longtime Upper West Sider Lisa Zaretsky owns an “embarrassing” collection of “20-odd” coats and keeps hers with Pologeorgis, a coat showroom with a dedicated floor for storage downstairs kept at 56 degrees with controlled humidity. Pologeorgis staff “come to your apartment, pack everything up neatly, and off they go,” says Zaretsky. They’ll inspect coats while the company is storing them and make repairs (optionally, for a fee); when customers want one back, “they’ll drop them off within two days,” Zaretsky says, adding that other places take a week or two. Plus, the prices are reasonable. Pologeorgis charges $95 per garment, for storage from April to October, plus pickup and delivery. And those prices have hardly gone up, according to retired publishing executive Connie Anne Harris, who previously worked for Vogue, Glamour, and InStyle and has gone to Pologeorgis for decades, calling owner Nick Pologeorgis “a genius.” when furniture and lighting designer Ben Kicic was looking for a storage unit in Crown Heights, the cheapest rate he could find for an “appealing” space was $340 a month. By expanding his search area a little further to East New York, he found an “amazing, fully staffed, superclean and secure” unit with Life Storage, a nationwide storage chain that has 12 locations in Brooklyn. After booking online (which Kicic recommends; that’s how he got a discount rate), he was able to schedule his move-in for the same day. Upon arrival, it took only 20 minutes to sign forms and get a key to his new unit. “I’ve been renting a 15-by-15-foot unit for over a year for $200 a month that I could fit 20 mattresses into if I wanted,” he says. “I have a sofa and ten chairs in there, and it’s still only half-full.” Plus, he says, Life Storage’s office sells packing supplies like tape, foam peanuts, plastic wrap, boxes, and locks, sparing you additional errands. 54 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 For a Used Bike RECYCLE-A-BICYCLE, 858 Fulton St., Clinton Hill; recycleabicycle.nyc €every single bike sold at Recycle-a-Bicycle was donated to the shop before being refurbished by staff. As such, prices remain startlingly low. Shannon Haupt, a law student, bought their first bike—a Diamondback road bike for around $400—at Recycle a couple of years ago: “They tuned it up for me, gave me a rack to put it on, and installed bike lights. It was all included.” After that one was stolen, Haupt went straight back to Recycle (which keeps about 20 bikes on the floor and another 100 or so in a Navy Yard warehouse) and bought a zhuzhed-up Columbia. The Recycle team even built it out to their specifications: “A new gear system; brake lines; fixed up the wheels, tires, and tubes—and the whole thing was only about $350,” Haupt says. The shop also has a selection of refurbished kids’ bikes, such as a bright-yellow 20-inch Hunt for $150, a Schwinn for $75, and a Yuba Balance for $35. All proceeds go toward the shop’s education program—the staff teaches free riding classes for kids and adults. For No Extra Charges DIXON’S BICYCLE SHOP, 792 Union St., Park Slope harold dixon, a Jamaican immigrant and an expert mechanic, opened Dixon’s in 1967; more than 50 years later, his sons, Chris and David, run the business. Its legions of fans—including many who swing by after shopping at the Park Slope Food Coop next door—say the feeling at Dixon’s is one of overwhelming goodnaturedness. “My front tire went flat four or five times in a matter of months,” says writer Kayla Levy, “and every single time I walk in for a fix, they remember me.
BIKE SHOPS For A QUICK FLAT FIX NYC VELO 66 Second Ave.; nycvelo.com And they only charged me the first time I came in, just in case it was their fault the tire was still leaking.” (It wasn’t, she says: The staff eventually informed her the tire was dead and replaced it “for an exceedingly fair price.”) Government worker Jess Powers says that when her brake popped off unexpectedly when she was riding downhill from Prospect Park, Dixon’s replaced it, then greased her chain for free. “They said it needed doing,” she says. “Some places want to charge you for every little thing. They’re just not like that.” For an Approachable E-Bike PROPEL, 134 Flushing Ave., Clinton Hill; propelbikes.com in his three decades working as a bike messenger, Kevin “Squid” Bolger has gone through more than ten bikes. “Eventually the frame will crack somewhere if you’re using it all the time,” he says. But when it comes to fixable, day-to-day issues—punctures, snapped chains, rust—he has stuck with NYC Velo for over ten years. Bolger says that at specialty bike shops, “if you came in with a flat, they might be like, ‘You have to leave it or we can’t help you with that’ ”—which doesn’t help when you’re already running late to get some blueprints up to a midtown office. Owner Andrew Crooks, on the other hand, is good for a flat fix (for $25) for messengers like Bolger, who both co-owns and runs the courier service Cyclehawk. He recently added a couple cargo bikes to his fleet for wine deliveries (a big part of his business these days) and will get their cumbersome hydraulic brakes serviced only at NYC Velo. for hauling groceries or children, from around $3,000), and adventure (pedal-assists that can traverse forest trails, from around $4,700). Stern quickly deduced that he wanted the fastest possible ride, so Chris set him up with a Stromer (from $3,100), which can go 28 mph. He then adjusted the seat height for Stern, taught him how to use the digital controls, and let him go on a test drive around the neighborhood. He bought the bike. Now, Stern says, “whenever there’s an issue with the bike, I just drop it off, then get text updates. ‘Looks like a brake issue,’ one week. ‘Motor issue,’ two weeks. They’re communicative, which I appreciate.” specializes in custom bikes for cyclists of all sizes and styles, from gravel-road riders to crit racers, and tune-ups (starting at $175) for riders who have invested in top-of-the-line equipment like a carbon frame, a Dura-Ace groupset, or carbon wheels made at Randall’s other shop, Honey Wheel Co., in Gowanus. Calilap says Randall’s deep knowledge is key: When he had a persistent brake issue, for instance, Randall dug in until he learned it was actually a manufacturer error in the bike’s front fork. “Every project Tijon has worked on with me is finished to perfection,” Calilap says, “down to the placement of the handlebar tape.” For Top-of-the-Line Tune-ups For Tricking Out a BMX TUNED, furniture-maker Ephraim Stern walked into Propel, an electric-bike shop in the Brooklyn Navy Yard, on a whim. “I’d never even seen an e-bike before I went in there,” Stern says. “But Chris, the owner, simplified it.” The shop breaks its inventory into four categories: comfort and cruising (e-bikes for running errands, from $2,600), commuters (zippier options that can handle cobblestones, from around $2,600), kids and cargo (ones with powerful motors 291 Nevins St., Gowanus; tunedby.square.site “i need to know that my bike mechanic knows the ins and outs of race machines,” says Angelo Calilap, a creative director who races in Prospect Park and Central Park and in national events like Gravel Worlds in Lincoln, Nebraska. So Calilap takes his bikes to Tuned, the newest shop run by Tijon Randall, a bike mechanic who has been building and fixing bikes in New York for over 20 years. Tuned BIKEFIX NYC, 334 E. 6th St.; bikefixnyc.com between the wheelies and standing up on their seats, street riders put an unusual amount of wear and tear on their bikes. Professional street rider Julius “Obloxkz” Barnes rides a Throne 27.5-inch Goon XL (just imagine a big BMX bike) and for years has relied on BikeFix NYC to maintain it. Barnes started going to Will Hough, the shop’s owner, because he lived nearby; these days, he regularly travels to the East Village from his home in the Bronx for tune-ups (starting at $75) and new gear at BikeFix. The shop caters to all kinds of riders, but Hough makes a point of stocking goods for the bike-life crowd, so you can pick up Maxxis mountainbike tires (from $55) or spoke skins for your wheels in a rainbow of colors or get a busted chain on your bike rethreaded after too many tricks. But a big part of the draw is the vibe: Outside the shop, you’ll almost always find some of the city’s best riders hanging out, smoking weed, and popping wheelies down 6th Street. For Vintage Colnago Frames and Shimano Derailleurs NEW YORK BIKE JUMBLE, Fifth Ave. and 4th St., Park Slope; nybikejumble.com for rare, discontinued, or esoteric bikes and parts—like a vintage Shimano derailleur for a 1980s Japanese road bike or a giant yellow tricycle— Evan Friss, author of On Bicycles: A 200-Year History of Cycling in New York City, recommends Bike Jumble, the bike flea market held outside the Old Stone House in Park Slope’s Washington Park. Since 2009, the Jumble has hosted dozens of vendors (mostly hobbyists and collectors) selling restored classics, hard-tofind components, and cycling ephemera like jerseys and caps. “It’s a museum of sorts, a selection of bikes and parts from the last 60 or so years,” Friss says. Another longtime attendee says that “for collectors of classic steel road frames and Campagnolo parts, the Jumble can’t be beat,” adding that he found his silver Colnago there for $500— around $1,500 less than what the Italian bikes usually cost (even when used). This year’s Jumbles are scheduled for May 7 and September 10 in Park Slope. For a Peloton Instructor– Approved Bike Fitting REDBEARD BIKES, 69 Jay St., Dumbo; redbeardbikes.com from torso length to back flexibility to wingspan, riders have unique proportions that affect how they ride, and a custom fit takes your geometry into account. So when Peloton instructor and Masters Track World Champion racer Christine D’Ercole hears of anyone who needs a seat adjustment or a new handlebar angle, she sends them to Redbeard. “The owner, Ilya Nikhamin, is an especially excellent bike-fitter,” she says. (Basic consults at Redbeard start at $150; more detailed, three-tofour-hour fittings go up to $450.) “A proper fit will help you ride more efficiently, more powerfully, and will help avoid injury from misaligned joints,” she says. “While it might not seem relevant to the everyday rider, it is.” march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 55
STORAGE UNITS For Patient Explainers on Gear Ratios CITY BICYCLES, 307 W. 38th St.; citybicyclesnyc.com €when mo hussain fell down the rabbit hole into the world of hobbyist cycling—replete with custom bikes, drop-bar bikes, and Lycra—he had a lot of questions about the right bike to build. “I’d go to shops and annoy mechanics with questions, peppering them for hours,” says Hussain, who works as an IT director and organizes Cycling Fanatics New York, a club for riders in the boroughs and New Jersey. Not every mechanic was receptive to Hussain’s inquisitive approach, but he ultimately found a patient teacher at City Bicycles. While building himself a $1,700 custom track bike for racing in events—a project that required sourcing parts and learning about mechanics like gear ratios—Hussain worked closely with shop owner Jhonatan Moloon. “He explained to me the gearing, what he likes to ride, what a good setup for me would be like, going through each option,” Hussain says. “Those should have been billable hours, but he was just giving away the sauce. And he’s never burdened or irritated.” For AN ACTUALLY WORTH IT $13,500 BIKE STRICTLY CYCLING COLLECTIVE 525 W. 30th St.; strictlycyclingcollective.com long before eric min bought his first Pinarello Dogma, he knew he’d buy it from Strictly Cycling Collective. Dogmas are obscenely fast, responsive, and light Italian racing bikes—five of the six last Tour de France winners have ridden them—and the Collective is one of the very few places that sells them in the city. “I heard of it before I could feasibly shop there, but once I could, I never looked back,” says Min, the CEO of Zwift, a virtual-world cycling platform. The Collective, which originally opened in New Jersey in 1994, sells four brands of high-end bikes: Pinarellos, Specialized, Assos, and its own brand, Strictly. Besides the Dogma, it sells models like the 13-pound S-Works Aethos road bike ($13,500) and the Turbo Creo e-bike made for mountain cycling ($9,750.) Min heads to the Hudson Yards shop (which has a café and a Retül Bike Fit rig for a hightech fitting) anytime a new Dogma model comes out so that its “highly knowledgeable mechanics” can keep his bike in shape in between upgrades. 56 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 For a Same-Day Appointment UNI K WAX, multiple locations; unikwax.com €there are plenty of fancy places to get a bikini wax in the city—like Haven in Soho, where treatment rooms are decorated with roses floating in bowls of water, or Maris Dusan, which is situated on the ground floor of a Park Avenue townhouse. But none, according to Lili Chemla, founder of clothing company Leset, beat Uni K. No matter which location she visits (the chain has 13 across the city, from Bay Ridge to Lenox Hill to Long Island City), the technicians expertly (and quickly) use hard wax and are “diligent about making sure you’re smooth as a seal,” she says, “not letting a single hair pass their notice.” The no-frills studios are always clean, but the real appeal is the company’s online booking portal and easy-to-parse menu of services listing several variations on bikini waxes, ranging from “top only” ($13), for just the horizontal strip of hair above the pubic area, to a “Boy Short” ($87), which includes hips and inner thighs. Nora DeLigter, writer-director who has been going to Uni K for bikini waxes for eight years, says over all that time, she has “never not gotten a same-day appointment.” For a BoyZillian MPM, 239 W. 26th St.; mpm.studio €when it comes to cleaning up his nether regions, “most woman waxers act kind of afraid of me,” says one avid male client who’d prefer to remain anonymous. “They generally aren’t willing or able to get me into the right positions to really get it done.” Not so at MPM, an exclusively for-men spot in Chelsea that sugars (a hairremoval process that uses a lemon-water-and-paste mixture instead of wax) away hair in the perineum, on the balls, around the shaft, and basically anywhere else the customer pleases (prices start at $30 for “the crack only”). Oskar, one of the technicians, is particularly good at “contorting my body into whatever shape it takes to really get into the crevices of my butt. He’s not shy around or afraid of the male body.” The “BoyZillian” ($60) removes hair from the full pubic area in 30 minutes or less, and while it’s admittedly “extremely painful,” Oskar is “gentle and makes it more tolerable than it should be.” For Taraji P. Henson’s Go-to TENOVERTEN, 121 Fulton St.; tenoverten.com €in her ten years at Tenoverten, Miranda Doxani has gained a highprofile following for her sur-

HAIR-REMOVAL SERVICES BEST of NEW YORK 2022 prisingly painless waxing services. Her client list includes Demi Moore, Taraji P. Henson, Maggie Gyllenhaal, and Naomi Watts as well as Jimena Garcia, Chanel’s in-house brow artist, who has been seeing Doxani for bikini waxes (from $35) for 15 years, since before Doxani moved to Tenoverten. Doxani uses nontoxic products (Satiness beeswax, natural resin-based wax, azulene oil), but Garcia says Doxani’s finesse comes down to experience: “She knows how to adjust the temperature, the pace, the way she holds her hands specifically. You can learn technique in school, but you have to actually do it over and over to be able to really see hair-growth patterns and hair types the way she does.” For a ’90s-esque Arch ZUBI’S THREADING CORNER, 157 Allen St.; zubisthreading-corner .business.site €“zubi always has a point of view about eyebrow shape and the relationship between how your hair grows and the shape of your face,” says stylist Mellany Sanchez of Zubi Kothiya, owner of Zubi’s Threading Corner. (She got Kothiya’s name in the first place from her friend Seymore Fleck, a beauty specialist who has been seeing Kothiya since 2008.) Take, for instance, the time Sanchez showed Kothiya her saved photos of ’90s supermodels and Puerto Rican women with their ultra-arched, razor-thin brows. (“I live for it,” she says.) Kothiya steered her away, suggesting instead that a better arch would be achieved by growing her brows in and shaping them so they gently taper past the outer corners of her eyes. Now Sanchez has a feathery, ’90s-esque arch with none of the no-going- in 2016, contributing editor at Vogue Jenna Rennert went to Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal on the F r recommendation of a friend and has been a regular ever since, dipping in frequently ahead of events. She has referred industry friends, like Instagram’s head of beauty programs, Kristie Dash, who has since become a regular. Romeo & Juliette has 14 available lasers, including Nd:yag lasers, which yield the best results on darker skin tones and are not available at many med spas. Rennert’s bikiniline treatments (from $235) are generally done with the Synchro REPLA:Y, which has nuanced settings to allow for more targeted treatments based on hair type and thickness and skin tone and sensitivity. Dash remembers being pleasantly surprised at her first appointment when multiple R M J settings were used on a single body part. “It’s such a L H R thorough process,” she says. “Other salons pop you into a room and just start zapping.” Blake Newby, an editor at Essence, has been getting her Brazilian area done at Romeo & Juliette for three years. “The area has stayed hairless as long as I’ve been diligent with touch-ups,” she says. “And I’ve never experienced so much as an ounce of discoloration. I’ve referred friends with deeper skin tones than me to R&J, and they said the same.” - back overplucking. (From $10 to $200 for a wide range of services.) For No Ingrowns SHEN BEAUTY, 138 Court St., Cobble Hill; shenbeauty.com €beauty writer Saleam Singleton gets chest and stomach waxes and says his priority is to find “a service that is as gentle as possible” because his coarse hair typically leads to ingrown hairs and irritation. He’s been a regular for a year at Shen Beauty, where he sees Annie Otaigbe, who does waxing, facials, and body treatments (from $16 to $145). Otaigbe is “very interested in and passionate about skin care,” says Singleton, pointing to her biomedical-informatics training from the Aveda Arts & Sciences Institute New York as well as the product regimen she has put him on. Besides using micellar water, Amber After Wax Quench, and Fur Oil (a product that softens pubic hairs and clears pores) during treatments (and recommending them for at-home care), Otaigbe has given 58 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Singleton crucial advice on preventing ingrowns in between waxes. From sharing the best exfoliators (Nécessaire’s The Body Exfoliator) to which acids will gently treat hyperpigmentation (glycolic, kojic, and mandelic), “it’s more than just waxing,” Singleton says. “I’ve gone to waxers in the past who don’t share any tips, but Annie is a gem.” For a DominatrixApproved Bikini Treatment LUNA LE VAG, 1096 Broadway, Bushwick; lunalevag.com €mistress marley is a financial dominatrix who, until last year, got regular bikini waxes that would often leave her sore and with uneven hair regrowth. She immediately converted to sugaring after going to Jordan Cozens, co-owner of Luna Le Vag in Bushwick. “It’s less painful,” she says. “I’m in and out in ten minutes, and I can go a whole month and the hair doesn’t grow back.” Plus, as Marley discovered, Luna Le Vag offers a menu of services tailored to skin care for women of color: To gently lighten the hyperpigmentation on her bikini line, Marley stocks up on Luna Le Vag’s Clear Skies brightening solution, made with witch hazel, kojic acid, and glycolic acid. Every three to four months, she’ll add on one of Luna Le Vag’s facial-foryour-bikini treatments, called a Vajacial (from $60)—the clay mask and hydrating post-sugaring treatment are meant to help exfoliate dead skin and coax out any ingrowns. “It’s a very relaxing experience” as well as a thorough one, Marley says. “She’s super-informative. To go to someone who understands your hair and after-care is so important.” For Ancestral Brows “I threaded my eyebrows mercilessly as soon as I was allowed to,” says the communications strategist, and from the age of 17 up until the pandemic, she kept her brows in distinct, separate arches. But postlockdown, with her childhood brow fully rewilded after having no access to a salon, she decided to leave “colonial standards of beauty” behind. On a recommendation from hairstylist Dhiran Mistry, she went to see Azi Sacks, whose “eyes lit up in a way I hadn’t seen before,” Rahim says. “Her concern was, ‘How do we keep these as full and ancestral as possible?’” For Rahim, Sacks carefully tweezes to preserve her brows’ natural shape ($120 for shaping)— somehow taming the cowlick that stumped previous eyebrow artists— and adds a tint ($40) for further definition. AZI SACKS, THE BROW STUDIO, 205 W. 20th St.; azibrow.com €as a child, zara Rahim’s unibrow was openly praised at home by her Bangladeshi family but mocked by her classmates at her Florida school. REPORTING BY: Alice Markham-Cantor, Mackenzie Wagoner, James Lynch, Willy Blackmore, and Louis Cheslaw
THE UNFORGETTABLE STORY IS NOW THE UNFORGETTABLE BROADWAY SHOW BASED ON THE BEST-SELLING BOOK BY ANTOINE DE SAINT-EXUPÉRY Le Figaro Le Parisien France 3 Strictly Limited Engagement BROADWAY THEATRE, Broadway and 53rd St. OFFICIAL AIRLINE TheLittlePrinceBroadway.com BUY YOUR TICKETS AT TELECHARGE.COM
The CULTURE PA How Blue Man 60 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Illustration by André Carrilho
lew Up The wild success of a show starring strange bald men painted in Yves Klein blue. B y M O L L Y L A N G M U I R march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 61

Ca. 1990: Flyer for an early show. 1988: 1993: The first BMG appearance, on MTV. Playing a “drumbone.” i - - - - - - – - - - - - i i – l -
1990: On top of the Clocktower Gallery. Mid-’90S: 1991: Astor Place Theatre playbill. — - Mirinda soda ad campaign.
2015: Performing in Las Vegas. 2001: With Jill Scott and Moby. 2018: At New York Fashion Week. l - – -
T h e C U LT U R E PAG E S SUPERL ATI V E S Jon Batiste on a Lifetime of Musical Alchemy By justin curto jon batiste has no interest in fitting neatly into categories. The lifelong musician instead is engaged in what he calls a broader “humanist” project— to be as multifaceted and expressive a creator as possible, be that as a recording artist, an Oscar-winning film composer, or a bandleader for The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. Born into a New Orleans musical institution, Batiste began performing in the Batiste Brothers Band at age 8 and later juggled studying jazz at Juilliard and touring with his band, Stay Human. Their 2014 performance on The Colbert Report earned them the gig as the Late Show house band before Batiste had even turned 30. His eighth album, 2021’s We Are, is a document of virtuosity blending R&B, jazz, hip-hop, and rock, sometimes in the same song. The risk paid off: He is nominated for 11 Grammys, a near record. A more personal win is his history-making number of nominations across fields in a single year, appearing in the R&B, American Roots, Classical, Music Video, and general categories for We Are, along with Jazz and Visual Media for his soundtrack to Pixar’s Soul. He welcomes the hard-won attention while keeping his focus on craft, just as he would if the accolades had never arrived. Quickest song to make on We Are Song that sounds like New Orleans made in the length of time that it took for me to play it. The first take on the song feels like you’re communicating something beyond comprehension. Composers such as Beethoven, Chopin, Bach— three of my favorites— there’s so many stories of them improvising movements or impromptus or fantasies, where they would create something on the spot and then go back and refine it by putting it onto a score. That’s what I did with this piece: I channeled the feeling of the moment in streams of consciousness that come on the piano. upbringing in detail. Its collaborators, Trombone Shorty and PJ Morton, were there in New Orleans with me. PJ’s verse talks about his experience growing up there, as does mine; Troy plays his solo and you hear what his experience was being 3, 4 years old, marching in parades and second lines. Even the production and the beat—we borrowed from the sounds of New Orleans hiphop and all that stuff that we grew up listening to, whether it was the Hot Boys and Cash Money or No Limit with Master P and the crew. Troy and PJ didn’t need to be in the room with me to get it. We lived it. ➽ “Movement 11’ ” was ➽ “Boy Hood” speaks to my 66 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Album that foretold his artistic vision ➽ 2013’s Social Music (with Stay Human) is an amazing thing to have captured for me as an artist at that time because it’s really We Are 1.0. It speaks to all of the same themes that have since only become more and more political and divisive but are really rooted in humanism. This ability to blend all of the genres acts as an allegory for how human beings can coexist on this planet. Social Music predates We Are almost by ten years, but it was the beginning of refining that vision. Most political song ➽ “Tell the Truth” is so, so powerful in the sense of it being a mandate from my parents—my dad in particular—when I left New Orleans for New York. “Tell the truth” is the mandate that I would give to everybody in a position of power. The things that we march about, we just want transparency. Everybody wants to know what’s what and not be manipulated. There’s a very, very political message in “Cry” as well. It’s even political, as a Black artist, to be nominated in American Roots for this song. At the end, the lyric says, “For the struggle of the immigrants/ For the wrongful imprisonment / For the loss of our innocence.”

Inspired by a True Diva How do you write, direct, and star in a Céline Dion biopic without losing your nerve? First step: Change her name. By R A C H E L H A N D L E R aline is in theaters April 8. the film aline, which premiered last year at Cannes to an audience both baffled and delighted and which was deemed “scary” by The Guardian ahead of its April release, defies simple explanation. It is about a woman who looks and acts and sounds like Céline Dion. This woman’s life includes many of Dion’s own pivotal moments: discovery as a gawky but preternaturally talented young girl by a much older manager who eventually becomes her ponytailed husband; a “makeover” and an ascent to international superstardom; a Titanic performance at the Oscars; a Vegas residency. But here, her name is Aline Dieu and she is played in a César-winning performance by French writer-director-star Valérie Lemercier at every stage of her life—including at age 5, shrunk down and warbling at a family wedding. If Lemercier had gotten her way, she would also have played Aline as an infant. A Dion obsessive who co-wrote the film with her frequent collaborator Brigitte Buc, Lemercier says Aline was “freely inspired” by the singer’s life, though she takes some strange creative liberties: scenes in which Aline gets lost inside her own mansion or reveals a long-awaited pregnancy by carving the letters BB into a bowl of her husband’s carrot purée with her hands. Lemercier pitches her performance somewhere between earnest homage and camp P H OTO G R A P H S : J E A N - M A R I E L E R OY © R E C TA N G L E P R O D U C T I O N S / G A U M O N T / T F 1 F I L M S P R O D U C T I O N , D E L’ H U I L E / P R O D U C T I O N S C A R A M E L F I L M I N C . / P C F A L I N E L E F I L M I N C . / B E LG A P R O D U C T I O N S T h e C U LT U R E PAG E S
imitation, mimicking Dion’s spontaneous, limb-flinging dance moves and wide-eyed energy. But she insists she is not making fun of Aline or Céline— instead, she sees Aline as a tribute to a fellow artist grappling with the highs and lows of stardom. Although Lemercier’s work is unfamiliar to many Americans, she’s well known in France as a film actor, director, and stage performer. (She’s also no stranger to celebrity impressions; she made a satirical film inspired by Princess Diana and Prince Charles in 2005 called Palais Royal!) “I wanted to speak about the artist’s life, which is also mine,” says Lemercier. “You’re alone onstage. You’re alone afterward. You’re alone when you go out. The changing rooms in the theaters are awful. There are no windows. It’s not very glamorous. I wanted to speak about all of that.” You take some artistic liberties with Céline Dion’s life, starting with her name. Why didn’t you want to do a straight biopic? I changed the name first. My co-writer said to me, “Change the name. It will all be easier.” And, in fact, it was. Céline’s younger than me. She’s alive. Of course, she’s much more famous than me—I couldn’t have a poster with my head and the words Céline Dion. I changed her name to be more free. And I preferred to make small digressions. To make a movie, you need strong images and symbols. For example, her father gives her a coin at the beginning of the movie that she carries with her all over the place—it’s not totally a fact. It’s between something true and something untrue. When did you first become a fan? Céline has been famous in France since she was about 14 years old, but I heard about her late. I was doing a play in 1995, and there was a girl working at the theater who always sang Céline’s album D’eux while she was giving out tickets and seating people. I didn’t know anything about Céline’s life or her love story, just the beautiful songs. I didn’t even know her English repertoire. But then I was very touched by the first images of her walking alone after her husband René Angélil’s funeral in 2016. I saw Céline onstage for the first time while I was writing the script. I was really struck by the performance, by the voice. It sounds like you were less drawn to her talent and celebrity and more to the story behind it, the people around her. It’s a movie for her and for René. There are books this thick on René and her mother—bigger than the ones about Céline. There was so much material: the love story, the family story, the success story. I was very touched by that big family of Céline’s—that they’re so close. The love story with her mother is really important. Céline wasn’t supposed to be on Earth— she was born when her mother was in her 40s. Everything is a plus, everything is a gift, because she wasn’t supposed to live. So her mother did twice as much for her last little girl as for her 13 other children. She wanted to repair something. And when Céline arrived in René’s life, he had no artists, no job. I think the movie is a story about repair. Have you met Céline before or since the movie? No. I’d like to. The first thing I did when I finished the script was to give it to her French manager, who read it on a plane. She liked it and said, “I see how much you love her.” But Céline didn’t want to read it. She doesn’t want to see the pictures of our actors or be part of it. I understand why she prefers not to see the movie. I hope she will see it one day because, of course, I did it for her. “I was singing for real in a stadium with nobody in front of me. I was alone. And I was crying.” If her manager had said, “I don’t like this,” would you still have made the movie? Did you feel like you needed that permission? It would have been difficult. In Québec, there are a lot of comedians who love to make fun of the age difference between her and René. People were waiting for me to be sarcastic in the movie, maybe even more than in the five movies I’ve made before. But that was not the story I wanted to tell. I wrote it as an homage. Dieu means “god” in French. Was that name a bit of a wink, a joke about her elevated status? No. It was not a joke. It’s just close to Dion. Some people really are named Dieu. What were some other details you invented? For example, did René actually propose to Céline by putting a ring inside an ice-cream cone? No. In the film, she meets him just after she goes ice-skating, wearing her mother’s gigantic shoes. Céline was not ice-skating right before she met him. I think she had normal shoes on in real life. But I wanted to explain why she has 10,000 pairs of shoes. I thought, Maybe if during the first important meeting of her life, she has bad shoes, maybe afterward she has too many shoes. It’s small things to understand her better. And it’s also a comedy, so I wanted funny things that were not bad for her. What made you decide, I’m not only going to write this, but I’m going to direct it and star in it and even play her at age 5? When Aline doesn’t know how to be a woman, how to dance, when she has the wrong teeth—when she’s in the dentist’s chair with an open mouth—I didn’t want to make a small girl do that. It’s fine to laugh about my own maladroit. I think it’s not funny to do that to a poor little girl. So you decided instead, Okay, I’m gonna shrink myself. It’s not my own face on a child’s body; it’s all me. When I’m at school, they put me at a big desk with papers bigger than normal ones and a big pen. When I’m signing records, we used big records. And we took off my wrinkles. Onstage, I’ve played a lot of kids and teenagers. It’s one of the things I love to do. Of course, it could be strange for Americans because you don’t know me. But in France, they know I’ve played that kind of character. So maybe it’s more funny for us. I will tell you: At first I also wanted to play her at 6 months old, as a baby with one tooth, sleeping in a drawer. My producer asked me to take that out. One time I will show it to you because it was so funny. For me, it’s a big regret that it’s not in the movie. You really embody Céline’s natural wackiness. She is a kooky person, and the tone of the film feels like it’s on the same wavelength as her sense of humor. She’s a clown. Can you talk to me about finding that tone? Because it’s a fine line—you’re not making fun of her. I think we did that in editing. The script was funnier, more of a comedy. But I wanted to mix funny and sensitive. We know all along that Aline’s husband, GuyClaude, is going to die. The day we edited the death, I came back very sad. It felt like it happened to me. It was difficult. A lot of her hits, like “The Power of Love” and “All Coming Back to Me Now,” are missing from the film. But you do have a lot of her bigger covers, like “River Deep, Mountain High” and “Nature Boy.” Were you unable to get the rights to some of those other songs? All the songs I chose speak about her love. Each is a step of her love story. And at the end, she’s alone, and there is only one song she sings from the beginning to march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 69
T h e C U LT U R E PAG E S We had 50 singers to choose from. It was like The Voice with no names attached. She was letter B, and she was really the best. They told me, “She works a lot. She will be easy to direct,” and that was the case. Of course, she was obliged to sound like Céline, but I wanted to hear her heart. I wanted her to be in the song. I think she had the most difficult job, making 16 songs. They’re not complete in the movie, but we did it for the record. What was the process of matching up your performance to her vocals? Did you lip-sync to her? She was singing to match me. She has the lyrics, she has my face, she must breathe like me, she must move like me. All of that. In certain songs, you can hear my voice mixed with her voice for a few moments. So when you filmed those concert scenes, were you singing in front of an audience or lip-syncing to another track? I was singing for real in a stadium with nobody in front of me. I was alone in 22-centimeter heels. And I was crying. I was really in the songs. I was totally, 100 percent in the songs. I heard two of Céline’s siblings thought the film was disrespectful because it painted her as growing up in squalor. What’s your reaction to that? It’s difficult to say. We proposed to the Québec distributor that the family see the movie—all of her brothers and sisters— and they didn’t want to. Then one journalist let them enter a press screening under another name, and they left before the movie ended. Of course, they didn’t recognize Céline in the film. I think it’s very difficult when you’re so close. Aline’s house is not exactly the same as Céline’s. I know she didn’t leave her house through a window wearing her wedding dress. I never wanted to be unkind. I spent all my energy to make her onscreen family a good family with love. I did get some advice while I was making the film from one of Céline’s other siblings, but he didn’t speak publicly so I can’t say his name. René’s family loves the movie. What would you say if you could meet Céline now? First, I’d say, “You have nice shoes.” And ■ afterward, we’ll see. 70 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Why Is Everyone Suddenly Reading Cassandra at the Wedding? By n o r a d e l i g t e r there’s no easy explanation for why Cassandra at the Wedding—a 1962 novella about a pair of twins reuniting at their family ranch in the Sierra Nevadas— should be circulating rapidly right now. The book, by Dorothy Baker, wasn’t a best seller when it first appeared. Its most recent reissue, from New York Review Books, came out a decade ago. So why is seemingly every screenwriter, editor, and Ph.D. candidate from New York to L.A. picking it up? We set out to find Cassandra’s patient zero by talking to every person we know who has read it lately. the stein strain ➽ In October, the author Lynn Steger Strong t “Favorite novels about siblings??” Cornelia Channing, now an editorial assistant at the New York Times, responded with Cassandra—which h i from the writer she’d heard about from her boyfriend, and editor Sadie Stein, who came across it at a used-book shop in Paris in 2002. S t l of a class she is teaching at Columbia on unhinged narrators. the ward strain ➽ It seemed as though Stein was behind the spread—until we heard about Taylor Ward, the wine and service director at Cervo’s, Hart’s, and the Fly. H while combing the publisher’s website in 2016. “I love Cassandra—she’s so narcissistic that she actually is incapable of reading the room,” he says. He recommended it to Kassandra Thatcher, a ceramicist; Kate Abernathy, a film editor; Lily Soule, the Fly’s manager; t Emma Wooley, a brand strategist, and Emily Dinowitz, a producer ( and Eliza Dumais, an editor). the sestanovich strain ➽ Last year, Emily Rappaport, a book-to-film scout, C from author and editor Clare Sestanovich. She recommended it to Sacha to Zander Allport, a Ph.D. candidate, w r Macabee, an English teacher, who recommended it to Soren Hope, a painter. Rappaport also f c the production company Seaview. Strangely, Neon, another production company, reached out to Seaview as well: An actor had brought a book to Neon’s attention, and the company was hoping to approach the estate. B O O K ) ; L E V R A D I N / A L A M Y ( E A R LY ) Victoria Sio provides Aline’s singing voice. How did you work together to get her to sound so similar to Céline? CULTURE CONTAGION the early strain ➽ The actor was John Early. He says he found Cassandra afte to “become a Deborah Eisenberg completist.” Once he’d read short stories, he moved on to her favorite books—and, as it Eisenberg w NY for Cassandra. Soon, he was talking about the book to anyone who would listen, including the comedian Kate Berlant and the playwright Sarah DeLappe, who began discussing adapting the book into a film. DeLappe, along with Early, Neon, and Seaview, approached the Dorothy Baker estate, meeting with Baker’s grandchildren over Zoom. The estate signed off on Seaview, Neon, and Early as producers. i f P H OTO G R A P H S : J G P H the end, that last song: “Ordinaire.” That really speaks to who she is. The only song I couldn’t get was “The Power of Love.” We have “I’m Alive,” we have “My Heart Will Go On,” and there are some important French songs, like “Pour Que Tu M’aimes Encore.”
@khaby.lame A S M O OT H E R W AY TO S O DA
p o p / t v / m o v i e s T h e C U LT U R E PA G E S CRITICS P O P / CRAIG JENKINS Impostor Syndrome When the metamorphosis is constant, how do we ever know the true form? rosalía achieved maximum saturation at a shocking speed. In a flash, whispers about a gifted singer-songwriter from Spain reimagining flamenco music blossomed into near-global acclaim as the taste for stark, traditional covers displayed on her 2017 debut album, Los Ángeles, evolved into the spirited genre hybridization and careful pop inroads of its 2018 successor, El Mal Querer. By 2019, Rosalía was guesting on international hits alongside música urbana elites J Balvin, Bad Bunny, and Ozuna, and on English-language records by Travis Scott and James Blake. She has described this evolution in self-mythologizing terms, telling The Fader in 2019 that when she encountered flamenco at age 13, she immediately saw the role it would play in her musical future: “I realized, This is my path.” The quest to fill reggaetón and Latin trap songs with the melodrama and vocal theatrics of flamenco singing has earned the vocalist an embarrassment of praise. El Mal Querer received awards MOTOMAMI at the Latin Grammys in 2018 and 2019 and was named Best Latin COLUMBIA RECORDS. Rock, Urban, or Alternative Album at the 2020 Grammys; the Billie Eilish duet “Lo Vas a Olvidar” was crowned Best Latin at the 2021 MTV VMAs. But Rosalía’s critics, and even some of her admirers, 72 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 see a problem: a white European woman swiping accolades that should be reserved for artists of color from across the Atlantic. To a cynic, Rosalía may seem like a ringer. Born in Catalonia, the affluent territory in northeastern Spain that has been actively trying to secede from the country for the past few years, she received training from a vocal coach as a teen, landing at Taller de Músics—the Barcelona school with a stated interest in “the dissemination of jazz, flamenco, and modern popular music”—at 16. From there, she enrolled in the Catalonia College of Music, participating in its flamenco program, which accepts only one student a year. It’s not the common experience. Dabbling in reggaetón and adjacent styles tied Rosalía to external worldviews and gave her a feeling of cross-cultural solidarity. When performing in Mexico and Panama, she explained in a 2019 Billboard video series called Growing Up Latino, “I feel Latina.” There are people for whom this music is a matter of life and death, and there are people for whom this music is an P H OTO G R A P H : R E P U B L I C R E CO R D S Craig Jenkins on Motomami … Kathryn VanArendonk on Pachinko … Alison Willmore on Deep Water.
BROADWAY’S MOST THRILLING AND ROMANTIC SCORE Photo by Matthew Murphy PHANTOMBROADWAY.COM Get Tickets
avenue of personal expression. Rosalía is a terrifyingly good study, a singer at ease with any sound she surveys, who bends genre, culture, and music history to her will. As she excels in scenes linked ineffably to specific cultural identities, questions about what is gained and lost when she takes up space in these communities persist. Some flamenco purists perceive the Catalan star’s success in a historically Andalusian form as an insult. Rosalía responded in 2018, stating that flamenco doesn’t belong to their community or anyone else’s. As she circles reggaetón, dembow, and bachata now, her every move seems to annoy someone. Motomami, Rosalía’s third album, shows off three years of gains and lays out its goals in the first song, “Saoko,” borrowing the chorus from Puerto Rican reggaetónero Wisin’s 2004 hit “Saoco.” She raps about embracing change and finding peace in her inconsistencies: “Me contradigo, yo me transformo/Soy todas las cosas, yo me transformo.” If water is always changing states, chilling to become ice or warming to steam, why are we expected to stick with a fixed persona? Motomami revels in dualities: It’s an album about trying to square the pangs of desire with the freedom of being single, about wanting to look fantastic but knowing that beauty eventually fades, about juggling the love of self and family and men and God, about combining sounds from the past and the present, from the avant-garde and the mainstream. “Saoko” recalls aughts reggaetón but plays with your expectations for that instrumentation, shifting on a dime from rockadjacent distortion to jazz, warning listeners to torch whatever preexisting ideas they had about this album. This music is restless, a puckish expression of exquisite taste. No style sticks for two songs in a row. After “Saoko,” “Candy” serves flashy synths and Burial samples. “Diablo” interrupts its feathery reggaetón with stately James Blake vocals—this after the title track’s loopy Pharrell production. “La Fama” one-ups the old bachata remixes of the Weeknd’s hits, getting Abel Tesfaye to sing an original, then “Bulerías” recenters flamenco. The latter offers a close look at the spiderweb of influences Rosalía pulls from as it invokes the names of some of her heroes in prayer: “Que Dios bendiga a Pastori y Mercé/A la Lil’ Kim, a Tego, y a M.I.A.” (“Bulerías” also offers rare insight into how the singer copes with backlash as she pledges to meet negativity in kind— “De cada puñalaíta saco mi rabia”—and compares herself to the suffering woman from 1940s and ’50s flamenco star Manolo Caracol’s “La Niña de Fuego.”) Triangulating Rosalía’s interests through references, samples, collaborators, and covers is exhilarating. “Delirio de Grandeza” reimagines Cuban singer Justo Betancourt’s 1968 Fania Records weeper, adding some of the short-lived rap duo Vistoso Bosses’ 2009 Atlanta bass track “Delirious.” “CUUUUuuuuuute” gets Argentine DJ and producer Tayhana to loop up vocals from Vietnamese social-media star Soytiet for a clattering dance track that suddenly collapses into a quiet piano break. It’s here that Motomami starts to feel a bit too coolly curated, though, like an attempt to get the listener lost in its vastness. It’s a jolt when the breathy, carnal exaltations of “Hentai” give way to sped-up raps in “Bizcochito,” where smirking rebuffs invert dembow tradition, suggesting straight men aren’t the players they’re allowed to believe they are: “¿Tú eres el que pimpeas o te pimpean a ti?” “G3 N15” recasts our theme as lust, not love: “Esto no es El Mal Querer, es el mal desear.” A message of self-sufficiency and empowerment steadies Motomami through roiling creative twists, those owed to its twin interests in complicating our grasp on Rosalía’s abilities as a vocalist and tying international movements in modern Spanish-language music to their 19th- and 20th-century antecedents. El Mal Querer dealt in stories about escaping toxic relationships, a quality inherited from the source material it was based on, the tale of a woman locked in a tower by her jealous husband. Motomami keeps suitors at arm’s length. These songs luxuriate in designer threads and spurned advances; they also warn of tethering self-worth to desirability and material wealth. In the years spent fine-tuning the sound and scope of this album, Rosalía has spoken candidly about her interest in effecting change in a music business that 74 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 overlooks women. As eager as Rosalía is to shake things up, though, her career path is familiar: The story of the godsend whose raw skill justifies the space they occupy in communities of color is also the story of Eminem, who has won the Best Rap Album Grammy six times, more than any other living rapper. Whiteness, or proximity to it, often buys artists greater visibility, even in non-white spaces. White artists get commended for trying to “transcend culture,” while performers of color get pilloried for the same behavior. Rosalía has admitted that privilege is in part what affords her the freedom to change drastically with each album and to enjoy acclaim that was never showered on the innovators of the genres she delves into. Motomami offers a chance to fix that. Only you’d really have to lurk the album credits and be eagle-eyed with the music videos to catch the contributions of Caribbean and Latin American musicians to Motomami. The real revolution would have been bringing everyone to the table to share the spotlight this concerted push for crossover success is bound to generate. It’s not Rosalía’s fault the music industry uses Latin interchangeably with Spanishspeaking while ignoring the deeper distinctions the former carefully delineates. She is not to blame for narrower opportunities for artists who don’t sing in English or for the long history of talent shielding white artists from criticism. Look, Rosalía can make whatever music she wants. She’s brilliant. Motomami is great. But if her vision for this music of San Juan, Santo Domingo, Medellín, Miami, and the Bronx fails to honor the richness of those origins, if the story is just the richness of her gift, ■ this isn’t the change she prophesied. T V / KATHRYN VANARENDONK A Tale Only As Old As Time One self-contained multigenerational epic that refutes all mythmaking. years ago, while watching The Forsyte Saga, the 2002 adaptation of John Galsworthy’s gargantuan family drama, I began to wonder what it would be like to watch a television series that continues forever. It could be roughly like that one, I thought, or like the TV version of Roots: the story of how one bloodline registers enormous historical events on an intimate scale, told through each new generation as a barometer for the world in flux. It’s a thought experiment, one that gets to ignore all the logistical reasons a show like that is essentially impossible. Pachinko, the new adaptation of Min Jin Lee’s generational saga about a Korean family, is not a realization of my imagined forever story, but
Embrace the great outdoors... Relax. Reconnect. Rediscover. ...without leaving the comfort of your home. It’s a gorgeous day. Sunny, warm, with a breeze. And where are you? Thanks to your SunSetter retractable awning, you’re hanging out in your new outdoor oasis— with friends and a cold beverage in hand. Feeling 20 degrees cooler under the instant shade you created by simply pressing a button. Learn more about America’s #1 best-selling awning for over 20 years at www.sunsetter.com or call 1-800- 491-0911 x 36689 today!
76 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 M O V I E S / ALISON WILLMORE In the Shallow All play and no work kills the mood of the erotic thriller. a dr i a n ly n e is a moralizer at heart. This may seem like a counterproductive quality for a filmmaker best known for his contributions to the erotic-thriller boom of the ’80s and ’90s, but for Lyne, the shame is inextricable from the sizzle. In 1987’s Fatal Attraction, Michael Douglas nails Glenn Close against a kitchen counter—being, as she puts it, “a naughty boy”—while his wife and child are out of town, and then he gets punished when Close’s character turns out to be an obsessive stalker; in 1993’s Indecent Proposal, Demi Moore sleeps with a wealthy Robert Redford in exchange for money that she and Woody Harrelson desperately need, a mutually agreed-on dalliance that nevertheless almost breaks P H OTO G R A P H : A P P L E T V + it achieves all the same feats of scope and It all makes Pachinko a family epic that sharpness. The series slides among several satisfies the minute, glorious, devastating decades at once: The protagonist, Sunja, human drama—marriages, deaths, pregis born in early-20th-century Korea, and nancies, affairs, gossip, betrayal, and Pachinko spends time with her in her early romance. Throughout, the series is transchildhood (when she’s played by Yuna), in formed by the performances of each Sunja. her young adulthood (played by Minha Youn is excellent as the elder iteration, and Kim), and when she is a grandmother Kim is absolutely astounding as Sunja in (Yuh-jung Youn). Sunja’s life encompasses her youth. There is a clarity to Kim’s permultiple titanic changes in both the history formance that becomes the foundation of the world and of her family. As a child, on which the whole series rests: Every Sunja lives in Japanese-occupied Korea eventual transformative twist and turn and grows up with the omnipresence of in the family history seems to stem from colonial rule. As a young adult, a specific flash of emotion across she moves to Japan. By the time her face, the code that translates she’s elderly, her family has put Pachinko’s immense historical PACHINKO down roots in both Japan and the weight into palpable human APPLE TV+. U.S. while maintaining a bedrock reality. She is also a boulder in a of Korean culture and identity. river, resisting the rush of overAlthough Pachinko moves whelming events and preventfreely in and out of periods in Sunja’s life ing her family from getting swept away. (chiefly her young adulthood in the 1920s So many of the other performances are and her grandson’s early adulthood in the fantastic—especially that of Lee Minho 1980s), it does so in a way that resists fran- as Koh Hansu, a figure who becomes the tic flashback-style finger-pointing. Its pace specter of an alternate history for Sunja— is urgent but measured. Gaps in Sunja’s life but they all exist as reflections of and allow for surprise and discovery, but the responses to Kim’s Sunja. series avoids clean, overly ordered logic. If the drama did not work on a tiny, When new pieces of Sunja’s history slot individual level, there’d be no grounding it. into place, they tend to arrive only after The most straightforward version sees the you’ve roughly sussed out what they must family as a microcosm of a particular hislook like, giving Pachinko’s revelations torical thread: Sunja’s family as a window the weight of poignant inevitability. That into all the pain and horror of occupaPachinko entirely dodges plodding obvious- tion. Pachinko, though, is too deft and ness, though, feels almost like magic: It’s not much, much too careful to spin another quite genealogy as puzzle box, and it’s not uncomplicated progress narrative. It is not lineage as personality test, either. Each era a series about glorifying a simpler, more in Sunja’s life has its own rhythm and inter- authentic past, and it is not a celebration nal momentum. When parallels occur, or of a more comfortable, more technologiwhen one story’s events answer some ques- cally complex modernity. If anything, it’s tion that arose elsewhere, those moments an admirable portrait of Sunja’s resilience. come quietly. Even then, Pachinko avoids slipping into wholehearted boosterism for its protagonist. She is remarkable, and she is ordinary, and Pachinko does not see those as conflicting truths. I have longed for an infinite family drama that can strikingly refute so many myths. Those set against a volatile timeline put the lie to shortsighted “arc of history bends toward justice” stories. They are also reminders that our current experience of a nightmarish too-muchness is not special or unprecedented. We cannot get distance from our now, but we can see a family story play out for nearly a century and feel shaken out of the unbearable intensity of being blinded by current events. Pachinko’s opening credits are an almost uncannily precise distillation of the series: After a montage of images evoking the dark past, it shifts to a brightly lit pachinko parlor—the titular game of chance—where cast members from each era dance with ecstatic abandon to the Grass Roots’ “Let’s Live for Today.” It flattens the Pachinko timeline. Here they all are at once, while the lyrics “Live for today/And don’t worry ’bout tomorrow” play over them. Pachinko is an incredible expression of that idea and a rebuke to my desire for a perpetual TV show that I won’t ■ soon forget.
“ FRESH AND HILARIOUS! The laugh-out-loud sad comedy we’ve been needing. Bryna Turner reshapes the wedding genre for our time. Directed with wit by Jenna Worsham, this sprightly, 70-minute LCT3 production offers Mary Wiseman a brilliant showcase for her comic genius.” –Jesse Green, BRUTALLY HILARIOUS!” “ –Zachary Stewart, ★★★★ ! “ ” Photo by Marc J. Franklin –Adam Feldman, AT THE WEDDING is sponsored by The Blanche and Irving Laurie Foundation’s Theatre Visions Fund. Major support is provided by The Virginia B. Toulmin Foundation.
78 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Vic as he drives. When things get worse, right around the time Vic does kill one of Melinda’s lovers, they don’t even share a frame. So, really, we’re left with an erotica lacking in thrill because the film’s stakes are never clear. Melinda isn’t worried that Vic will kill her, even when she comes to believe he has killed on her behalf. And Vic isn’t especially careful to hide his body count. The ending, which strays from the book, feels almost like a joke about Lyne’s social conservatism, except it’s played straight. For all its sloppiness, though, Deep Water offers the rare experience of watching a movie that’s decidedly grown-up. It may be set in a subtropical city, but there’s a coolness to its look, to the slightly greentinged cinematography and the unwilted crispness of its characters’ appearances, that adds a sense of distance. When Vic and Melinda get ready to go to that first party, she allows him to pick the shoes she’s going to wear and to kneel and put them on her feet. Then they disappear into the night in a flurry of perfume and promises to the babysitter, off to the unfathomable land of adults, a place so vividly realized that the film’s messy writing almost passes for ■ psychological complexity. P H OTO G R A P H : H U LU apart the couple’s previously passionate guably interesting together. Affleck, cast marriage; and in 2002’s Unfaithful—once in a part that feels written for someone thought to be Lyne’s last film—Diane Lane reedier and nerdier, summons his deadenlivens her suburban existence by having eyed Gone Girl affect to play the stolid Vic an affair with a dreamy Olivier Martinez, as someone who isn’t really seen by anyonly for her doting husband, played by one in his life except his wife. De Armas, Richard Gere, to find out and kill the guy with her calculating eyes and bright smile, in a burst of rage. The sanctity of the home is incandescent, even when the characin Lyne’s work is constantly assailed by the ter she’s playing seems to reinvent herself allure of sordid, frantic, awesomeevery other scene based on what looking extramarital sex. will throw Vic most off balance. Deep Water, a half-sultry, halfSometimes Melinda appears DEEP WATER stultifying adaptation of the 1957 to really want out of her marriage HULU. Patricia Highsmith novel and and out of motherhood, two comLyne’s first movie in two decades, mitments that, she suggests, were initially looks like another variaVic’s idea. Other times, she and tion on this theme. Its marrieds, Vic (Ben Vic appear to have settled into a routine Affleck) and Melinda (Ana de Armas), that, however poisonous, seems to work for reside in an elegant New Orleans house them. “If you were married to anyone else, with their daughter, Trixie (Grace Jenkins), you’d be so fucking bored you’d kill yourand appear to lead lives of moneyed leisure. self,” Melinda taunts after coming home Their circle includes couples played by late and drunk, and it’s possible she’s right, Lil Rel Howery, Devyn Tyler, Dash Mihok, though neither apparently has any interest Jade Fernandez, Tracy Letts, and Kristen in talking out the dynamics of their power Connolly, and they all own equally fabu- games or making them consensual. Their lous places and throw shindigs with live status as a couple is instead measured out music and bartenders. For fun, Vic raises in the scenes of their car rides home. When snails and rides his mountain bike out of things are good, Melinda, in a gesture of the city. Melinda’s hobbies, on the other practiced intimacy, retrieves a half-eaten hand, are being the life of the party and apple from Trixie’s lunch and shares it with having affairs with men whom she insists on bringing to the events she and Vic are always going to. Her latest conquest, when the movie opens, is a blissful idiot named Joel (Brendan C. Miller), who makes the mistake of assuming that Melinda and Vic have an understanding. We’re tempted to believe the same thing given Melinda’s openness about what she’s doing and the way she meets Vic’s gaze through a window as he watches her kiss her lover. But when Joel and Vic have a moment alone, Vic lobs an idle threat his way, implying that he murdered the last man with whom Melinda had a fling. He didn’t, or at least he probably didn’t, but it’s obvious that he is not as content with the situation as he claims to be to concerned friends. What’s less evident about Vic and Melinda’s relationship is how much he is turned on by the public cuckolding. The story we’re shown, which was written by Zach Helm (of Mr. Magorium’s Wonder Emporium) and Euphoria creator Sam Levinson, never creates any sense of internal coherence in its toxic main pair. Deep Water, whose planned theatrical release presumably became a casualty of covid and the Disney-Fox merger, is now an artifact of the very public and since concluded real-life romance between its leads, who share a spark onscreen in the warmthfree way two rocks struck together might. Neither is served especially well by the roles assigned to them, but they’re inar-
THE MACBETHS HAVE ARRIVED DANIEL CRAIG RUTH NEGGA DIRECTED BY SAMGOLD NOW PLAYING ON BROADWAY at the GET TICKETS LONGACRE THEATRE LIMITED ENGAGEMENT | 15 WEEKS ONLY Telecharge.com
4. 15. 1. For more culture coverage and streaming recommendations, see vulture.com. 20. 10. TV 7. Watch The Grammy Awards Music’s biggest, delayed night. T h e C U LT U R E PA G E S To CBS, April 3. The Grammy Awards, originally scheduled for a January 31 ceremony, will finally be handed out during proceedings broadcast from Las Vegas and hosted, like last year, by The Daily Show’s Trevor Noah. BTS, Billie Eilish, and Olivia Rodrigo are slated to perform, so yes, your kids might actually be interested in watching an awards show. j.c. 8. See The Patsy One man to rule them all. Abrons Arts Center, March 30 to April 30. Twenty-five things to see, hear, watch, and read. MARCH 30–APRIL 13 TV TV 1. Watch Moon Knight 4. Watch A Black Lady Llewyn Davis: Marvel star. Disney+, March 30. Yes, this is yet another Marvel series being rolled out by Disney+. But it is another Marvel series, and one that stars both Oscar Isaac, as the titular character who has dissociative identity disorder, and Ethan Hawke, as a cult leader, so at least some attention must be paid. jen chaney POP MUSIC 2. Listen to Unlimited Love Ahead of a super-stacked summer stadium tour. Warner Records, April 1. The 12th album from veteran L.A. funk-rockers the Red Hot Chili Peppers reunites the team behind beloved albums like 1991’s Blood Sugar Sex Magik, restoring John Frusciante to guitar duties and tapping Rick Rubin as producer. The musicianship is as tight as the songwriting is affecting—the function of a unit that grasps its strengths, then plays to them. craig jenkins BOOKS 3. Read Sea of Sketch Show Emmy nominated. HBO, April 8. This under-the-radar sketch series rarely gets the attention it deserves, but the cast is stellar and the ideas razor sharp. This season, Skye Townsend steps in for departing regular Laci Mosley; guests include Wanda Sykes, Ava DuVernay, and Lance Reddick. kathryn vanarendonk MOVIES 5. See Sidney Poitier & His Trailblazing Contemporaries A 48-film fest. Film Forum, April 1 to 28. Programmed by film historian Donald Bogle, this series showcases the work of the first major male Black movie star—and films with actors he paved the way for, like Ivan Dixon (Nothing But a Man), James Edwards (Home of the Brave), Juano Hernandez (Intruder in the Dust), and Canada Lee (Cry, the Beloved Country). alison willmore OPERA Tranquility 6. See Elektra Knopf, April 5. Metropolitan Opera, opens April 1. In 1912 Eng a; 300 years l a book tour. Their stories (and others over the centuries) reduplicate in subtle and sci-fi ways. Emily St. John Mandel also riffs on today, as a pandemic rattles the novel’s universe. emma alpern e of soprano firend Lise Davidsen as her sister Chrysothemis. Those voices, in this score, are the operatic equivalent of a monster-truck rally: It’s hard to believe they can get so big, so daring, so exciting. justin davidson The Station Eleven author’s new novel. A Patrice Chéreau production. 80 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 After decades of winning Obies and mounting his own spectacular plays, David Greenspan began turning complex, multi-role classics into oneman shows. For the Transport Group, he returns to the show that started it all—his 2011 adaptation of Barry Conners’s little-known 1925 comedy The Patsy. It’s an 80-minute whirlwind, a hilarious visit to pre-Depression theater, and to play all its many parts, Greenspan makes himself into a buoyant bit of dandelion fluff, soaring on the play’s funny, 100-year-old breeze. helen shaw MOVIES 9. See Babi Yar. Context Kyiv, Ukraine, September 1941. Film Forum, opens April 1. This is Ukrainian director Sergei Loznitsa’s most brutal, traumatizing documentary yet—an onthe-ground look at the Nazi invasion of Ukraine during WWII and the mass murder of Jews at the titular ravine on the outskirts of Kyiv. bilge ebiri TV 10. Watch Slow Horses Based on the first of Mick Herron’s Slough House novels. Apple TV+, April 8. What’s better than a British spy drama? What about a British spy drama about a team of washedup spies starring Gary Oldman, Kristin Scott Thomas, and Jonathan Pryce, created by one of the writers of Veep and produced by Graham Yost of Justified fame? You’re going to watch it, but most important, your dad is going to watch it and he’s going to text you about it. k.v.a. POP MUSIC 11. Listen to Ivory Ft. Daniel Caesar and Kali Uchis. Warner Records, April 8. On his debut, Mexican American singer-songwriter Omar Apollo stretches out into his many prodigious talents, pulling ideas from indie rock, hip-hop, and Mexican ranchera music to make his own brew, kicking impressive raps in English and Spanish on the trap jam “Tamagotchi” and pouring his heart out over rockers like “Talk,” folk ballads like “Personally,” and R&B jams like “No Good Reason” and “Killing Me.” c.j. F R O M L E F T: M A R V E L S T U D I O S ( M O O N K N I G H T ) ; A P P L E T V + ( S LO W H O R S E S ) ; I F C F I L M S ( N I T R A M ) ; T I N A T H O R P E / H B O ( A B L AC K L A DY S K E TC H S H O W ) ; A 24 ( E V E RY T H I N G E V E RY W H E R E A L L AT O N C E ) THEATER
“JAMES MCAVOY DAZZLES IN JAMIE LLOYD’S RAVISHING CYRANO DE BERGERAC. I FELL IN LOVE ALL OVER AGAIN.” THE NEW YORK TIMES “STUPENDOUS. BREATHTAKINGLY THRILLING.” EVENING STANDARD “TRIUMPHANT. PREPARE TO BE DAZZLED.” THE TELEGRAPH OLIVIER AWARD WINNER BEST REVIVAL THE TIMES THE OBSERVER FINANCIAL TIMES Season Sponsor: APR 5—MAY 22 ONLY! TICKETS START AT $45 BAM.ORG/CYRANO 718.636.4100 Leadership support for theater at BAM provided by The Fan Fox & Leslie R. Samuels Foundation, Inc.; The SHS Foundation; and The Shubert Foundation, Inc. Leadership support for BAM Access Programs provided by the Jerome L. Greene Foundation Proud Partner of Cyrano de Bergerac THE JAMIE LLOYD COMPANY BY EDMOND ROSTAND IN A NEW VERSION BY MARTIN CRIMP DIRECTED BY JAMIE LLOYD
g a mes PODCASTS Solutions to Last Issue’s Puzzles M A C N O S H H Y U N D A E D I C Radiotopia. I E S Q I R O A W N R A N D D O A H A O A L A N S P R I M A U D E L A C E N S N E A L O N T P P S T V E R Y H I G H C H E R R Y P T U B U R I H A N N A P O O D L E I W L N A T E E T E A C H A E D A B O E N N E D N A J A Y I E S A R W N Y B R O W N I K S A A G N F L S E A A A J A S A L L R E A M A W H A E I N O N E A R I I N G T U N R U R O S Q A R H O L E S E E T E D U S A T P R O G O A L E I D O N T G O E C A N N O L I A C C U S E R R U M R A M I D O L E A P E R S E K E A M S S O W S I S C E N T O N P A L G T M A I R L N V E N T I A N N A Y T E A N G E A R S I E R N O D T O V L O G E E O R M O R I Historians Kellie Carter Jackson and Leah Wright Rigueur scour the decadeslong archive of The Oprah Winfrey Show to extract a deeper sense of Oprah’s legacy. nicholas quah N L E T Y TV 13. Watch Tokyo Vice HBO Max, April 7. This loose adaptation of Jake Adelstein’s book Tokyo Vice: An American Reporter on the Police Beat in Japan stars Ken Watanabe, Rinko Kikuchi, and Ansel Elgort. Michael Mann directs the premiere, and if we’re lucky, we’ll get some beautiful shots of men middle-gazing into the distance, pondering their choices. roxana hadadi C R A P A W S L A U R A U R E A R E A T H E B A T M A N E Y E H H T S A T T I N S O N R P O P D A M S S I T A I T E R L I M E The Steamy Puzzle N O S P O L H U S H I A L L E R I I V E R B O A T S D G E R T O N E Q U A L A R U E A R E D R U G L Y N E D E N I E E T S E T E O N S I E N S Find new puzzles daily at nymag.com/games. The Last of Sheila, April 30 and May 1 Psycho star Anthony Perkins and Sondheim actually co-wrote the screenplay for this 1973 murder mystery, which filmmaker Rian Johnson has called an inspiration for Knives Out. of St. Luke’s E E alison willmore Performing J. S. Bach’s St. Matthew Passion. Carnegie Hall, April 7. The Orchestra of St. Luke’s teams up with three different choruses for a performance of Bach’s vaulting, consoling cathedral of a piece. Bernard Labadie, who is a passionate Passion specialist, conducts. j.d. MOVIES 15. See Nitram Caleb Landry Jones, one of cinema’s most compelling weirdos, plays a lonely, agitated man who would go on to perpetrate the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, the worst single-shooter mass killing in Australian history. b.e. TV P S A A T T Stavisky, April 15 and 16 Sondheim composed the score for this Alain Resnais–directed biopic, which stars Jean-Paul Belmondo as the disgraced financier Alexandre Stavisky. CLASSICAL MUSIC IFC, opens March 30. The Gotham Puzzle R Original Cast Album: Company, April 9, 17, and 23 D. A. Pennebaker’s electric doc about the marathon session resulting in a beloved recording (parodied perfectly by Documentary Now!) offers a glimpse of Stephen Sondheim at work. A crime drama. With the Best Actor at Cannes. T P West Side Story, April 1 and 3 (2021), April 2 and 3 (1961) The original Robert Wise adaptation may be a classic, but last year’s Steven Spielberg–directed update is downright astonishing. 14. Hear Orchestra The Scam Puzzle O M O Highlights from the Museum of the Moving Image’s salute to the big-screen work of the musical-theater legend. Studying the icon. P U F F S U P N E R A T E S U N D A E I S C R A S I U R N N E O SEE IT BIG: SONDHEIM Oprahdemics Unfinished Business A S P E U The Shortlist 12. Listen to 16. Watch The Invisible Pilot A double life. HBO, April 4. Adam McKay produces this three-part doc about Gary Betzner, the family man and pilot who jumped off a bridge in 1977. Each episode considers another angle, connecting what happened to covert schemes involving guns and drugs. r.h. DANCE 17. See Soledad Barrio & Noche Flamenca CLASSICAL MUSIC 18. Hear Missa Solemnis Beethoven’s Solemn Mass. Carnegie Hall, April 8. April is choral-monolith month at Carnegie Hall, it seems; on the day after Bach’s St. Matthew Passion, the Philadelphia Orchestra rolls in for Beethoven’s mega-Mass in a performance led by Yannick Nézet-Séguin. j.d. TV 19. Watch 61st Street If you weren’t into the new Law & Order. AMC, April 10. The legal drama follows a Black high-school track star caught up in a drug bust during which a police officer dies. Once a public defender (played by Courtney B. Vance) takes his case, the two must face down the corruption of Chicago’s criminal-justice system. The series already has a two-season order, and the cast includes scene stealers Aunjanue Ellis and Holt McCallany. r.h. MOVIES 20. See Everything Everywhere All at Once Ke Huy Quan stars. Get on the floor. In theaters. The Joyce Theater, April 5 to 10. There is no way to briefly do justice to the Daniels’ bizarre, expansive, heartwarming, profane, harrowing, exhausting, universe-hopping, multipletimeline action-comedy-sci-fi-fantasy-adventurefamily-drama extravaganza. But you’re definitely gonna want to see it more than once, so start now, while it’s in theaters. b.e. Soledad Barrio and her group, Noche Flamenca, under the artistic direction of her husband, Martín Santangelo, dances in a much-anticipated ussion and physical virtube the thing to stamp out those post-lockdown blues. h.s. 82 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2

POP MUSIC 21. Listen to THE ORCHID SHOW: JEFF LEATHAM’S KALEIDOSCOPE Now–May 1 nybg.org Fear of the Dawn The first of two new Jack White albums. Third Man Records, April 8. Fear of the Dawn sees former White Stripes frontman and sometime Raconteur Jack White leaning into the pummeling rock that made him famous on songs like “Taking Me Back” and the title track, but the theatricality of “Hi-De-Ho,” a Q-Tip collaboration with an unexpected flamenco breakdown, shows that his music remains unpredictable. c.j. TV 22. Watch Julia What to watch while eating coq au vin. HBO Max, March 31. British actress Sarah Lancashire (Coronation Street, Happy Valley) brings an infectious joie de vivre to her portrayal of Julia Child in this series about the cookbook author’s rise to fame as a PBS star of her own show. Lancashire is joined by David Hyde Pierce as Child’s husband, Paul, and Bebe Neuwirth as her close friend Avis, which makes this kinda sorta a Frasier reunion. j.c. CLASSICAL MUSIC 23. Hear New York Festival of Song The season finale. Merkin Hall, April 13. REBEL, JESTER, MYSTIC, PO ET CONTEMPORARY PERSIANS The Mohammed Afkhami Collection “A rare treat” —Hyperallergic Is there a genre more eternal, more intimate, or more varied than the song? The resilient group NYFOS, which has spent three decades exploring the simple, infinite terrain of voice + words + piano, closes out its comeback season with a program devoted to Black composers, with music by H. Leslie Adams, Margaret Bonds, Harry Burleigh, Adolphus C. Hailstork, Robert Owens, Hale Smith, and William Grant Still. j.d. BOOKS Asia Society Museum 725 Park Avenue, New York City AsiaSociety.org/ContemporaryPersians On View Through May 8, 2022 24. Read Post-Traumatic Chantal V. Johnson’s thoughtful, caustic debut. Little, Brown and Company, April 5. On the verge of distancing herself from her unstable family, Vivian, a Black Latinx attorney at a New York City psychiatric hospital, descends into an era of self-destruction. Through it all, she assesses herself in a tart inner monologue, even as she draws on wells of tenderness with her clients. e.a. TV 25. Watch Our Great Shirin Aliabadi. Miss Hybrid 3, 2008. Chromogenic print. Mohammed Afkhami Foundation. Photograph courtesy of Mohammed Afkhami Foundation National Parks A stunner. Netflix, April 13. Let this five-part docuseries about the National Parks system, narrated by Barack Obama, step into that void you once filled by getting high and watching Planet Earth. Sure, there are problems in the world. But have you seen the Grand Canyon? Yeah. Yeah. k.v.a.
J.E.R. CARPENTER TRIPLE-MINT MASTERPIECE STUNNING PARK AVENUE 3BR CONDO KIP’S BAY TOWNHOUSE - NEW TO MARKET 550 Park Avenue, 17E — WEB# 21558346 502 Park Avenue, 15CDE — WEB# 21330822 136 East 30th Street — WEB# 21565663 $16,750,000 - This spectacular sun-flooded 4 bedroom plus staff bedroom, 3.5 bathroom corner home is a true architectural masterpiece with breathtaking vistas of the iconic Manhattan skyline including Central Park and the East River. Cathy Franklin (m) 917.863.8209 $12,950,000 - Exceptional 3 bedroom/3.5 bath smart home with custom classic features, lovely outlooks south & east onto Park Avenue. Unique floor plan, light filled 38’ LR, 9.6’ ceilings, large primary bedroom. Top notch building. Katherine S. Slattery (m) 917.855.0222 $6,800,000 - Live-in or invest in this 25 ft wide 5-story multiresidential TH with 5 free market apartments; approximately 6730 sf with multiple outdoor spaces. Excellent rent roll. Dennis Hughes 212.836.1037 Deanna Kory 212.937.7011 A R ARE COMBINATION LIVING ABOVE THE FRAY SKY HOUSE NOMAD 181 Hudson Street, 4BC — WEB# 21260046 400 East 51st Street, 29B — WEB# 21608460 11 East 29th Street, 1022 — WEB# 21498795 $5,850,000 2,987 square foot Tribeca Loft Condo with super low monthlies. Flexible 3 bedroom, 3 bath layout + 2 bonus rooms. 10 south facing windows overlooking Vestry Street. This one feels like home. Janine Young (m) 504.710.6413 $4,700,000 - Offering spectacular views from every room, this 3-4 bedroom trophy home spans 2,347 SF and sits atop the Costas Kondylis designed Grand Beekman Condo, featuring all amenities. Exceptional in every way. Gilda Shani (m) 917.650.5455 $2,350,000 The Sky House located in Nomad/Flatiron neighborhood 2 bedroom/2.5 bath in pristine condition. South, West and North views and lots of light. Flexible space can be converted to 3rd bedroom. Ellen Freeman (m) 917.881.4027 PARK VIEWS AND PRIVATE BALCONY TR ANQUIL AND ZEN CONDO PERFECT PIED-A-TERRE 40 East 80th Street, 21A — WEB# 21592231 365 Bridge Street, 6D — WEB# 6369294 24 West 55th Street, 10F — WEB# 21598946 $1,695,000 This brilliantly designed 3 bed, 3 bath corner home is perched on Madison Avenue with a sprawling floorplan, a private balcony, and Central Park views from nearly every room. Steven Kramer (m) 516.445.5509 Rachel White (m) 917.572.3368 $1,090,000 Amid the chaos and the noise of downtown Brooklyn, is this tranquil LOFT with 2 windowless sleeping areas. Low CC and Taxes, 24hr doorman, pet friendly, gym and shared outdoor spaces, completes you. Sharon Burroughs (m) 917.940.2118 $750,000 Divine oversized one bedroom with sunny garden facing views at desirable Rockefeller Apartments. F/S prewar coop with deco details, renovated kitchen, herringbone wood floors and new casement windows. Charlotte Van Doren (m) 917.603.9489 Patricia Cliff (m) 917.699.9159 Real estate agents affiliated with The Corcoran Group are independent contractor sales associates and are not employees of The Corcoran Group. The Corcoran Group is a licensed real estate broker located at 590 Madison Ave, NY, NY 10022. All listing phone numbers indicate listing agent direct line unless otherwise noted. All information furnished regarding property for sale or rent or regarding financing is from sources deemed reliable, but Corcoran makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy thereof. All property information is presented subject to errors, omissions, price changes, changed property conditions, and withdrawal of the property from the market, without notice. Equal Housing Opportunity.
The Future of Trumpism CO N T I N U E D F R O M PAG E 4 7 governor since the Jim Crow era to institute a literal poll tax. After signing the law, DeSantis proclaimed on his official Twitter account, “Voting is a privilege that should not be taken lightly.” He conveyed his beliefs with chilling accuracy: Voting is a privilege, not, as many Americans believe, a right. trump and desantis have been circling each other since the 2020 election, and their budding rivalry has so far been shaped by the GOP’s two great preoccupations of the immediate post-Trump era: the pandemic and Trump’s attempts to steal the election. The incipient contest broke into public view in December. It began when DeSantis appeared on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo, who asked if he had gotten a booster shot. DeSantis evaded the question and changed the subject to his fight against vaccine requirements. A couple of weeks later, Pushaw announced that DeSantis was refusing to disclose his status as a matter of “medical privacy.” The next week, Trump appeared on One America News and, without naming him, ridiculed DeSantis for being afraid to come clean. “I watched a couple of politicians be interviewed and one of the questions was ‘Did you get the booster?’ ” Trump said. “Because they had the vaccine, and they’re answering like—in other words, the answer is ‘Yes,’ but they don’t want to say it because they’re gutless. You gotta say it, whether you had it or not. Say it.” Quickly afterward, DeSantis hit back. The lobbyist Josh Holmes, an ally of Mitch McConnell’s, asked DeSantis on his podcast if he had any regrets about his term in office. DeSantis replied that he wished he had spoken out more forcefully against Trump’s early, intermittent endorsements of social distancing when the coronavirus pandemic began, which he described as “locking down the country.” In other words, DeSantis considers his biggest mistake in office failing to push back against something Donald Trump did. The most revealing aspect of the episode was how the conservative media covered it. If you listened to the Trump-critical outlets on the right—the ones aligned with the GOP Establishment’s belief that Trump’s personality is a liability for the party—the first shots had been fired in DeSantis’s uprising. National Review, which has become the premier intellectual organ of the anti-anti-Trump right while pining for his replacement, ran columns with headlines like “Could DeSantis Beat Trump?” and “The DeSantis-Trump Tensions Will Lead to a Test of Strength.” Meanwhile, the most loyal Trumpist corners of the conservative media denied the entire premise that DeSantis and Trump were in conflict. American Greatness, an online magazine invented in response to the Trump campaign and premised on turning his slogans into a political program, insisted that “the New York Times story on the Trump-DeSantis feud is kayfabe” (a staged conflict). In a column headlined “Why the Media’s Attempt to Split DeSantis and Trump Isn’t Working,” the Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway argued that the “corporate media” is trying to pit Trump and DeSantis “against each other” because “they’re a threat to the Establishment.” If you’re a Republican who wants Trump gone, DeSantis is the man with the guts to take him on. If you’re a Republican who adores Trump, DeSantis remains his loyal ally. Both wings of the party are jostling for DeSantis’s approval and broadcasting DeSantis-friendly messages to their audiences. The same dynamic can be seen in DeSantis’s courtship of the anti-vaccine movement. Pro-vaccine conservatives maintain the pretense that DeSantis only opposes vaccine mandates, calling him “a vocal proponent of the covid vaccines” and insisting that the claim he is encouraging doubt about the safety or efficacy of the vaccines is a “lie.” Meanwhile, anti-vaccine activists have hailed DeSantis as their champion. Vaccine skeptic Robert Malone, appearing on Steve Bannon’s podcast, gushed, “Ron DeSantis and surgeon general Joe Ladapo … are giving hope to the rest of the world. They are listening to the key messages we are putting forth.” If you completely dismiss the possibility that DeSantis could pry the Republican base away from a president to whom it has formed a cultlike attachment, you may not be considering the potential effect of two more years of DeSantis being given the sort of coverage in the right-wing media that Pravda devoted to Joseph Stalin. What a DeSantis-led Republican Party is perhaps best captured o the claims that the 2020 election was stolen. DeSantis began by playing the familiar role of Trump defender, complaining the day after the election about Fox News’ decision to call Arizona for Joe 86 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Biden. (The network, he speculated, had “some type of motive, whether it was ratings, whether it was something else.”) He went on Hannity’s show to warn of “vote dumps,” a Republican term designed to cast suspicion on the results coming out of Democratic counties: “I tell you, what I’m seeing in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania is troubling, Sean.” Later that day, DeSantis went on Fox News again and floated the possibility that Republican-controlled legislatures in battleground states won by Biden could override the election results and appoint Trump electors. On the day of the insurrection, DeSantis issued a perfunctory rebuke (“Violence or rioting of any kind is unacceptable”) before pivoting back to his comfortable posture of offense. In the past year, he has assailed Liz Cheney for cooperating with the investigation of the attack (“We want people that are going to fight the left”), refused to say whether Biden legitimately won the election, and similarly declined to clarify whether Pence was correct to certify the Electoral College results. By the time the anniversary of the insurrection arrived, DeSantis was floating the right-wing rumor that the violence on January 6 had actually been ginned up by undercover FBI agents. But mostly he resented the media for covering the issue at all. “This is their Christmas: January 6,” he complained. “They are going to take this and milk this for anything they could to be able to smear anyone who ever supported Donald Trump.” DeSantis also marked the anniversary by wooing right-wing social-media personalities with an invitation to his office, dinner at the governor’s mansion, and rooftop drinks. One of the less visible aspects of DeSantis’s political operation has been its appeals to conservative activists who have gained clout and influence during the Trump era and who have legitimized vaccine skepticism, support for Vladimir Putin, and dismissing or even participating in the January 6 insurrection. Pushaw attended an event to promote the anti-gay education bill held by Brandon Straka, who was recorded at the Capitol on January 6 urging the crowd to seize a police officer’s shield and yelling “Go, go, go!” Esther Byrd, whom DeSantis appointed to the state’s board of education, has reportedly defended the January 6 rioters, QAnon, and the Proud Boys. DeSantis’s unembarrassed courtship of right-wing extremists has broadened his array of media advocates. Perhaps most important, his no-enemies-to-the-right strategy has sent a message about his brand: Unlike the weak Republican Establishment, DeSantis will stand with conservatives. In January, a small band of white
supremacists converged in Orlando, where they chanted “White power!” and roughed up a Jewish student. Pushaw suggested on Twitter that the white supremacists were actually Democrats pretending to be Nazis to make DeSantis look bad, a charge that was quickly debunked. When DeSantis was asked about the episode at a press conference, he could have confined himself to a rote denunciation of the racist hoodlums, as several of his fellow Florida Republicans did. Instead, he launched an extended diatribe against “Democrats who are trying to use this as some type of political issue to try to smear me.” He then wound his way through such talking points as Ilhan Omar, the BDS movement, Louis Farrakhan, inflation, illegal immigration, crime, and the supposed failures of the Biden administration—which the press was allegedly trying to obscure by bringing up the Orlando attack. Rubio, standing behind DeSantis, shuffled his feet uncomfortably as DeSantis’s rant went on. “We’re not playing their game,” he insisted, falling back on his occasional habit of narrating his own political strategy. Their game, in this case, meant accepting the terms of debate as defined by what he has called the “corrupt” media. In a high-profile editorial denouncing Trump six years ago—a cover story with the glittering tagline “Against Trump”— National Review asked, “If Trump were to become the president, the Republican nominee, or even a failed candidate with strong conservative support, what would that say about conservatives?” More recently, National Review’s editor, Rich Lowry, made the case for DeSantis on the grounds that he is the closest possible thing to Trump. “The challenge to Trump,” he reasoned, “will have to come from the Trump wing—at this point, more like the Trump fuselage, wing and landing gear—of the party.” The paradigmatic DeSantis constituent within the Republican elite would be William Barr. The former attorney general, who released a memoir in March describing his clashes with Trump over the 2020 election, has called Trump delusional and says he wants to nominate “young candidates who will fight for principle but don’t have the sort of obnoxious personal characteristics that alienate a lot of voters.” But Barr eagerly supported many of Trump’s efforts to weaponize the Justice Department and has conceded that he will vote for Trump again should he be nominated. It’s worth noting that the one major difference between Barr and DeSantis is that the former drew the line at Trump’s attempt to overturn the results of the last election. With DeSantis, there’s no telling where that ■ line might be. Blocked CO N T I N U E D F R O M PAG E 4 7 Luke learned about the mandatory oneyear thinking period, during which he’d be on blockers alone. “I was in shock. I was in disbelief. I told them, ‘That’s a whole year of my life that I’m not going to be able to feel. You don’t understand what it’s like,’ ” says Luke. “It was emotional overload.” Eventually, he calmed down. It was 12 more months. He could do this. bell’s report found two strong supporters in Susan Evans, who had a short tenure at gids in the mid-aughts, and her husband, Marcus, a member of the Tavistock Council of Governors who resigned because he didn’t think the organization was taking Bell’s recommendations seriously. They soon mounted a public campaign to sound alarms about gids. In their view, there was not enough evidence to support putting young people on blockers. Doing so, they argued, could push minors toward a medical pathway when they might have otherwise outgrown their dysphoria. Susan Evans was eventually contacted by the mother of a 15-year-old with autism who was assigned female at birth and was, according to the mother, “desperate to run away from all that made her female.” The mother feared that if seen by gids clinicians, her child would be put on puberty blockers. Evans and the mother decided to file a lawsuit against the Tavistock. A decision in their favor had the potential to end gender-affirming medical treatment for minors in the U.K. As they set out to find expert witnesses for the case, a woman named Keira Bell (no relation to David Bell) came forward. She was a 23-year-old former gids patient, assigned female at birth, who had transitioned to male after being assessed at gids, then gone back to identifying as female. Soon, Evans and her team asked Keira to become the main claimant named in the lawsuit. (She is the Bell in Bell v. Tavistock.) Keira’s childhood had been difficult— her parents divorced when she was 5, and her mother, forced to go on welfare, “descended into alcoholism and mental illness,” according to an essay Keira published on the Substack Persuasion. She describes herself as a tomboy, not think- ing much about gender until the onset of puberty, when “everything changed for the worse.” She no longer fit in with the boys who were her closest friends but didn’t feel she belonged with the girls, either. “By the time I was 14, I was severely depressed and had given up: I stopped going to school; I stopped going outside,” she wrote. Keira also realized she was attracted to girls. Keira had her first appointment with gids when she was 15, and she says that by the time she got there, she was “adamant that I needed to transition.” After what she describes as “a series of superficial conversations with social workers,” she was put on puberty blockers at age 16 and received her first testosterone shot a year later. Her voice deepened, she grew facial hair, and she changed her name to Quincy. At 20, she had her breasts removed. Rather than feeling more comfortable with her body, Keira became uneasy, eventually realizing that she was not a man and the gender dysphoria she’d experienced was “a symptom of my overall misery, not its cause.” She blamed gids for not more thoroughly evaluating her and for putting her on a path to hormone treatments. In court, Keira’s lawyer, Jeremy Hyam, argued that people under the age of 18 were incapable of informed consent: They lack the ability to decide if puberty blockers are right for them, and even if they could, gids failed to provide adequate information on the drugs and their possible effects. (Hyam did not respond to interview requests on Keira’s behalf.) On December 1, 2020, three judges ruled in favor of Keira’s claim, agreeing that young people under 16 couldn’t consent to puberty blockers and also that the treatment was “experimental” in nature. After the ruling, the NHS updated its guidelines: Anyone 16 and under in the U.K. could not go on blockers without getting a judge’s approval first. In their decision, the judges wrote that it was “highly unlikely” a child 13 or under could give informed consent to pubertyblocking treatment and that they were “very doubtful” children 14 or 15 could do so either. The judges seemed particularly skeptical that a child under 16 could understand the way puberty blockers might affect their fertility and sexual functioning. The medical evidence for the conclusions in the decision, however, is thin. Joshua Safer, an endocrinologist and the director of the Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, says that blockers are not known to affect fertility. If a kid decides to stop, “you’re going to have the same puberty you would have had anyway, just a little later.” Juanita Hodax, a pediatric endocrinologist and co-director of the march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 87
Seattle Children’s Gender Clinic, points out that blockers have been used for 40 years for precocious puberty with no effect on fertility and “there’s no reason to think it would be any different in gender-diverse kids.” The question of sexual functioning is more complicated. Marci Bowers, the incoming president of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health and a well-known gender-affirming surgeon who is herself transgender, says she’s “squarely on the side of blockers,” particularly for transmasculine kids, because if they use them early in puberty, they can halt breast growth and avoid top surgery later. However, she does have concerns when it comes to transfeminine kids and is of the view that they should “allow a little bit of puberty to happen, if they can possibly stand it.” For starters, if a transfeminine child goes on blockers very early in puberty, it can limit the growth of the scrotum and other genital tissue, which can make vaginoplasty more complicated in the future—although certainly not impossible. Also, if those same young people go straight onto estrogen, they may experience challenges having an orgasm later in life. Bowers’s argument for a more nuanced approach, however, squares poorly with the blanket ban imposed by the court. Susie Green, the CEO of Mermaids, a nonprofit that supports gender-diverse young people and their families, says her phone started ringing almost immediately after the decision was announced. “There was so much confusion, such a lack of clarity around what would happen next,” she says. Green heard from young people who had gotten their first gids appointment and thought they could finally go on puberty blockers. “They were just told, ‘That’s not happening now.’ ” Green felt that she had very little hope to offer them. “A lot of parents were talking around, ‘How am I going to keep my kid alive?’” B ecause luke had just turned 17, he wasn’t initially affected by the court’s decision: He had been on blockers for more than three months by the time Bell v. Tavistock was announced. He was relieved that he would be able to continue them, but he knew people who were still waiting. Most of them would likely pay for private health care, he believed. Luke was surprised that Keira Bell’s story had had such an impact; Bell was 16, after all, when she went on blockers—old enough to give consent, according to the court. Had she been going through gids now, she would have been eligible for blockers and could have had the same outcome. Luke had also never felt pushed to tran- sition by anyone at gids. If anything, he thought, they were holding him back. “If that was actually happening, I would be as disgusted with it as Keira was,” he says. “You should not be encouraging children to go on hormones when they don’t need them. That’s terrible, because they are going to end up with dysphoria. That’s not what’s happening.” In August 2021, Luke finally experienced the direct effects of Bell v. Tavistock. That month, his one-year “thinking period” should have ended. But after the court decision, gids stopped referring its patients for hormone treatments regardless of age. Luke’s options were limited: He could stay on puberty blockers beyond the one-year mark and continue living with the side effects, or he could go off the blockers, which would cause his body to resume a female puberty. In the end, he stayed on blockers—less a choice than a necessity. To help with the side effects, his endocrinologist suggested they try reducing the interval between doses. “I’ve been on them for so long I’ve been getting really, really bad pain in my bones, in my muscles, and getting a lot of skin pain,” says Luke. “It’s affecting my sleep.” In September, an appeals court reversed the initial judgment, ultimately ruling that the court had no place in medical decisions made by patients, their families, and their doctors. A spokesperson for gids said that referrals to endocrinology resumed that same month, but patients and activists say in practice the door to medical interventions remained largely shut for months. In that time, says Green, the service was “completely stagnating as far as we can see, and NHS England seem really reluctant to do anything about all of those thousands of young people who are on that waiting list.” Only now, more than a half-year later, are patient groups beginning to see more young people move on to hormone treatments again. Trans-rights advocates recently sued the NHS for gids’ yearslong waiting period, which is well beyond the 18-week maximum that is supposed to be allowed. Jolyon Maugham, a lawyer and the founder of Good Law Project, says he hopes that the litigation will give ammunition to those in the NHS who “do not subscribe to this view that we must pathologize gender dysphoria.” He envisions a system where many transgender young people could get puberty blockers from their GPs and only complex cases would require seeing a specialist. Hilary Cass, a former president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, who is leading an independent review of gids commissioned by NHS, embraced a similar solution in an interim 88 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 report published in March. Cass called for a new clinical model that doesn’t rely on gids alone, instead allowing young people to seek care through a network of regional hubs. The Cass report also criticized the slow pace of the treatment received by patients like Luke, but it has yet to come down on either side of the debate about blockers and hormones. In the fall, Luke’s gids clinician told him that, with his 18th birthday approaching, his best chance for accessing hormones would be to switch to the adult service and be put on the waiting list there. In January, two months after his birthday, he and his mother drove to London for what they thought was going to be another consultation. Instead, Luke learned that he would begin a low dose of testosterone that day. It took a moment for the news to settle in. “You know, when something really good happens, you just feel a bit out of it?” he asks. “That’s kind of how I felt—like I had to have a lie-down. It felt conclusive in a really relaxed, safe, nice, ‘It’s over’ kind of way.’” Once home, they celebrated with Champagne. The physical changes are, so far, subtle; Luke will eventually go on a higher dose of testosterone, which will help him grow facial hair, increase his muscle mass, and deepen his voice. The testosterone has also relieved many of the side effects of the puberty blockers, which he’s still on to suppress his estrogen levels. He has more energy and fewer aches. He’s happier, too. “I think 99 percent of my moods, feeling better, is knowing that I don’t have to go through more of this stuff,” he says. There is relief in knowing that he will start art school in London this fall with his medical transition under way. He hopes to get top surgery in the next few years and has already started saving for the £8,000 outof-pocket fee by selling thrift-store finds online. There’s a scenario he has imagined in which he and his new university friends go swimming and someone notices the scars on his chest and asks about them. “I will be like, ‘Oh, I had top surgery, I was born a girl,’” he says. “I feel like it needs to be that simple because I don’t want to hide it and I don’t want to make it a big aspect of me.” Now that he’s on testosterone, it’s surreal to him—even infuriating—that he could have felt this way years ago. He worries about the kids who still don’t have access, the ones stuck on the waiting list for what could be years. On the rare occasion that he gets a hot flash these days, and the familiar feeling of discomfort seeps in before the testosterone recalibrates his body, he thinks of them. “There are people who don’t get through those times of it being uncomfortable,” he says. “There are people who literally ■ don’t survive it.”
SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION NEW YORK’S TOP RATED FAMILY LAW AND TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 Joshua S. Rubenstein Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION NEW YORK’S TOP RATED FAMILY LAW & TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 Jay resides in Manhattan with his wife and two children. When not with his family or in the office, he can be found training for his next race. Jay is a veteran of numerous road races and triathlons and, on happy occasion, makes the podium. 450 Seventh Avenue, 33rd Fl, New York, NY 10123 Phone: 646 780-8100 jfreiberg@ef-law.com www.ef-law.com Cardi & Edgar LLP DAWN M. CARDI (212) 481-7770 cardiedgarlaw.com 2 NEW YORK’S FAMILY LAW AND TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 | ALM FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT NYMAG.COM/LEGAL-LEADERS/2022/TRUST-ESTATES
SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION NEW YORK’S TOP RATED FAMILY LAW & TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 WILL CONTESTS, ACCOUNTING CONTESTS, COMPLEX TRUST & ESTATE LITIGATION, ESTATE & TRUST ADMINISTRATION The four senior attorneys at our law firm, Gary E. Bashian, Andrew R. Frisenda, Michael G. Hanrahan and Hayley A. Chittenden, and all attorneys in our firm, have over 120 years experience in providing personal service to our clients. Additional Related Areas of Practice • Family Business & Corporate Litigation Relating to Estates, Complex Trust & Estate & High Income & High Asset Preservation Including Planning for Future Generations for High Net Worth Entrepreneurs, Corporate Executives & Investment Bankers • Corporate & Business Law & Litigation • Matrimonial & Family Law & Litigation • Infant & Adult Guardianship Law & Litigation We strive to provide you the best possible outcome through individualized attention and careful, fact-finding and tax analysis to honor your wishes to protect your family, not just from a tax perspective, but to protect all family members. We are available on a 24-hour basis, 7 days a week. Admitted in NEW YORK and CONNECTICUT BASHIAN P.C. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 235 MAIN STREET, SUITE 610, WHITE PLAINS, NY | 552 LAKE AVENUE, GREENWICH, CT 914.946.5100 WWW.BASHIAN-LAW.COM 6KHĚV0RUHWKDQD/DZ\HU 6KHĚV0RUHWKDQD3V\FKRORJLVW 6KHĚV0RUHWKDQD-XGJH As a Family Court and former Acting Supreme Court Judge, the Hon. Jane Pearl (Ret.) handled more than 100,000 cases during her 21+ years on the bench. Jane Pearl is one of the few judges in New York State who has a PhD in psychology and was a practicing clinical and consulting psychologist, training and supervising mental health professionals, for more than 20 years. Jane Pearl will be consulting with clients, litigating, and mediating cases as well as accepting assignments as a Parent Coordinator, an Attorney for Children, a Neutral Evaluator and an Independent Mediator. She will also be assisting members of our bar with reviews of forensic evaluations, as well offering her services as a trial consultant to other law firms. Now is your chance to put Judge Pearl’s 21+ years of legal experience on the bench, handling more that 100,000+ cases, to work for you and your clients. 6KHĚV-DQH3HDUO 6SHFLDO&RXQVHO 646-770-3868 FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT NYMAG.COM/LEGAL-LEADERS/2022/TRUST-ESTATES mandellawfirm.com NEW YORK’S FAMILY LAW AND TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 | ALM 3
Joshua S. Rubenstein Partner New York Office +1.212.940.7150 joshua.rubenstein@katten.com

SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION NEW YORK’S TOP RATED FAMILY LAW & TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 Friedman & Friedman, Attorneys at Law Divorce and Family Law Family law has evolved significantly in the more than 40 years since Sari Friedman first began practicing law. But as a leading authority on divorce matters, Friedman has remained at the forefront of her field. And today, the practice she runs with her daughter Andrea is recognized throughout Long Island, Westchester County , the five boroughs and the lower Hudson valley, for its zealous advocacy and personalized service. “Our family-oriented drive is reflected in both our firm’s operations and the clients we help,” notes Sari, who, in addition to being AV Preeminent® rated by MartindaleHubbell® and included in New York Metro Super Lawyers, received Hofstra University School of Law’s 2017 Women Leaders in Law award. “We understand the importance of family, and our growth has been informed by our collaborative, personal approach.”Indeed, partner Andrea, a Westchester resident, expanded the firm by successfully launching and managing its office in White Plains. Andrea has been recognized for several years by Top 100 Registry, Lawyers of Distinction, American Institute of Family Lawyers. Andrea was inducted by the Marquis Who’s Who in America and in 2021 was recognized by the New York Times as a Power Lawyer. In 2017, Andrea was recognized by Long Island Business News as one of its “40 Under 40,” after being named to its “Ones to Watch” list in 2014. She has also received the 2018 – “Emerging Leader” Award, Outstanding Women in Law, Hofstra University School of Law and achieved the Rising Star award, by Super Lawyers. She also serves on the board of the Westchester Women’s Bar Association. “Diligence is key in this field, and it helps that both of us love what we do,” Andrea says. “Everyone’s situation is different, and it’s always rewarding when you’re able to help clients move forward in their lives.” Long Island Office: 666 Old Country Rd., Suite 704, Garden City, NY 11530 | PH: 516.688.0088 | www.sarilaw.com Westchester Office: 120 Bloomingdale Road, Suite 307, White Plains, NY 10605 | PH: (914) 686-8258 | www.andreafriedman.com ADRIA S. HILLMAN ROSEANN C. BRANDA, SAMUEL J. FERRARA FAMILY LAW COMPLEX DIVORCE, VALUATION, PARENTING ISSUES ADRIA S. HILLMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C 41 EAST 57TH ST., 34TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10022 PH: 212.593.5223 | FAX: 212.593.4633 6 NEW YORK’S FAMILY LAW AND TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 | ALM ABRAMS FENSTERMAN BROOKLYN 718.215.5300 LAKE SUCCESS 516.328.2300 RBRANDA@ABRAMSLAW.COM SFERRARA@ABRAMSLAW.COM WWW.ABRAMSLAW.COM FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT NYMAG.COM/LEGAL-LEADERS/2022/TRUST-ESTATES
SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION NEW YORK’S TOP RATED FAMILY LAW & TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 JEWELL LAW, PLLC MATRIMONIAL & FAMILY LAW Ken Jewell In marital strife, the question to answer is do you want to be happy or right? BodnarMilone LLP Family Law Lydia A. Milone Peter O. Bodnar Erik Kristensen Tamara A. Mitchel John P. Frucco Pamela J. Jenson, Aoife Collins Katherine Chestnut FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT NYMAG.COM/LEGAL-LEADERS/2022/TRUST-ESTATES NEW YORK’S FAMILY LAW AND TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 | ALM 7
SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION NEW YORK’S TOP RATED FAMILY LAW & TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 MICHAEL N. CONNORS ELDER LAW, PROBATE, WILLS, TRUSTS AND ESTATES SHANNON ROGERS SIMPSON MATRIMONIAL AND FAMILY LAW SHARA H. GOLDFARB, ESQ. Shara H. Goldfarb is a partner at the Miller Law Group. Shara is dedicated to providing her clients with compassionate, thoughtful counseling, mediation and legal representation during the divorce transition. Shara is a skilled litigator and zealous advocate in her role as the attorney for children in contested custody cases. Having witnessed the devasting impact the court process can have on children, Shara has focused her practice in recent years on achieving creative, complex out-of-court settlements through collaborative law, mediation and skilled negotiation. In addition to her 20+ years of family law litigation experience, Shara is a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst, a certified mediator, a trained collaborative law attorney, and has been selected to be on the Attorney for the Child Panel and the Matrimonial and Family Law Mediation Panel for the Ninth Judicial District. Connors & Sullivan Attorneys at Law, PLLC 110 East 59th Street, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10022 PH: 718 238 6500 | info@connorsand sullivan.com www.connorsandsullivan.com COHEN CLAIR LANS GREIFER THORPE & ROTTENSTREICH LLP The Lipstick Building 885 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, New York 10022 PH: 212.300.1100 | Fax: 212.300.1111 srsimpson@cohenclairlans.com www.cohenclairlans.com 271 North Avenue, Suite 812, New Rochelle, NY 10801 60 E 42nd St, Suite 4600 New York , NY 10165 914-745-9851 | shara@miller-law.com www.miller-law.com WdZ//'>dZ/ dZh^d^Θ^dd^>t WĂƚƌŝĐŝĂ'ĂůƚĞƌŝƐĞƌǀĞƐĂƐ DĂŶĂŐŝŶŐƩŽƌŶĞLJŽĨ DĞLJĞƌ,^ƵŽnjnjŝ,ŶŐůŝƐŚΘ <ůĞŝŶ,W..ĂŶĚŝƐŚĂŝƌŽĨ ƚŚĞĮƌŵ’ƐDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞĂŶĚƚŚĞĮƌŵ’Ɛ tŝůůƐ,dƌƵƐƚƐΘƐƚĂƚĞƐ ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ.DƌƐ.'ĂůƚĞƌŝ’ƐƉƌĂĐƟĐĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ ƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨĞƐƚĂƚĞĂŶĚĨĂŵŝůLJ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐƉůĂŶƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞƚĂdžĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ ƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌŽĨǁĞĂůƚŚƚŽƚŚĞŶĞdžƚŐĞŶĞƌĂƟŽŶ ǁŚŝůĞŵĞĞƟŶŐƚŚĞƐƉĞĐŝĮĐƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůŐŽĂůƐŽĨ ŚĞƌĐůŝĞŶƚƐ.^ŚĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚƉůĂŶƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨǁŝůůƐĂŶĚŐƌĂŶƚŽƌƚƌƵƐƚƐ, ŝƌƌĞǀŽĐĂďůĞůŝĨĞŝŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞƚƌƵƐƚƐ,ŐĞŶĞƌĂƟŽŶ ƐŬŝƉƉŝŶŐƚƌƵƐƚƐ,ŐƌĂŶƚŽƌƌĞƚĂŝŶĞĚĂŶŶƵŝƚLJ ƚƌƵƐƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂƌƌĂŶŐĞŵĞŶƚƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽ ƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƚůŝƩůĞŽƌƌĞĚƵĐĞĚŐŝŌƚĂdž ĐŽƐƚƚŽƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚďĞŶĞĮĐŝĂƌŝĞƐ. Maximize Your Recognition To compete in today’s highly crowded legal marketplace, you need an added edge over your competitors. Highlighting your recognition in ALM publications provides an authoritative and convincing way to impact your target audience. With ALM reprints, e-prints, permissions and plaques, you can showcase the acknowledgement that you have earned and leverage that endorsement. Order your custom reprints today. Contact: 877-257-3382 | reprints@alm.com DzZ,^hK/,E'>/^,Θ<>/E,W.. 99Ϭ^ƚĞǁĂƌƚǀĞ,^ƵŝƚĞϯϬϬ 'ĂƌĚĞŶŝƚLJ,EzϭϭϱϯϬ W;ϱϭϲ)ϳϰϭ ϲϱϲϱ ǁǁǁ.ŵƐĞŬ.ĐŽŵ almreprints.com 8 NEW YORK’S FAMILY LAW AND TRUSTS & ESTATES LAWYERS 2022 | ALM FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT NYMAG.COM/LEGAL-LEADERS/2022/TRUST-ESTATES
Galaxy Brain CO N T I N U E D F R O M PAG E 3 5 Never before have I written a story with which my male peers were so eager to help. They sent tweets, they sent podcasts, they proposed merch. “I really want to make one of those ’90s pop-star shirts for tooze,” one enterprising friend texted, along with a Backstreet Boys Etsy link. Maybe this is what Tooze feels like all the time, I thought—carried along by great gusts of boyish enthusiasm, lavished with informative chats. It felt good. The texts arrived in a flurry when, in February, Elon Musk tweeted about Tooze. The Tesla co-founder had jumped into an exchange about the Canadian truck blockade to recommend The Wages of Destruction. “Well thank you @elonmusk much appreciated!” Tooze responded. Musk had cited the book in the course of comparing Justin Trudeau to Adolf Hitler. This came to Tooze’s attention only later. At the time, Tooze had been distracted: He was flying to the Bahamas, where he and his wife are rebuilding their house, which was destroyed by Hurricane Dorian. “I wish I had been more on top if it,” he told me. “But my initial impulse when somebody says something nice about my work is to simply say thanks.” I n the acknowledgments to Shutdown, Tooze thanks two therapists by name; in Crashed, he thanks an anonymous psychoanalyst. For a time, he was doing three psychoanalysis sessions per week, though lately he has cut back to two. “It helps me sort through the psychointellectual dramas of high-stakes intellectual life,” he said, such as interviewing Timothy Geithner. (“He lays a trip on you,” said Tooze of the former Treasury secretary. “He is a little Napoleonic figure. He’s very charismatic. He’s playing with your mind; he’s playing with your emotions.”) On a more quotidian level, “it helps me manage the fears around writing.” Despite his graphomaniacal recent output, Tooze has grappled with insecurity and writer’s block over the years. “I was an economist as an undergraduate. I wasn’t in a writey-writey di he said. “I didn’t think of myself as ” Sometimes the dramas of intellectual life take the form of reviews. “A lot of my graduate students had to talk me down after the Anderson piece,” Tooze said. In 2019, he was waiting to board a transatlantic flight in Paris when he received an email from Susan Watkins, editor of New Left Review. Tooze had contributed to NLR in the past, and Watkins was writing to share an essay on his work it would publish in a few hours. Tooze remembers struggling to download the text on his phone as he boarded the plane—“a horrific situation,” he said. The piece, when it arrived, was a long and scathing critique by Perry Anderson. Coming after Crashed had amassed a year of acclaim, its publication was “like watching gods fight,” one Tooze fan told me. Anderson cast Tooze as insufficiently critical of power, a thinker whose posture amounted to “running with the hare and hunting with the hounds.” It is true that Tooze’s work deals almost exclusively with the doings of a tiny, powerful elite. This is his method and the basis of what fans on the left see as his critique. As Tooze put it to me, “If you want to do critical analysis of contemporary capitalism, stick with the trouble, stay inside the machine. Follow the people who are operating the machine and you’ll be amazed what they’ll tell you. Absolutely staggering what they will say out loud.” He sees his work as offering, in “quite explicit” terms, a class politics for his educated, white-collar readers—the professional-managerial class, or PMC. “It’s a matter of holding ourselves as the PMC responsible for our catastrophic fuckups,” he said. “In argument with Perry Anderson and people like that, I’ve become more and more conscious of this. It’s a kind of class politics. It’s a PMC class politics.” (He also said, “I mean, look at me, for crying out loud. I cannot be the bearer of a populist politics.”) Reading Anderson’s account of his work left him “vaguely sick” and “dizzy”; he felt “travestied” and “misunderstood.” But Tooze, who describes his politics as “leftliberal,” was accustomed to political scrutiny. “My lefty friends in the United States were so disappointed in me for using the word ‘liberal’ about myself,” he said. He didn’t quite understand why it bothered them until witnessing the “full-on self-celebration of New York Times liberalism” in the wake of Biden’s election. “Nevertheless, you don’t need to witness that to know that liberalism has blind spots. It must have. All ideologies do. But it really has lots, and to my mind, reading Marxism has always been the most powerful corrective to that.” Tooze is a figure with unimpeachable Establishment credentials who takes the left seriously. The combination has made him, in the words of one Tooze Bro, “the only person who can make credible, respected appearances at the Verso loft or at Davos.” Recently, an invitation to deliver a particularly prestigious lecture “unleashed a com- plete crisis,” Tooze told me. The honor was an occasion for “incomprehension and panic and almost shame—impostor complex.” The solution he and his analyst devised was to focus on what he might usefully say. Just be useful: This directive has of late become his “principal stabilizing device.” “I’m no longer, I would say, principally driven by a striving for distinctiveness or radical originality or those things,” he said. (“Though obviously—and it does happen to me—when you come up with an original idea, it’s great.”) Shutdown, for example: “The purpose of that book is to be useful,” he said. “People need to understand what happened in the bond market last year, and most people don’t. So let’s really explain it and link it up to all the other things that happened and provide a map. And write that book, and write it quickly, and get it out, and like—it’s useful.” Russia’s war on Ukraine, it soon developed, was yet another disaster that put Tooze’s services in demand. It was a crisis that entangled military strategy, diplomatic power, and international finance; it concerned both European history and the economic machinery that churned within global politics. It was textbook Tooze terrain. One night in early March, a week into the invasion, I received an email from him. “No doubt there are more important things to write and think about right now,” he wrote. “But this is a chronicle of a week in the life of Tooze.” Below was a schedule listing some 21 items, which included giving interviews, filing articles, and attending a National Security Council advisory session on IndoPacific strategy. Tooze reported that he had just finished a 14-hour day that began with talking to Der Spiegel and ended with talking to Chris Hayes. Still outstanding were requests from 13 established organizations and outlets as well as six or so from “podcasts, etc.” whose names he did not recognize. He had taken to using two computers at once to ease toggling between events. “Plus,” he wrote, “many of the interviews and panels I’ve been doing are in German. So I get confused, at times, about what language I am in.” On Ones and Tooze, he explained the fine print on energy sanctions; in The New Statesman, he explained Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz. “Who do you think has gotten less sleep the last two weeks,” a friend later texted me, “Putin or Tooze?” The need for explanation was evolving so swiftly that Ezra Klein had interviewed Tooze twice in the space of four days. “In a moment like this,” Tooze wrote in an email to me at 10:56 p.m., “if folks feel I can help make sense of things, I am all in. I will ■ work around the clock.” march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 97
ES By Matt Gaffney 2 5 6 9 0 12 14 15 16 41 42 43 75 76 9 22 23 24 25 27 30 31 34 3 44 2 38 4 32 39 2 33 40 46 4 48 4 4 56 7 62 59 3 65 7 6 70 7 6 72 7 2 73 9 0 3 4 89 9 9 03 1 90 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 34 37 44 46 47 48 49 50 52 Across 9 96 0 99 10 05 2 Thick carpet Pour water on Nonclerical Capital on a peninsula Have ___-track mind (be obsessed) Piece with a thesis Ma plays it Rotten to the core Pet bug of a game-show icon? Truck brand Withdrawal schedule Swimmers said to be slippery Scully and Mulder’s cases Green arm of govt. Part under a car Honors Ming thing Songwriting method that produced hits like “Straight Up” and “Forever Your Girl”? Dental-floss brand Native to Intended for, as a letter Madrid metal Soldier’s bed Ear, for one Type of advocacy grp. 06 3 92 9 0 107 10 10 0 5 1 1 5 10 14 18 5 95 9 2 74 1 1 122 1 53 Like some situations 55 18 holes designed by a “Parks and Recreation” star? 61 “Where It’s At” singer 62 Makers of mochas 63 “Jude the Obscure” novelist 64 Home to Mavericks 66 So much 67 “A.I.,” e.g. 68 Soup with tofu cubes, often 69 “The Tempest” king 72 “Sexy ___” (“White Album” song) 73 Temporarily replace, as a talkshow host 77 First two words of the “Friends” theme song 78 People who avoid the singer of “Smile”? 81 Wave part 83 Habit wearer 84 Salma Hayek’s “mother” 85 Thespian Tyler 86 Commentator Kasparian 87 2017 World Series winners* 90 Part of GSA 91 Journalistic success 93 Baker’s dozen of 1970s blaxploitation movies? 98 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 97 Wilson and Jillian, e.g. 98 In an honorable way 99 Wedding-day promises 100 Bird with excellent vision 102 Words after checking your watch 105 State for the record 106 Mechanic’s tool of yore 111 Below average 112 Rival drink of Tom Hanks Orange Soda and Denzel Washington Ginger Ale? 116 “Uncut Gems” gem 117 “The bombs bursting ___ …” 118 Yoga position 119 Ready for business 120 Fail to obey 121 Ultimate goals 122 Neither sober nor drunk 123 Sonic the Hedgehog’s creator 1 2 3 4 Down Put on a flash drive Elaborate con Latin for “years” Like “Downton Abbey” characters, mostly 5 Fold of skin on a dog’s neck The solutions to last week’s puzzles appear on page 82. address changes to New York Magazine, P.O. Box 37130, Boone, IA, 50037. Canada Post International Publications Mail Product (Canadian Distribution) Sales Agreement No. 40612608. Canada returns to be sent to The Mail Group, P.O. Box 25542, London, ON, N6C 6B2. Subscription rates in the United States and possessions: 26 issues, $59.97. For subscription assistance, write to New York Magazine Subscription Department, P.O. Box 37130, Boone, IA, 50037, or call 800-678-0900. Printed in the U.S.A. Copyright © 2022 by Vox Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited. Founding chairman, Bruce Wasserstein; chief executive officer, Jim Bankoff. New York Magazine is not responsible for the return or loss of unsolicited manuscripts. Any submission of a manuscript must be accompanied by an SASE. Initial Misunderstanding 6 Its second letter stands for “Safety” 7 “Don’t keep ___ suspense!” 8 Wouldn’t stand for it? 9 Letter-reading activity 10 Actors Majors and Pace 11 Key used with other keys 12 ___ will (spite) 13 Learn to live with one another 14 Negligent 15 Shape without corners 16 Cat avoiders 17 Order with lodges 20 People in “People” 23 Phone purchase 24 Lugosi of “Dracula” 29 Use, as an airplane 31 Solo 32 Ready to eat 33 Some choir members 34 Words to learn 35 Bakery inhalation 36 Half-man, half-goat 38 Crocheted shawl 39 Range dividing Europe and Asia 40 Make bare 41 Beach-bag item 42 Literary Jong 43 The Dalai Lama et al. 45 Increases 51 Go back to the drawing board 54 Shaped like a vanity mirror 56 Some play themselves 57 1970s role for Valerie Harper 58 Nitpick 59 Bay window 60 Frequent letter recipient 65 Digressions 67 Lacks permission to 68 Interior 69 Org. for songwriters 70 First name on cookies 71 Time after you “fall back” in fall 72 Gross-sounding semi-liquid 73 Capture 74 No petty thief 75 Stars that form a hunter 76 Party host’s stack 79 Spy’s stock-in-trade 80 Radiates 82 The Fool’s deck 88 Much of Asia 89 December tremble 90 Warn off, as a guard dog might 92 Three-color cats 94 Supercool, to surfers 95 Lionel Richie’s show, for short 96 Medal-count champs at the 2022 Winter Olympics 101 Tiny 102 Small player 103 Be bitter about it 104 Bakery unit 105 Without any adjustments 106 Leave no escape for 107 Physicist’s particles 108 “Clue” weapon 109 Couturier Cassini 110 Bubbe 113 Mono114 “The Evil Dead” creator Raimi 115 Show set in Vegas March 28–April 10, 2022. VOL. 55, NO. 7. New York Magazine (ISSN 0028-7369) is published biweekly by Vox Media, LLC, 250 Vesey Street, New York, N.Y., 10281. Periodicals postage paid at New York, N.Y., and additional mailing offices. Editorial and business offices: 212-508-0700. Postmaster: Send GA M the new york crossword
the vulture 10x10 Across 1 Sebastian in “The Little Mermaid,” for one 5 Benedict Cumberbatch or Florence Pugh 9 The Killers song that asks, “Are we dancer?” 11 Tip-top 12 Peacock show set at Whitlock H.S. 13 Boring way to learn 14 Titular portrait subject in “The Duke” 16 Take in, as a movie 17 “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” role 18 Ask for a treat, in a way 19 “Speed” vehicle 22 Jim who plays Kempton Bunton in “The Duke” 25 Haim, for one 26 “Hyperbole and a Half ” blogger Brosh 27 Extremity the Beatles want to hold 28 Site of a major conference in 1945 29 Hardly mainstream 30 Pay attention to Across 1 2019 movie with a mythical “butthole cut” 5 Lamb’s mother 8 Getting nearer 10 Pirate portrayed by Taika Waititi in “Our Flag Means Death” 11 Character described as a “human female Jedi master” on Wookieepedia 12 “The of March” (Ryan Gosling political drama) 13 CD-___ 14 Savory flavor enhancement 16 “Living With Yourself ” facility that creates secret y 1 3 4 6 9 12 3 14 1 1 1 1 23 6 27 2 29 25 26 29 30 31 32 Hiroto Katagiri on 14-Across With every little detail, onscreen Mag known for sex tips (an infamous one involves a doughnut) Fly high in the sky Loose basis of the 2004 film “Troy” Pointy part of a fork 2019 documentary about psychedelic therapy 30 THE SEEDY PUZZLE By Stella Zawistowski 2 3 4 9 1 16 17 1 1 20 21 22 4 2 2 2 30 3 32 27 2 THE JOLLY ROGER PUZZLE clones of patrons 17 Area of expertise for Chidi on “The Good Place” 21 Make amends 23 Piece of land 24 Instruction in a recipe 25 Chicken, in Spanish 27 “No ___!” 28 Group organized by baristas at more than 100 Starbucks locations (and counting!) 29 Little Monsters, e.g. 30 Kaley Cuoco role for 12 years Find new puzzles daily at nymag.com/games. 0 2 25 By Malaika Handa 1 4 12 4 17 1 19 2 2 2 2 30 2 Down mademoiselle” 20 Come together for a cause 21 Stand in good ___ 22 Co-star of George and Frances in “Burn After Reading” 23 Neil Lane item on “The Bachelor” 24 “Ugh, boring” 25 “Batman” preceder Down featuring Lena Headey as Sikes City where Anthony Bourdain ate bun cha with Barack Obama Denzel’s co-star in “Training Day” Small group of specialists Drug dropped in season five of “Mad Men” Stringy tie favored by Vincent Vega Whitman of “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” “The Fairly ___ Parents” (Nickelodeon show) 1 Mouthfuls of tobacco 2 “The Legend of Zelda” currency 3 Walk without haste 4 Ditch a party 5 Floating palace in “Cleopatra” 6 Place for a hairdye touch-up 7 Totally digging 8 Charli D’Amelio, for one 10 “Beats me” 15 “The old has gone away” Danny Gokey song 18 Mad-Eye ___ (Hogwarts professor) 19 Disney princess who’s “a most peculiar By Stella Zawistowski 22 Across 1 Move really slowly, as a plot 5 Italian violinmaking family of note 10 Delevingne of “Suicide Squad” 11 Source material for fanfiction 12 “Baywatch: Panic at Malibu ___” 13 Costumes seen in “The Big Leap” 14 New HBO Max drama shot on location in Japan 16 Role for Jennifer in “Respect” 17 Where to watch “Naomi” and “Riverdale” 21 Fashion boundary? 22 Ken who plays THE GOYA PUZZLE 2 1 Doc who’s your go-to 2 Café additive 3 Apt name for a Boston terrier 4 German-language Netflix show with time-travel tangles 5 Word inscribed on two Oscar statuettes a year 6 Color similar to lilac 7 Absolute opposite 8 “You have me there” 9 Measurement on a pair of 501s 15 Can’t keep the boredom off your face 17 2021 Charles Dickens adaptation 18 19 20 23 24 27 28 Down 1 “Wallace & Gromit” technique 2 NYC rep. who plays “League of Legends” 3 “For shame!” 4 Sis or bro 5 Old-fashioned shout of surprise 6 Jewelry-making material 7 Finales 8 Queen with iconic eyeliner 9 Sound in a “Young Frankenstein” bit 10 Sounds made while shivering 14 “It’s Raining ___” (Weather Girls song) 15 Dance movie with four sequels 18 “You Be ” 19 20 22 24 26 (Run-D.M.C. song) : Stoic Celestial spheres Letters on a sunscreen bottle Number of seasons of “Firefly” march 28–april 10, 2022 | new york 99
compiled by melvin backman, dominique pariso, and chris stanton highbrow “Mariupol is no more.” “The team that has been investigating Mr. Trump harbors no doubt about whether he committed crimes—he did.” But DA Alvin Bragg punted Nasty, tendentious Republican senators try to p… trip … But Ketanji Brown Jackson keeps her cool. BA.2 runs wild, and the Biden administration will no longer reimburse hospitals for COVID care of uninsured patients. Half of the latest round of architecture firms designing the city’s next generation of public projects are certified “Minority- and Women-Owned Business Enterprises.” The New York Times’ preening gamified cancelculture editorial. Governor Hochul keeps delaying the implementation of nursing-home-staffin rules meant to ensure they have enough nursing staff. Jonah Peretti scurried away without taking questions from BuzzFeed News after he told his newsroom he was gutting BuzzFeed News. Return to the office? That sad desk salad is way more expensive than it was in 2019. Travis Scott and Kylie Jenner change their 1-month-old son’s rad name, Wolf. You can do that? Maury Povich to retire, which means we may never find who’s our daddy. So Netflix is canceling The Baby-Sitters Club, raising its prices, and trying to crack down on pas wo d sh sharin sharing ng o password g? Debate: Baldwin vs. Buckley at the South Oxford Space reminds us how inarticulate our debates are. Who said his name three times? Beetlejuice returns to Broadway (again). Disney workers across the country stage walkout over company’s stance on Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill. Spring is finally here, but so is “I think its just allergies, not COVID” season. Daddy Yankee is gifting us one last album, Legendaddy, before he retires from music. Barry Jenkins and Issa López are teaming up for True Detective season four. After DJ-ing a Chainsmokers concert during the pandemic’s peak, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon has a gig at Lollapalooza. Just what the kids want! Simon Rex didn’t get to keep his Red Rocket prosthetic penis … … But Minx finally allows for phallic diversity in televised male nudity. Do we really need twice as many shows about the Real Housewives of New York? l owbrow 100 n e w y o r k | m a r c h 2 8 – a p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 2 2 Jersey City’s own teenytiny Saint Peter’s University took down No. 2–seed Kentucky in the NCAA men’sbasketball tournament. And Just Like That … is renewed. Long may Che Diaz reign! Freed Amanda Bynes! Hark that jingle-jangle! It’s the start of Mister Softee season. Pusha T releases Arby’s-sponsored diss track about McDonald’s, fails to reveal Ronald McDonald’s secret love child. Ye seems like he would rather terrorize Kim Kardashian than perform at the Grammys. Elaine Hsieh Chou’s Disorientation skewers academia. Thomas Woodruff’s pandemic dino paintings at Vito Schnabel’s gallery. brill iant despicable We couldn’t really afford to buy an apartment even before interest rates went up (and they will likely go up again) … Albany is all in on expanding childcare subsidies. Stare-off! Marina Abramovic brings back The Artist Is Present to benefit Ukraine. The new Compact magazine’s baldfaced attempt at subversion. … And there are 2,500 New Yorkers living on the streets and in the subway, while 2,500 apartments designated for them sit empty. Ukraine persists. Nayland Blake reproduces the façade of the defunct Mineshaft sex club on the side of the Whitney. Ben Affleck was “exceptionally good” at h handling his gastropod co-stars on the set of Deep Water. RPDR queen cast as the Sanderson sisters in Hocus Pocus . P H OTO G R A P H S : C H A D N AG L E / F L I C K R ( M A R I U P O L ) ; N I A I D (CO V I D) ; N E W YO R K T I M E S ; M I C H A E L N E W M A N / F L I C K R ( A PA R T M E N T ) ; CO M PAC T; V I N TAG E ( L A U R E N H O U G H ) ; B R I A N AC H / T E C H C R U N C H ( P E R E T T I ) ; L E AT H E R P E D I A ( M I N E S H A F T ) ; A P P L E ( F L AG ) ; M O M A ( A B R A M O V I C ) ; P E N G U I N ( D I S O R I E N TAT I O N ) ; A P P L E (C H I L D C A R E ) ; V I TO S C H N A B E L / T H O M A S W O O D R U F F ; C H R I S TO P H E R M C E L R O E N ( B A L D W I N ) ; WA R N E R B R O S. ( B E E T L E J U I C E ) ; PAT R I C K B O U Q U E T ( W O L F ) ; L I S A / F L I C K R ( S A L A D) ; S TO C KC ATA LO G / F L I C K R ( P O L L E N ) ; N E T F L I X ( B A B Y-S I T T E R S C LU B ) ; A 24 ( S I M O N R E X ) ; T H E M A U RY S H O W ( M A U RY ) ; R O D R I G O F E R R A R I ( K A N Y E ) ; T H E CO M E U P / F L I C K R ( P U S H A T ) ; C H A R L E S S Y K E S / B R AVO ( R E A L H O U S E W I V E S ) ; LO R E N J AV I E R ( D I S N E Y ) ; A B C / T Y L E R G O L D E N ( B A R RY J E N K I N S ) ; S E B A S T I A N R / F L I C K R ( DA D DY YA N K E E ) ; H B O ( A N D J U S T L I K E T H AT ) ; H E A R T T R U T H / F L I C K R ( B Y N E S ) ; S A I N T P E T E R ’ S U N I V. ; N E W WAV E G U R LY / F L I C K R ( S O F T E E ) ; K AT R I N A M A R C I N O W S K I / H B O ( M I N X ) ; H U LU ( A F F L E C K ) ; V H 1 ( H O C U S P O C U S ) THE APPROVAL MATRIX Our deliberately oversimplified guide to who falls where on our taste hierarchies.
There’s no place like home. GERSHWIN THEATRE ♦ WickedtheMusical.com SCAN HERE TO BUY TICKETS AND LEARN MORE
davidyurman.com 888 dyurman